The political entity Great Britain has been a bloodsoaked LIE from start to its hopefully soon finish. It has kept its people SUBJECTED to resourse theft , genocide , cultural distruction and reduced its subjected people to ignorant ,debtor slaves and cannon fodder ,lorded over by a foreign gangster family in tiaras, and “represented” by an elected dictatorship.
A provocative new documentary that made its debut Friday at the Cannes Film Festival claims Britain’s royals are racist “gangsters in tiaras” and Prince Philip is a womanising psychopath.
The movie Unlawful Killing revives claims that Princess Diana – adored by millions as the “people’s princess” but viewed in royal circles as an embarrassing loose cannon – was murdered by the British establishment.
Unlawful Killing is the story of the deaths of Princess Diana, Dodi Fayed and their driver Henri Paul.
It reveals a cover-up by the British Establishment culminating in a six month inquest.
Keith Allen’s ground breaking documentary recreates key moments from the inquest and demonstrates how vital evidence of foul play was hidden from public scrutiny, how the Royal Family were exempted from giving evidence and how journalists, particularly those working for the BBC, systematically misreported the events and in particular, the verdict itself.
This is the story of how the world was deceived.
OF COURSE THIS FILM IS BANNED IN THE UK!!
SO MUCH FOR FREE SPEACH IN THE UK.
The political entity Great Britain has had to re-invent itself every few years to continue its survival. The current version the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland only “officlally” existed since 1953!! It first began in 1707 as the Kingdom of Great Britain, this version came to an end in 1800. It was replaced by the United Kingdoms of Great Britain and Ireland, this version also came to an end.
The political entity that manifests itself today is called the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland(aka the UK or Great Britain) and it too hopefully is nearing its end…Its history is just a long list of colonialism ,bloodshed and resourse theft by war mongerors ,pirates , robber barons ,paedophiles and an inbred feudal elite.It is not a proud or shining record, but we get handed it wrapped in fancy pomp and ceremony that itself is a modern invention to ensure its survival. It is nothing more than an invented vanir to cover the greed and brutal ruthlessness of an elitist few and has nothing to do with an ancient people and thier genuine heritage. In fact the modern people of the British Isles know very little of thier genuine and ancient history, as the modern British ruling elite relies on lies ,flag waving and pomp and ceremony and an ignorance amoungst the general population of thier ancient roots and customs and thier massive cultural influence on human society both ancient and modern . The modern British population is fed MSM presstitute propaganda about fake wars , fake economics and false flags ,while the FREE PRESS (aka the INTERNET) is being cencored by the British government regime .Keep ’em scared and ignorant and distract them with blood and circus is the modern British ruling class way,it has not changed for centuries.
IN FACT SCOTLAND WAS STOLEN FROM ITS PEOPLE SLICE BY SLICE BY THE PEN AND THE SWORD
‘Show the people that our Old Nobility is not noble, that its lands are stolen lands – stolen either by force or fraud; show people that the title-deeds are rapine, murder, massacre, cheating, or court harlotry; dissolve the halo of divinity that surrounds the hereditary title; let the people clearly understand that our present House of Lords is composed largely of descendants of successful pirates and rogues; do these things and you shatter the Romance that keeps the nation numb and spellbound while privilege picks its pocket.’
That was how Tom Johnston, the historian and former Secretary of State for Scotland, described Scotland’s noble landowners in 1909 in his book, Our Scots Noble Families.
SO LETS START LOOKING AT THE REAL SITUATION AND THE CASE FOR SCOTTISH INDEPENDENCE
Former Ambassador, Human Rights Activist
There are many reasons I support Scottish independence (and Welsh independence and Irish reunification). But among those reasons, and the one which I shall be expounding on Sunday, is that the United Kingdom as an entity is fundamentally tied to US military and neo-imperial interests. Neither Robin Cook nor Lib Dems in government have been able to separate the UK from aggressive foreign occupations, ruinous military expenditure, addiction to weapons of mass destruction and a contempt for international law.
