A division of Buk missile systems of the Ukrainian Armed Forces was, according to Pravda, deployed to the Donetsk Oblast on July 15, two days before the downing of the Malaysian airlines MH17 flight. The Buk missile system has the capabilities of downing an aircraft flying at 35,000 feet.
While the Pravda report remains to be confirmed, Russian Defense sources confirm the presence of several missile batteries in the Donesk oblast operated by the Ukraine armed forces:
‘The Ukrainian military has several batteries of Buk surface-to-air missile systems with at least 27 launchers, capable of bringing down high-flying jets, in the Donetsk region where the Malaysian passenger plane crashed, Russian Defense Ministry said”(RT, July 17, 2014) http://www.globalresearch.ca/was-ukraines-ministry-of-interior-behind-the-downing-of-malaysian-airlines-mh17/5391909
Very few mainstream outlets, however, are even considering the possibility that it was the Ukrainian military that shot down the Malaysian plane. This is simply because the goal of this whole ordeal, in addition to overshadowing the genocide taking place in Gaza, is to drum up international hostility toward Russia and the separatists that it supports.
It is also important to point out that nowhere in the mainstream press are there any suggestions of the possibility that it was not a missile that brought down the plane. That is, there is no suggestion of this possibility unless it can be blamed on Russia.
What is notable is the fact that there are emerging reports that the Malaysian flight was actually being escorted by Ukrainian military jets only 3 minutes before it crashed.
This report, released by E Turbo News, a global travel news agency, suggested that, not only was the plane being escorted by Ukrainian military jets but that air traffic records were immediately confiscated after the plane went down. The report suggests that internal communication acknowledged that the Ukrainian military was involved but shed no light on where the shootdown orders came from. Speculation ranging from a simple and tragic accident to an attempted coup by Timoshenko forces against the Presidency of Poroshenko have since arisen.
As E Turbo News reports,
ETN received information from an air traffic controller in Kiev on Malaysia Airlines flight MH17.
This Kiev air traffic controller is a citizen of Spain and was working in the Ukraine. He was taken off duty as a civil air-traffic controller along with other foreigners immediately after a Malaysia Airlines passenger aircraft was shot down over the Eastern Ukraine killing 295 passengers and crew on board.
The air traffic controller suggested in a private evaluation and basing it on military sources in Kiev, that the Ukrainian military was behind this shoot down. Radar records were immediately confiscated after it became clear a passenger jet was shot down.
Military air traffic controllers in internal communication acknowledged the military was involved, and some military chatter said they did not know where the order to shoot down the plane originated from.
Obviously it happened after a series of errors, since the very same plane was escorted by two Ukrainian fighter jets until 3 minutes before it disappeared from radar.
Radar screen shots also show an unexplained change of course of the Malaysian Boeing. The change of course took the aircraft directly over the Eastern Ukraine conflict region.
Some tweets received suggest this may have been a secret military uprising against the current Ukrainian president under the direction of formerly-jailed Prime Minister Timoshenko. http://www.globalresearch.ca/western-media-deception-new-information-and-questions-about-malaysian-flight-mh-17/5392095
TWA 800 ,MH370 AND MH17 COINCIDENCES
The flight 17 crash shares an anniversary with the demise of TWA 800, which AT’s own Jack Cashill has compellingly argued was, in fact, brought down by a missile on July 17, 1996 and subsequently covered up by the US government. And, the maiden flight of flight 17 occurred in 1997 on the date of, you guessed it, July 17.
So “17s” are everywhere. To be sure, though, each of the items in the last paragraph is easily ranged under the heading “coincidence.”
And yet, the evidence presented in this article suggests that MH 370 and MH 17 are linked in ways that might not be due to chance. Both MH 370 and MH 17 appear to have lost communicative contact, and both appear to have veered off course on very unusual routes. How many aircraft of other airlines have done so in recent months, never mind how many of the 55 aircraft over Donetsk did so on July 17? How many aircraft other than MH 17 had their inaugural voyage on the date of July 17?
These considerations suggest that, in fact, in the cases of MH 370 and MH 17 we might not be dealing with a “fair coin.”
MH 17 ALSO LEFT FROM AMSTERDAM, WHERE THE UNDERPANTS BOMBER TOOK OFF FROM! http://www.globalresearch.ca/malaysian-airlines-mh370-and-mh17-a-criminologist-questions-what-are-the-probabilities-is-it-a-mere-coincidence/5392265
Regardless of the true causes of the crash of Malaysian flight 777, it is clear that the world oligarchy is, at the very least, not letting a good crisis go to waste. The ability to distract from Western-backed genocides occurring simultaneously across the world as well as domestic issues and the world economic depression has been conveniently provided by the Malaysian flight shootdown.
But who ever is responsible ,it still means 295 people where murdered in cold blood for some ones delusional ideology and thier mad grasp for control of the centralised authority in the Ukraine.
If we let this get out of control it could mean WWIII and countless more deaths!
Flying over warzone Ukraine, The probable and Convenient Happens JUST LIKE THE UNDERPANTS BOMBER THIS FLIGHT LEFT FROM AMSTERDAM
THE PREVIOUS UNDERPANTS BOMBER WAS A CIA ASSET AND WAS LET THROUGHT AMSTERDAM SECURITY BY A MOSSAD AGENT!
Airport security in Amsterdam is contracted to an Israeli company with the most sophisticated technologies who had developed the concept of security profiling https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2012/05/09/the-second-coming-in-underpants-but-was-it-premature/
OBVIOUSLY THIS ISRAELLI SECURITY COMPANY AND TECHNOLOGY IS COMPLETELY USELESS…OR THEY ARE AIDING AND ABETTING THE TERRORISTS Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 en route from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur crashed in Ukraine near the Russian border. MH17 had 295 people on board — 280 passengers and 15 crew members. Western media has gone into overdrive mode in reporting that the plane was deliberately shot down. Salivating over the story, self-acclaimed pundits are putting the blame on anti-coup Ukrainians and even pointing the finger at Russia even as the crash has not been investigated yet. http://www.globalresearch.ca/mh17-versus-iran-air-655-malaysian-airlines-boeing-777-downed-over-ukraine-kiev-regime-accuses-putin-of-sponsoring-terrorists/5391859
At no juncture during the Ukrainian crisis could the downing of Malaysian Boeing 777 flight MH17 have been more convenient for NATO and its proxy regime in Kiev.
Russia and the fighters operating in eastern Ukraine have nothing to gain by downing a civilian airliner, but absolutely everything to lose – thus pointing the finger in another direction – that of NATO and their proxy regime in Kiev. That the downed aircraft is yet another Malaysian Boeing 777 – the second one this year to be lost under extraordinary circumstances –(apparently the US’s global military satelite surveylance system cannot find a Boeing 777 when it transponder goes off?!) has serendipitously gained maximum attention for propagandists across the West. They have the world’s full and undivided attention with which to pin the blame on Russia and anti-Kiev fighters in eastern Ukraine.
The impetus necessary to unite Europe and other Western allies behind NATO and the US for a more direct intervention in Ukraine where the West is currently floundering is now consuming headlines around the world. If the downing of MH17 was not a case of tragic misidentification, then answering the first question of any investigation, cui bono – or to whose benefit – is answered resoundingly with, “NATO.” http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ea9_1405620477
So far Russia has denied involvement.
From the reports I’ve read Russia and the Ukraine are the only nations in the region that have the capability to shoot down a plane traveling at 30,000ft.
Regardless of who caused it, I’m sure all our thoughts are with the families of the 295 people on board the flight. So far no survivors have been reported.
ISRAEL ALSO BENEFITS
IT ALSO TAKES OUR ATTENTION AWAY FROM THE ISRAELLI WAR CRIMES CURRENTLY BEING INFLICTED IN GAZA
On the ground in Gaza: Batsh family decimated in Israeli air strike
You will not hear much or anything about it from the presstitute US media, and it is unlikely to receive much coverage in Europe. The facts are so greatly at odds with the West’s position that the White Book is a huge embarrassment to the West. The slaughter of Ukrainians on Washington’s orders by Washington’s stooge government in Kiev has worsened considerably in the past three months, producing more than 100,000 Ukrainian refugees fleeing into Russia for protection from strikes against civilian housing from the air, artillery, and tanks. Every effort by the Russian government to involve Washington, the European Union, and Kiev in negotiations to find a peaceful settlement has failed.
Washington is not interested in a settlement. Disturbed by its NATO vassals’ dependence on Russian energy and the growing economic relationships between Russia and Europe, Washington is at work through its Kiev proxy murdering citizens in eastern and southern parts of present-day Ukraine that once were part of Russia.
Washington has declared these civilians to be “terrorists” and is trying to force Russia to intervene militarily in order to protect them. Russia’s protective intervention would then be denounced byWashington as “invasion and annexation.” http://www.globalresearch.ca/washingtons-war-crimes-spread-from-africa-and-the-middle-east-to-ukraine/5389768
ISRAEL, MODERN OR ANCIENT HAS NO RIGHT TO EXIST IN A MODERN 21ST CENTURY CIVILISATION BREAKING NEWS
ISRALLI CLAIMS FOUND TO BE COMPLETELY FALSE!!
ORIGINAL INHABITANTS FOUND!!
