2012 A Brave New World Where War Is Peace and Slavery Is Freedom

I THOUGHT 1984 WAS SUPPOSED TO BE A WARNING NOT AN INSTRUCTION MANUAL!!
Nineteen Eighty-Four (first published in 1949) by George Orwell is a dystopian novel about Oceania,(AMERICA/UK) a society ruled by the oligarchical dictatorship of the Party(CONSERVATIVE NEW LABOUR / REPUBLICAN DEMOCRATIC). Life in the Oceanian province of Airstrip One(UK) is a world of perpetual war(TWAT), pervasive government surveillance(SECURITY SERVICES), and incessant public mind control(MAINSTREAM MEDIA), accomplished with a political system euphemistically named English Socialism (Ingsoc) (REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY), which is administered by a privileged Inner Party elite(POLITIONS). Yet they too are subordinated to the totalitarian cult of personality of Big Brother, the deified Party leader(BIG MONEY) who rules with a philosophy that decries individuality and reason as thoughtcrimes; thus the people of Oceania are subordinated to a supposed collective greater good
ANY OF THIS SOUNDING FAMILIAR?
HOW IS IT THAT IN A TIME OF AUSTERITY MEASURES, WE CAN AFFORD TO KEEP EXPANDING TWAT (THE WAR AGAINST TERROR) RECENTLY RE-BRANDED R2P (RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT)?
YES THE TWAT LOGO WAS WEARING THIN. ESPECIALLY AS WE WHERE FIGHTING ALONGSIDE AL QUADA IN LIBYA!
WARS COST MONEY. THE LAST 2 WORLD WARS BANKRUPTED THE BRITISH EMPIRE THEY COST THAT MUCH!
WHO IS FOOTING THE BILL?…WELL YOU ARE OF COURSE ..TAXPAYER WHO ELSE?
R2P WAS USED IN LIBYA ,BECAUSE OF CLAIMS OF RAPE AND 200 DEAD PROTESTORS!
THESE WHERE FOUND TO BE LIES. JUST LIKE THE CLAIMS MADE AGAINST YUGOSLAVIA! JUST LIKE THE CLAIMS MADE AGAINST IRAQ . JUST LIKE THE LIES BEING TOLD ABOUT SYRIA!
THIS RESPONSIBLILTY TO PROTECT IN LIBYA LED TO OVER 60,000 DEAD , MASS GENOCIDE AND ETHNIC CLEANSING! …..AND CHINA ENDED UP WITH THE OIL DEALS!! THE SAME RESULTS HAPPENED IN IRAQ , AFGHANISTAN AND YUGOSLAVIA
HOW CAN THIS BE HAPPENING AGAIN? AND WHAT RESULT DO THEY EXPECT THIS TIME?
THIS IS TRUE INSANITY
1984 MAINSTREAM MEDIA NEWSPEAK IN 2012 ..WAR LIES ..WAR IS PEACE ..SLAVERY IS FREEDOM
As a language, Newspeak applies different meanings to things and actions by referring only to the end to be achieved, not the means of achieving it; hence, the Ministry of Peace (Minipax) deals with war, and the Ministry of Love (Miniluv) deals with brainwashing and torture. The Ministries do achieve their goals; peace through war, and love of Big Brother through mind control.
1984 THE PRESSTITUTE
In the Ministry of Truth (Minitrue),(MSM) the protagonist Winston Smith (a member of the Outer Party) works as an editor revising historical records to concord the past to the contemporary party line orthodoxy — that changes daily — and deletes the official existence of unpersons, people who have been “vaporized”; who have not only been killed by the state, but effectively erased from existence.
THE 1984 BOGEY MAN
Emmanuel Goldstein—(AL QUADA) He is the symbolic Enemy of the State—the national nemesis who ideologically unites the people of Oceania with the Party, especially during the Two Minutes Hate, and other fear mongering by the Inner Party. It is unknown whether he is real or a fabrication of the Party itself for the purpose of propaganda.
THE 1984 WORLD
Globally three superstates(NATO/BRIC/ISLAM) fight a perpetual war for the remaining unconquered lands of the world, in pursuit of which they form and break alliances as convenient.
BUT IF WINSTON SMITH THOUGHT HE HAD IT BAD ,LIVING IN A WAR SOCIETY.