The UK must be broken up. I want to see a Scotland that accepts it is a proud and equal nation among other nations, but has no desire to be more than equal, that plays an active part in the UN and in strengthening the framework of international law, does not possess WMDs and which will never attack another country unless it or an ally is physically attacked,
A Scotland like that is acheivable. A UK like that is not. Part of the reason may be that the UK was in truth in itself an imperial construct, with Scotland, Wales and Ireland the first conquered people. Their later absorption into the imperial culture (which still infects unionists) does not alter that truth.
THERE ARE INDEED MANY MORE ECONOMIC REASONS FOR SCOTTISH INDEPENDENCE
UNIONIST POLITIONS LABOUR/TORY/LIB-DEM ARE ALL LIARS AND RACISTS WHEN IT COMES TO SCOTTISH ECONOMIC INDEPENDENCE.
The Tories have now admitted that they would see support for Labour and the Liberals in Scotland as a pro-Union vote that the Conservatives would try to use as a mandate to rule in Scotland, even if they have no Scots MPs.
OUR BRITISH UNIONIST PARTY LIARS IN ACTION. THE TORY/LABOUR/LIBERAL COALITION OF LIARS
View from the LEFT
“LABOUR ministers were warned in a secret Whitehall dossier 30 years ago of the powerful case for Scotland becoming independent with booming oil revenues, but the information was kept confidential by Harold Wilson’s government to keep nationalism at bay.
The dossier, most of which was written by a leading government economist in 1974 and 1975, sets out how Scotland would have had one of the strongest currencies in Europe, attracting international capital into its banks in the same way as Switzerland.
It argued Scotland could quickly become one of Europe’s strongest economies with “embarrassingly” large tax surpluses.”
View from the RIGHT
“Adam Smith Institute, Friday, April 27, 2007
The Scottish economy could enjoy record growth if Scotland became independent, leaving the average Scot many thousands of pounds better off each year. This is the finding of a research Briefing Paper published today by the Adam Smith Institute, the free market economic think tank.”
WHAT HAS UNIONISM GIVEN SCOTLAND? APART FROM HAVING ITS OIL RESOURSES STOLEN TO PROP UP FRAUDULENT AND CRIMINAL FINANCIAL BANKERS IN THE SOUTH …..ITS GIVEN US UNEMPLOYMENT AND A BAD BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT FOR A START
Unionism has given Scotland a loss of business investment ,as bank rates are set according to the souths’ needs so encouraging business to move south.
Increased unemployment due to unfavourable business environment and the migration of businesses to the south
Caused a population exodus,note there where less people in Scotland in 2006 than in 1961 and note the amount of ex-pat posters.Also notice the brain drain stopped with Scottish Devolution!!!
5,116,900 (2006 est)
5,094,800 (2005 est)
5,078,400 (2004 est)
5,057,400 (2003 est)
5,054,800 (2002 est)
5,062,011 (2001 est)
5,083,000 (1991 est)
5,180,200 (1981 est)
5,234,000 (1971 est)
5,201,000 (1961 est)
Would the LAST Scot to leave the Union please switch the lights out….
1961 – 43,983,300
1971 – 45,870,100
1981 – 46,623,500
1991 – 48,067,300
2001 – 49,138,831
2005 – 50,431,700
2006 – 50,762,900
Caused a Scottish “Brain drain”,note the amount of well educated ex-pat posters paying thier taxes to foreign countries
Caused english people to look at Scots as “subsidy junkies” where the FACTS seem to point the other way
Caused the Scots to blame the english for OUR problems ,instead of giving us the tools to deal with the problems ourselves.But this is just the British establishments divide and rule policy in action.
Caused a 25%-30%(at least) LOSS of living standards ,or a 30% Union Jack Tax.
Using the UK’s own assumptions for tax revenue and spending, but including Scotland’s share of North Sea Oil receipts, this answer revealed that between 1978-79 and 1994-95 Scotland had a cumulative surplus of £27.6 billion, or £34 billion in today’s prices. At the same time the UK had a deficit of more than £330bn.
