PEOPLE THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA IS TRYING TO TELL YOU THE WORLD IS A DARK AND SMELLY PLACE
THIS IS A LIE
IT IS DARK AND SMELLY FOR THE MSM BECAUSE THE MSM HAS ITS HEAD SHOVED UP IT ASS!!!
MY MESSAGE TO THE PRESSTITUTES
PULL YOUR HEAD OUT OF YOUR ASS AND SEE THE WORLD FOR WHAT IT IS!!!
THE WORLD IS WONDERFUL
IT IS POPULATED BY AND INFINITE VARIETY OF LIFE AND HUMAN CULTURES
EVERY HUMAN A FINITE PIECE OF INFINITE POSSIBILITY
THE VAST MAJORITY OF THESE CREATURES ARE DECENT
OUR PLANET IS A GEM THAT SHINES IN THE INFINITE DARKNESS OF SPACE
NEVER FORGOT THIS!!
OUR BIGGEST THREAT TO HUMANITY AND LIFE ON EARTH IS GLOBAL GOVERNMENT
RUN BY THE FEW FOR THE FEW AT THE EXPENSE OF THE MASSES
THE VAST MAJORITY OF THESE ELITES ARE CORRUPT
THEY AIM TO DESTROY THE INFINITE VARIETY THAT IS LIFE ON EARTH ,HUMAN OR OTHERWISE.
THEY ARE DELUSIONAL CONTROL FREEKS
THEY CAN ONLY LEAD US TO DESTRUCTION
THE 2ND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS CLEARLY STATES THE MORE YOU IMPOSE LAW ,THE MORE YOU ACCELERATE CHAOS
…SO GLOBAL GOVERNMENT CAN ONLY LEAD TO GLOBAL CHAOS
LETS LOOK AT THE TRACK RECORD OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER SO FAR…..
AN ONGOING DISASTER: Libya, Africa and Africom
More than 50,000 Deaths
by Dan Glazebrook
The scale of the ongoing tragedy visited on Libya by NATO and its allies is becoming horribly clearer with each passing day. Estimates of those killed so far vary, but 50,000 seems like a low estimate; indeed the British Ministry of Defence was boasting that the onslaught had killed 35,000 as early as last May. But this number is constantly growing. The destruction of the state’s forces by British, French and American blitzkrieg has left the country in a state of total anarchy – in the worst possible sense of the word.
NOT ANARCHY!! SWITZERLAND OR ICELAND ARE IN STATES OF ANARCHY .THEY ARE DIRECT DEMOCRACIES, THEREFORE THE PEOPLE ARE THE ULTIMATE POWER. THERE IS LESS CRIME AND CORRUPTION AND HIGH STANDARDS OF LIVING
IN FACT LYBIA USED TO BE AN ANARCHIST STATE UNDER GADDAFFI. HE HAD A DIRECT DEMOCRACY POLITICAL SYSTEM. THIS IS MORE DEMOCRATIC THAN EUROPEAN “REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY”.(AKA ELECTED DICTATORSHIP)
THAT WAS WHY LYBIA HAD THE HIGHEST LIVING STANDARDS IN AFRICA AND GADDAFFI WAS GOING TO GET A HUMANITARIAN AWARD!!
WHAT WE ARE SEEING TODAY IN LYBIA IS AN IMPOSITION OF LAW
..THUS ACCELERATING CHAOS!!
IGNORE THE 2ND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS AT YOUR PERIL…….THE GOVERNMENT DOES!!!
Having had nothing to unite them other than a temporary willingness to act as NATO’s foot soldiers, the former ‘rebels’ are now turning on each other. 147 were killed in in-fighting in Southern Libya in a single week earlier this year, and in recent weeks government buildings – including the Prime Ministerial compound – have come under fire by ‘rebels’ demanding cash payment for their services. $1.4billion has been paid out already – demonstrating once again that it was the forces of NATO colonialism, not Gaddafi, who were reliant on ‘mercenaries’- but payments were suspended last month due to widespread nepotism. Corruption is becoming endemic – a further $2.5billion in oil revenues that was supposed to have been transferred to the national treasury remains unaccounted for. Libyan resources are now being jointly plundered by the oil multinationals and a handful of chosen families from amongst the country’s new elites; a classic neo-colonial stitch-up. The use of these resources for giant infrastructure projects such as the Great Manmade River, and the massive raising of living standards over the past four decades (Libyan life expectancy rose from 51 to 77 since Gaddafi came to power in 1969) sadly looks to have already become a thing of the past.