THE “ENGLISH SOCIALISM” DICTATORSHIP WAS NOT IMPOSING AUSTERITY MEASURES AS WELL!!
WELCOME TO WEST IN 2012 ITS 1984 WITH AUSTERITY MEASURES
WHERE WAR IS PEACE AND SLAVERY IS FREEDOM!!
1984’S EFFECT ON REAL SOCIETY
As literary political fiction and as dystopian science-fiction, Nineteen Eighty-Four is a classic novel in content, plot, and style. Many of its terms and concepts, such as Big Brother, doublethink, thoughtcrime, Newspeak, and memory hole, have become contemporary vernacular since its publication in 1949. Moreover, Nineteen Eighty-Four popularised the adjective Orwellian, which refers to official deception, secret surveillance, and manipulation of the past in service to a totalitarian or manipulative political agenda
THE GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO 1984
Throughout its publication history, Nineteen Eighty-Four has been either banned or legally challenged as intellectually dangerous to the public, just like Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World (1932); We (1924), by Yevgeny Zamyatin; Kallocain (1940), by Karin Boye; and Fahrenheit 451 (1951), by Ray Bradbury. In 2005, Time magazine included Nineteen Eighty-Four in its list of 100 best English-language novels since 1923. Among literary scholars, the Russian dystopian novel We, by Zamyatin, is considered to have inspired Nineteen Eighty-Four.
DICTATORSHIPS EFFECT ON REAL SOCIETY…. MAY I INTRODUCE EMMANUEL GOLDSTEIN 2012…MR.AL QUADA
ANNOUNCED BY THE BRITISH MINISTRY FOR TRUTH
EXPECT TROOPS IN AFRICA SOON
A British foreign policy think tank has this week released a study claiming that the terror group Al Qaeda is regrouping in Africa creating “an arc of instability” from the Western Sahel to the Eastern Horn.
ITS THE UNDEAD OSAMA BIN LADEN ,RISEN FROM HIS WATERY GRAVE..EXPECT A VIDEO SOON!!
The Royal United Services Institute, based in Whitehall, London, and closely aligned to official British foreign policy, cites “disturbing new trends” across the continent that “Osama bin Laden’s terror network” is seeking influence in Somalia, North Africa and the Western Sahara-Sahel.
WHERE ARE THEY GETTING ALL THIS INFORMATION?
“If correct [sic], this assessment would raise the worrying prospect of an arc of regional instability encompassing the whole Sahara-Sahel strip and extending through to East Africa, which the now weakened Al Qaeda-core could well exploit to regroup, reorganise and reinvigorate its terrorist campaign against the West,” the report said.
“IF CORRECT” SUGGESTS THAT THIS IS JUST CONJECTURE….A USEFUL SENARIO FOR THE WEST
Meanwhile, in other media reports it is claimed that Al Qaeda elements are joining forces with the Tuareg separatists following a military coup in the West Africa country of Mali. The alleged involvement of Al Qaeda in Mali has been cited by former colonial power France in its pledge to crush the coup.
WE HAVE ALWAYS BEEN AT WAR WITH AL QUADA,
AL QUADA IS OUR FRIEND,
WE HAVE ALWAYS BEEN AT WAR WITH AL QUADA
The purported Al Qaeda link in Mali appears incongruous. The Tuareg rebels – a nomadic group inhabiting northern Mali and Niger – were formerly fighting in Libya in support of the Gaddafi government against Western-backed insurgents. The Western-backed Libyan insurgents are known to have comprised Al Qaeda jihadists. Now it is being claimed by France and media reports that Al Qaeda are in league with their former enemies – the Tuareg – in the secession of the northern Mali territory.
AL QUADA A USEFUL TOOL .CREATE THE PROBLEM SO YOU CAN PROVIDE THE SOLUTION ..JUST POINT TO THE TARGET AND PUSH THE GO BUTTON ,WHEN THINGS GO BANG ,SHOUT ALQUADA AND OF TO SPREAD HUMANITARIANISM AND DEMOCRACY AGAIN…REMEMBER WAR IS PEACE
EXPECT THE RETURN OF THE LIVING DEAD AL QUADA IN AN AFRICAN COUNTRY SOON
What these various reports suggest is that Al Qaeda is being raised as a “spectre” over Africa to justify increased intervention by Western powers in that continent under the guise of “global security”.