AND HOW IS THE (DIS)UNITED KINGDOM DOING IN THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL WORLD? WELL WE WHERE UP TO OUR NECKS IN DEBT AND THIS WAS BEFORE THE CREDIT CRUNCH HIT US, WE ARE IN A HELL OF A WORSE STATE RIGHT NOW!!! BTW 181ST IS LAST PLACE….THANK GOD FOR AMERICAN ECONOMIC MUPPETS
THIS WAS OUR FININCIAL POSITION JUST BEFORE THE CREDIT CRUNCH!!
THE UK IS A NATION CON-DEM’ED!!!
a study by Aviva and accountants Deloitte found that the UK has the biggest pension gap in Europe, with Britons needing to increase the amount they save each year to have a good retirement income.
SO OUR FUTURE PENSIONS ARE GONE AS WELL THANKS TO THE BRITISH ECONOMIC GENIUS
Chinese rating agency strips Western nations of AAA status
China’s leading credit rating agency has stripped America, Britain, Germany and France of their AAA ratings, accusing Anglo-Saxon competitors of ideological bias in favour of the West.
The US falls to AA, while Britain and France slither down to AA-. Belgium, Spain, Italy are ranked at A- along with Malaysia.
Dagong rates Norway, Denmark, Switzerland, and Singapore at AAA, along with the commodity twins Australia and New Zealand.
AN INDEPENDANT SCOTLAND WOULD BE AAA TOO IF IT WAS NOT PART OF A FINANICAL BASKET CASE STATE CAPITALIST UK!!!!
SO MUCH FOR DEMOCRACY AND PROSPERITY FOR SCOTLAND IN THE MODERN UK. BUT THANKS TO THE SNP AND ITS FIGHT FOR SCOTTISH INTERESTS, SCOTLAND IS DOING BETTER THAN THE UK
Scotland outperforms UK in jobs market
Official statistics published today show a strengthening of the Scottish labour market, as unemployment across the UK as a whole rose above 2.5 million.
Among all the nations and regions of the UK, Scotland is the only place where unemployment fell in the latest quarter, May-July 2011.
BUT WHY CANNOT SCOTLAND DO WHAT NORWEGIANS DO EVERYDAY? WHY CANNOT SCOTLAND DO WHAT THE CZECH REPUBLIC, ESTONIA, LATVIA, SLOVAKIA ,SLONENIA , BOSINA, THE UKRAINE ,POLAND ,ICELAND , SWITZERLAND ETC.ETC.ETC DO EVERYDAY?
IN FACT ICELAND SHOWS US THE WAY IT SHOULD BE DONE IN THE MODERN 21ST CENTURY, THIS IS A SOLUTION BRITISH POLITICS COULD NEVER ACHIEVE WITH “REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY” AKA “ELECTED DICTATORSHIP”. ICELAND UNDERSTANDS TRUE FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY ,BRITAIN JUST HAS A VERSION IT CAN SHOW ON TV
THE BELGUIMS HAVE JUST GONE 15 MONTHS AS AN ANARCHIST STATE! NO GOVERNMENT ,SO NO AUSTERITY MEASURES, AND GUESS WHAT ,BELGIUM IS ECONOMICALLY BOOMING BECAUSE THERE ARE NO POLITIONS TO F*CK THINGS UP!!