POLITICAL PARTIES BANNED!!
GADDAFFI’S DIRECT DEMOCRACY SOCIALISM CANNOT EVEN BE MENTIONED WITHOUT YOU BEING DRAGGED OFF THE STREETS BY “GOVERNMENT FORCES”
THIS IS WHAT HITLER DID ….SO MUCH FOR FREESPEECH AND DEMOCRACY
But woe betide anyone who mentions that now. It was decided long ago that no supporters of Gaddafi would be allowed to stand in the upcoming elections, but recent changes have gone even further. Law 37, passed by the new NATO-imposed government last month, has created a new crime of ‘glorifying’ the former government or its leader – subject to a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. Would this include a passing comment that things were better under Gaddafi? The law is cleverly vague enough to be open to interpretation. It is a recipe for institutionalised political persecution.
RULE BY A VULGAR DISPLAY OF BRUTAL FORCE
THE FRUITS OF WESTERN HUMANITARIANISM AND DEMOCRACY
DICTATORSHIP AND GENOCIDE
Even more indicative of the contempt for the rule of law amongst the new government – a government, remember, which has yet to receive any semblance of popular mandate, and whose only power base remains the colonial armed forces – is Law 38. This law has now guaranteed immunity from prosecution for anyone who committed crimes aimed at “promoting or protecting the revolution”. Those responsible for the ethnic cleansing of Tawergha – such as Misrata’s self-proclaimed “brigade for the purging of black skins” – can continue their hunting down of that cities’ refugees in the full knowledge that they have the new ‘law’ on their side. Those responsible for the massacres in Sirte and elsewhere have nothing to fear. Those involved in the widespread torture of detainees can continue without repercussions – so long as it is aimed at “protecting the revolution” – i.e. maintaining NATO-TNC dictatorship.
LIBYA’S STANDARDS OF LIVING AND PUBLIC SAFETY HAVE VANISHED
This is the reality of the new Libya: civil war, squandered resources, and societal collapse, where voicing preference for the days when Libya was prosperous and at peace is a crime, but lynching and torture is not only permitted but encouraged.
AND ITS EFFECTS ARE BEING FELT ACROSS AFRICA AND THE MIDDLE EAST…JUST CREATING MORE INSTABILITY AND WAR
Nor has the disaster remained a national one. Libya’s destabilisation has already spread to Mali, prompting a coup, and huge numbers of refugees – especially amongst Libya’s large black migrant population – have fled to neighbouring countries in a desperate attempt to escape both aerial destruction and lynch mob rampage, putting further pressure on resources elsewhere. Many Libyan fighters, their work done in Libya, have now been shipped by their imperial masters to Syria to spread their sectarian violence there too.
SO ISLAMIC TERRORIST MERCENARIES ARE THEN SENT TO SYRIA AND PAID BY THE WEST TO SLAUGHTER SYRIANS AND BLAME SYRIAN GOVERNMENT FORCES
WHILE IN AFRICA HERE COMES AFRICOM
WE ARE HERE IS HELP……..OURSELVES TO YOUR RESOURSES
Most worrying for the African continent, however, is the forward march of AFRICOM – the US military’s African command – in the wake of the aggression against Libya. It is no coincidence that barely a month after the fall of Tripoli – and in the same month Gaddafi was murdered (October 2011) – the US announced it was sending troops to no less than four more African countries – the Central African Republic, Uganda, South Sudan and the Democratic Republic of Congo. AFRICOM have now announced an unprecedented fourteen major joint military exercises in African countries for 2012. The military re-conquest of Africa is rolling steadily on.