The RUSI, with an old colonialist flourish, says Al Qaeda “appears to be adopting a strategy of ‘going native’, which implies seizing upon and exploiting local grievances with the ultimate aim of securing a stable foothold in volatile countries”.
Significantly, that scary thought allows the RUSI study to conclude: ““The focus of anti-jihadist counter-terrorism is shifting to Africa.”
In other words, the pretext of anti-jihadist counter-terrorism by Western powers is shifting to Africa.
EXPANDING THE WAR…I MEAN THE PEACE
PURELY COINCIDENCE THAT ITS RICH IN NEEDED RESOURSES OF COURSE
MORE TAXPAYER FUNDED BLOODSHED AND CORPORATE TAX FREE PROFITS AND BLOOD AND MISERY AND THEFT AND RAPE
But in point of fact, the Western counter-terrorism pretext is not shifting; it is more accurately being extended to Africa, as NATO is continuing its illegal occupation and wars in Afghanistan, Iraq and Pakistan.
This represents a strategic expansion of the global war agenda that the Pentagon and its Western allies have been pursuing in the Middle East and Central Asia incorporating a region for hegemonic control stretching from the Mediterranean to the Caspian – a region that compromises at least 60 per cent of the earth’s known oil and gas reserves.
The seven-month aerial bombing campaign of Libya by NATO during 2011 that led to the overthrow of the government in Tripoli can be seen as serving as a beach-head for the US-led powers in North Africa, and for their continued militarization across the East-West continental belt, from the Atlantic to the Indian Ocean.
AFRICOM …WE ARE HERE TO HELP……..OURSELVES TO YOUR RESOURSES
Already, the Western powers are engaged in a new scramble for Africa that can be traced back to the setting up of the new US military command of AFRICOM under the George W Bush administration.
Since then, and especially under the Obama administration, there has been a scaling up low-intensity involvement of US, French and British forces in Ivory Coast, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of Congo, Uganda and on the east in Somalia, Kenya and Djibouti.
BRING OUT THE FLYING DEATH DEVICES.
American aerial drones and French naval forces have played a key role in supporting the Kenyan and Ethiopian army campaigns against Al Shabab militants in Somalia since October last year.
THE BOOTS ARE ALREADY ON THE GROUND
Other African countries where the Western powers are believed to be running clandestine Special Forces include Senegal, Sierra Leone, Nigeria and Sudan – all of them former British and French colonial possessions. There have also been claims of US staging violence in Nigeria to justify a state crackdown on popular protests against the government of President Goodluck Jonathan.
MAYBE AL QUADA ARE HIDING IN THIS NIGERIAN OIL FIELD, WHAT ABOUT DOWN THIS CONGOLESE GOLD MINE , MAYBE AL QUADA ARE HOLED UP IN A SOMALIAN DIAMOND MINE?
Africa’s undeveloped but vast natural resources of oil, metals, other minerals and agricultural potential is a bonanza that the stagnant capitalist powers cannot afford to miss out on, especially given China’s rise as a trading partner with many African states.
ITS A BARGIN BONANZA…SHOOT FIRST …NO QUESTIONS…STUFF YOUR POCKETS..NO BODY COUNTS
..OR HUMANITARIANISM AND DEMOCRACY AS WESTERN LEADERS CALL IT!!
The irony is that while Western governments, their think-tanks and mainstream media mouthpieces may talk up “an Al Qaeda arc of instability across Africa”, the real source of instability and militarization from the continent’s West to East is stemming from the neocolonialism of Western powers. To this end, the “spectre” of Al Qaeda is serving as a convenient pretext to justify further imperialist encroachment.
EXPECT MORE BLOODSHED …LIKE LIBYA , IRAQ , AFGHANISTAN , YUGOSLAVIA…ALL GREAT SUCCESSES!!
YES WE MANAGED TO SAVE THE ARABS ,NOW WE ARE HERE TO SAVE THE AFRICANS
WHAT WOULD THE WORLD DO WITHOUT US?
WHO WOULD SOLVE THIER PROBLEMS FOR THEM? 
Expect more Western mainstream media reports of mysterious Al Qaeda jihadists destabilizing poor, starving African countries, thus requiring the noble dispatch of NATO forces to “save the Dark Continent”.