IF THESE UNIONISTS ARE LIARS ABOUT OUT MODERN ECONOMIC SITUATION AND MODERN DEMOCRACY , WHICH THEY ARE, AS PROVEN ABOVE. WHAT OTHER LIES DO THEY SPIN TO KEEP THE BRITISH MASSES SLEEPWALKING SO THEY CAN BE ASSET STRIPPED AND SOLD AS DEBTORS SLAVES AND CANNON FODDER TO THE HIGHEST BIDDER. WELL I THINK WE ALL KNOW WE WHERE LIED INTO THE YUGOSLAVIAN WAR ,THE AFGHANISTAN WAR, THE IRAQ WAR AND NOW THE LYBIAN WAR
BUT ALSO OUR NOBLE AND ANCIENT HISTORY HAS BEEN KEPT FROM US AND REPLACED WITH SOME FAKE ROYAL CHEESEY PAGENTRY
OUR ANCIENT HISTORICAL LAND OF BRITON
Great Britain or Britain (Welsh: Prydain Fawr, Scottish Gaelic: Breatainn Mhòr, Cornish: Breten Veur) is an island situated to the northwest of Continental Europe. It is the ninth largest island in the world, and the largest European island, as well as the largest of the British Isles. With a population of about 60.0 million people in mid-2009,it is the third most populous island in the world after Java and Honshū. Great Britain is surrounded by over 1,000 smaller islands and islets. The island of Ireland lies to its west. Politically, Great Britain may also refer to the island itself together with a number of surrounding islands which comprise the territory of England, Scotland and Wales.
All of the island is territory of the sovereign state of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and most of the United Kingdom’s territory is in Great Britain. Most of England, Scotland, and Wales are on the island of Great Britain, as are their respective capital cities: London, Edinburgh, and Cardiff.
SO FOLKS, EVEN IF WE BECAME INDEPENDANT ,WE WOULD STILL BE BRITIONS AND BRITISH. JUST LIKE WE WHERE BEFORE THE UNITED KINGDOMS EXISTED. IN THE SAME WAY SWEDES, NORWEAGIANS, DANISH AND FINNISH ARE SCANDICS. SO IF YOU ARE WORRIED ABOUT LOOSING YOU BRITISH INDENTITY …STOP WORRYING ,WE WHERE BRITONS BEFORE THE UK EXISTED WE WILL STILL BE BRITONS AFTER IT.
THE INDIGENOUS CELTIC BRITISH PEOPLES
The Britons (sometimes Brythons or British) were the Celtic people culturally dominating Great Britain from the Iron Age through the Early Middle Ages. They spoke the Insular Celtic language known as British or Brythonic. They lived throughout Britain south of about the Firth of Forth; after the 5th century Britons also migrated to continental Europe, where they established the settlements of Brittany in France and the obscure Britonia in what is now Galicia, Spain. Their relationship to the Picts north of the Forth has been the subject of much discussion, though most scholars accept that the Pictish language during this time was a Brythonic language related to, but perhaps distinct from, British.
The earliest evidence for the Britons and their language in historical sources dates to the Iron Age. After the Roman conquest of 43 AD, a Romano-British culture began to emerge. With the advent of the Anglo-Saxon settlement in the 5th century, however, the culture and language of the Britons began to fragment. By the 11th century their descendants had split into distinct groups, and are generally discussed separately as the Welsh, Cornish, Bretons, and the people of the Hen Ogledd (“Old North”). The British language developed into the distinct branches of Welsh, Cornish, Breton, and Cumbric
THE PICTS WHERE THE ORIGINAL CELTIC BRITISH INHABITANTS OF THIS ISLAND.
The Picts were a group of Late Iron Age and Early Mediaeval people living in what is now eastern and northern Scotland.There is an association with the distribution of brochs, Pit-names, for instance Pitlochry, and Pictish stones. They are recorded from before the Roman conquest of Britain until the 10th century, when they merged with the Gaels. They lived to the north of the rivers Forth and Clyde, and spoke the extinct Pictish language, thought to have been related to the Brythonic languages spoken by the Britons to the south. They are assumed to have been the descendants of the Caledonii and other tribes named by Roman historians or found on the world map of Ptolemy. Pictland, also known as Pictavia, gradually merged with the Gaelic kingdom of Dál Riata to form the Kingdom of Alba (Scotland). Alba expanded, absorbing the Brythonic kingdom of Strathclyde and Bernician Lothian, and by the 11th century the Pictish identity had been subsumed into the “Scots” amalgamation of peoples.