THIS IS THE REAL REASON GADDAFFI HAD TO GO
HIS “AFRICAN UNION” WILL BE TURNED INTO AN AFRICAN PROXY OCCUPATION FORCE
None of this would have been possible whilst Gaddafi was still in power. As founder of the African Union, its biggest donor, and its one-time elected Chairman, he wielded serious influence on the continent. It was partly thanks to him that the US was forced to establish AFRICOM’s HQ in Stuttgart in Germany when it was established in February 2008, rather than in Africa itself; he offered cash and investments to African governments who rejected US requests for bases. Libya under his leadership had an estimated $150 billion of investments in Africa, and the Libyan proposal, backed with £30billion cash, for an African Union Development Bank would have seriously reduced African financial dependence on the West. In short, Gaddafi’s Libya was the single biggest obstacle to AFRICOM penetration of the continent.
Now he has gone, AFRICOM is stepping up its work. The invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan showed the West that wars in which their own citizens get killed are not popular; AFRICOM is designed to ensure that in the coming colonial wars against Africa, it will be Africans who do the fighting and dying, not Westerners. The forces of the African Union are to become integrated into AFRICOM under a US-led chain of command. Gaddafi would never have stood for it; that is why he had to go.
THE FUTURE OF AFRICA CAN BE SEEN IN TODAYS LIBYA……OR IRAQ …….OR YUGOSLAVIA
TO REPEAT AN ACTION AND EXPECT A DIFFERENT RESULT IS A DEFINITION OF CLINICAL INSANITY
And if you want a vision of Africa under AFRICOM tutelage, look no further than Libya, NATO’s model of an African state: condemned to decades of violence and trauma, and utterly incapable of either providing for its people, or contributing to regional or continental independence. The new military colonialism in Africa must not be allowed to advance another inch.
Dan Glazebrook writes for the Morning Star newspaper and is one of the co-ordinators for the British branch of the International Union of Parliamentarians for Palestine. He can be contacted at email@example.com
SO WHAT HAS ALL THIS “RESPRENTATIVE DEMOCRACY” AND TAXPAYER PAID FOR BLOOD AND SACRIFICE GOT US?
IMPROVED LIVING STANDARDS? NO
HUMAN RIGHTS? NO
LARGE CORPORATE TAX FREE PROFITS? YES
POLITICAL KICKBACKS? YES
INCREASED TERRORISM? YES
INCREASED HEROIN PRODUCTION? YES
CLOSER TO A NEW WORLD ORDER? YES
IN FACT THE VERY RESULTS OUR POLITIONS AND BIG BUSINESS LIKE.
MORE WAR AND INSECURITY AND LOTS OF NASTY PEOPLE TO POINT FINGERS AT
ITS THE ONLY WAY THEY CAN SURVIVE
BY KEEPING THE POPULATIONS SCARED AND IGNORANT…SO THEY CAN CONTINUE TO FLEECE AND SLAUGHTER US FOR FUN AND PROFIT
A DIRECT DEMOCRACY SYSTEM LIKE THOSE OF LYBIA ,ICELAND OR SWITZERLAND WOULD END THE WARS AND BAILOUTS IMMEDIATELY AND STOP THE BLOODSHED AND ARREST THE GUILTY,,,EVEN GUILTY PRIME MINISTERS!!
BUT AS THE WEST IS A “REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY”, THE KIND OF DEMOCRACY YOU CAN ADVERTISE IN TV. WE THE PEOPLE ARE DOOMED TO ILLEGAL WARS , DEBT SLAVERY ,POLITICAL CORRUPTION AND DECREASING STANDARDS OF LIVING. OUR POLITIONS WILL NOT FEAR ARREST AND OUR PROTESTORS WILL BE BEATEN AND EVEN KILLED!!
THE WAR MACHINE WILL KEEP TURNING
ACTUALLY AMERICA HAS INVADED OVER 70 COUNTRIES SINCE 1945 AND MANGED TO CREATE ZERO DEMOCRACIES.
IN FACT THEY HAD TO OVERTHROW QUITE A FEW ELECTED DEMOCRACIES TO DO THIS!!!!
Lies and Consequences in Our Past Wars
Prior to 2001, the Taliban was willing to turn Osama bin Laden over to a third country if he was promised a fair trial and no death penalty, and if some evidence of his guilt of crimes were offered. In 2001, the Taliban warned the United States that bin Laden was planning an attack on American soil. In July 2001 the United States was known to have plans to take military action against the Taliban by mid-October.