AL QUADA ARE OUR FRIENDS
WE HAVE ALWAYS BEEN AT WAR WITH AL QUADA
AL QUADA ARE OUR FRIENDS
Of course, the killer irony is that Al Qaeda is a global terror network created by the CIA, MI6 and Saudi Arabia to do the dirty work of Western powers, as Michel Chossudovsky, Peter Dale Scott and other writers have carefully documented.

The Al Qaeda brand has proven to be a lucrative “investment”.
From 9/11, Afghanistan, Iraq to Libya and currently Syria. And, now, the neocolonial reconquest of Africa. That’s what you call “return on money”.

BUT REMEMBER THIS IS A TAXPAYER FUNDED MILITARY WITH CORPORATE DRIVEN PROFITS AND GOALS
WELCOME TO THE NEW WORLD ORDER 
Finian Cunningham is Global Research’s Middle East and East Africa Correspondent
cunninghamfinian@gmail.com
http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=home
SO ITS SEEMS LIFE IMITATES ART
ANOTHER STRAIGHT OFF THE SHELF INSTRUCTION MANUAL FOR THE MODERN POLITION “BRAVE NEW WORLD”
The novel opens in London in 632 (AD 2540 in the Gregorian Calendar). The vast majority of the population is unified under the World State,(UN) an eternally peaceful, stable global society in which goods and resources are plentiful (because the population is permanently limited to no more than two billion people) and everyone is happy.(DRUGGED AND CONDITIONED) Natural reproduction has been done away with and children are created, ‘decanted’ and raised in Hatcheries and Conditioning Centres, where they are divided into five castes (which are further split into ‘Plus’ and ‘Minus’ members) and designed to fulfill predetermined positions within the social and economic strata of the World State.
To maintain the World State’s Command Economy for the indefinite future, all citizens are conditioned from birth to value consumption with such platitudes as “ending is better than mending,”(CONSUMMERISM) i.e., buy a new one instead of fixing the old one, because constant consumption, and near-universal employment to meet society’s material demands, is the bedrock of economic and social stability for the World State.The maxim “everyone belongs to everyone else”(MSM SOAP OPERAS) is repeated often,the need for transcendence, solitude and spiritual communion is addressed with the ubiquitous availability and universally endorsed consumption of the drug soma(BIG PHARMA).This affinity for the State-produced drug, as a self-medicating comfort mechanism in the face of stress or discomfort, thereby eliminates the need for religion or other personal allegiances outside or beyond the World State.
Spending time alone is considered an outrageous waste of time and money, and wanting to be an individual is horrifying
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brave_new_world
Brave New World has been banned and challenged at various times.
ARE YOU AN EPSILON OR AN ALPHA?
BUT REMEMBER TO KEEP TAKING YOUR SOMA
THE BRAVE NEW WORLD ORDER TAKES SHAPE
From the Cold War to NATO’s “Humanitarian Wars” – The Complicity of the United Nations
by Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya
Humanitarian wars, especially under the guise of the “Responsibility to Protect (R2P),” are a modern form of imperialism. The standard pattern that the United States and its allies use to execute them is one where genocide and ethnic cleansing are vociferously alleged by a coalition of governments, media organizations, and non-governmental front organizations. The allegations – often lurid and unfounded – then provide moral and diplomatic cover for a variety of sanctions that undermine and isolate the target country in question, and thereby pave the way for military intervention. This is the post-Cold War modus operandi of the US and NATO.
In facilitating this neo-imperialism, the United Nations has been complicit in the hijacking of its own posts and offices by Washington.
Former UN secretary-general Kofi Annan has been appointed a “special peace envoy” with a mediating role in Syria. Yet, how can Annan be evaluated as an “honest broker” considering his past instrumental role in developing the doctrine of R2P – the very pretext that has served to facilitate several US/NATO criminal wars of aggression? Furthermore, the evidence attests that the US and its allies – despite mouthing support for Annan’s supposed peace plan – are not interested in a mediated, peaceful solution in Syria.
THEY WHERE NOT INTERESTED IN A DEMOCRATIC SOLUTION IN LIBYA!
ONE WAS ON OFFER, SINCE THEN NOT EVEN A SIGN OF ELECTIONS ,JUST GENOCIDE!
WHAT HAPPENED TO “RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT” AND HUMANITARINISM AND DEMOCRACY?
IT SEEMS GADDAFFI WAS A LOT BETTER AT PROTECTING LYBIANS THAN NATO!!