Pictish society was typical of many Iron Age societies in northern Europe, having “wide connections and parallels” with neighbouring groups
Archaeology gives some impression of the society of the Picts. Although very little in the way of Pictish writing has survived, Pictish history since the late 6th century is known from a variety of sources, including Bede’s Historia ecclesiastica gentis Anglorum, saints’ lives such as that of Columba by Adomnán, and various Irish annals. Although the popular impression of the Picts may be one of an obscure, mysterious people, this is far from being the case. When compared with the generality of Northern, Central and Eastern Europe in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages, Pictish history and society are well attested
The name the Picts called themselves is unknown. The Latin word Picti first occurs in a panegyric written by Eumenius in AD 297 and is taken to mean “painted or tattooed people” (Latin pingere “to paint”; pictus, “painted”, cf. Greek “πυκτίς” – puktis, “picture”). As Sally M. Foster noted, “Much ink has been spilt over what the ancient writers meant by Picts, but it seems to be a generic term for people living north of the Forth-Clyde isthmus who raided the Roman Empire.”
Their Old English name gave the modern Scots form Pechts and the Welsh word Fichti. In writings from Ireland, the name Cruthin, Cruthini, Cruthni, Cruithni or Cruithini (Modern Irish: Cruithne) was used to refer to the Picts and to a group of people who lived alongside the Ulaid in eastern Ulster. It is generally accepted that this is derived from *Qritani, which is the Goidelic/Q-Celtic version of the Britonnic/P-Celtic *Pritani. From this came Britanni, the Roman name for those now called the Britons. It has been suggested that Cruthin was a name used to refer to all the Britons who were not conquered by the Romans; those who lived outside Roman Britannia, north of Hadrian’s Wall
WE ARE THE EUROPEAN ABORIGINALS
The Pictish Serpent Stone
Gobekli Tepe: The World’s First Temple?
Predating Stonehenge by 6,000 years, Turkey’s stunning Gobekli Tepe upends the conventional view of the rise of civilization
By Andrew Curry
gobekli tepe standing stones circles C.9000BC
Göbekli Tepe [ɡøbe̞kli ťe̞pɛ]is a hilltop sanctuary erected on the highest point of an elongated mountain ridge some 15 kilometres (9.3 mi) northeast of the town of Şanlıurfa (formerly Urfa / Edessa) in southeastern Turkey. The site, currently undergoing excavation by German and Turkish archaeologists, was most likely erected by hunter-gatherers in the 9th millennium BCE (c. 11,000 years ago). Together with Nevalı Çori, it has revolutionized understanding of the Eurasian Neolithic. When discovered, it had been deliberately filled in and buried, for reasons unknown
Göbekli Tepe is the oldest man-made religious structure yet discovered.The site is located on a hilltop, and contains 20 round, (now) subterranean structures, four of which have currently been excavated. Each building has a diameter of 10–30 meters, and is decorated with massive (mostly) T-shaped limestone pillars that are the most striking feature of the site.
Most of the pillars are decorated with carved reliefs of animals and of abstract enigmatic pictograms. The pictograms may represent commonly understood sacred symbols, as known from Neolithic cave paintings elsewhere.
It is also apparent that the animal and other images give no indication of organized violence, i.e., there are no depictions of hunting raids or wounded animals, and the pillar carvings ignore game on which the society mainly subsisted, like deer, in favor of formidable creatures such as lions, snakes, spiders and scorpions
THE INVENTION OF GREAT BRITAIN
Kingdom of Great Britain Flag
THE HISTORY OF GREAT BRITAIN. MODERN GREAT BRITAIN HAS ONLY EXISTED SINCE 1927 THE UK SINCE 1953. ……..SO TO CHANGE AGAIN IS NOT SUCH AN ISSUE, IS IT!!
The former kingdom of Great Britain, sometimes described as the ‘United Kingdom of Great Britain’,was a sovereign state in northwest Europe, in existence from 1707 to 1801. It came into being on 1 May 1707, with the political union of the kingdom of Scotland and the kingdom of England (which included Wales). With the 1706 Treaty of Union (ratified by the Acts of Union 1707), it was agreed to create a single, united kingdom, encompassing the whole of the island of Great Britain and its minor outlying islands, excluding Ireland, which remained a separate realm under the newly created British crown. A single parliament and government, based at Westminster, controlled the new kingdom. The former kingdoms had already shared the same monarch since James VI, King of Scots became King of England in 1603 following the death of Queen Elizabeth I, bringing about a “Union of the Crowns”.