When the United States attacked Afghanistan on October 7, 2001, the Taliban again offered to negotiate for the handing over of bin Laden. When President George W. Bush refused, the Taliban dropped its demand for evidence of guilt and offered simply to turn bin Laden over to a third country. Bush rejected this offer and continued bombing. At a March 13, 2002, press conference, Bush said of bin Laden “I truly am not that concerned about him.”[i] When President Barack Obama announced, in May 2011, that he had killed bin Laden, the war didn’t even slow down.
Bin Laden, as a justification for the longest war in U.S. history, had always had weaknesses. As with Saddam Hussein or Muammar Gadaffi or Manuel Noriega, past U.S. support for bin Laden had to be kept out of the discussion. And a crime had to be transformed into an act of war. A crime by a non-state group was used to implicate the nation of Afghanistan, even though 92% of Afghans not only didn’t support the crime of 9-11, but they have to this day never heard about it
“We did not choose this war,” said Obama on May 1, 2012, as if the crime of 9-11 had been continually compelling him to fight a war in Afghanistan year after year. But the war was not defensive. Afghanistan was not attacking the United States. The war was not authorized by the United Nations. And it was not declared by Congress, as no war has been since 1941. When Russia began talking about a preemptive strike against U.S. missile bases on Russia’s western border in May of 2012, there was nothing the United States could say against the justifiability of such an act. Not after Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and the threats being made toward Iran.
The tissue of lies surrounding the war on Afghanistan is typical. Libya, despite its use as a model for future “humanitarian wars,” is no different.
The United States and Europe had been arming and working with Muamar Gadaffi in Libya for years, up to shortly before “intervening” against him in 2011. U.S. and British spy agencies had worked with Gadaffi’s torturers and killers.
Gadaffi had given up his nuclear program. His subsequent fate (butchered and displayed in a meat locker), along with the fate of the nation of Iraq, sends a strong message to other nations already inclined to believe that only nuclear weapons will protect them.
But Gadaffi had displeased the West and displeased the Arab dictatorships. He was unreliable. He wanted too much of Libya’s wealth for Libyans. He was too independent. He even called the Saudi monarch the worst thing in the book: “made by Britain and protected by the U.S.” And he made that remark in Qatar, another nation that became his enemy.
The Arab Spring in Tunisia and Egypt was out of control. Nonviolent movements were overthrowing dictators. Something had to be done. Violence by protesters in Libya provided an opening — for the Gulf dictatorships and for U.S.A./NATO. Violent engagement in Libya, supposedly on behalf of the Arab Spring, provided cover for violent crackdowns on nonviolent protesters in Bahrain and Yemen. It was opponents of the Arab Spring who helped to arm the rebels in Libya — and later in Syria — but not just to arm them, also to control them. This began under the banner of humanitarianism.
But NATO immediately abandoned humanitarian rescue as the goal of its mission, replacing it with the need to overthrow Gadaffi. General Khalifa Belqasim Hifter was brought in from his home in Virginia by the CIA to lead the rebels, along with other CIA-friendly Libyans. Obama, Sarkozy, and Cameron published an essay on April 15th announcing their plan to overthrow Gadaffi, something the United Nations did not authorize. U.S. Navy Admiral Samuel Locklear admitted in May to Congressman Mike Turner (R., Ohio) that NATO was trying to assassinate Gadaffi.
The New York Times admitted to “scores” of dead from NATO strikes unacknowledged by NATO. Over 600,000 civilians fled the country, including 100,000 Libyans, while another 200,000 Libyans were internally displaced. NATO had bombed the city of Tripoli for months, occasionally apologizing for the deaths of civilians, but leaving many observers with the impression that the goal was “shock and awe” — or “terror bombing” as opposed to “precision bombing.” Among the targets were media outlets, in which journalists were killed by NATO’s missile strikes.
Eventually Amnesty International investigated and found no grounds for the accusations. Moreno-Ocampo did not investigate NATO’s crimes in Libya, any more than he has ever done so in Iraq or Afghanistan. On January 19, 2012, the Arab Organization for Human Rights, the Palestinian Center for Human Rights, and the International Legal Assistance Consortium reported that NATO had targeted civilian areas and committed war crimes.