I SEE NO REASON WHY NATO SHOULD BE INTERESTED IN A DEMOCRATIC SOLUTION IN SYRIA
THE RISE OF THE THE NEW WORLD ORDER
As the Cold War began to wind down in the late-1980s and early-1990s, NATO saw the opportunity that would arise from the geopolitical vacuum following the collapse of the Soviet Union and the dissolution of the Eastern Bloc. Not only did NATO begin transforming from a defensive organization into an offensive military body, the US-led alliance began to embrace a supposed humanitarian mandate for this purpose. It is through this purported embrace of humanitarianism that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization was able to change into an offensive, interventionist military force – indeed the largest such force ever in the history of the world.
NATO’s biggest military operation up until a decade after the Cold War was the First Persian Gulf War following the invasion in 1991 of Kuwait by Iraqi forces under the command of Saddam Hussein. The invasion of Kuwait by Iraq, at the time a US ally,(IRAQ IS OUR FRIEND /WE HAVE ALWAYS BEEN AT WAR WITH IRAQ) was mired in a territorial oil dispute over colonial-era borders to which Washington at first appeared to show cool indifference. Immediately after Iraqi forces entered Kuwait, however, a strident US government and media campaign was mounted claiming the sanctity of Kuwait’s sovereign territory and the “defence of small nations.”
NEWSPEAK
There were also lurid media reports – later shown to be fabrications – of atrocities committed by Iraqi troops, such as the butchering of babies taken from hospital incubators. The international public was successfully manipulated to accept a US-led war against Iraq to ironically liberate the Emirate of Kuwait only to reinstate an absolute and despotic monarch.
THE PLAN IS PUT IN PLACE 
Equipped with UN resolutions, the US-led NATO powers – along with a “coalition of willing” Arab states – launched a war on Iraq supposedly in the name of “humanitarianism.” Operations exclusively run by several NATO powers in Iraqi Kurdistan would also become the basis for NATO’s future humanitarian mandates. The precedent and tempo was now set for NATO’s subsequent “humanitarian” wars. The no-fly zones and legal semantics that were innovated by the Western powers to justify their intervention in Iraq were also applied by these same powers with regard to the former Yugoslavia. Variants of this humanitarian pretext for war included “upholding international law” and “international security” and were deployed for the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 and again against Iraq in 2003 – the Second Persian Gulf War – this time to justify the all-out conquest of that country.  The same rhetorical justification for military intervention was used by NATO powers to unleash a seven-month aerial bombing campaign in Libya in 2011 that led to the overthrow of the government and to the murder of the country’s leader Muammar Qaddafi. The thematic R2P is currently being amplified to decibel levels by NATO state governments and mainstream media with regard to Syria, where a NATO-led intervention is also covertly underway.
THE BRAVE NEW WORLD TRAIL OF DEAD
Yugoslavia: Srebrenica’s Sacrifice for NATO Intervention
On July 11, 1995, the forces of the Bosnian Serbs would march into the so-called UN Srebrenica Safe Area. The official NATO narrative is that UN troops agreed to withdraw from Srebrenica and let the Bosnian Serb forces take care of the local Bosniaks, but that once the Bosnian Serbs entered the area they proceeded to slaughter 8,000 Bosniaks. This would be billed as the worst massacre in Europe since the Second World War.
A NATO MASSACRE TO START A WAR…CREATE THE PROBLEM ,SUPPLY THE SOLUTION
In reality, the events of Srebrenica would be used and warped to justify a massive NATO response on the basis of public outrage. Bosniak leaders would also refuse to give the Red Cross the names of people who had fled Srebrenica, thus resulting in an inflated number of missing people. The number of the dead would later turn out to be significantly lower than originally reported. Media estimates also changed over time. The most senior UN official inside Bosnia-Herzegovina, Philip Corwin, would also lend his voice to those saying that the events in Srebrenica were distorted for political gain and military intervention by NATO.
THIS SLAUGHTER WAS ORDERED BY THE US PRESIDENT
Then US President Bill Clinton had actually instructed Alija Izetbegovic that 5,000 Bosniaks would need to be sacrificed to bring NATO into the war as a combatant. Surviving members of the Bosniak delegation from Srebrenica have stated on the record that Izetbegovic said that NATO would militarily intervene against the Republika Srpska if at least 5,000 dead bodies could be produced. The Fall of Srebrenica, a UN report issued on November 15, 1999, casually mentions this in paragraph 115. The Bosniak police chief of Srebrenica has also confirmed Clinton’s demand for a “sacrifice” from Izetbegovic to open the doors for NATO attacks against the Bosnian Serbs.
