REAL LIBERTARIANISM AND THE MODERN AMERICAN FAKE LIBERTARIANISM
THE MODERN AMERICAN LIBERTARIAN PARTY IS NOT A REAL LIBERTARIAN MOVEMENT.
IT IS AN OBJECTAVIST ,FREE MARKET , ECONOMIC AUTHORITARIAN MOVEMENT, AND AS SUCH A VERY BAD IDEA!
THE REAL LIBERTARIAN MOVEMENT IS AGAINST STATE , MORAL OR ECONOMIC AUTHORITARIANISM
THE MODERN AMERICAN JUST LIKES TO CALL HIMSELF A LIBERTARIAN, BUT DOES NOT KNOW WHAT REAL LIBERTARIANISM IS AND IS ACTUALLY AN OBJECTATVIST….BUT THE OBJECTATVIST PARTY DOES NOT SOUND AS GOOD OR AS EASY TO SELL TO A DUMBED DOWN POPULATION THAT DOES NOT KNOW THE TRUE HISTORY OF LIBERTARIANISM!!!
Ron Paul’s 2008 presidential campaign introduced many people to the word “libertarian.” Since Paul is a Republican and Republicans, like libertarians, use the rhetoric of free markets and private enterprise, people naturally assume that libertarians are some kind of quirky offshoot of the American right wing. To be sure, some libertarian positions fit uneasily with mainstream conservatism—complete drug decriminalization, legal same-sex marriage, and the critique of the national-security state alienate many on the right from libertarianism.
YES TODAY WE SEE FANATICAL AMERICANS SCREAMING FOR LIBERTY AND LIBERTARIANISM AND QUOTING THOMAS PAINE…SHAME THEY DON’T KNOW WHAT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT
THOMAS PAINE WAS A FANATICAL LIBERTARIAN SOCIALIST
It is the duty of the Patriot to protect his country from his government. – Thomas Paine
“Pay as a remission of taxes to every poor family, out of the surplus taxes, and in room of poor-rates, four pounds a year for every child under fourteen years of age.” Thomas Paine, The Rights of Man.
“It is painful to see old age working itself to death, in what are called civilised countries, for daily bread… pay to every such person of the age of fifty years … the sum of six pounds per annum out of the surplus taxes, and ten pounds per annum during life after the age of sixty… This support, as already remarked, is not of the nature of a charity but of a right.” Thomas Paine, The Rights of Man.
“There could be no such thing as landed property originally. Man did not make the earth, and, though he had a natural right to occupy it, he had no right to locate as his property in perpetuity any part of it.” Thomas Paine, Agrarian Justice.
“Create a national fund, out of which there shall be paid to every person, when arrived at the age of twenty-one years, the sum of fifteen pounds sterling, as a compensation in part, for the loss of his or her natural inheritance, by the introduction of the system of landed property.” Thomas Paine, Agrarian Justice.
BUT RON PAUL IS NOT A LIBERTARIAN!!
RON PAUL IS AN OBJECTAVIST …WHICH IS SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT
SO IF RON PAUL IS NOT A REAL LIBERTARIAN …WHAT IS REAL LIBERTARIANISM?
Libertarianism refers to political philosophies which emphasize freedom, liberty, and voluntary association. There is no general consensus among scholars on the precise definition. Libertarians generally advocate a society with a government of small scope relative to most present day societies or no government whatsoever
SO WHY DID CAPITALSIM GET CONFUSED WITH LIBERTARIANISM?
In Webster’s New International Dictionary, the definition of ‘Libertarian’ is stated to be: “One who holds to the principle of free will; also, one who upholds the principles of liberty, esp. individual liberty of thought and action.” Clearly, in comparison to the authoritarian Soviet Union and Red China of the 1940’s and 50’s, liberal capitalism could be made to appear more “libertarian” than socialism if one were to accept that China and the USSR were the definitive examples of “socialism”. But, if one were to have listened to the original socialistic libertarians (the anarchists) all along, it would have been clear that both the “socialism” of so-called “Communist” countries, and the idea of a “libertarian (or anarcho-) capitalism” were a farce.
SO WESTERN CAPITALSIM IS IT LIBERTARIAN?….NO!!
“Capitalism, arising as a new class society directly from the old class society of the Middle Ages, was founded on an act of robbery as massive as the earlier feudal conquest of the land. It has been sustained to the present by continual state intervention to protect its system of privilege without which its survival is unimaginable.”