Toward the end of the war, the rebels displaced the entire population of the town of Tawergha. All 30,000 people are now gone. The rebels had deemed the town’s residents’ skin too dark. Libya is now smuggling arms to Syrian rebels. Tribes are at war in Southern Libya. The new transitional Libyan government is not representative, democratic, stable, protective of civil rights, or productive of economic rights.
Dishonesty about wars did not begin with our 43rd president. In 1995, President Clinton announced that he would “help the people of Bosnia to secure their own peace.” Almost two decades later, U.S. and other foreign troops have never left , and the place is governed by a European-backed Office of High Representative.[xiv] U.S. involvement in Yugoslavia gave NATO a reason to exist after the collapse of the Soviet Union. It was also not unrelated to lead, zinc, cadmium, gold, and silver mines, cheap labor, and a deregulated market. In 1996 U.S. Secretary of Commerce Ron Brown died in a plane crash in Croatia along with top executives for Boeing, Bechtel, AT&T, Northwest Airlines, and several other corporations that were lining up government contracts for “reconstruction.” Enron, the famously corrupt corporation that would implode in 2001, was a part of so many such trips that it issued a press release to state that none of its people had been on this one. Enron gave $100,000 to the Democratic National Committee in 1997, six days before accompanying new Commerce Secretary Mickey Kantor to Bosnia and Croatia and signing a deal to build a $100 million power plant. The annexation of Kosovo created a militarized buffer between Yugoslavia and the projected route of an oil pipeline through Bulgaria, Macedonia, and Albania. The pipeline is being built, with U.S. government support, to provide the United States and Western Europe with access to oil from the Caspian Sea. Energy Secretary Bill Richardson said in 1998: “This is about America’s energy security. It’s very important to us that both the pipeline map and the politics come out right.”
by David Swanson
BUT ITS NOT JUST THE RESOURSES THEY ARE AFTER
ITS THE DESTRUCTION OF NATIONS AND CULTURES AND AN END TO A TRUELLY MULTI-CULTURAL WORLD
PROUD INDEPENDANT LIBYANS IS JUST AS REPUGNANT TO GLOBAL ELITES AS PROUD INDEPENDANT SCOTS
THEY MUST TURN US ALL INTO SINGLE UNITS, WITH NO EMPATHY FOR OUR BROTHERS AND SISTERS AND ONLY FEELINGS OF LOYALTY TO THE CENTRAL GLOBAL POWER AND IDEOLOGY
JUST AS THE VATICAN HATED EUROPEAN NATIONALISM IN WHAT THEY CALLED CHRISTENDOM,YES DURING THE DARK AGES EUROPE WAS THE DOMAIN OF CHRIST CONTROLLED BY THE VATICAN. THE PEOPLE LIVED IN FILTH AND IGNORANCE AND TERROR, THEY DIED YOUNG AND WHERE USED AS ARROW FODDER FOR “RELIGIOUS” WARS
THIS WAS THE RULE OF CHRISTIAN ABRAHAMIC MONOTHEISM IN EUROPE THE OLD POWER HUNGRY ELITE. THEY RULED BY MASS IGNORANCE AND FEAR .BY CLOSING BATHHOUSES AND BURNING WISE WOMAN IT SPREAD DISEASE THROUGH EUROPE ,IT THEN SPREAD THIS DISEASE TO THE NEW WORLD ,THE MODERN ELITES ARE TRYING TO BRING IT BACK
YES THIER VISION OF THE FUTURE IS TO TURN THE CLOCK BACK A 1000 YEARS ,REDUCE THE LIVING STANDARDS AND EDUCATION AND LIFE EXPECTANCY ,WHILE THE ELITES HAVE ALL THE LATEST TECHNOLOGY TO KEEP US IN LINE AND BRAINWASH US WITH PROPAGANDA
Western Wars are for Assimilation
These wars are more about ideology and Social Engineering than a grab for the resources.
Much of Iraq’s oil resources were given to China and Russia, Libya’s Oil Wells were damaged in such a manner that it will take a very long time to repair them.
Of far more interest is the need to break up racially homogeneous societies.
For sure there are many merchants of war who will jump on the bandwagon, and care not about assimilation, but the hidden elite who are really pulling the strings, are the one’s with the power to instigate the wars.
IT IS IMPERATIVE FOR THE GLOBAL EXPERIMENT TO CONTINUE
…OTHERWISE THIER HOUSE OF CARDS MIGHT COLLAPSE…….