The new kingdom of Great Britain was superseded by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland on 1 January 1801, when Great Britain was united with the Kingdom of Ireland by the Acts of Union of 1800 following the suppression of the Irish Rebellion of 1798. Most of Ireland left the union in 1922, leading to another re-naming of the state in 1927, as the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. The later British states, albeit with territorial changes, are considered direct continuations of Great Britain rather than successor states.
THE SCOTS IN GREAT BRITAIN RECIEVED THE SAME TREATMENT AS THE NATIVE AMERICANS DID IN AMERICA …GENOCIDE AND THE INTENTIONAL DESTRUCTION OF THIER CULTURE.
FYI SCOTTISH HIGHLANDERS REFERED TO THE “UNION JACK” AS THE “BUTCHERS APRON”!!
THE CHANGING TITLES OF THE BRITISH ISLES. A QUISLING SCOTTISH KING HANDS BRITAIN TO GERMAN HANOVER AND THE UNITED KINGDOM IS CREATED IN 1953. NOT EXACTLY AN ANCIENT OR CLASSY BEGINNING
The Treaty of Union and the subsequent Acts of Union themselves state explicitly that England and Scotland were to be “United into One Kingdom by the Name of Great Britain”. They also refer to the new state as “One Kingdom”, the “United Kingdom of Great Britain” and the “United Kingdom”.The websites of the UK parliament,the Scottish Parliament, the BBC, and others including the Historical Association refer to the state created on 1 May 1707, as the “United Kingdom of Great Britain”. However, the state created by the union of England and Scotland in 1707 is usually referred to as the kingdom of Great Britain.
The term united kingdom is found in informal use during the 18th century to describe the newly combined nation of England and Scotland, but only officially became part of the name of the state with the Acts of Union of 1800, when it was specified as the name of the state after being united with the Kingdom of Ireland. The Historical Association stated in The Times in 2006 that “The United Kingdom did not come into being until 1800, with the Act of Union with Ireland,” although an article on its website now refers to The Creation of the United Kingdom of Great Britain in 1707. In 1927 the departure of Southern Ireland from the United Kingdom five years before was recognised by the style of the British sovereign being changed, removing from it the term “United Kingdom”. This was not reinstated until 1953
The kingdoms of England and Scotland, both in existence from the 9th century, were separate states until the Acts of Union came into effect in 1707. However, they had come into personal union in 1603, when James VI of Scotland succeeded his cousin Elizabeth I as King of England (under the name of James I). This Union of the Crowns under the House of Stuart meant that the whole of the island of Great Britain was now ruled by a single monarch, who by virtue of the English crown also ruled over the Kingdom of Ireland. Each of the kingdoms maintained its own parliament and laws
The succession to the British throne (and that of Ireland) was now determined by the English Act of Settlement; Scotland’s Act of Security, a source of contention with England, thus ceased to have effect. The Act of Settlement required that the heir to the English throne be a Protestant descendant of the Electress Sophia of Hanover; this brought about the Hanoverian succession only a few years after the Union.
Legislative power was vested in the Parliament of Great Britain, which formally replaced both the Parliament of England and the Parliament of Scotland. However, the new body was in practice a continuation of the English parliament, sitting at the same location in Westminster, albeit expanded to include representation from Scotland.
As with the former Parliament of England and the modern-day Parliament of the United Kingdom, the Parliament of Great Britain was formally constituted of three elements: the House of Commons, the House of Lords, and the Crown. The right of the English peerage to sit in the House of Lords remained unchanged, while the disproportionately large Scottish peerage was only permitted to send sixteen representative peers, elected from amongst their number for the life of each parliament.