It should be noted that most of the modern pro-capitalist “libertarian” writing suffers from a severe defect: they overlook the fact that capitalism in every form ever tried throughout history is inherently authoritarian (i.e the boss/worker relationship), and thus incompatible with libertarianism in any form. However, if you ignore and skip over those portions that talk about capitalist ideas, there are some really eloquent arguments for individual rights, liberties, and responsibilities in these writings.
Unlike right-wing Libertarians, Liberals and Social Democrats, libertarian socialists reject participation in the mainstream representative voting process. Libertarian socialism is, in effect, a revolutionary theory and approach to political life. Libertarian Socialism’s anti-state stance might even give it the label “Laissez-fair socialism”- if a politician (or capitalist) were to approach some anarchist workers in France and ask them what it was he could do for them, they would reply, “Laissez-nous faire.”- essentially, “leave us alone”. Libertarian socialists understand that it is the workers who create and maintain everything in the world, and they do not need leaders to direct them in the affairs of their lives. What is the least a government could do for workers? Keep the Government and capitalists off their back– but it is far better to avoid the need for “politricksters” and capitalist rulers in the first place.
ACTUALLY USSR ,CHINA AND THE WEST ARE ALL JUST STATE CAPITALIST SOCIETIES AND ARE NOT LIBERTAIAN AT ALL.
State capitalism has various different meanings, but is usually described as a society wherein the productive forces are controlled and directed by the state in a capitalist manner, even if such a state calls itself socialist. Corporatized state agencies and states that own controlling shares of publicly-listed firms, and thus acting as a capitalist itself, are two examples of state capitalism
IN REALITY IT IS JUST FASCISM
Fascism should more appropriately be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power.
Benito Mussolini, fascist dictator of Italy (1922-1943)
STATE CAPITALSIM IS THE GLOBAL POLITICAL SYSTEM WE HAVE.
A FAKE DIVIDE AND RULE SYSTEM “LEFTWING VERSES RIGHTWING” IS USED TO KEEP OUR POLITICAL MASTERS IN POWER.
THE REAL POLITIK IS AUTHORITARIAN VERSES LIBERTARIAN….BUT DO NOT EXPECT A POLITION ,LEFTWING OR RIGHTWING ,TO POINT THIS OUT.
POLITICAL SYSTEMS LIKE DIRECT (TRUE)DEMOCRACY WILL NEVER BE MENTIONED AND FREE MARKET CAPITALISM WILL BE SOLD AS LIBERTARIANISM AND ANARCHY ETC WILL ONLY BE BAD MOUTHED
GOVERNMENT GOOD , ANARCHY BAD ……WILL BE THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA RUT …(REPEAT UNTIL TRUE)
LIBERTARIAN SOCIALISTS ARE THE ORIGINAL AND TRUE LIBERTAIANS
PEOPLE …WE DID NOT CREATE OUR RESOURSES!!
WE ARE ONLY THE CUSTODIANS AND IT IS OUR DUTY TO PRESEVE THESE RESOURSES FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS
WE DO NOT SELL THEM FOR PERSONAL PROFIT AND LEAVE OUR CHILDREN WITH NO HERITAGE
THIS WOULD BE SELFISH AND IRRESPONSIBLE AND VERY SHORT SIGHTED
THE PRODUCTS OF THESE RESOURSES BELONG TO THE WORKER, NOT THE STATE ,NOT THE CORPORATION AND NOT EVEN THE COMMUNITY
THIS WOULD ONLY BE STATE OR CORPORATE OR COMMINITY THEFT
Libertarian Socialism recognizes that the concept of “property” (specifically, the means of production, factories, land used for profit, rented space) is theft and that in a truly libertarian society, the individual would be free of exploitation caused by the concentration of all means of wealth-making into the hands of an elite minority of capitalists.
It is recognized that there are authoritarian systems and behavior, distinct from libertarian, or non-authoritarian ones. Since capitalism’s early beginnings in Europe, and it’s authoritarian trend of wage-slavery for the majority of people (working class) by a smaller, elite group (a ruling, or, capitalist class) who own the “means of production”: machines, land, factories, there was a liberatory movement in response to capitalism known as “Socialism”. In almost every case, the socialist movement has been divided along authoritarian, and libertarian lines. The anarchists on the libertarian side, and the Jacobins, Marxists, Leninists, Stalinists, and reformist state-socialists on the authoritarian side. (And liberals more or less split down the middle.)