SYRIA: The West Undermines UN Monitors. Paves the Way for NATO Intervention
Western propagandists unanimously defer to “activists” despite hundreds of UN monitors on the ground in Syria.
by Tony Cartalucci
THE NEW WORLD ORDER NOT ONLY HATES DIRECT (TRUE) DEMOCRACY IT HATES COUNTRIES AND PEOPLE THAT TAKE ON A NATIONAL IDENTITY AND PRIDE, INDEPENDANT OF THE GLOBAL ELITES AND THIER GLOBAL PLANS.
AS THE INDEPENDANTS NATION STATE ALWAYS HAS BETTER LIVING STANDARDS AND EDUCATION. LESS CRIME AND CORRUPTION MORE DEMOCRACY AND FREEDOMS
THEY ALSO CANNOT BE USED AS DEBTOR SLAVES OR CANNON FODDER FOR GLOBAL ELITES
THOSE THAT STAND UP TO THE GLOBAL ELITE AND THIER GLOBAL PLANS ,WILL FIRST BE RIDICULED
THEN PHYSICALLY SILENCED ….OF COURSE IT IS ALL DONE LEGALLY
Owner of Pentagon’s Propaganda Firm Admits to Attacks on Journalists
The former president said he acted alone, independent of the contractor
by John Glaser
The co-owner of a major Pentagon propaganda contractor publicly admitted Thursday that he was behind a series of coordinated misinformation campaigns targeting two USA Today journalists who had scrutinized the contractor in their reporting.
Camille Chidiac is the former president and still the minority owner of Leonie Industries, which USA Today exposed as contracting with the Pentagon to employ “the modern equivalent of psychological warfare,” said he alone was responsible for the attacks on the journalists and was operating independent of the company or the Pentagon.
The reports published by USA Today exposed the dubious nature and exorbitant costs of the Pentagon’s “Information Operations,” (IO) or war propaganda, used abroad in places where the U.S. intervenes.
Subsequent reports exposed Leonie Industries for failing to pay up to $4 million in federal taxes, even as they were receiving government contracts worth hundreds of millions of dollars.
THE POLICE FORCE WILL PROTECT AND SERVE THE ELITE
ONLY WAR PROPAGANDA WILL BE TOLERATED
PROPAGANDA DESIGNED TO MAKE THE INDIVIDUAL THINK THIS IS ALL NORMAL
IT WILL BE SUBTLE AND REPETATIVE , THE MSM R.U.T. (REPEAT UNTIL TRUE)
WAR IS PEACE ,SLAVERY IS FREEDOM, WORK WILL MAKE YOU FREE , ANARCHY IS EVIL , GOVERNMENT IS GOOD
…..OF COURSE ITS ALL LIES AND DELUSIONAL NONSENSE
JUST LIKE GLOBAL WARMING IT WILL CLAIM TO BE BASED IN SCIENCE! BUT WHEN WE EXAMINE ITS CREDENTIALS WE FIND IT TO BE LIES AND SCAMS
Legitimizing Global Tyranny: Moving Towards World Government
by Jurriaan Maessen
Gideon Rachman’s 2008 article titled ‘And now for a world government’ and, more recently, Scientific American- editor Gary Stix’s piece Effective World Government Will be Needed to Stave Off Climate Catastrophe, illustrate a widespread and dangerous misconception. It also demonstrates the cunning of one world- propagandists in the crafting of their arguments. In Rachman’s article we are shown typical Palaeolithic artistry: horses, warriors, deer and, portrayed on the very same rocky surface, a globe. It is almost admirable were it not so deviously cunning, to bundle within a single image the primitive with the “modern” and by doing so, considering the latter as the logical conclusion of the former. Rachman explains:
‘For the first time since homo sapiens began to doodle on cave walls, there is an argument, an opportunity and a means to make serious steps towards a world government.’
That the implementation of a one world government is not some magical or mysterious suggestion that can only be understood by an arduous reading between the lines, as some naive debunkers have suggested, has been disproven by the fact that the aim of global government has been spelled out for us word for word by overeager transnationalists and the think tanks they tend to assemble in. Like any governmental decree, the implementation of an actual world state to replace the nation-state of old requires a theoretical legitimization. The people designated to clear the theoretical brushes, so to speak, have been picked from the marble halls of academia.