YUGOSLAVIA WAS NOT AN ETHNIC WAR, BUT A DIVIDE AND RULE STRATAGEY
In the Bosnian War, all sides committed horrific atrocities. The crime of the Bosnian Serbs that appeared to rouse NATO was not ethnic cleansing. The crime of the Bosnian Serbs was that they were fighting to preserve Yugoslavia. Even Croats and Bosniaks in both Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina who wanted to preserve Yugoslavia and inter-ethnic peace were targeted, demonized, or killed. For example, the Bosniak Fikret Abdic was charged as a war criminal in Croatia after he fled Bosnia-Herzegovina, and Josip Rejhl-Kir, the Croat police chief of Osijek, was murdered by Croat nationalists for working to preserve the harmony between Croats and Croatian Serbs.
THIS ENABLED THE EXPANSION OF WESTERN CORPORATE POWER INTO THE BALKANS
UP UNTIL THEN YUGOSLAVIAS RESOURSES WHERE UNDER SERBIAN SOCIALIST CONTROL
NATO intervened in Bosnia-Herzegovina to change the balance of power. The Bosnian Serbs were up until then the superior military force. Had NATO powers not internationalized the fighting and intervened, the Bosnian Serbs would have taken control of the country and maintained it as an integral part of Yugoslavia. This would have crippled or halted Euro-Atlantic expansion in the Balkans.
NATO SUPPORTTED THE ISLAMIC TERRORISTS AGAIN…JUST LIKE IN AFGHANISTAN
THE SERBS WHERE DEMONISED IN WESTERN MSM…BUT MILOSOVIC WAS FOUND INNOCENT BY THE ICC..HE WAS ALSO LATER FOUND DEAD IN HIS ICC CELL
SO NATOS CLAIMS WHERE FALSE AGAIN…WHILE THE KLA WAS A GENOCIDAL MAFIA RUNNING DRUGS AND SELLING SERBIAN P.O.W. ORGANS
On January 15, 1999, the fighting in Racak between Serbian forces and the outlawed Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA), which the US State Department itself labelled a terrorist organization, would be used to paint a similar picture of genocide and ethnic cleansing to justify war. By this time, the Serbs had successfully been demonized by NATO and the media as the perpetrators of ethnic cleansing in the former Yugoslavia, so NATO’s efforts to vilify the Serbs were made relatively easy. It is a matter of public record that US Secretary of State Madeline Albright and the KLA leadership were working to create a humanitarian pretext for intervention. It was in this context that the US and NATO had pressured the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia to accept an arrangement where their military forces would leave Kosovo, but allowed the KLA to continue its attacks. This stoking of tensions is what NATO has tried to replicate in Syria through the so-called Free Syrian Army, which in reality is a terrorist organization linked to NATO and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC).
THIS IS A WAR AGAINST SOCIALISM AND A WAR FOR CORPORATE RIGHTS NOT HUMAN RIGHTS
WITH SOCIALIST YUGOSLAVIA BALKANISED AND HANDED TO ISLAMIC EXTREMISTS NEXT WAS SOCIALIST IRAQ.
TODAY ITS SOCIALIST LIBYA AND SOCIALIST SYRIA TO BE ASSET STRIPPED AND HANDED TO THE ISLAMIC EXTREMISTS!!!
…..WASN’T THIS SUPPOSED TO BE A WAR AGAINST TERROR? SPECIFICALLY ISLAMIC TERROR!
THEN WHY DO WE KEEP ATTACKING NON-THREATENING SECULAR SOCIALISTS AND HANDING THE COUNTRY TO THREATENING ISLAMIC TERRORISTS?!?!?!!?
WHY ARE WE NOT INVADING THE ISLAMIC TERRORIST SUPPORTING AND ANTI-DEMOCRATIC AUTHORITARIAN REGIMES OF BAHRAIN AND SAUDI ARABIA?
THEY ARE MASS MURDERING DEMOCRACY PROTESTORS AS WE SPEAK!!!
MEANWHILE………………..