Despite the end of a separate parliament for Scotland, however, the country retained its own laws and system of courts after the Union.
THE PURPOSE OF GREAT BRITAIN, RESOURSE THEFT!
Mercantilism was the basic policy imposed by Britain on its colonies. Mercantilism meant that the government and the merchants became partners with the goal of increasing political power and private wealth, to the exclusion of other empires. The government protected its merchants—and kept others out—by trade barriers, regulations, and subsidies to domestic industries in order to maximise exports from and minimise imports to the realm. The government had to fight smuggling—which became a favourite American technique in the 18th century to circumvent the restrictions on trading with the French, Spanish or Dutch. The goal of mercantilism was to run trade surpluses, so that gold and silver would pour into London. The government took its share through duties and taxes, with the remainder going to merchants in Britain. The government spent much of its revenue on a superb Royal Navy, which not only protected the British colonies but threatened the colonies of the other empires, and sometimes seized them. Thus the Royal Navy captured New Amsterdam (later New York) in 1664. The colonies were captive markets for British industry, and the goal was to enrich the mother country
INDEPENDENCE AND DIRECT DEMOCRACY
BELGIUM ,IS SIMILAR TO ICELAND. IT TOO IS ECONOMICALLY BOOMING. THAT IS BECAUSE BELGIUM HAS HAD NO GOVERNMENT FOR OVER 15 MONTHS. THEREFORE NO POLITIONS HAVE POWER ,THEREFORE NO AUSTERITY MEASURES, THEREFORE NO ECONOMIC COLLAPSE OR RIOTS IN THE STREETS………IN FACT THE BELGIUMS ARE HAVING STREET PARTIES ,NOT RIOTS,,TO CELEBRATE THIER FREEDOMS AND THIER ANARCHIST STATE!!!
No Government, No Problem – Belgium Celebrates 450 Days Without Government But With Growth
Belgium has not had a government in over 15 months, a record for modern economies. Yet their economy somehow managed to outperform those of the UK, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, The Netherlands, Finland, and Switzerland in the most recent quarter.
Street parties held to lampoon politicians
So Thursday night’s “people’s festival” in Ghent, a large street party in honour of eight government-free months, with its spoof world championship ceremony, was accompanied by stunts in Brussels and Antwerp, Leuven and Liege
The flashmobs, pranks, parties, and stunts were organised using the now established motor of spontaneous political activism – social networking sites Facebook and Twitter
The country is prosperous and well-run bureaucratically. The caretaker Leterme government has just accomplished a smooth and much-praised presidency of the European Union.
So does it matter?
“Everything goes on in the same old way,” said Cocquyt. “It’s better not having a government”
OR WE CAN KEEP LISTENING TO GOVERNMENT LIARS AND GET SCREWED STUPID!!
OF COURSE OUR BRITISH GOVERNMENT FACES RIOTS NOT STREET PARTIES AND BLAMES THE RAPE VICTIM,AS THE GOVERNMENT NEEDS A SCAPEGOAT.SO YOUTHS,ANARCHISTS AND IMMIGRANTS ARE BLAMED!! BUT SWITZERLAND ,A DIRECT DEMOCRACY , HAS 20% IMMIGRATION ,AND ANARCHIST STATE(DIRECT DEMOCRACY) AND ITS YOUTHS ALL HAVE GUNS,THEY ARE THE SWISS ARMY!! SWITZERLAND HAS THE HIGHEST STANDARD OF LIVING AND LEAST CRIME AND CORRUPTION IN EUROPE….AND NO RIOTS!!
THE GOVERNMENT COULD NEVER ADMIT THE RIOTS ARE THE FAULT OF AUTHORITARIAN GOVERNMENT AND A BRUTAL POLICE STATE. ITS THE 2ND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS IN ACTION , THE MORE YOU IMPOSE LAW THE MORE YOU ACCELERATE CHAOS!! THAT IS WHY THE BELGIUMS ,ICELENDICS AND SWISS PARTY IN THE STREETS WITHOUT AUSTERITY MEASURES AND THE BRITISH AND OTHERS UNDER AUTHORITARIAN RULE RIOT IN THE STREETS AND FACE A BLEEK FUTURE!!…….ITS THE GOVERNMENT STUPID!!!