“Saul H. Mendlovitz, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, directed the project. Richard A. Falk, also a member of the CFR, contributed academic work. The goals of the WOMP, according to Mendlovitz, were to “…go beyond the nation-state system…to use a much broader range of potential actors, including world institutions, transnational actors, international organization, functional activities, regional arrangements, the nation-state, subnational movements, local communities, and individuals.”
“it is my personal belief (not shared by all members of WOMP) that there is an overwhelming surge in the direction of global polity and that a world state is emerging. Indeed, some of the policy elite are beginning to discuss a single world central bank and a single currency.”
All this is not science, of course. Rather, it is an attempt to scientifically legitimize a move toward world government. It is not a new concept, the idea that the large emerges from the small, rising in the steadiest of lines upward in time. This idea accommodates our most intimate fancies about time, evolution and progression. The mind, after all, tends to construct scientific parameters around the immeasurable unpredictability of the universe hoping to encapsulate infinity. It also watches nature and then, one on one, projects it onto political systems. The problem is that once these counterfeit scientists have calculated their way towards world government, and propagate its inevitableness, the sociopaths move in to seize control.
Two years after Mendlovitz’s speech, two term President of the European Commission Jacques Delors gave a speech to the Royal Institute of International Affairs titled ‘The European Community and the New World Order’. Invoking the famous New World Order-speech of George Bush senior, Delors took it a step further, speaking of “world government”, “transferring sovereignty” and a “worldwide single market”. In his speech, Delors advocates the destruction of sovereignty of all nation-states as a remedy. Furthermore, he states this to be neseccary in order to prevent “human rights violations”:
“International apathy about human rights violations will not be able to hide behind pretext of immutable, inviolable national sovereignty much longer.”
In 2003, University of Chicago’s Alexander Wendt witch-crafted a philosophical monstrosity under the header “Why a World State is Inevitable: teleology and the logic of anarchy”. Carefully avoiding any moral implications clinging to his manuscript, Wendt argues the case for world government as the necessary and inevitable end result of the current merging of nation-states into ever-larger bodies of influence.
“(…) this article argues that a global monopoly on the legitimate use of violence- a world state- is inevitable.”
“Rather than go down with the ship of national sovereignty, states should try to “get the best deal” they can in the emerging global constitution.”
After identifying the main enemy to world dictatorship, he then proposes to co-opt the natural drive towards auto-determination in order to bring about his desired world state.
“Nationalist struggles for recognition are by no means over, and more new states- “more anarchy”- may yet be created. But while further fragmentation is in one sense a step back, it is also a precondition for moving forward, since it is only when difference is recognized that a larger identity can be stable. (…)
Far from suppressing nationalism, a world state will only be possible if it embraces it.”
Everyone dedicated to fight the push for world dictatorship should wash their ears well with this statement. For the New World Order will pull out all the stops, including flirtations with national sovereignty, courting true libertarianism and align itself with any and every grassroots movement springing up out of the soil.
The anti-venom is education, education and some more education. Anything too much centralized leaves itself wide open to infiltration.
Another “founding father” of the scientific dictatorship, Sir Bertrand Russell once explained:
“Every government that has been in control of education for a generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen …”
One of the aims described in the document, was (page 2): “Preparing and carrying out “pilot programmes” of education incorporating these principles.”
Regarding the before mentioned “legal implications”, one of the proposals was to “draw up regulations relating to international mass communications .”
There is nothing like a strong choke hold to force your subjects into submission. When the status of the journalist in this new world order was discussed, the participants agreed that they would first have to “assess the feasibility of establishing an international code of ethics which would be adopted by journalists possessing a “universal” sense of mission, that is to say transcending their national origin in the defense of peace and fraternity .”
After we strip off the Orwellian euphemisms, this code of ethics clearly equals a strangling oath of obedience.
Among the many disturbing recommendations made by the panel, such as setting up “an international fund for the purpose of renting news transmission channels”, the need was expressed “to set up a “World Press Council” to help ensure the truthfulness and objectivity of information, in the event of it proving impossible to devise and adapt an “international code of ethics ”’.