THE LIBERTARIAN TERM AND IDEOLOGY WAS FIRST PUT IN PRINT IN 1850’S AND LATER IN THE 1890’S WITH THE PRINTING OF “THE LIBERTARIAN” IN FRANCE
THE TRUE HISTORY OF TRUE LIBERTARIANISM
The term libertaire (libertarian) was coined by Joseph Déjacque, who fled France after the December 1851 coup and would create Le Libertaire, the first anarcho-communist newspaper in the United States. Other anarchists of this period include Ernest Cœurderoy, who took exile after 13 June 1849 demonstration, and refused to return to France after the 1859 amnesty.Anselme Bellegarrigue launched one of the first anarchist newspapers, named L’Anarchie, journal de l’ordre (Anarchy, The Newspaper of Order) during the Second Republic in 1850.
Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, the first self-identified anarchist.Pierre-Joseph Proudhon (1809–1865) was the first philosopher to label himself an “anarchist.” Proudhon opposed government privilege that protects capitalist, banking and land interests, and the accumulation or acquisition of property (and any form of coercion that led to it) which he believed hampers competition and keeps wealth in the hands of the few. Proudhon favoured a right of individuals to retain the product of their labor as their own property.Thus, he saw private property as both essential to liberty and a road to tyranny.
“Sebastien Faure, who founded Le Libertaire in 1895, is often credited with having invented the word ‘libertarian’ as a convenient synonym for ‘anarchist.’ However, Joseph Dejacque’s use of the word as early as 1858 suggests that it may have had a long currency before Faure adopted it.”
[George Woodcock, Anarchism, p. 281 (footnote)]
The term “libertarian” goes back at least to the 17th and 18th century religious debates regarding free-will versus pre-destination, and was used at that time to refer to persons who believed that individuals had full liberty to act as they saw fit.
According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the first known usage of “libertarian” was in 1789 as part of “Belsham’s Essays”, in which he appears to use the term in opposition to “necessitarian”. It’s hard to say whether there was a direct connection with other uses of the term.
An early socialistic libertarian movement (in deeds if not in name) had it’s roots as far back as the French Revolution of 1789 in the poor serfs who saw through the authoritarianism of the Jacobins (and the bourgeoisie in general) who had used these serfs to overthrow the monarchy. [Further information is available from Peter Kropotkin’s The Great French Revolution, 1789-1793 (pub: 1909)]
An earlier movement of “libertarian revolutionaries” were a movement from the mid-1600’s called “The Levellers”. Though they did not use the term “libertarian”, they clearly had a libertarian orientation. They had a socialistic and individualistic aspect like the mutualists (mentioned below), and there was an even more socialistic movement called “The Diggers” or “The True Levellers”. (There was also a group in San Francisco in the 1960’s called The Diggers.)
HISTORY OF THE LIBERTARIAN MOVEMENT IN FRANCE
Histoire du mouvement libertaire 1850-1918
List of French libertarian organisationsEnDehors (individualist anarchist, 1891)
Bonnot Gang (illegalist, 1911)
Fédération Anarchiste (synthesist, 1945, member of International of Anarchist Federations)
L’Anarchie (individualist anarchist, 1905)
CNT-F (revolutionary-syndicalist, 1945)
CNT-AIT (anarcho-syndicalist, 1945) http://cnt-ait.info English section of the web site :
Libertarian Communist Organization (France) (OCL, platformist, 1976)
Anarchists Union (1979)
No Pasaran (SCALP, antifascist,1984)
Alternative libertaire (1991, platformist member of the International Libertarian Solidarity)
Libertarian Socialism is a term essentially synonymous with the word “Anarchism”. Anarchy, strictly meaning “without rulers”, leads one to wonder what sort of system would exist in place of one without state or capitalist masters… the answer being a radically democratic society while preserving the maximal amount of individual liberty and freedom possible.
THE SPANISH LIBERTARIAN REVOLUTION. IT TOOK BOTH FRANCO AND HITLER TO DEFEAT THEM!!
In Spain in 1932 Issac Puente wrote the pamphlet “Libertarian Communism”, and the CNT adopted libertarian communism as its goal at the 1936 Saragossa conference on the eve of the Spanish Revolution. In France in 1926 the Dielo Trouda group of anarchists who had fled Russia wrote the hotly debated “Organisational Platform of the Libertarian Communists”.
During the Spanish Civil War (1936-1939) a coalition group called the United Libertarian Organisations (ULO) was created with the intent of spreading truthful information about the revolutionary anarchist activities in Spain. The organisation consisted of groups publishing Cultura Proletaria (Spanish), Il Martello (Italian), Delo Truda (Russian anarchist), Il Proletario (Italian IWW), Freie Arbeiter Stimme (Jewish Anarchist Federation), the American anarchist publication, Vangaurd, as well as the Marine Transport Workers Industrial Union and General Recruiting Union of the IWW, and the Spanish Labor Press Bureau (administered by the CNT-FAI representative in the United States and Canada, the Chicago anarchist Maximilian Olay). The official organ of the ULO was called Spanish Revolution (now available in facsimile from Greenwood Publishing Corporation). Examples of articles are: Rural Collectives in Graus and Imposta; Peasants Build a New Economy; Statistics on Industrial Socialization in Catalonia; Organising the Textile Industry; Industrial Democracy; Running a Department Store; Telephone System Run by Workers; Peasant Communes in Aragon; etc. Anyone interested in constructive economic and social achievements of the CNT-FAI in revolutionary Spain should consult the pages of Spanish Revolution.
AMERICAN FAKE LIBERTARIANISM A VERY MODERN MOVEMENT AND WAS INVENTED IN 1971
THE RIGHTWING FREE-MARKET /OBJECTAVISTS JUST STOLE THE LIBERTARIAN LABEL
Founded December 11, 1971
In 1972, “Libertarian Party” was chosen as the party’s name, narrowly beating out “New Liberty Party.”
The Libertarian Party is the third largest and fastest growing political party in the United States. The political platform of the Libertarian Party reflects the ideas of Libertarianism, favoring minimally regulated, laissez-faire markets, strong civil liberties, drug liberalization, LGBT rights (such as in marriage, child custody, adoption, immigration or military service laws), separation of church and state, minimally regulated migration across borders, and non-interventionism and diplomacy in foreign policy, i.e., avoiding foreign military or economic entanglements with other nations and respect for freedom of trade and travel to all foreign countries
THEY STOLE THE LIBERTARIAN LABEL FROM THE TRUE AMERICAN LIBERTARIAN PARTY
What these people did not know or chose to ignore was that at least two US libertarian socialist organisations already existed, one formed in July 1954 called the Libertarian League, started by Russell Blackwell, and the other formed in 1949 and called the Libertarian Book Club, an idea initiated by Gregory P. Maximoff, and formerly established by a number of anarchists, including: Bill & Sarah Taback, Joseph & Hannah Spivack, Joseph Aaronstam, Ida Pilot (a professional translator) and her companion Valerio Isca, and Esther and Sam Dolgoff. The Libertarian League of the 1920′ was a simmilarly socialistic organization, but no longer existed. The Libertarian Book Club is based in New York City, and is still active today.
(This information is from the book “Fragments: A Memoir”, by Sam Dolgoff, Pub. 1986 Refract Publications, Cambridge, England)
THE RISE OF THE FAKE LIBERTARIAN CAPITALIST
While a number of pro-capitalist “Libertarian” organisations and publications tend to have recently appeared in the United States and a few other countries, these entities serve the interests of small business owners, landlords, investors and some upwardly-mobile professionals. Essentially secular neo-conservative organisations, with strong inspiration from the writings of the ultra-capitalist Ayn Rand, economist Murray Rothbard, and science-fiction writer Robert Heinlein.Typical of these advocates of the sacredcy of private property is a distortion of the theories of the moral individualist philosophers of the 19th century (Benjamin Tucker, Lysander Spooner, Josiah Warren, Henry David Thoreau, etc.) who respected the rights of the individual but were highly critical of the concentrations of wealth and power which led to capitalism and economic oppression since the dawn of the Industrial Revolution. Due to the elite privilege for the few over the many inherent in a ‘pure’ capitalist system, “libertarian” capitalism is un-democratic and anti-libertarian. For more information see the essay “Libertarianism: Bogus Anarchy”, by Peter Sabatini, and a TV interview with Noam Chomsky
The libertarian left had little interest in nationalizations or state-social-programs, arguing that they placed power into the hands of elite managers and not the workers themselves. The destruction of the original libertarian movement in the United States, (by mass deportations and imprisonment), as well as in Europe (The Fascist victories in Spain, Italy and Germany) left a vacuum in which was possible for one Dean Russell of the capitalist “Foundation for Economic Education” to write an article in the FEE publication, “Ideas on Liberty” of May, 1955 entitled “Who is a Libertarian?” which advocated that the right should “trademark and reserve for our own use the good and honorable word ‘libertarian.'” In other cases, conservative Science Fiction writers such as Robert Heinlein and Poul Anderson used the term in their writing to depict fictionally virtuous forms of capitalism. It should be noted that these writers and others like them (Ann MaCaffrey, Daniel F. Galouye, Keith Laumer, etc.) supported the U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War. For more information see the article “Starship Stormtroopers” by Micheal Moorcock.
WHY DID RON PAUL CALL HIS SON RAND?
BECAUSE RON PAUL IS AN OBJECTAVIST NOT A LIBERTARIAN
….AYN RAND THE OBJECTAVIST
Objectivism is a philosophy created by Russian-American philosopher and novelist Ayn Rand (1905–1982). Objectivism’s central tenets are that reality exists independent of consciousness, that human beings have direct contact with reality through sense perception, that one can attain objective knowledge from perception through the process of concept formation and inductive logic, that the proper moral purpose of one’s life is the pursuit of one’s own happiness (or rational self-interest), that the only social system consistent with this morality is full respect for individual rights embodied in laissez faire capitalism, and that the role of art in human life is to transform humans’ metaphysical ideas by selective reproduction of reality into a physical form—a work of art—that one can comprehend and to which one can respond emotionally.
Objectivism holds that because the opportunity to use reason without the initiation of force is necessary to achieve moral values, each individual has an inalienable moral right to act as his own judgment directs and to keep the product of his effort.
Objectivism holds that the only social system which fully recognizes individual rights is capitalism,specifically what Rand described as “full, pure, uncontrolled, unregulated laissez-faire capitalism.” Objectivism regards capitalism as the social system which is most beneficial to the poor, but that this isn’t its primary justification. Rather, it is the only moral social system. Objectivism maintains that only societies seeking to establish freedom (or free nations) have a right to self-determination
Objectivism views government as “the means of placing the retaliatory use of physical force under objective control—i.e., under objectively defined laws;” thus, government is both legitimate and critically important in order to protect individual rights. Rand opposed so-called “rational anarchism,” because she saw putting police and courts on the market as an inherent miscarriage of justice. Objectivism holds that the proper functions of a government are “the police, to protect men from criminals—the armed services, to protect men from foreign invaders—the law courts, to settle disputes among men according to objectively defined laws,” the executive, and legislatures. Furthermore, in protecting individual rights, the government is acting as an agent of its citizens and “has no rights except the rights delegated to it by the citizens” and it must act in an impartial manner according to specific, objectively defined laws. Prominent Objectivists Leonard Peikoff and Yaron Brook have since expressed support for other government functions
Some critics, such as philosophers Roy Childs, Norman P. Barry, and Chandran Kukathas, have argued that Objectivist ethics are consistent with anarcho-capitalism instead of minarchism
BUT THIS FLUFFY ARTHOUSE CAPITALISM THAT AYN RAND IMAGINES IS JUST NOT POSSIBLE.
AYN RAND DOES NOT UNDERSTAND HUMAN NATURE
ACTUALLY AYN RAND IS DESCRIBING AMERICA 200 YEARS AGO.
UNFORTUNATELY THE GOVERNMENT GREW ,THE POLICE GREW ,THE ARMY GREW AND THE NATIVES WHERE SLAUGHTERED FOR THIER RESOURSES AND THE MASSES WHERE FORCED EVER WESTWARDS LOOKING FOR NEW NATIVE RESOURSES TO STEAL!!!
POWER CORRUPTS AND ABSOLUTE POWER ATTRACKS THE ABSOLUTELY CORRUPT ,
JUST AS MUCH AS IT CORRUPTS THE UNCORRUPTED!!
IF RESOURSES ARE FOR SALE ,THEN THE GREEDY ,POWER HUNGRY AND RUTHLESS WILL END UP WITH THEM
AND GOVERNMENT WILL ALWAYS FIND AN EXCUSE TO USE ITS BRUTE FORCE IF GOVERNMENT FEELS THREATENED
…AND GOVERNEMT WITH POLICE FORCES AND MILTRY FORCES WILL USE THEM
TO THINK THAT GOVERNMENT WOULD NOT AMASS POWER AND THEN DEFEND ITS POWER IS JUST AS DELUSIONAL AS BELIEVING A WORKERS DICTATORSHIP GOVERNMENT WILL JUST WITHER AWAY
EITHER WAY ITS JUST STATE CAPITALISM IN A DIFFERENT WRAPPING….AYN RAND IS JUST AS DELSUIONAL AND UNWORKABLE AS KARL MARX AND HIS PROLETARIAT DICTATORSHIP
“Whether the mask is labeled Fascism, Democracy, or Dictatorship or the Proletariat, our great adversary remains the Apparatus-the bureaucracy, the police, the military…. No matter what the circumstances, the worst betrayal will always be to subordinate ourselves to this Apparatus, and to trample underfoot, in its service, all human values in ourselves and in others.”– The French worker philosopher Simone Weil,1945
“All government, of course, is against liberty. The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary. Most people want security in this world, not liberty.”
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out… without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable. It doesn’t take a majority to make a rebellion; it takes only a few determined leaders and a sound cause.”
OBJECTAVISM IS NOT LIBERTARIANISM
UNRESTRICTED FREE-MARKET CAPITALISM IS NOT LIBERTARIANISM
TRUE LIBERTARIANISM IS AGAINST POLITICAL ,RELIGIOUS ,MORAL AND ECONOMIC AUTHORAITARIANISM!!!
AMERICAN FAKE LIBERTARIANISM (OBJECTAVISM) IS JUST ECONOMIC AUTHORAITARIANISM!!
THESE PEOPLE REFER TO SOCIALISTS AS EVIL.
THEY CONSIDER IT EVIL IF YOU REFUSE TO HAVE YOUR RESOURSES ON THE MARKET PLACE
SO OBJECTAVIST/ANARCHO-CAPITALIST/FAKE LIBERTARIAN…HOW MUCH WOULD YOU SELL YOUR AIR FOR?
REMEMBER YOU ARE EVIL IF YOU DON’T SELL IT, AND REMEMBER YOUR CHILDREN WILL STILL NEED TO BREATH AFTER YOU ARE DEAD!!!
BUT MAINSTREAM MEDIA AND FAKE REVOLUTIONARIES ARE USING THE LIBERTARIAN LABEL TO SELL YOU TO CORPORATE RIGHTS NOT PROTECT YOUR HUMAN RIGHTS AND YOUR NATIVE NATURAL RESOURSES.
THE SOLUTION TO BADLY RUN STATE CAPITALISM IS NOT UNRESTRICTED STATE CAPITALISM
…THIS JUST FREES THE GREEDY AND THOSE THAT DESIRE POWER.
THIS WAS THE SYSTEM IN THE 1600’S ,IT GAVE US ROBBER BARONS ,PRIVATEERS AND LOOTED RESOURSES FROM THE NATIVE PEOPLES
CAPITALISM IS A SYSTEM THAT KNOWS THE PRICE OF EVERYTHING AND THE VALUE OF NOTHING
PLEASE ASK THE INDIGENOUS NATIVE AMERICANS WHAT THEY THOUGHT OF AMERICAN UNRESTRICTED CAPITALISM IN THE 16 AND 1700’S ONWARDS!!!!
IN EUROPE IT ENSLAVED THE MASSES IN FACTORY SWEAT SHOPS ,IN AMERICA IT DROVE THE IMMIGRANT EUROPEAN POPULATION WEST AS THE STOLEN NATIVE RESOURSES GOT BOUGHT UP BY CORPORATE INTERESTS
THOSE THAT DO NOT LEARN FROM HISTORY ARE DOOMED TO REPEAT IT
THAT IS WHAT BIG GOVERNMENT AND BIG CORPORATIONS ARE COUNTING ON
THE SYSTEM IS NOT BROKEN
THIS IS JUST THE SYSTEM REPEATING
Law is stagnation , Conformity is death by boredom and ignorance ,Obedience is for slaves and Specialisation is for insects!