WE HAVE ALWAYS BEEN AT WAR WITH GADDAFFI
GADDAFFI IS OUR FRIEND
WE HAVE ALWAYS BEEN AT WAR WITH GADDAFFI
In the Arab World: Libya and Syria
In 2011, the humanitarian card would be played again by NATO, this time in the North African country of Libya. Colonel Qaddafi was accused of massacring his own people in Libya, particularly in Benghazi. Packaged with unverified claims of jet attacks and foreign mercenaries, this prompted the UN to permit the US and its NATO allies to impose another no-fly zone, as in Iraq and Yugoslavia. Illegally, the NATO powers arrogated the no-fly zone provision of UN Security Council Resolution 1973 to mount an aerial bombing campaign.
PROTECTING HUMAN RIGHTS INVOLVES MASS MURDER AND BOMBING RAIDS ON CIVILIAN TARGETS AND INSTALLING AN UNELECTED ISLAMIC TERRORIST DICTATORSHIP!
The massive onslaught involving over 10,000 bombing missions was conducted in concert with NATO special forces and proxy militias on the ground. NATO warplanes targeted civilian population centres and civilian infrastructure, such as food stores and water and power utilities – acts that are war crimes under international law. Such a blatant campaign of state terrorism – obscenely in the name of “protecting human rights” – was instrumental in overthrowing the sovereign government in Tripoli and installing a proxy regime composed of an extremely volatile amalgam of opportunist para-militaries, terrorists, NATO intelligence operatives, and fractious tribal warlords. Recent reports of internecine bloodletting and revenge killing erupting across Libya, “post-NATO liberation,” attest to the real criminal enterprise of NATO’s regime change in Libya that was cynically perpetrated under the guise of protecting civilians.
THE REAL EFFECTS ON LYBIA ARE NEITHER HUMANITARIAN OR DEMOCRATIC. THE STANDARDS OF LIVING AND HUMAN RIGHTS HAVE PLUMMETED!!
NOW ITS SYRIA TURN…USING THE SAME GAME PLAN. EXPECT THE SAME RESULTS
Meanwhile, in Syria, the US and its cohorts have sought to replay the city of Homs like another Srebrenica, Racak, and Benghazi. They have sought to use the same tactic for inciting sectarian tensions and then blaming the government of President Bashar Al-Assad for conducting a “brutal crackdown.” The US and its allies are demanding that the Syrian Army stops fighting while the insurgent forces of the Syrian National Council’s Syrian Free Army are given a free hand to launch attacks, just as the NATO power demanded of the Yugoslav military while giving a green light to the KLA. Russian and Chinese demands that both sides observe a ceasefire offset this strategy.
BUT A BRIC HAS BEEN THROWN INTO THE WAR MACHINE
What stands in the way of yet another NATO intervention is a firm resolve by Moscow and Beijing(BRIC) at the UN Security Council as well as the alliance between Syria and Iran. Damascus and its allies, however, should be wary of more traps to tie Syria down politically and legally through one-sided agreements. Nor should the Syrians place their trust in the United Nations to act as an “honest broker.”
THE BRAVE NEW WORLD TAKES SHAPE
Humanitarianism: The Face of Modern Imperialism
The NATO military interventions in Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, and Libya were and are colonial invasions masquerading as humanitarian endeavours. Moreover, what NATO did in Yugoslavia was to intervene incrementally to divide and conquer the country. According to General John Galvin, the former supreme commander of NATO, this was done because NATO officials knew that an all-out invasion during the disintegration of the country would result in a massive guerrilla war with high costs for NATO. It can also be added that such a NATO intervention would have had the inverse effect of unifying Yugoslavia instead of allowing the federal state to dissolve.
At the start of 2011, both Libya and Syria were holdouts to NATO’s Mediterranean Dialogue and they also had reservations about the EU’s Union for the Mediterranean (UfM). This effectively means that they were both resistant to Euro-Atlantic expansion. While popular protests in Bahrain and Jordan went unnoticed, all public eyes were directed by NATO state governments and corporate media towards Libya and Syria. This is because of imperialist interests to subvert both the latter Arab states – while the former mentioned states are allies and therefore must be bolstered despite their well-documented repressive conducts.
OCEANIA IS ON THE MARCH
Atlanticism is on the march. Both NATO’s operations in the Balkans and the Arab World are intended to expand the Euro-Atlantic Zone. Its involvement in African Union missions in East Africa are also tied to this. For all observers who take a detailed look at the restructuring of states vanquished by NATO, this should be clear. Humanitarianism has become the new face of modern imperialism.