THE MURDEROUS MUPPET SHOW THAT IS THE BRITISH POLITICAL ESTABLISHMENT MUST END!! IT HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR FAR TOO LONG…..IT SHOWS NO SIGN OF CHANGING………..IT IS TIME TO MAKE HISTORY
The end of the UK or the start of a new federation?
The United Kingdom is falling apart. And nobody seems to have really noticed. It’s not the riots and the burning buildings, nor the stumbling stock markets. Those fill every front page.
At a slower, less alarming pace, something more profound is happening: the United Kingdom may well be on the verge of breaking up; actually disuniting its disparate parts.
But in generally less dramatic fashion, Scotland has voted for a Scottish National Party (SNP) government, committed to an independence referendum; a long-cherished dream. Signs of a rift were also on display when Scottish First Minister Alex Salmond complained bitterly about broadcasters heading coverage of the riots as “UK riots” when they were, in fact, English ones alone. Claiming the footage would damage Scotland’s reputation as a tourism destination, he told BBC Radio Scotland: “We know we have a different society in Scotland, and one of my frustrations was to see this being described on BBC television and Sky as riots in the UK.”
But the friction and current constitutional confusion between the two countries harks back much further, to the Jacobite uprisings of the 18th century; the Culloden massacre and 1747 Act of Proscription, a law that banned the wearing of traditional dress, use of Gaelic, bearing of arms or even enjoyment of traditional music in an attempt by the British government to pacify the “unruly” Scottish clans.
It was a process that author Alastair MacIntosh describes as the final internal colonization of the British Isles; one that saw some half a million people forced off their land in what became known as the Highland Clearances, while remaining clan chiefs were incorporated into the British aristocracy, which MacIntosh characterized as “remnant symbols of ‘noble savagery’ that could safely be repackaged into a shortbread tin mélange of British identity.”
That same tin is currently being rattled. And when it is opened it looks set to reveal as many worms as any can. For England without the appendages of its empire – of which Scotland is in many senses the first and last part – is a curiously blank slate; a country without a memory that also, uniquely and alone in the UK, exists without its own parliament and government
MODERN SCOTLAND ONWARDS TO INDEPENDENCE AND PROSPERITY AND RETAKING OUR RIGHTFUL PLACE ON THE GLOBAL STAGE….IN SCOTLAND INDEPENDENCE IS NOW THE POPULAR CHOICE!
Alex Salmond ,the man with the plan
Salmond hails new poll showing half the electorate now support SNP
An opinion poll carried out by Angus Reid for todays Sunday Express newspaper confirms other recent polls in showing that the SNP is increasing its lead over the other parties.
When don’t knows and won’t says are excluded, headline figures give the SNP 49% of Scottish voting intention, Labour are trailing on 23%, followed by the Conservatives on 13%. The Lib Dems come in a poor fourth at 5%, confirming that the party is suffering the electoral effects of its coalition with the Conservative government in Westminster.
The poll is the third in the past ten days which puts SNP at 49%. By confirming the trend apparent in the earlier polls, this new poll shows that the swing to the SNP is no statistical blip, but represents a very real change in Scottish voting intentions.
The poll also showed that 36% of Scots agreed with the statement that Scotland would become an independent state within their lifetime. This is greater than the 32% who disagreed with the statement.
I hold no malice or hatred to English people. In fact I believe the vast majority of English are just as subjugated as the average Scot. With Scottish indepandence I believe we would see a liberation of the English as well, as all the political institutions would have to be reorganised ,this would take public discussion and I believe it can only be good for all involved. Re-evaluating “representative democracy” as a political system ,where “direct democracy” is a much better system, and looking at EU membership ,would be 2 good topics for discussion. I am sure there would be many more topics ,like bringing Great British war criminals ,financial fraudsters and paedophiles to justice!!