A transnational body, in other words, that will decide whether a news item is truthful or not.
As the theoreticians pancake hypothesis upon hypothesis to prove their position, namely that a world state is inevitable, a closer inspection of their work reveals it is a false understanding, manufactured by a biased predisposition: both time and space have stunningly little regard for our fancies, phasing- as they do- in and out of our grasp as quickly as you can say ‘fallacy’. History, it seems, does not support their arguments.
SO ACCORDING TO THESE SCIENTISTS AND EXPERTS ,THE USSR SHOULD OF GONE FROM STRENGTH TO STRENGTH,..IT DID NOT.
THE UNITED KINDOM SHOULD BE EXPANDING INTO EUROPE , BUT IT IS FACING ITS END WITH SCOTTISH INDEPENDENCE
THE EUROPEAN UNION SHOULD BE EXPANDING…BUT GREECE AND IRELAND ,SPAIN AND PORTUGAL AND EVEN HOLLAND AND GERMANY HAVE MASSIVE POPULAR MOVEMENT TO GET OUT OF THE EU!!
THE UNITED STATES SHOULD OF SPREAD ACROSS CENTRAL AND SOUTH AMERICA
IT DID TRY THIS THROUGH EXTREME FORCE ,BUT EVEN FORCING THE PROCESS DID NOT WORK!!!
AND ALL THIS UNITING WAS SUPPOSED TO BE PART OF A NATURAL PROCESS!!!!!
MEANWHILE IN REALITY…..THERE IS NO HISTORICAL EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT GLOBAL GOVERNMENT
IN FACT IT SUGGESTS GLOBAL GOVERNMENT IS A VERY BAD IDEA BORN OF BLOODSHED AND DOOMED TO FAILURE
After the Roman Empire had collapsed, other, smaller kingdoms emerged out of its ruins. This applies to the Greeks, the Babylonians, and almost every other system with imperial designs. The Egyptian kingdom, once a vast and powerful culture, grew to be just a shadow of its former self at the beginning of our calendar. Charlemagne established the great Frankish empire only to unwittingly lay the groundwork for the establishing of sovereign states in the centuries to come, like Germany and France. We have only to study history in order to counter the mythology of a gradual evolution towards a one world system. There is no evidence supporting an historic, chronological pattern of progression from the small to the great. More often than not it is the other way around, for excessive power always provokes resistance.
Global Research Articles by Jurriaan Maessen
ACTUALLY IN REALITY BIG GOVERNMENT IS THE BIGGEST KILLER OF HUMAN LIFE
NOT WAR ,NOT DISEASE OR TERRORISM OR ANARCHISTS
POLITIONS ARE THE BIGGEST KILLERS……ITS CALLED DEMOCIDE
OF COURSE OUR POLITIONS REPRESENT THE VERY BEST IN OUR SOCIETY
TODAY YOU ARE MORE LIKELY TO BE ATTACKED BY A PTSD WAR-VET LEFT HOMELESS ON THE STREET BY A GOVERNMENT THAT HAS NO FURTHER USE FOR HIM
ACTUALLY THE TERRORISTS ARE VERY CLOSE TO DECLARING VICTORY!
ACCORDING TO OSAMA BIN LADEN, HIS AIM WAS TO BANKRUPT AMERICA!!!
TO STOP THIS WASTE OF HUMAN LIFE ,AND TO DEFEAT THE GLOBAL TERRORISTS FORIEGN AND DOMESTIC ,WE NEED TO MAKE A MILITIA ARMY NOT A STANDING ARMY INVASION FORCE PAID FOR BY THE TAXPAYER AND USED AS CORPORATE MUSCLE
POLITICALLY WE MUST STOP THIS LEFTWING VERSES RIGHTWING FALSE DIVIDE.
AUTHORITARIAN VERSES LIBERTARIAN IS THE REALPOLITIK
SUPPORT YOUR LOCAL PROTESTORS
END THE WARS
END THE BAILOUTS
ARREST WAR CRIMINALS AND FRAUDSTERS
DO THIS AND THINGS WILL IMPROVE
DO NOTHING AND THINGS WILL GET WORSE
VIOLENCE BREEDS VIOLENCE
EDICATION BREEDS UNDERSTANDING
PEACE TO EVERYONE