SORRY ISRALLIS BUT THIS LAND IS MINE YES ISRAELLIS THE HOLY LAND BELONGS TO ARYAN CELTS!
LOOK AT THE TEMPLE BUILT 12,000BC
AND CHECK THE DNA OF THE ANCIENT PEOPLES
ITS ARYAN CELT DNA
WE CELTS WHERE THIER 10,000 YEARS BEFORE YOU
THE GODS CHOSE TO GIVE THE LEVANT TO US
THE GODS MADE THE ARYAN CELTS THIER CHILDREN AND THIER CHOOSEN ONES
Also known as Eynan (Hebrew) or Mallaha (Arabic), this Natufian village was colonized in three phases. The first two phases were comprised of massive stone-built structures with smaller ones in the third phase. The phases occurred from 12,000 to 9600 BCE.Hundreds of Natufian graves have been excavated in Israel, Jordan, Syria, and Lebanon.In 2008, the grave of a Natufian ‘priestess’ was discovered (in most media reports referred to as a shaman or witch doctor ). The burial contained complete shells of 50 tortoises, which are thought to have been brought to the site and eaten during the funeral feast http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/11/081104-israel-shaman-missions.html
This temple site is the oldest known man-made place of worship.Through the radiocarbon method, the end of stratum III could be determined at circa 9,000 BC ; its beginnings are estimated to 11,000 BC or earlier. Stratum II dates to about 8,000 BC.But the construction of the Göbekli Tepe complex implies organisation of a degree of complexity not hitherto associated with pre-Neolithic societies. The archaeologists estimate that up to 500 persons were required to extract the 10-20 ton pillars (in fact, some weigh up to 50 tons) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6bekli_Tepe https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/03/the-history-of-the-celtic-people/
SO ISRAELLIS YOU WILL BE MOVING OUT NOW TO LET THE ARYAN CELTS HAVE OUR PROMISED LAND BACK?
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS JEWISH DNA!
JUST AS THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS CHRISTIAN OR ISLAMIC DNA
THESE ARE JUST DELUSIONAL BELIEFS NOT RACES OF PEOPLE
FYI YOU CAN MOST DEFINATELY FIND ARAB DNA JUST LIKE YOU CAN FIND CELTIC DNA.
…SO SURELY THIS MEANS ITS THE JEWS THAT ARE THE INVENTED PEOPLE https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2012/03/16/israellis-are-the-invented-people-and-anti-semitic/ https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2013/03/16/a-conversation-with-a-zionist/ Meanwhile in reality……
Most modern Israellis are just delusional Eastern Europeans who have had thier foreskins stolen and are now persecuting the descendants of the ancient hebrews ,most of which converted to Islam a thousand years ago!
CAN WE PLEASE STOP MASSACRING EACH OTHER FOR TALKING SNAKES ,IMMACULANT CONCEPTIONS ,GODS MADE FROM CRACKERS AND WINE,THAT COLLECT FORSKINS AND DO REAL ESTATE DEALS, AND WORSHIP OF MOON(ISLAM) , STARS(JUDAISM) AND TORTURE DEVICES(CHRISTIANITY)
DO YOU THINK SLAUGHTERING EACH OTHER IN THE NAME OF A “GOD OF LOVE” MAKES ANY SENSE WHAT SO EVER?
A BELIEF IN GOD OR GODS IS IRRELEVENT
IT WOULD BE A GODS BELIEF IN YOU, THAT WOULD BE RELEVENT!
IF YOU THINK THE WORLD IS A DARK AND SMELLY PLACE
IT IS BECAUSE YOU HAVE YOUR HEAD SHOVED UP YOUR ASS
PLEASE PULL IT OUT AND SEE THE WORLD FOR WHAT IT IS
WE ARE STAR STUFF ,HARVESTING STAR LIGHT
A SPECK OF DUST SUSPENDED IN A SUN BEAM
WE ARE A FINITE PIECE OF INFINITE POSSIBLITY….UNLESS YOU PRIMITIVE DELUSIONAL BARBARIC FUCKWITS BLOW IT UP!
ABRAHAMIC MONOTHEISTS FUCK YOU AND YOUR INVENTED GOD!
FUCK YOUR DELUSIONAL IGNORANCE AND YOUR ARRONGANCE
YOU WILL PROBABLY BE THE DEATH OF US ALL
…TRYING TO BRING “YOUR GOD” TO EARTH ON HIS WHITE HORSE ,SO YOU CAN RULE BY HIS SIDE….A GREAT PLOT FOR CONAN THE BARBARIAN……A VERY BAD IDEA TO BASE A SERIOUS RELIGION ON!
NEVER HEARD OF A SELF FULLFILLING PROPHECY?
A self-fulfilling prophecy is a prediction that directly or indirectly causes itself to become true, by the very terms of the prophecy itself, due to positive feedback between belief and behavior. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-fulfilling_prophecy THE REST OF THE WORLD IS REALLY NOT IMPRESSED WITH YOUR BELIEFS OR YOUR BEHAVIOUR
MOST MODERN CULTURES HAVE MANAGED TO STOP BELIEVING THIER PRIMITIVE INVENTED GODS CHOSE THEM AS DIVINE RULERS!
ABRAHAMIC MONOTHEISTS PLEASE GROW UP!!
Tory child abuse whistleblower: ‘I supplied underage rent boys for Margaret Thatcher’s cabinet ministers’
Whistleblower and former Conservative party activist Anthony Gilberthorpe says he provided child prostitutes for a sex and drugs party with top politicians
Senior Tory cabinet ministers were supplied with underage boys for sex parties, it is sensationally claimed.
Former Conservative activist Anthony Gilberthorpe said he told Margaret Thatcher 25 years ago about what he had witnessed and gave her names of those involved.
His allegations that he saw top Tories having sex with boys comes after David Cameron launched a Government inquiry into claims of a cover-up.
Anthony, 52, said: “I am prepared to speak to the inquiry. I believe I am a key witness.”
Trawling seedy streets during a Tory conference, Gilberthorpe says he was asked to find underage rent boys for a private sex party at a top hotel.
Today, more than three decades later, he claims he was acting on the orders of some of the most senior figures of Margaret Thatcher’s government.
Anthony says he was a full-time political activist when he helped procure the “youngest and prettiest” boys for several cabinet ministers after being told to find “entertainment”.
In a series of explosive claims about conferences at Blackpool and Brighton in the 1980s, he alleges boys as young as 15 indulged in alcohol and cocaine before they had sex with the powerful politicians.
He says one person who attended a party is a current serving minister.
Others said to be present at the parties included Keith Joseph, Rhodes Boyson, Dr Alistair Smith and Michael Havers
As a young aspiring politician, Mr Gilberthorpe admits being in awe of the men, but now insists: “They manipulated and groomed me to do their bidding.”
He said: “I was just 17 when I first went to a conference in Brighton in 1978. I couldn’t believe I was rubbing shoulders with all these important people and I couldn’t believe that they were taking such a keen interest in me. I would have done anything for them because I was so desperate to make it in politics.
“During the years I was attending conferences between 1978 and 1985, I was a full-time political activist. At the same time I was running for office in district and county council elections.”
Cabinet Minister: Former Education Secretary Keith Joseph
Cabinet Minister: Former Education Secretary Keith Joseph
Mr Gilberthorpe claims that at the 1983 Blackpool conference he was asked by Dr Alistair Smith – the Tory Party Chairman in Scotland – to arrange for young rent boys to have sex with two high-profile cabinet ministers, who we are not naming today.
Other MPs at that party were said to include Rhodes Boyson and Keith Joseph.
In that week he presented the then-Prime Minister Mrs Thatcher with a cake to mark her 58th birthday. But he says he also had a more sordid role – using his young looks to find these underage boys for her ministers.
At the time, the age of consent made it illegal to have gay sex with anyone under 21-years-old.
He said: “Dr Smith, who I looked up to at the time and was the most important Tory in Scotland, told me to go and fetch some ‘entertainment’, which was code for young boys and handed me a handful of bank notes. There was about £120.”
Mr Gilber-thorpe claims he was not shocked by the request.
He said: “It was a norm and an open secret that these older members of the Tory party, like
Dr Alistair Smith, paid for young men to join them at sex parties.
“It was the first time I was asked to fetch them but it was hardly surprising as I was becoming one of their trusted people. There was a well known and used cruising area close to the Imperial Hotel, which was a conference hotel. The hotel was not open to the public.
“I was expected to find the youngest and prettiest boys. It was what those men wanted.
“In fact it was all they wanted.
“So myself and another Tory candidate walked down there and sat on some benches underneath an archway in the Pavilion area of Blackpool and waited.”
Attorney General: Lord Michael Havers
Attorney General: Lord Michael Havers
He said they were approached within minutes by a “guy aged about 20” called James. He went on: “I asked him if he wanted to come back to the hotel and he said ‘yes’.
We asked if he had any mates and he went away and came back with two boys who were aged about 15 and no older.
“It was a surreal situation as we were dressed in suits and ties and they were wearing jeans.
“We said we would make it worth their while and the older one held out his hand and I passed him the money to share out. I promised him there would be plentiful amounts of free booze.”
Mr Gilberthorpe claims he then asked hotel security to contact a man inside who worked at the Conservative Party Central Office to arrange for the three rent boys to be given security clearance and special badges that would allow them to enter the Imperial.
He said: “All MPs, members of the National Executive and chosen delegates were given name badges that allowed you access to the conference hotel.
“Some of them had a small Oscar sign in the corner which was a code to allow others to know you were allowed into these secret parties.” He claimed the Hollywood-style Oscar symbol was actually in honour of gay writer and poet Oscar Wilde. Once inside the Imperial, he says the group walked up several flights of stairs to a room where politicians were waiting for them, along with a table of cocaine
In attendance: Rhodes Boyson at the Conservative party conference in Blackpool, 1987
In attendance: Rhodes Boyson at the Conservative party conference in Blackpool, 1987
He said: “We took them straight upstairs and into a room where Dr Smith and other MPs were waiting for them at the party. They were given drinks and cocaine to snort and then they were all moved into the centre of the room.”
Mr Gilberthorpe said he witnessed two senior Tories having sex with the boys. He said: “A couple of other MPs were in the room. I can clearly remember seeing one politician, who is now a serving Tory MP, standing there and watching.”
Mr Gilberthorpe also claims that two years earlier in 1981 he saw Sir Michael Havers – then Attorney General – at a swimming pool party at the Tory conference in Blackpool, where underage boys were encouraged to perform sex acts on several politicians, who we are also not naming today.
He recalled: “In 1981 I was invited back to the Imperial Hotel by a Conservative councillor.
“He was a big player in the notorious right-wing group the Monday Club.
“We arrived at around midnight and I was led down some stairs to a door where two men were stood as security.
“We were allowed to enter and I was led through a tiled changing room where there were piles of clothes strewn across the floor. We then walked into an area where there was a large pool and lots of men either stood around naked or simply wrapped in towels.
“Among the MPs I recognised in there were Keith Joseph and Rhodes Boyson. I saw the Attorney General Michael Havers down there as well.
“There were a couple of glass tables set up as a mini bar with bottles of spirits on them and there was cocaine on several tables. I saw several boys who were clearly aged between 15 and 16 down there and I saw that a few were performing sex acts on MPs.
“Other young men were acting as waiters walking around with little black bow ties on. I was completely shocked by it because I was still only 20 and I had never seen anything like it.”
He added: “I stayed for a couple of hours but was tired because a conference was always a boozy affair where mainly spirits were drunk in large quantities from about 5pm onwards.”
Request: Smith ‘asked for young boys’
Mr Gilberthorpe, now 52, says he also attended a sex party at the Grand Hotel in Brighton during the Conservatives’ 1984 conference.
On the night before the seafront hotel was hit by an IRA bomb attack, he claims he saw senior MPs engaging in sex acts with boys below the age of consent at a “corridor party” held in a row of rooms on the fourth floor.
He said: “There were two guys on the door at the end of the corridor and because we were in the group I was allowed to enter. Several doors were left open and others were closed. “There were several men walking from one room to another and enjoying sex acts with other naked men, including boys who were clearly only about 15 or 16 years old. I saw Keith Joseph there and a politician who is now still a serving MP.
“It was held on the night before the bomb went off and afterwards one MP crudely joked that it was a good job it was, or there would have been rent boys falling through the floor.”
Mr Gilberthorpe, who decided to finally break his silence because he fears an Establishment cover-up, also claims that in the aftermath of the bombing, in which five people were killed, he was asked to look after two rent boys.
He said: “I rushed over there from my hotel after I heard the blast and saw Keith Joseph stood outside in a blanket.”
Yesterday he said: “I was a teenager when I first met these men and they manipulated me and groomed me to do their bidding.
“Because they were the most powerful men in the land, I was led to believe it was all OK. In truth they were abusers and once they had tired of me they simply discarded me. It is time this came to light before anyone else is abused. “They didn’t think they were doing anything wrong and it was the norm then. They felt untouchable.” http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/tory-child-abuse-whistleblower-i-3848987
Tory child abuse whistleblower: ‘Margaret Thatcher knew all about underage sex ring among ministers’
Former activist Anthony Gilberthorpe says he sent Thatcher a 40-page dossier in 1989 accusing Cabinet members of abusing underage boys
Thatcher and Gilberthorpe
Her former Parliamentary Private Secretary Sir Peter Morrison has already been named in connection with a probe into the Bryn Estyn children’s home in Wrexham where Jimmy Savile allegedly molested boys.
Mrs Thatcher lobbied for Savile to be given a knighthood and he visited her at Chequers on at least 11 occasions.
The late MP Geoffrey Dickens also passed a list of names of prominent government figures involved in child sex abuse to Mrs Thatcher’s Home Secretary Leon Brittan. The list was “lost” by the Home Office.
Former High Court judge Baroness Butler-Sloss
Details of Mr Gilberthorpe’s evidence emerged as retired judge Baroness Butler-Sloss came under growing pressure to stand down as head of the Westminster child abuse inquiry.
She is accused of keeping allegations about a bishop out of a review of how the Church of England dealt with two paedophile priests because she “cared about the church.”
Now, she faces fresh criticism over her admission of the key role of Lord Havers in the Cleveland child sex abuse inquiry in 1987 which she led.
Asked who instigated the Cleveland inquiry in 2003 Lady Butler-Sloss replied: “I think it was my brother actually as Lord Chancellor.” A key part of the Thatcher era was her emphasis on “family values” and personal morality.
at around the same time the former PM’s Parliamentary Private secretary, the late sir Peter Morrison, was indulging his sexual appetite for boys as young as 15. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/tory-child-abuse-whistleblower-margaret-3849172
Margaret Thatcher ‘personally covered up’ child abuse allegations against senior ministers
The Tory Prime Minister is said to have held a meeting with a rising star, who was tipped for promotion, and told him: “You have to clean up your sexual act”
Margaret Thatcher personally covered up child abuse allegations made against one of her senior ministers, according to explosive new claims. The Sunday People reports Tory Prime Minister is said to have held a high-powered meeting with the rising star, who was being tipped for promotion, and told him: “You have to clean up your sexual act.”
It followed an allegation that the minister had sexually abused young boys at the home of one of his political allies in 1982.
However the minister apparently ignored the warnings. It is claimed that four years later he was spotted by police seeking young boys for sex at Victoria railway station in London.
But no action was taken.
The extraordinary claims – made to the Sunday People by a source with inside knowledge of Scotland Yard in the early 1980s – are now expected to be put before the
Westminster child abuse inquiry announced last week by the Prime Minister.
They go to the very heart of claims that there was an Establishment cover-up to protect politicians , judges and police officers involved in a sick paedophile network.
According to the source, the minister’s alleged interest in abusing young boys first came to light after he stayed at the home of a constituency agent.
The agent, responsible for securing local election success for the Tory MP, is believed to have alerted authorities. A high-level meeting involving then Prime Minister Mrs Thatcher, Home Secretary Willie Whitelaw, a senior policeman and an MI5 officer was held to discuss his alleged behaviour.
The minister, according to the source, was then summoned to 10 Downing Street.
But, instead of being disciplined or sacked, the minister was warned about his future behaviour and the matter was swept under the carpet.
Four years later, fresh allegations surfaced
Request: Smith ‘asked for young boys’
In 1986, the politician was alleged to have been found seeking rent boys in the men’s toilets at Victoria railway station in central London Alec Marnoch, a highly respected police officer and Operations Commander of the Yard’s No 8 Area which covers Westminster and the West End.
Mr Marnoch, who died aged 58 in 1999 soon after his retirement, also intimated to the source that police working in Piccadilly Circus had got a report of the same politician importuning at one of London’s most notorious rent-boy haunts – the “chicken rack”.
The “chicken rack” was a set of metal railings close to Piccadilly underground station which was a vice hotspot in the 1980s.
Boys as young as 13 waited there to be picked up by men for sex – often VIPs such as politicians, TV stars or even policemen
The Sunday People has been leading the way since Mr Watson first stunned Parliament and PM David Cameron in October 2012 with claims of a high-profile paedophile network with links to 10 Downing Street.
Since breaking the story, we have produced a string of exclusives about the alleged VIP paedophile ring and reveal how far it reached. We first revealed the existence of the “Dickens dossier” which was handed to then Home Secretary Leon Brittan.
Its disappearance has prompted the Butler-Sloss inquiry.
The dossier, compiled by now-dead MP Geoffrey Dickens , contained information that would blow the lid off a secret VIP paedophile network, according to Mr Dickens’s son Barry.
He says that in the weeks after his father submitted the dossier, the family’s home was twice “professionally” burgled.
The Home Office admits there is no trace of the dossier and that 114 “potentially relevant files” have been destroyed or lost.
The Home Office was forced to defend Baroness Butler-Sloss, 80, after it was claimed she buried allegations about a bishop from a child-abuse review in 2011.
She reportedly told a victim she did not want to include the allegations in a review of how the Church of England dealt with two paedophile priests because she “cared about the Church” and “the Press would love a bishop”. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/margaret-thatcher-personally-covered-up-3848836 https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2013/02/20/paedophiles-in-panic-timebomb-at-elm-guest-house-pop-stars-a-bishop-and-a-top-politician-appear-on-a-list-seized-by-police-investigating-child-abuse-at-the-london-hotel-in-the1980s/
HAS ANYTHING BEEN DONE ABOUT THESE CHILD MOLESTORS?
IN FACT A ROLLING COMMITTEE WAS SET UP TO PROTECT THESE MOLESTORS
The Sunday Times is reported to have obtained an FBI list of Labour MPs who have used credit cards to pay for internet child pornography, and Blair has responded by imposing a massive news blackout, failing however to stop the arrest of one of his most important aides, Phillip Lyon.The controversy [was] certain to topple the Blair government, which has already issued a D-Notice to gag the press from revealing the names of known paedophiles within the British executive, including at least two senior ministers; and the case highlights the government’s antipathy toward the Sunday Herald and its brand of independent journalism that has, among other things, exposed the role played by the domestic security agency, MI5, in helping the IRA to carry out terrorist atrocities. Also revealed by the Sunday Herald’s Home Affairs Editor, Neil Mackay, the British intelligence services are actively engaged in preventing any further child sex revelations that could incite further hostility to an already unpopular Prime Minister and destroy the morale of troops set to invade Iraq. An intelligence officer told Mackay that “a ‘rolling’ Cabinet committee had been set up to work out how to deal with the potentially ruinous fall-out for both Tony Blair and the government if arrests occur. THE ROLLING CABINET COMMITTEE CONTINUES
IN FACT DAVID CAMERON CONTINUES TO WORK WITH AND PROTECT CHILD MOLESTORS https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2014/03/05/david-cameron-is-covering-for-paedophiles-again/
Direct democracy, classically termed pure democracy, is a form of democracy and a theory of civics in which sovereignty is lodged in the assembly of all citizens who choose to participate. Depending on the particular system, this assembly might pass executive motions, make laws, elect or dismiss officials, and conduct trials. Direct democracy stands in contrast to representative democracy, (UK, EU system)where sovereignty is exercised by a subset of the people, usually on the basis of election. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_democracy Our “subset of the people” , all have the same financial backers and lobby groups, and are therefore a one-party-system of elected dictatorship! The Tweedle dum and Tweedle Dee of representative democracy!
Let me put this simply The PROVEN track records of Direct Democracy and Representative Democracy are… Direct Democracy means more freedom ,more prosperity ,less political corruption ,less war ,more criminal elites being arrested. Representative Democracy means less freedom ,less prosperity ,more political corruption ,more war and criminals elites are above the law.
People who believed in a society without a centralised social power system included Thomas Piane ,Adam Smith ,Karl Marx , Lenin and most progressive free thinkers People who believed in a society with a centralised social power system included Hitler ,Mussolini , Stalin , Thatcher ,Blair ,Cameron and most indoctrinated political non-thinkers Do you feel in good company supportting centralised authorities?
Centralised authorities ignore the laws of Thermodynamics! It does not matter if you are a super massive black hole or the leader of a political social movement you cannot defy the laws of thermodynamics! The more you impose law, the more you accelerate chaos! Think people!! How can passing a law reduce crime? It just creates a new criminal class! …and therefore increases crime….and social chaos! We have a law against murder. BUT the state now trains our youth to murder and gives them opertunity to do so ,free of any criminal repurcusion! If you are in the armed forces YOU ARE FREE FROM CIVILIAN LAW!! Centralised authorities can pardon crimes ,just like priests can pardon sins! This includes murder ,rape and destruction. I know, I have a friend that drunkenly stole a tank and killed 2 people by accident! He was British army so the locals could do nothing about it! ..and this is nothing compared to some of the stories I’ve heard!! We have military death drones killing people globally!! The Japanese are tried of having thier young girls raped by US marines and nothing can be done about that either! Because this is the law according to the centralised authority….as it would be awkward if our “glorious liberation forces” were all arrested by the local authorites for mass murder ,rape and bombings!! …but people still cheer our taxpayer funded invasion forces,which spread murder and mayhem and war crimes,instead of a militia army which could insure our national security without war crimes, and keep voting for the monkey in the red ,blue or orange rossette,who just sits and throws sh1t at monkeys with different rossettes,while stealing the nations wealth….. and we wonder why the world is so f*cked up?!?!?!
POLITIONS ARE THE PROBLEM NOT THE SOLUTION (I used to think they where useless until I realised that they are bio-degradable) 😉 STOP THE ROT! DEMAND DIRECT DEMOCRACY TODAY!
In reply to Craig Murray’s post a good idea ,the killing of Tony Blair… http://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2014/03/a-good-idea/
Craig,an even Better Idea is Direct Democracy!
Will Direct Democracy solve all the nations problems…NO!!!!
But things WILL IMPROVE DRASTICALLY!!!
Let me REPEAT
The PROVEN track records of Direct Democracy and Representative Democracy are…
Direct Democracy means more freedom ,more prosperity ,less political corruption ,less war ,more criminal elites being arrested.
Representative Democracy means less freedom ,less prosperity ,more political corruption ,more war and criminals elites are above the law.
Many people try to fight the branches of evil, very few try to strike at ITS ROOTS!!
Direct Democracy is political weedkiller!!
SO how do we achieve a Direct Democracy?
Nothing really changes
We just constitutionally make the people the highest executive in the land!
As it should be in a democracy.
We look at Switzerland and Iceland where Direct Democracy has worked successfully for 100’s of years, and figure out what is the best line to set for a referendum? (100,000 names in a 100 days for example)
That is all it takes!
Local government would become much more powerful…here is one solution explained.
and here is our British democracy explained
Personally I would like to see added to a PR voting system the “empty seat” or anarchist option. So if 10% vote for this we leave 10% of the seats empty, but the remaining politions would still have to get over 50% of the parliment to agree!
(If parliment was 200 seats and a 10% anarchist vote, then only 180 seats are filled.
BUT it would still take 101 votes to pass a law!)
This also gives the oppertunity for the centralised authority to naturally wither away as it becomes more obvious it is not needed…just as Karl Marx and Adam Smith intended
…If ANY of this is beyond your capabilities then you are retarded!….OR YOU have succomed to “Stockholmn syndrome” and now sympathise with your oppressors and your chains give you comfort!
SO WHO IS OSBOURNE SUPPORTTING IN THE UKRAINE WITH A BRITISH OPEN CHEQUE BOOK?
THE NEO-NAZI RIGHT SECTOR!!!
Democracy Murdered By Protest: Ukraine Falls To Intrigue and Violence.
In western Ukraine the only organized and armed force is the ultra-nationalist Right Sector. From the way this group’s leaders speak, they assume that they are in charge.
One of the group’s leaders, Aleksandr Muzychko, has pledged to fight against “Jews and Russians until I die.” Asserting the Right Sector’s authority over the situation, Muzychko declared that now that the democratically elected government has been overthrown, “there will be order and discipline” or “Right Sector squads will shoot the bastards on the spot.”
The bastards are any protesters who dare to protest the Right Sector’s control.
Muzychko declared, “The next president of Ukraine will be from Right Sector.”
Another Right Sector leader, Dmitry Yarosh, declared: “the Right Sector will not lay down its arms.” He declared the deal made between the opposition and the President to be “unacceptable” and demanded the liquidation of President Yanukovich’s political party.
The Right Sector’s roots go back to the Ukrainians who fought for Adolf Hitler against the Soviet Union during World War 2. It was the Right Sector that introduced armed fighters and turned the tide of the protests in Kiev from peaceful protests in favor of joining the EU to violent attacks on police with the view of overthrowing the democratically elected government, which the Right Sector succeeded in doing.
The Right Sector did not overthrow the Ukraine government in order to deliver it into the hands of the Washington and EU paid “opposition.”
There is a tendency to discount the Right Sector as a small fringe group, but the Right Sector not only took control of the protests away from the Western supported moderates, as moderate leaders themselves admitted, but also the Right Sector has enough public support to destroy the national monument to the Red Army soldiers who died liberating Ukraine from Nazi Germany.If the Right Sector hates Russians for defeating the Nazis, the Right Sector also hates the US, France, and England for the same reason. The Right Sector is an unlikely political party to take Ukraine into the EU.
Provincial governments in eastern and southern Ukraine that formerly were part of Russia are organizing militias against the ultra-nationalist threat unleashed by Washington’s stupidity and incompetence and by the naive and gullible Kiev protesters.
Having interfered in Ukraine’s internal affairs and lost control, Washington is now issuing ultimatums to Russia not to interfere in Ukraine. Does the idiot Susan Rice, Obama’s neoconservative National Security Advisor, think Putin is going to pay any attention to her ultimatums or to any instruction from a government so militarily incompetent that it was unable to successfully occupy Baghdad after 8 years or to defeat a few thousand lightly armed Taliban after 12 years? In only took a few hours for Russian troops to destroy the American and Israeli trained and armed Georgian army that Washington sent to invade South Ossetia.
Where does Obama find morons like Susan Rice and Victoria Nuland? These two belong in a kindergarten for mentally handicapped children, not in the government of a superpower where their ignorance and arrogance can start World War 3.
The Ukrainian right-wing is in a stronger position than Washington’s paid Ukrainian puppets, essentially weak and irrelevant persons who sold out their country for Washington’s money. The Right Sector is organized. It is armed. It is indigenous. It is not dependent on money funneled in from Washington and EU financed NGOs. It has an ideology, and it is focused. The Right Sector doesn’t have to pay its protesters to take to the streets like Washington had to do.
The American media is a useless news source. It serves as a Ministry for Government Lies. The corrupt propagandists are portraying the undemocratic removal of Yanukovich as a victory for freedom and democracy. When it begins to leak out that everything has gone wrong, the presstitutes will blame it all on Russia and Putin. The Western media is a plague upon humanity. http://www.globalresearch.ca/democracy-murdered-by-protest-ukraine-falls-to-intrigue-and-violence/5370317
Sources: http://rt.com/news/ukraine-right-sector-militants-210/ http://rt.com/news/war-monument-toppled-ukraine-351/ http://rt.com/news/ukraine-acting-president-yanukovich-339/ http://rt.com/news/ukraine-opposition-yanukovich-coup-273/ http://www.themoscowtimes.com/news/article/russia-pledges-to-fight-for-crimea-if-ukraine-splits/495034.html http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-26312008 http://www.channel4.com/news/kiev-svoboda-far-right-protests-right-sector-riot-police
CIA Agent Captured in Ukraine Helping Protesters
20 Feb 2014
A CIA agent has allegedly been captured in the Ukraine, as shown in the video. The Special Activities Division (SAD) is a division in the United States Central Intelligence Agency’s (CIA) National Clandestine Service (NCS), responsible for covert operations known as “special activities”. Within SAD there are two separate groups, SAD/SOG for tactical paramilitary operations and SAD/PAG for covert political action. Special Operations Group (SOG) is the department within SAD responsible for operations that include the collection of intelligence in hostile countries and regions, and all high threat military or intelligence operations with which the U.S. government does not wish to be overtly associated. As such, members of the unit (called Paramilitary Operations Officers and Specialized Skills Officers) normally do not carry any objects or clothing (i.e., military uniforms) that would associate them with the US government. NOTICE I.D. IS WRITTEN IN ENGLISH
NOT UKRAINE OR RUSSIAN OR EVEN GERMAN
VIDEO HERE http://beforeitsnews.com/war-and-conflict/2014/02/cia-agent-captured-in-ukraine-helping-ukranian-protesters-video-here-2450486.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Gladio
COINCIDENTLY THIS ALL KICKED OFF WHEN THE UKRAINE DECIDED NOT TO JOIN THE EU AND SIGNED A DEAL WITH RUSSIA IT SEEMS LIKE ANOTHER FALSE FLAG FAKE COLOUR REVOLUTION BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE US/UK/EU AND THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA PROPAGANDA SERVICES THIS TIME THEY ARE SUPPORTTING THE EXTREME RIGHT AND NEO-NAZIS!! ..AND CLAIMING THEY ARE HUMANITARIAN AND DEMOCRATIC APPARENTLY JUST LIKE IN LYBIA WHERE THE AL QUADA FLAG NOW FLIES WHERE A SECULAR DIRECT DEMOCRACY WITH THE HIGHEST STANDARDS OF LIVING IN AFRICA USED TO BE ALL THANKS TO THE USA ,UK AND NATO!!
The recent protests in Ukraine have the stench of a foreign-orchestrated attempt to destabilize the government of Viktor Yanukovych after he walked away from signing an EU Association Agreement that would have driven a deep wedge between Russia and Ukraine. Glamor-star boxer-turned political guru, Vitaly Klitschko, has been meeting with the US State Department and is close to Angela Merkel’s CDU political machine in Germany. The EU association agreement with Ukraine is widely resisted by many EU member states with deep economic problems of their own. The two EU figures most pushing it—Swedish Foreign Minister Carl Bildt and Polish Foreign Minister Radosław Sikorski—are both well known in the EU as close to Washington. The US is strongly pushing the Ukraine EU integration just as it had been behind the 2004 failed “Orange Revolution” to split Ukraine from Russia in a bid to isolate and weaken Russia. Now Ukrainians have found evidence of direct involvement of the Belgrade US-financed training group, CANVAS behind the carefully-orchestrated Kiev protests. A copy of the pamphlet that was given out to opposition protestors in Kiev has been obtained. It is a word-for-word and picture-for-picture translation of the pamphlet used by US-financed Canvas organizers in the 2011 Cairo Tahrir Square protests that toppled Hosni Mubarak and opened the door to the US-backed Muslim Brotherhood. The photo below is a side-by-side comparison:
The photo left is from Tahrir Square; the right from Kiev and here below is the English original used by the Belgrade CANVAS NGO:
Canvas, formerly Otpor, received significant money from the US State Department in 2000 to stage the first successful Color Revolution against Slobodan Milosovic in then-Yugoslavia. Since then they have been transformed into a full-time “revolution consultancy” for the US, posing as a Serbian grass-root group backing “democracy.”  Who would ever think a Serbian-based NGO would be a front for US-backed regime change?
The Strange Ukraine “Opposition”
Direct sources in Kiev that I have contacted report that the anti-government protestors have been recruited with money from among university students and unemplyed to come by bus into the heart of Kiev. The revealing aspect is the spectacular emergence of champion boxed Vitaly Klitschko as presumably the wise politician guiding Ukraine’s future. No doubt spending your career beating other boxers unconscious is a superb preparation for becoming a statesman, though I for one doubt it. It reminds of the choice of a low-grade Hollywood movie actor, Ronald Reagan as President. But more interesting about “opposition” spokesman Klitschko is who his friends are.
Klitschko is being backed by US Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland. Nuland, former US Ambassador to NATO, is a neo-conservative married to leading neo-conservative hawk, Robert Kagan, and was herself a former adviser to Dick Cheney. 
Klitschko is also very friendly with German Chancellor Merkel. According to a recent Der Spiegel report, Merkel wants to support Klitschko in his bid to become Ukraine’s president in 2015. 
More evidence that a darker agenda lies behind the “democracy” opposition is the fact that the demands of the protestors went from demanding accession to the EU to demanding the immediate resignation of the Yanukovich government. Klitschko and the opposition used an unfortunate police crackdown on protesters to massively expand the protest from a few hundred to tens of thousands. On December 18, the government took the wind partly out of the Klitschko sails by signing a major economic agreement with Moscow in which Russia agreed to cut the price of Russian gas exported to Ukraine by a third, down to $268.5 per 1,000 cubic meters from the current level of more than $400, and to buy $15 billion of Ukraine’s debt in eurobonds. That gives Ukraine breathing room to avoid a sovereign debt default and calmly negotiate over its future.
NATO Obama and Cameron are determined to spread dictatorship and centralised authority globally ,and to stamp out freedom democracy and human rights where ever they appear.They have already turned the USA and the UK into prison colonies, where every word and action is monitored!
THE FOREIGN POLICY IS TO SPREAD SHARIA LAW AND CREATE THEOCRATIC ISLAMIC STATES NOT DEMOCRATIC SECULAR STATES THEY DO THIS USING ISLAMIC TERRORISTS AS FIGHTERS
…IN EUROPE IN THE 70’S AND 80’S THEY USED THE CIA AND MI5 AND BLAMED THE SOCIALISTS
BUT THE WAR IS NOT GOING ACCORDING TO PLAN
FREEDOM IS NOT THAT EASY TO STAMP OUT
IN LYBIA THE COUNTER REVOLUTION IS WELL UNDER WAY
IN SYRIA THE WAR IS ALL BUT LOST
The Secret War in Libya
The battles currently raging in the South of Libya are no mere tribal clashes. Instead, they represent a possible burgeoning alliance between black Libyan ethnic groups and pro-Gaddafi forces intent upon liberating their country of a neocolonial NATO-installed government.
On Saturday January 18th, a group of heavily armed fighters stormed an air force base outside the city ofSabha in southern Libya, expelling forces loyal to the “government” of Prime Minister Ali Zeidan, and occupying the base. At the same time, reports from inside the country began to trickle in that the green flag of the Great Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya was flying over a number of cities throughout the country.
Despite the dearth of verifiable information – the government inTripoli has provided only vague details and corroboration – one thing is certain: the war for Libya continues. On the Ground Libya’s Prime Minister Ali Zeidan called an emergency session of the General National Congress to declare a state of alert for the country after news of the storming of the air base broke. The Prime Minister announced that he had ordered troops south to quell the rebellion, telling reporters that, “This confrontation is continuing but in a few hours it will be solved.” A spokesman for the Defense Ministry later claimed that the central government had reclaimed control of the air base, stating that “A force was readied, then aircraft moved and took off and dealt with the targets…The situation in the south opened a chance for some criminals…loyal to the Gaddafi regime to exploit this and to attack the Tamahind air force base…We will protect the revolution and the Libyan people.”
In addition to the assault on the airbase, there have been other attacks on individual members of the government in Tripoli. The highest profile incident was the recent assassination of the Deputy Industry Minister Hassan al-Droui in the city of Sirte. Although it is still unclear whether he was killed by Islamist forces or Green resistance fighters, the unmistakable fact is that the central government is under assault and is unable to exercise true authority or provide security in the country.
Many have begun speculating that his killing, rather than being an isolated, targeted assassination, is part of a growing trend of resistance in which pro-Gaddafi Green fighters figure prominently.
The rise of the Green resistance forces in Sabha and elsewhere is merely one part of larger and more complex political and military calculus in the South where a number of tribes and various ethnic groups have risen against what they correctly perceive to be their political, economic, and social marginalization.
Groups such as the Tawergha and Tobou ethnic minorities, both of which are black African groups, have endured vicious attacks at the hands of Arab militias with no support from the central government. Not only have these and other groups been the victims of ethnic cleansing, but they have been systematically shut out of participation in Libyan political and economic life. The tensions came to a head earlier this month when a rebel chief from the Arab Awled Sleiman tribe was killed.
Rather than an official investigation or legal process, the Awled tribesmen attacked their black Toubou neighbors, accusing them of involvement in the murder. The resulting clashes have since killed dozens, once again demonstrating that the dominant Arab groups still view their dark skinned neighbors as something other than countrymen.
Undoubtedly, this has led to a reorganization of the alliances in the region, with the Toubou, Tuareg and other black minority groups that inhabit southern Libya, northern Chad and Niger moving closer to the pro-Gaddafi forces. Whether or not these alliances are formal or not still remains unclear, however it is apparent that many groups in Libya have come to the realization that the government installed by NATO has not lived up to its promises, and that something must be done. The Politics of Race in Libya Despite the high-minded rhetoric from Western interventionists regarding “democracy” and “freedom” in Libya, the reality is far from it, especially for dark skinned Libyans who have seen their socioeconomic and political status diminished with the end of the Jamahiriya government of Muammar Gaddafi.
While these peoples enjoyed a large measure of political equality and protection under the law in Gaddafi’s Libya, the post-Gaddafi era has seen their rights all but stripped from them. Rather than being integrated into a new democratic state, the black Libyan groups have been systematically excluded. In fact, even Human Rights Watch – an organization which in no small measure helped to justify the NATO war by falsely claiming that Gaddafi forces used rape as a weapon and were preparing “imminent genocide” – has reported that, “A crime against humanity of mass forced displacement continues unabated, as militias mainly from Misrata prevented 40,000 people from the town of Tawergha from returning to their homes from where they had been expelled in 2011.” This fact, coupled with the horrific stories and images of lynchings, rapes, and other crimes against humanity, paints a very bleak picture of life in Libya for these groups. In its 2011 report, Amnesty International documented a number of flagrant war crimes carried out by the so called “freedom fighters” of Libya who, despite being hailed in the Western media as “liberators”, used the opportunity of the war to carry out mass executions of black Libyans as well as rival clans and ethnic groups.
This is of course in stark contrast to the treatment of black Libyans under the Jamahiriya government of Gaddafi which was praised up and down by the Human Rights Council of the United Nations in their 2011 report which noted that Gaddafi had gone to great lengths to ensure economic and social development, as well as specifically providing economic opportunities and political protections to black Libyans and migrant workers from neighboring African countries.
With this in mind, is it any wonder that Al Jazeera quoted a pro-Gaddafi Tuareg fighter in September 2011 as saying, “fighting for Gaddafi is like a son fighting for his father…[We will be] ready to fight for him until the last drop of blood.” As the Toubou and other black ethnic groups clash with Arab militias, their struggle should be understood in the context of a continued struggle for peace and equality. Moreover, the fact that they must engage in this form of armed struggle again illustrates the point that many international observers made from the very beginning of the war: NATO’s aggression was never about protecting civilians or human rights, but rather regime change for economic and geopolitical interests.
That the majority of the population, including black ethnic minorities, is worse off today than they ever were under Gaddafi is a fact that is actively suppressed. Black, Green, and the Struggle for Libya It would be presumptuous to assume that the military victories made by the pro-Gaddafi Green resistance in recent days will be long-lasting, or that they represent an irreversible shift in the political and military landscape of the country.
Though decidedly unstable, the neocolonial puppet government in Tripoli is supported economically and militarily by some of the most powerful interests in the world, making it difficult to simply overthrow it with minor victories. However, these developments do signal an interesting shift in the calculus on the ground. Undoubtedly there is a confluence between the black ethnic minorities and the Green fighters as both recognize their enemy as being the tribal militias who participated in the overthrow of Gaddafi as well as the central government in Tripoli.
Whether a formal alliance emerges from this remains to be seen. Were such an alliance to develop however, it would be a watershed moment in the continued war for Libya. As Green resistance fighters have shown in Sabha, they are able to organize themselves in the south of the country where they enjoy a large degree of popular support.
One could imagine an alliance in the south that would be able to hold territory and possibly consolidate power throughout the southern part of Libya, creating a de facto independent state. Naturally, the cry from NATO and its apologists would be that this is anti-democratic and counter-revolution.
This would be understandable as their goal of a unified Libya subservient to international finance capital and oil interests would become unattainable. One should be careful not to make too many assumptions about the situation in Libya today, as reliable details are hard to come by.
More to the point, Western media has attempted to completely suppress the fact that the Green resistance even exists, let alone is active and winning victories.
All this simply further illustrates that the war for Libya rages on, whether the world wants to admit it or not.
By Eric Draitser
Global Research, January 22, 2014
Eric Draitser is the founder of StopImperialism.com. He is an independent geopolitical analyst based in New York City.
You can reach him at email@example.com.
MEANWHILE IN SYRIA….
THE NATO SUPPORTTED ISLAMIC WAR AGAINST SECULAR SOCIALISM FAILS
NATO AFTER SUPPLYING CHEMICAL WEAPONS AND TRAINING TO ISLAMIC FIGHTERS FAILS TO BRING SHARIA LAW TO SECULAR DEMOCRATIC SYRIA
A WAR COUNCIL IS HELD TO FIGURE OUT WHAT TO DO NEXT?
THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION IS DETERMINED TO BRING SHARIA LAW TO SYRIA…ITS HUMANITARIAN AND DEMOCRATIC…APPARENTLY,ACCORDING TO OBAMA AND CAMERON
THIS SHOULD MAKE YOU WORRIED WHAT DO OBAMA AND CAMERON THINK HUMANITARIANISM AND DEMOCRACY IS?
..OF COURSE THEY COULD JUST BE BARE FACED LIARS!!!
AND KNOW THAT THEY ARE BRINGING A CENTRALISED RELIGIOUS AUTHORITY TO A SECULAR DIRECT DEMOCRAY
AS DIRECT DEMOCRACY IS A MORE DEMOCRATIC SYSTEM THAN REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY(UK SYSTEM)AKA ELECTED DICTATORSHIP
HOW CAN A REPRESENTATION OF A DEMOCRACY(UK) BRING DEMOCRACY TO A TRUE DEMOCRACY(DIRECT DEMOCRACY) LIKE LYBIA FOR EXAMPLE?
THE TRUTH IS
IT CANNOT , IT CAN ONLY DESTROY THE TRUE DEMOCRACY
…AND BRINGING ISLAM TO A SECULAR NATION IS THE JOB OF ISLAMIC RELIGIOUS EXTREMISTS AND DAVID CAMERON AND BARAK OBAMA!!
Syria Peace Conference:
The Obama Administration’s Orwellian Subterfuge It is difficult to call this week’s gathering in Montreux, Switzerland, a “peace conference” on Syria, since the U.S. and its allies are determined to change the regime by force of arms.
Washington has forged an “unholy alliance with its “Wahhabi allies from Saudi Arabia and al-Qaeda,” who act as America’s “boots on the ground.” “The most effective fighters are the al-Qaeda linked jihadists armed by the U.S. and the Saudi government.” There is one thing that the so-called peace conference on Syria is guaranteed to achieve and that is that when the last speech is made and the delegates leave the hall, the grotesque bloodletting and devastation will continue for the people of Syria. Why? Because for the Obama Administration, the diplomatic process was never intended to bring about a peaceful resolution to the war. Its main purpose was always to affect their main strategic objective – the removal of President Bashir al-Assad from power and the disappearance of Syria as an independent state. Fidelity to this goal continues to drive U.S. policy. U.S. strategists care little about the fact that, in their quest to oust the Syrian President, they have created an unholy alliance between the U.S. and its Wahhabi allies from Saudi Arabia and al-Qaeda as their “boots on the ground.” It is an alliance that ensures that, should the Al-Assad government fall, the Syrian people will either live under totalitarian fundamentalist Wahhabi rule or see their country disappear as a coherent state and into warring factions.
By juxtaposing U.S. rhetoric that expresses concerns for democracy, pluralism and the human rights of the Syrian people with actual U.S. decisions, we see a dramatic illustration of the astonishing hypocrisy of U.S. policies.
The Obama Administration understood the scale of human suffering it would unleash in Syria by arming, funding, training and providing political support for the opposition—opposition that it moved from a non-violent protest movement to a violent insurgency, as part of its larger geo-strategic plan for the region. That is why commitment to regime change, rather than to a peace based on Syrian realities and the needs of the Syrian people, is the price of admission to this week’s conference in Montreux, Switzerland. It is a conference that it would be more accurate to call a ‘war conference’ rather than a ‘peace conference’ due to U.S. Secretary of State Kerry’s insistence on keeping the scope of the agenda confined to the terms of the Geneva I communique, which calls for a political transition in Syria.
“Is Syrian’s future already written from the Libyan experience?”
The Syrian National Coalition is a mirage. Its “Free Syrian Army” has no standing and the most effective fighters are the al-Qaeda linked jihadists armed by the U.S. and the Saudi government. They are now the real power brokers on the ground. For these fighters, Geneva II is an irrelevant sideshow that has no bearing on them and they have rejected the Western-backed Syrian National Coalition. So who does the Syrian National Coalition represent, when the bulk of the fighters have shifted to al-Qaeda and the other more than 1,000 Islamist rebel groups that between them have 100,000 fighters, all united in their commitment to a post-Assad state in which Sharia, or Islamic Law, will be established throughout Syria?
Yet on January 16, Kerry restated the U.S. position on Geneva 2. “It is about establishing a process essential to the formation of a transition government body — governing body — with full executive powers established by mutual consent,” he told reporters.
The consent of whom? Who assumes power and will a new government represent the aspirations for democracy, civil liberties, workers’ rights, respect for religious and community difference that the “revolution” promised or is Syrian’s future already written from the Libyan experience?
There are now voices inside and outside the Administration saying that the U.S. should abandon the Syrian National Coalition and work instead with the Salafi-Wahhabi fundamentalists who have joined together under the umbrella of the Islamic Front (IF) and are being presented as the “moderate” alternative to the radicalism of al-Qaeda.
However, the Syrian people, who have a history of secularism and respect for different religions, have not signed on to a post-Assad society and government ruled by a group that has publically stated its opposition to democracy and intention to establish an Islamic state under Sharia law.
“In the end the interests of the Syrian people are of little concern to these policymakers who prioritize U.S. imperialist interests above every other consideration.”
But who cares what the Syrian people want? It does not seem to matter to the U.S. that supporting Salafi-Wahhabi fundamentalism is the antithesis of the justification it gave for supporting the “revolution” against al-Assad. It does not matter because in the end the interests of the Syrian people are of little concern to these policymakers who prioritize U.S. imperialist interests above every other consideration.
In the long annuls of crimes by U.S. and Western imperialism, the slow, protracted destruction of the Syrian state, including the tens of thousands of lives sacrificed, is starting to emerge as one of its most significant crimes. It can be listed with crimes like the Christmas season carpet bombing of North Vietnam in 1972 and the millions murdered in Iraq during the period of sanctions and full-blown military attack. In this era in which war is peace and wars are fought for “humanitarian purposes,” it is hard for many to get to the truth. But one thing is certain—the humanitarian disaster in Syria that was supposed to be the justification for intervention by the U.S. and its allies will continue unabated for the foreseeable future.
Ajamu Baraka is a human rights activist, organizer and writer.
He is an Associate Fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS) in Washington, D.C. and editor and contributing columnist for the Black Agenda Report.
Baraka’s latest publications include contributions to two recently published books “Imagine: Living in a Socialist USA” and “Claim No Easy Victories: The Legacy of Amilcar Cabral.” By Ajamu Baraka Global Research, January 23, 2014 Black Agenda Report
“Question. Why was Mandela’s life celebrated by the world while Gaddafi after everything he did for Africa was gunned down like a dog?”, a Twitter user wondered days after Nelson Mandela’s passing.
This question becomes even more valid in light of what the mainstream media, in the wake of the former South African president’s death, have been anxiously hiding from the public: the actual close and crucial alliance between Mandela and Gaddafi.
Former Cabinet Minister Peter Hain commented of the trip: “This just exposes his(DAVID CAMERON) hypocrisy because he has tried to present himself as a progressive Conservative, but just on the eve of the apartheid downfall, and Nelson Mandela’s release from prison, when negotiations were taking place about a transfer of power, here he(DAVID CAMERON) was being wined and dined on a sanctions-busting visit. “This is the real Conservative Party … his colleagues who used to wear ‘Hang Nelson Mandela’ badges at university are now sitting on the benches around him. Their leader at the time Margaret Thatcher described Mandela as a terrorist.”
HAVING JUST RETURNED FROM SOUTH AFRICA .THIS STORY STRIKES A CHORD WITH ME. IN TODAYS SOUTH AFRICA MANY PEOPLE REMEMBER MANDELA ,AND HIS STRUGGLE, WITH FONDNESS . BUT THESE PEOPLE STILL STRUGGLE ECONOMICALLY . THEY ALSO SEE THE MODERN ANC LEADERSHIP AS “OUT-OF-TOUCH” THERE ALREADY IS THE ANC RADICAL SPLINTER GROUP THAT IS GATHERING POWER. WHILE MANELAS’ CHILDERN FIGHT AMOUNGST THEMSELVES FOR WESTERN BACKED MONEY ,POWER AND PRESTIGE MANDELA HIMSELF SOLD OUT OR WAS BROKEN. …AND THE SAME IS TRUE OF THE ANC LEADERSHIP NELSON MANDELA ACTUALLY SPENT MOST OF HIS FREEDOM LIVING IN A REPLICA COMPOUND OF HIS PRISON CELL THAT HE HAD ORDERED BUILT IN HIS HOMETOWN!!! NELSON MANDELA SUFFERED FROM “STOCKHOLME SYNDROME” ……THAT IS WHY THE WEST LOVED HIM
Back in the 70s and 80s, when the West refused to allow sanctions against Apartheid in South Africa and used to call Mandela a terrorist, it was none other than Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi who kept supporting him. Gaddafi funded Mandela’s fight against Apartheid by training ANC fighters and by paying for their education abroad, and their bond only became stronger after Mandela’s release from prison on February 11, 1990.
Nevertheless, one of them ended up being “gunned down like a dog” and his death was celebrated by the entire elite of the imperialist world, which celebrations were significantly summarized by Hillary “Warzone” Clinton in a now infamous interview in which she exults: “We came, we saw, he died!”
As for the other one, the same entire elite of the imperialist world crowded into the FNB stadium in Soweto, South Africa, to attend the funeral of their hero, and to verbosely praise Mandela and his achievements with all possible superlatives.
Mandela on Gaddafi So how did the branded Saint Mandela really feel about the branded Mad Dog Gaddafi? Let’s hear straight from the horse’s mouth what the mainstream media have left out of their laudatory picture of the former ANC leader. Right upon his release from prison, after more than 27 years behind bars, Mandela broke the UN embargo and paid a visit to the Libyan capital of Tripoli, where he declared: “My delegation and I are overjoyed with the invitation from the Brother Guide [Muammar Gaddafi], to visit the Great Popular and Socialist Arab Libyan Jamahiriya. I have been waiting impatiently ever since we received the invitation. I would like to remind you that the first time I came here, in 1962, the country was in a very different state of affairs. One could not but be struck by the sights of poverty from the moment of arrival, with all of its usual corollaries: hunger, illness, lack of housing and of health-care facilities, etc. Anger and revolt could be read in those days on the faces of everyone. Since then, things have changed considerably. During our stay in prison, we read and heard a great deal about the changes which have come about in this country and about blossoming of the economy which has been experienced here. There is prosperity and progress everywhere here today which we were able to see even before the airplane touched ground. It is thus with great pleasure that we have come on a visit in the Jamahiriya, impatient to meet our brother, the Guide Gaddafi.” When Mandela was taken to the ruins of Gaddafi’s compound in Tripoli, which was bombed by the Reagan administration in 1986 in an attempt to murder the entire Gaddafi family, he said: “No country can claim to be the policeman of the world and no state can dictate to another what it should do. Those that yesterday were friends of our enemies have the gall today to tell me not to visit my brother Gaddafi. They are advising us to be ungrateful and forget our friends of the past.” In response, Gaddafi thanked Mandela for his friendship, saying: “Who would ever have said that one day the opportunity for us to meet would become reality. We would like you to know that we are constantly celebrating your fight and that of the South African people, and that we salute your courage during all of those long years you spent in detention in the prison of Apartheid. Not a single day has passed without us having thought of you and your sufferings.” Eight years later, when then U.S. president Bill Clinton visited Mandela in March 1998, Clinton criticized the South African president’s meeting with Muammar Gaddafi. In reaction to that criticism, Mandela straightforwardly replied: “I have also invited Brother Leader Gaddafi to this country. And I do that because our moral authority dictates that we should not abandon those who helped us in the darkest hour in the history of this country. Not only did the Libyans support us in return, they gave us the resources for us to conduct our struggle, and to win. And those South Africans who have berated me for being loyal to our friends, can literally go and jump into a pool.”
Mandela on the West Subsequently, let’s hear the ANC leader’s real thoughts on the West that has put him on a posthumous pedestal, and on topics that, to say the least, are not exactly popular among Western leaders. On the U.S. preparing its war against Iraq in 2002: “If you look at those matters, you will come to the conclusion that the attitude of the United States of America is a threat to world peace. If there is a country that has committed unspeakable atrocities in the world, it is the USA. They don’t care for human beings.” In a 1999 speech: “Israel should withdraw from all the areas which it won from the Arabs in 1967, and in particular Israel should withdraw completely from the Golan Heights, from south Lebanon and from the West Bank.” “The UN took a strong stand against apartheid; and over the years, an international consensus was built, which helped to bring an end to this iniquitous system. But we know too well that our freedom is incomplete without the freedom of the Palestinians.” (RT)
The revolutionary Mad Dog On the day of Mandela’s funeral, December 15, 2013, a citizen from Accra, Ghana, expressed:
“All day long here in Ghana they have been broadcasting live the Memorial Service of Nelson Mandela in South Africa. Courtesy, of course, of the BBC and Deutsche Welle? Why on earth doesn’t Africa have its own Broadcasting Network in this day and age? The news coverage on the BBC is always distorting according to their own interest, and that on Deutsche Welle a bit less, but still not African! And in all of Ghana – a nations with so many media resources – there is not a single foreign correspondent in the lot! Why must Africans always depend on others to tell their own stories to them?! Shame! Shame! Shame!” In fact, there actually was someone working on an African broadcasting network. Someone who already connected the entire African continent by radio, television and telephone. In the early 90s, this person funded the establishment of the Regional African Satellite Communication Organization, which eventually provided Africa with its first own communications satellite on December 26, 2007. A second African satellite was launched in July 2010 and advanced plans for a continental broadcasting network were made. The person who funded at least 70% of this revolutionary project was the revolutionary leader of the Libyan Jamahiriya, Muammar Gaddafi. Gaddafi thus angered the Western bankers, since Africa no longer would pay the annual $500 million fee to Europe for the use of its satellites, and of course no “self-respecting” banker was willing to fund a project that frees people from their claws. And this was not the only way in which Gaddafi angered the West to the point that he had to be eliminated from their agenda. The leader of the Libyan Al-Fateh Revolution worked hard and came close to embody the famous 1865 quote by American economist Adam Smith, saying: “The economy of any country which relies on the slavery of blacks is destined to descend into hell the day those countries awaken.” On the eve of the NATO-led war against Libya, Gaddafi’s booming country largely co-funded three projects that would rid Africa from its financial dependence on the West once and for all: the African Investment Bank in the Libyan city of Sirte, the African Monetary Fund (AFM), to be based in the capital of Cameroon, Yaounde, in 2011, and the African Central Bank to be based in the capital of Nigeria, Abuja. Especially the latter angered France – not coincidentally also the main orchestrator of the war on Libya – because it would mean the end of the West African CFA franc and the Central African CFA franc, through which France kept a hold on as much as thirteen African countries. Only two months after Africa said no to Western attempts to join the AFM, Western organized “protests” against the AFM’s benefactor, Muammar Gaddafi, started to erupt in Libya… ultimately resulting in the freezing of $30 billion by the West, which money mostly was intended for the above mentioned financial projects. But Gaddafi helped the African continent in more than just material ways. More than any other African leader, he supported Mandela’s ANC’s struggle against the racist regime in South Africa. Above that, many Black Africans, especially sub-Saharan African migrants and refugees, found a new home in Gaddafi’s prosperous Libya. Gaddafi understood that in order to develop a strong Africa that would be able to finally throw off the shackles of imperialism, unity was the first requirement. The 2009 Chairperson of the African Union also understood the African culture and recognized that African problems need African solutions. During a 2010 meeting in Tripoli, in which he addressed dozens of leaders from across Africa, he told: “African traditions are being replaced with Western culture and multiparty politics is destroying Africa.” Instead, Gaddafi promoted the establishment of a People’s Government (Jamahiriya) in which the power would not belong to (puppet) governments, but to the African people. And nothing scared the Western capitalists more than a united Africa – Muammar Gaddafi’s dream that was about to come true by the end of 2010.
The problem was Libya had an independent state bank, not part of BIS (Rothschild’s banks) and wanted to switch trading oil from dollars to gold.
Some of what I have found out about Libya & Muammar Al Qaddafi since the brutal, illegal invasion of Libya by Rothschild owned NATO forces.
Not only have I learnt that Qaddafi is NOT a dictator (he stood down after setting up direct democracy) but his people have something to teach us about freedom & independence!
I ask all reading this to do whatever they can to oppose the New World Order, NATO, the UN & our corrupt politicians.
The draft UN report on human rights in Libya before the NATO bombings & invasion.
The lukewarm Saint When Nelson Mandela endured 27 years of isolation in prison, he paid the price of being the socialist revolutionary and the racial equality fighter that he was. His freedom was taken away by the South African Apartheid regime, a regime that was the result of the infiltration of South Africa by European colonial powers. How come the same colonial powers now consider him to be a hero and a saint? Did the Western elite have a massive change of mind, and thus all of the sudden embraced the exact same ideology that made them put Mandela behind bars a few decades ago? We only have to take a look at the current situation of the Blacks in NATO-led Libya to understand that this was not quite the case. Libya, in 1951 officially the poorest country in the world, under Gaddafi attained the highest standard of living in Africa. The country’s prosperity attracted many Black African immigrants, during the 2011 war on Libya by the mainstream media purposely misnamed as being “black sub-Saharan African mercenaries”. Gaddafi provided them with work and education. Those immigrant workers, to whom Gaddafi was a hero, a father and a friend, now face the cruelest forms of racism by the Western-installed Libyan puppet regime. Just one telling example is a video in which Libyan “rebels” force Black immigrants to eat the green flag of the Libyan Jamahiriya. Then why the 180 degrees change of attitude of the West towards Mandela after his release from prison? Statistics show that still 65% of the Blacks in South Africa remain unemployed, while 90% of the Whites own 90% of South Africa’s wealth. Over the last decades, Apartheid may have disappeared for the visual scene, fact is that Blacks remain poor while Whites remain rich. Yet the West regards Mandela as the protector of the South African economy. According to a Financial Times journalist, Mandela’s ANC “proved a reliable steward of sub-Sahara Africa’s largest economy, embracing orthodox fiscal and monetary policies.” Canadian The Globe and Mail recently added that Mandela did this “without alienating his radical followers or creating a dangerous factional struggle within his movement”. In other words, Mandela ran with the hare and hunted with the hounds… mainly economically – and nothing interested, interests and will interest the Western capitalist countries more than economics. As aptly stated by independent writer Stephen Gowans,
“Thus, in [The Globe and Mail journalist Doug] Saunder’s view, Mandela was a special kind of leader: one who could use his enormous prestige and charisma to induce his followers to sacrifice their own interests for the greater good of the elite that had grown rich off their sweat, going so far as to acquiesce in the repudiation of their own economic program.” “”Here is the crucial lesson of Mr. Mandela for modern politicians,” writes Saunders. “The principled successful leader is the one who betrays his party members for the larger interests of the nation. When one has to decide between the rank-and-file and the greater good, the party should never come first.” “For Saunders and most other mainstream journalists, “the larger interests of the nation” are the larger interests of banks, land owners, bond holders and share holders. This is the idea expressed in the old adage “What’s good for GM [General Motors], is good for America.” Since mainstream media are large corporations, interlocked with other large corporations, and are dependent on still other large corporations for advertising revenue, the placing of an equal sign between corporate interests and the national interest comes quite naturally.” I believe the dictionary has a word for that: lukewarm.
What if Mandela had not danced to the tune of the imperialists?What if he did have said words and did have made plans that were too threatening to the interests of the corporate financiers who run the planet – the reason why Gaddafi had to be killed? Then South Africa under his leadership quite likely would have become what Iraq and Libya currently are: a country in turmoil, torn apart by imperialist powers that Mandela, not inconceivable even out of fear for what they are capable of, preferred to side with. Also the inevitable question arises: where was Mandela when his brother Gaddafi’s country was bombed for nine months by the most powerful military alliance in modern history? Sources have declared by that time his health was too fragile and he was in a too vulnerable state of mind, for which reason his family deliberately kept him away from news that would severely upset him. Whatever the case may be, the significant fact remains that no ANC member stood up for Gaddafi during the war on Libya the way Gaddafi stood up for his friend Mandela during his imprisonment and afterwards.
The lesson for us At the beginning of a new year, let us allow ourselves to take a few moments to reflect on our destiny and on that of the post-Mandela and post-Gaddafi world we live in. We live in a time of transition on all fronts. More than ever we are faced with the choice of being guided by fear – especially by the fear of losing credibility with the public and being punished by “authorities” when we challenge the powers-that-be – or being guided by the freedom of thought. The latter will result in a higher level of understanding of both ourselves and the world around us, which is the main condition for a much needed (r)evolution and for the establishment of true democracy.
What the world needs now, are “Mad Dogs”. Revolutionaries with a vision who dare to be unconventional and dare to be so all the way. It is time for us to become a Gaddafi rather than a Mandela. It is time to let the walls of fear around our thinking fall away. It is time to break free from the fear of not being liked, of no longer being accepted, of being looked upon differently, of being branded an outcast, a lunatic, a conspiracy theorist or anything bad when we raise our voices. We need to dare to totally tear aside the veil of Apartheid that mights and media use to cover up what is really going on in the world. Only then real progress can be achieved.
“Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery; None but ourselves can free our mind.” – Bob Marley
MANDELA WAS A HERO HE FOUGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AND LOST! HE PAID THE PRICE AND SPENT MOST OF HIS LIFE IN PRISON PRISON BROKE HIM WHEN HE WAS RELEASED ,HIS FIGHT AND HIS IDEOLOGY HAD GONE HE STILL GAVE US THE SOUNDBYTES ,BUT THE ACTUAL BITES HAD GONE. SINCE THEN HE WAS USED AS A POSTER BOY FOR THE NEO-LIBERAL/NEO-CON AGENDA AND SOUTH AFRICA STILL SUFFERS THE INJUSTICE AND POVERTY THAT MUMMAR GADDAFI SOLVED VERY ,VERY QUICKLY IN LYBIA …….THAT IS UNTIL THE WEST AND CAMERON AND OBAMA BOMBED THE SECULAR SWITZERLAND OF AFRICA AND ITS GREAT INFRASTRUCTURE BACK TO THE STONE AGE AND CREATED A DYSFUNCTIONAL TERRORIST SUPPORTTING ISLAMIC STATE OF LYBIA!!!