Former UN secretary-general Kofi Annan is a man whose face fits the deceptive humanitarian agenda of modern imperialism.
The above text is an adaptation of an article from the Journal of the Strategic Cultural Foundation (SCF).

Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya is a Sociologist and award-winning author. He is a Research Associate at the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG), Montreal. He specializes on the Middle East and Central Asia. He has been a contributor and guest discussing the broader Middle East on numerous international programs and networks such as Al Jazeera, Press TV, teleSUR and Russia Today. His writings have been published in more than 10 languages. Nazemroaya also writes for the Strategic Culture Foundation (SCF), Moscow. He is the author of a forthcoming book about Libya, The War on Libya and the Re-Colonization of Africa (2012).
 Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya is a frequent contributor to Global Research.  Global Research Articles by Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya
http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=30114

“O wonder!
How many goodly creatures are there here! How beauteous mankind is! O brave new world!
That has such people in’t!”
Miranda’s speech in Shakespeare’s The Tempest, Act V, Scene I
However, what she is actually observing is not men acting in a refined or civilized manner, but rather drunken sailors staggering off the wreckage of their ship. Huxley employs the same irony when the “savage” John refers to what he sees as a “brave new world.”
NINETEEN EIGHTY FOUR FINISHES WITH……
Smith has accepted the Party’s depiction of life, and sincerely celebrates a news bulletin reporting Oceania’s decisive victory over Eurasia for control of Africa. He then realises that “he had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Brother”.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nineteen_Eighty-Four
LETS HOPE NOT!!!

EPILOGUE

Brave New World Revisited (Harper & Row, US, 1958; Chatto & Windus, UK, 1959),[22] written by Huxley almost thirty years after Brave New World, was a non-fiction work in which Huxley considered whether the world had moved toward or away from his vision of the future from the 1930s. He believed when he wrote the original novel that it was a reasonable guess as to where the world might go in the future. In Brave New World Revisited, he concluded that the world was becoming like Brave New World much faster than he originally thought.
Huxley analysed the causes of this, such as overpopulation as well as all the means by which populations can be controlled. He was particularly interested in the effects of drugs and subliminal suggestion. Brave New World Revisited is different in tone because of Huxley’s evolving thought, as well as his conversion to Hindu Vedanta in the interim between the two books.
The last chapter of the book aims to propose action which could be taken in order to prevent a democracy from turning into the totalitarian world described in Brave New World. In Huxley’s last novel, Island, he again expounds similar ideas to describe a utopian nation, which is generally known as a counterpart to his most famous work.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brave_new_world#Brave_New_World_Revisited

BEING THE ETERNAL OPTIMIST THAT I AM ,THE ONE THING THAT THESE PROPHETS OF DOOM MISSED OUT ON ,WAS THE RISE OF THE INTERNET AND THE GENERAL DECENCY OF THE HUMAN SPIRIT!
ULTIMATELY THE MOB RULES!!
THAT IS WHY THE BRAVE NEW WORLD ORDER MUST SPEND ALL ITS TIME 24/7 CONVINCING THE MOB WITH ROLLING NEWS AND LIES AND PLATITUDES ,KEEPING US SCARED AND IGNORANT AND DRUGGING US WITH RITALIN AND OTHER MIND BENDING PHARMACUTICALS. THIS IS COSTLY AND TIME CONSUMING AND VERY INCONVENITENT FOR THE ELITE POWERS THAT BE.
BUT ULTIMATELY VERY ,VERY  NESSECARY
…OTHERWISE ITS THE TORCH BAREING LYNCH MOB AT THE DOORS!!!
THESE THINGS COMBINED ARE THE BIGGEST THREAT TO THE “BRAVE NEW WORLD ORDER”
WE HAVE BEEN WARNED
PROTEST AND SURVIVE
THERE IS NO JUSTICE
THERE IS JUST US!
AND THE FUTURE BELONGS TO US NOT THEM

Advertisements

2 Responses to 2012 A Brave New World Where War Is Peace and Slavery Is Freedom

  1. I have not checked in here for some time because I thought it was getting boring,
    but the last several posts are great quality
    so I guess I’ll add you back to my everyday bloglist.
    You deserve it friend 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: