The Global Political Awakening and the New World Order

July 6, 2010

We WE are in the midst of the most explosive development in all of human history. Humanity is experiencing a simultaneously opposing and conflicting geopolitical transition, the likes of which has never before been anticipated or experienced. Historically, the story of humanity has been the struggle between the free-thinking individual and structures of power controlled by elites that seek to dominate land, resources and people. The greatest threat to elites at any time – historically and presently – is an awakened, critically thinking and politically stimulated populace. This threat has manifested itself throughout history, in different places and at different times. Ideas of freedom, democracy, civil and human rights, liberty and equality have emerged in reaction and opposition to power structures and elite systems of control.

The greatest triumphs of the human mind – whether in art, science or thought – have arisen out of and challenged great systems of power and control. The greatest of human misery and tragedy has arisen out of the power structures and systems that elites always seek to construct and manage. War, genocide,persecution and human degradation are directly the result of decisions made by those who control the apparatus of power, whether the power manifests itself as intellectual, ecclesiastical, spiritual, militaristic, or scientific. The most malevolent and ruthless power is that over the free human mind: if one controls how one thinks, they control the individual itself. The greatest human achievements are where individuals have broken free the shackles that bind the mind and let loose the inherent and undeniable power that lies in each and every individual on this small little planet.

Currently, our world is at the greatest crossroads our species has ever experienced. We are in the midst of the first truly global political awakening, in which for the first time in all of human history, all of mankind is politically awakened and stirring; in which whether inadvertently or intentionally, people are thinking and acting in political terms. This awakening is most evident in the developing world, having been made through personal experience to be acutely aware of the great disparities, disrespect, and domination inherent in global power structures. The awakening is spreading increasingly to the west itself, as the majority of the people living in the western developed nations are thrown into poverty and degradation. The awakening will be forced upon all people all over the world. Nothing, no development, ever in human history, has posed such a monumental threat to elite power structures.

This awakening is largely driven by the Technological Revolution, which through technology and electronics, in particular mass media and the internet, have made it so that people across the world are able to become aware of global issues and gain access to information from around the world. The Technological Revolution, thus, has fostered an Information Revolution which has, in turn, fed the global political awakening.

Simultaneously, the Technological Revolution has led to another unique and unprecedented development in human history, and one that is diametrically opposed, yet directly related to the global political awakening. For the first time in human history, free humanity is faced with the dominating threat of a truly global elite, who have at their hands the technology to impose a truly global system of control: a global scientific dictatorship. The great danger is that through the exponential growth in scientific techniques, elites will use these great new powers to control and dominate all of humanity in such a way that has never before been experienced.

Through all of human history, tyrants have used coercive force and terror to control populations. With the Technological Revolution, elites increasingly have the ability to control the very biology and psychology of the individual to a point where it may not be necessary to impose a system of terror, but rather where the control is implemented on a much deeper, psychological, subliminal and individual biological manner. While terror can prevent people from opposing power for a while, the scientific dictatorship can create a personal psycho-social condition in which the individual comes to love his or her own slavery; in which, like a mentally inferior pet, they are made to love their leaders and accept their servitude.

So we are presented with a situation in which humanity is faced with both the greatest threat and the greatest hope that we have ever collectively experienced in our short human history. This essay, the third part in the series, “The Technological Revolution and the Future of Freedom,” examines the ideas behind the global scientific dictatorship, and how it may manifest itself presently and in the future, with a particular focus on the emergence of ‘new eugenics’ as a system of mass control.

Free humanity faces the most monumental decision we have ever been presented with: do we feed and fuel the global political awakening into a true human psycho-social revolution of the mind, creating a new global political economy which empowers and liberates all of humanity; or… do we fall silently into a ‘brave new world’ of a global scientific oppression, the likes of which have never before been experienced, and whose dominance would never be more difficult to challenge and overcome?

We can either find a true freedom, or descend into a deep despotism. We are not powerless before this great ideational beast. We have, at our very fingertips the ability to use technology to our benefit and to re-shape the world so that it benefits the people of the world and not simply the powerful. It must be freedom for all or freedom for none.

What is the ‘Scientific Dictatorship’?

In 1932, Aldous Huxley wrote his dystopian novel, “Brave New World,” in which he looked at the emergence of the scientific dictatorships of the future. In his 1958 essay, “Brave New World Revisited,” Huxley examined how far the world had come in that short period since his book was published, and where the world was heading. Huxley wrote that:

In politics the equivalent of a fully developed scientific theory or philosophical system is a totalitarian dictatorship. In economics, the equivalent of a beautifully composed work of art is the smoothly running factory in which the workers are perfectly adjusted to the machines. The Will to Order can make tyrants out of those who merely aspire to clear up a mess. The beauty of tidiness is used as a justification for despotism.[1]

Huxley explained that, “The future dictator’s subjects will be painlessly regimented by a corps of highly trained social engineers,” and he quotes one “advocate of this new science” as saying that, “The challenge of social engineering in our time is like the challenge of technical engineering fifty years ago. If the first half of the twentieth century was the era of technical engineers, the second half may well be the era of social engineers.” Thus, proclaims Huxley, “The twenty-first century, I suppose, will be the era of World Controllers, the scientific caste system and Brave New World.”[2]

In 1952, Bertrand Russell, a British philosopher, historian, mathematician, and social critic wrote the book, “The Impact of Science on Society,” in which he warned and examined how science, and the technological revolution, was changing and would come to change society. In his book, Russell explained that:

I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is mass psychology. Mass psychology is, scientifically speaking, not a very advanced study… This study is immensely useful to practical men, whether they wish to become rich or to acquire the government. It is, of course, as a science, founded upon individual psychology, but hitherto it has employed rule-of-thumb methods which were based upon a kind of intuitive common sense. Its importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda. Of these the most influential is what is called ‘education’. Religion plays a part, though a diminishing one; the Press, the cinema and the radio play an increasing part.

What is essential in mass psychology is the art of persuasion. If you compare a speech of Hitler’s with a speech of (say) Edmund Burke, you will see what strides have been made in the art since the eighteenth century. What went wrong formerly was that people had read in books that man is a rational animal, and framed their arguments on this hypothesis. We now know that limelight and a brass band do more to persuade than can be done by the most elegant train of syllogisms. It may be hoped that in time anybody will be able to persuade anybody of anything if he can catch the patient young and is provided by the State with money and equipment.

This subject will make great strides when it is taken up by scientists under a scientific dictatorship.[3]Russell went on to analyze the question of whether a ‘scientific dictatorship’ is more stable than a democracy, on which he postulated:

Apart from the danger of war, I see no reason why such a regime should be unstable. After all, most civilised and semi-civilised countries known to history have had a large class of slaves or serfs completely subordinate to their owners. There is nothing in human nature that makes the persistence of such a system impossible. And the whole development of scientific technique has made it easier than it used to be to maintain a despotic rule of a minority. When the government controls the distribution of food, its power is absolute so long as it can count on the police and the armed forces. And their loyalty can be secured by giving them some of the privileges of the governing class. I do not see how any internal movement of revolt can ever bring freedom to the oppressed in a modern scientific dictatorship.[4]

Drawing on the concept popularized by Aldous Huxley – of people loving their servitude – Bertrand Russell explained that under a scientific dictatorship:

It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even in  totalitarian countries. Fichte laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished… Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible. Even if all are miserable, all will believe themselves happy, because the government will tell them that they are so.[5]

Russell explained that, “The completeness of the resulting control over opinion depends in various ways upon scientific technique. Where all children go to school, and all schools are controlled by the government, the authorities can close the minds of the young to everything contrary to official orthodoxy.”[6] Russell later proclaimed in his book that, “a scientific world society cannot be stable unless there is a world government.”[7] He elaborated:

Unless there is a world government which secures universal birth control, there must be from time to time great wars, in which the penalty of defeat is widespread death by starvation. That is exactly the present state of the world, and some may hold that there is no reason why it should not continue for centuries. I do not myself believe that this is possible. The two great wars that we have experienced have lowered the level of civilization in many parts of the world, and the next is pretty sure to achieve much more in this direction. Unless, at some stage, one power or group of powers emerges victorious and proceeds to establish a single government of the world with a monopoly of armed force, it is clear that the level of civilization must continually decline until scientific warfare becomes impossible – that is until science is extinct.[8]

Russell explains that eugenics plays a central feature in the construction of any world government scientific dictatorship, stating that, “Gradually, by selective breeding, the congenital differences between rulers and ruled will increase until they become almost different species. A revolt of the plebs would become as unthinkable as an organized insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton.”[9]

In a 1962 speech at UC Berkeley, Aldous Huxley spoke about the real world becoming the ‘Brave New World’ nightmare he envisaged. Huxley spoke primarily of the ‘Ultimate Revolution’ that focuses on ‘behavioural controls’ of people. Huxley said of the ‘Ultimate Revolution’:

In the past, we can say, that all revolutions have essentially aimed at changing the environment in order to change the individual. There’s been the political revolution, the economic revolution . . . the religious revolution. All these aimed as I say not directly at the human being but at his surroundings, so by modifying his surroundings you did achieve – at one remove – an effect upon the human being.

Today, we are faced, I think, with the approach of what may be called the ‘Ultimate Revolution’ – the ‘Final Revolution’ – where man can act directly on the  mind-body of his fellows. Well needless to say some kind of direct action on human mind-bodies has been going on since the beginning of time, but this has generally been of a violent nature. The techniques of terrorism have been known from time immemorial, and people have employed them with more-or-less ingenuity, sometimes with utmost crudity, sometimes with a good deal of skill acquired with a process of trial and error – finding out what the best ways of using torture, imprisonments, constraints of various kinds . . .

If you are going to control any population for any length of time, you must have some measure of consent. It’s exceedingly difficult to see how pure terrorism can function indefinitely, it can function for a fairly long time; but sooner or later you have to bring in an element of persuasion, an element of getting people to consent to what is happening to them.

Well it seems to me the nature of the Ultimate Revolution with which we are now faced is precisely this: that we are in process of developing a whole series of techniques, which will enable the controlling oligarchy – who have always existed and will presumably always exist – to get people to love their servitude. This is the ultimate in malevolent revolution…

There seems to be a general movement in the direction of this kind of Ultimate Control, this method of control, by which people can be made to enjoy a state of affairs by which any decent standard they ought not to enjoy; the enjoyment of servitude . . .

I am inclined to think that the scientific dictatorships of the future – and I think there are going to be scientific dictatorships in many parts of the world – will be probably a good deal nearer to the Brave New World pattern than to the 1984 pattern. They will be a good deal nearer, not because of any humanitarian qualms in the scientific dictators, but simply because the ‘brave new world’ pattern is probably a good deal more efficient than the other. That if you can get people to consent to the state of affairs in which they are living – the state of servitude – if you can do this, then you are likely to have a much more stable, a much more lasting society; much more easily controllable society than you would if you were relying wholly on clubs, and firing squads and concentration camps.[10]

In 1961, President Eisenhower delivered his farewell address to the nation in which he warned of the dangers to democracy posed by the military-industrial complex: the interconnected web of industry, the military, and politics creating the conditions for constant war. In that same speech, Eisenhower warned America and the world of another important change in society:

Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been overshadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research.

Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers.

The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present – and is gravely to be regarded.

Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.[11]

In 1970, Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote about “the gradual appearance of a more controlled and directed society,” in the “technetronic revolution”; explaining:

Such a society would be dominated by an elite whose claim to political power would rest on allegedly superior scientific know-how. Unhindered by the restraints of traditional liberal values, this elite would not hesitate to achieve its political ends by using the latest modern techniques for influencing public behavior and keeping society under close surveillance and control. Under such circumstances, the scientific and technological momentum of the country would not be reversed but would actually feed on the situation it exploits.[12]

New Eugenics

Many sciences and large social movements are directed by the same foundations and money that financed the eugenics movement in the early 20th century. The Rockefeller foundations, Ford, Carnegie, Mellon, Harriman, and Morgan money that flowed into eugenics led directly to ‘scientific racism,’ and ultimately the Holocaust in World War II.[13] Following the Holocaust, Hitler had discredited the eugenics movement he admired so much in America. So the movement branched off into forming several other social engineering projects: population control, genetics, and environmentalism. The same foundations that laid the foundations for eugenic ideology – the belief in a biological superiority and right to rule (justifying their power) – then laid the foundations for these and other new social and scientific movements.

Major environmental and conservation organizations were founded with Rockefeller and Ford Foundation money,[14] which then continued to be central sources of funding to this day; while the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) was founded in 1961 by Sir Julian Huxley, Aldous Huxley’s brother, who was also the President of the British Eugenics Society. Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands became the organization’s first president. Prince Bernhard also happened to be one of the founders of the elite global think tank, the Bilderberg Group, which he co-founded in 1954; and he was previous to that, a member of the Nazi Party and an SS officer.[15] Sir Julian Huxley also happened to be the first Director-General of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO). In 1946, Huxley wrote a paper titled, “UNESCO: It’s Purpose and its Philosophy.” In it, he wrote that the general focus of UNESCO:

is to help the emergence of a single world culture, with its own philosophy and background of ideas, and with its own broad purpose. This is opportune, since this is the first time in history that the scaffolding and the mechanisms for world unification have become available, and also the first time that man has had the means (in the shape of scientific discovery and its applications) of laying a world-wide foundation for the minimum physical welfare of the entire human species…[16]

At the moment, it is probable that the indirect effect of civilisation is dysgenic instead of eugenic; and in any case it seems likely that the dead weight of genetic stupidity, physical weakness, mental instability, and disease-proneness, which already exist in the human species, will prove too great a burden for real progress to be achieved. Thus even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for Unesco to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable…[17]

Still another and quite different type of borderline subject is that of eugenics. It has been on the borderline between the scientific and the unscientific, constantly in danger of becoming a pseudo- science based on preconceived political ideas or on assumptions of racial or class superiority and inferiority. It is, however, essential that eugenics should be brought entirely within the borders of science, for, as already indicated, in the not very remote future the problem of improving the average quality of human beings is likely to become urgent; and this can only be accomplished by applying the findings of a truly scientific eugenics…[18]

It is worth pointing out that the applications of science at once bring us up against social problems of various sorts. Some of these are direct and obvious. Thus the application of genetics in eugenics immediately raises the question of values- what qualities should we desire to encourage in the human beings of the future?[19]

On page 6 of the UNESCO document, Sir Julian Huxley wrote that, “in order to carry out its work, an organisation such as Unesco needs not only a set of general aims and objects for itself, but also a working philosophy, a working hypothesis concerning human existence and its aims and objects, which will dictate, or at least indicate, a definite line of approach to its problems.”[20] While much of the language of equality and education sounds good and benevolent, it is based upon a particular view of humanity as an irrational, emotionally driven organism which needs to be controlled. Thus, the ‘principle of equality’ becomes “The Fact of Inequality”:

Finally we come to a difficult problem-that of discovering how we can reconcile our principle of human equality with the biological fact of human inequality… The democratic principle of equality, which is also Unesco’s, is a principle of equality of opportunity-that human beings should be equal before the law, should have equal opportunities for education, for making a living, for freedom of expression and movement and thought. The biological absence of equality, on the other hand, concerns the natural endowments of man and the fact of genetic difference in regard to them.

There are instances of biological inequality which are so gross that they cannot be reconciled at all with the principle of equal opportunity. Thus low-grade mental defectives cannot be offered equality of educational opportunity, nor are the insane equal with the sane before the law or in respect of most freedoms. However, the full implications of the fact of human inequality have not often been drawn and certainly need to be brought out here, as they are very relevant to Unesco’s task.[21]

Many of these “genetic inequalities” revolve around the idea of intellectual superiority: the idea that there is no equality among the intellectually inferior and superior. That inequality is derived from human biology – from genetics; it is a “human fact.” It just so happens that elites who propagate this ideology, also happen to view the masses as intellectually inferior; thus, there can be no social equality in a world with a technological intellectual elite. So eugenics must be employed, as the UENSCO paper explains, to address the issues of raising human welfare to a manageable level; that the time will come where elites will need to address the whole of humanity as a single force, and with a single voice. Eugenics is about the social organization and control of humanity. Ultimately, eugenics is about the engineering of inequality. In genetics, elites found a way to take discrimination down to the DNA.

Genetics as Eugenics

Award-winning author and researcher, Edwin Black, wrote an authoritative history of eugenics in his book, “War Against the Weak,” in which he explained that,

“the incremental effort to transform eugenics into human genetics forged an entire worldwide infrastructure,” with the founding of the Institute for Human Genetics in Copenhagen in 1938, led by Tage Kemp, a Rockefeller Foundation eugenicist, and was financed with money from the Rockefeller Foundation.[22] While not abandoning the eugenics goals, the new re-branded eugenics movement “claimed to be eradicating poverty and saving the environment.”[23]

In a 2001 issue of Science Magazine, Garland Allen, a scientific historian, wrote about genetics as a modern form of eugenics. He began by citing a 1998 article in Time Magazine which proclaimed that, “Personality, temperament, even life choices. New studies show it’s mostly in your genes.” Garland explains the implications:

Coat-tailing on major advances in genetic biotechnology, these articles portray genetics as the new “magic bullet” of biomedical science that will solve many of our recurrent social problems. The implication is that these problems are largely a result of the defective biology of individuals or even racial or ethnic groups. If aggressive or violent behavior is in the genes, so the argument goes, then the solution lies in biomedical intervention–gene therapy in the distant future and pharmacotherapy (replacing the products of defective genes with drug substitutes) in the immediate future.

By promoting such claims, are we heading toward a new version of eugenics? Are we getting carried away with the false promise of a technological fix for problems that really lie in the structure of our society? My answer to these questions is “yes,” but with some important qualifications that derive from the different historical and social contexts of the early 1900s and the present…

The term eugenics was coined in 1883 by the Victorian polymath Francis Galton, geographer, statistician, and first cousin of Charles Darwin. It meant to him “truly- or well-born,” and referred to a plan to encourage the “best people” in society to have more children (positive eugenics) and to discourage or prevent the “worst elements” of society from having many, if any, children (negative eugenics). Eugenics became solidified into a movement in various countries throughout the world in the first three decades of the 20th century, but nowhere more solidly than in the United States and, after World War I, in Germany.[24]

While genetic traits such as eye colour and the like were proven to be hereditary, “eugenicists were more interested in the inheritance of social behaviors, intelligence, and personality.” Further:

American eugenicists also strove to disseminate the results of eugenic research to the public and to lawmakers. They supported the idea of positive eugenics [encouraging the ‘best’ to become better], but focused most of their energies on negative eugenics [to encourage the ‘worst’ to become fewer]. Eugenicists wrote hundreds of articles for popular magazines, published dozens of books for the general (and some for the scientific) reader, prepared exhibits for schools and state fairs, made films, and wrote sermons and novels.[25]

American eugenicists, fully backed by the financial support of the major American philanthropic fortunes, passed eugenics legislation in over 27 states across the United States, often in the form of forced sterilizations for the mentally ‘inferior’, so that, “By the 1960s, when most of these laws were beginning to be repealed, more than 60,000 people had been sterilized for eugenic purposes.” As Garland Allen wrote:

For the wealthy benefactors that supported eugenics, such as the Carnegie, Rockefeller, Harriman, and Kellogg philanthropies, eugenics provided a means of social control in a period of unprecedented upheaval and violence. It was these same economic elites and their business interests who introduced scientific management and organizational control into the industrial sector…

[In 1994] we saw the resurrection of claims that there are genetic differences in intelligence between races, leading to different socio-economic status.Claims about the genetic basis for criminality, manic depression, risk-taking, alcoholism, homosexuality, and a host of other behaviors have also been rampant in scientific and especially popular literature. Much of the evidence for such claims is as controversial today as in the past.

We seem to be increasingly unwilling to accept what we view as imperfection in ourselves and others. As health care costs skyrocket, we are coming to accept a bottom-line, cost-benefit analysis of human life. This mind-set has serious implications for reproductive decisions. If a health maintenance organization (HMO) requires in utero screening, and refuses to cover the birth or care of a purportedly “defective” child, how close is this to eugenics? If gene or drug therapy is substituted for improving our workplace or school environments, our diets and our exercise practices, how close is this to eugenics? Significant social changes are expensive, however. If eugenics means making reproductive decisions primarily on the basis of social cost, then we are well on that road.[26]

Genetics unleash an unprecedented power into human hands: the power of unnatural creation and the manipulation of biology. We do not yet fully understand nor comprehend the implications of genetic manipulation in our food, plants, animals, and in humans, themselves. What is clear is that we are changing the very biology of our environment and ourselves in it. While there are many clear and obvious benefits to genetic technology, such as the ability to enhance ailing senses (sight, hearing, etc.) and cure diseases, the positive must be examined and discussed with the negative repercussions of genetic manipulation so as to better direct the uses of this powerful technology.

Debates on issues such as stem-cell research and genetic manipulation often focus on a science versus religion aspect, where science seeks to benevolently cure mankind of its ailments and religion seeks to preserve the sanctity of ‘creation’. This is an irrational and narrow manner to conduct a real debate on this monumental issue, painting the issue as black and white, which it most certainly is not. Science can be used for good as well as bad, and human history, most especially that of the 20th century, is nothing if not evidence for that fact. Incredible scientific ingenuity went into the creation of great weapons;the manipulation of the atom to kill millions in an instant, or the manufacturing of biological and chemical weapons. The problem with the interaction of science and power is that with such great power comes the temptation to use and abuse it. If the ability to create a weapon like an atom bomb seems possible, most certainly there are those who seek to make it probable. Where there is temptation, there is human weakness.

So while genetics can be used for benevolent purposes and for the betterment of humankind, so too can it be used to effectively create a biological caste system, where in time it would be feasible to see a break in the human race, where as human advancement technologies become increasingly available, their use is reserved to the elite so that there comes a time where there is a biological separation in the human species. Oliver Curry, an evolutionary theorist from the London School of Economics predicted that “the human race will have reached its physical peak by the year 3000” and that, “The human race will one day split into two separate species, an attractive, intelligent ruling elite and an underclass of dim-witted, ugly goblin-like creatures.”[27] Such was the plot of H.G. Wells’ classic book, “The Time Machine,” who was himself, a prominent eugenicist at the turn of the 20th century. While this would be a long time from now, its potential results from the decisions we make today.

Population Control as Eugenics

Not only was the field of genetics born of eugenics, and heavily financed by the same monied-interests that seek social control; but so too was the field of population control. In environmental literature and rhetoric, one concept that has emerged over the years as playing a significant part is that of population control. Population is seen as an environmental issue because the larger the population, the more resources it consumes and land it occupies. In this concept, the more people there are the worse the environment becomes. Thus, programs aimed at controlling population growth are often framed in an environmentalist lens. There is also a distinctly radical element in this field, which views population growth not simply as an environmental concern, but which frames people, in general, as a virus that must be eradicated if the earth is to survive.
 
However, in the view of elites, population control is more about controlling the people than saving the environment. Elites have always been drawn to population studies that have, in many areas, helped construct their worldview. Concerns about population growth really took hold with Thomas Malthus at the end of the 18th century. In 1798, Malthus wrote a “theory on the nature of poverty,” and he “called for population control by moral restraint,” citing charity as a promotion of “generation-to-generation poverty and simply made no sense in the natural scheme of human progress.” Thus, the idea of ‘charity’ became immoral. The eugenics movement attached itself to Malthus’ theory regarding the “rejection of the value of helping the poor.”[28]

The ideas of Malthus, and later Herbert Spencer and Charles Darwin were remolded into branding an elite ideology of “Social Darwinism”, which was “the notion that in the struggle to survive in a harsh world, many humans were not only less worthy, many were actually destined to wither away as a rite of progress. To preserve the weak and the needy was, in essence, an unnatural act.”[29] This theory simply justified the immense wealth, power and domination of a small elite over the rest of humanity, as that elite saw themselves as the only truly intelligent beings worthy of holding such power and privilege.

Francis Galton later coined the term “eugenics” to describe this emerging field. His followers believed that the ‘genetically unfit’ “would have to be wiped away,” using tactics such as, “segregation, deportation, castration, marriage prohibition, compulsory sterilization, passive euthanasia – and ultimately extermination.”[30] The actual science of eugenics was lacking extensive evidence, and ultimately Galton “hoped to recast eugenics as a religious doctrine,” which was “to be taken on faith without proof.”[31]

As the quest to re-brand “eugenics” was under way, a 1943 edition of Eugenical News published an article titled “Eugenics After the War,” which cited Charles Davenport, a major founder and progenitor of eugenics, in his vision of “a new mankind of biological castes with master races in control and slave races serving them.”[32] A 1946 article in Eugenical News stated that, “Population, genetics, [and] psychology, are the three sciences to which the eugenicist must look for the factual material on which to build an acceptable philosophy of eugenics and to develop and defend practical eugenics proposals.”[33]

In the post-war period, emerging in the 1950s and going into the 1960s, the European colonies were retracting as nations of the ‘Third World’ were gaining political independence. This reinforced support for population control in many circles, as “For those who benefited most from the global status quo, population control measures were a far more palatable alternative to ending Third World poverty or promoting genuine economic development.”[34]

In 1952, “John D. Rockefeller 3rd convened a group of scientists to discuss the implications of the dramatic demographic change. They met in Williamsburg, Virginia, under the auspices of the National Academy of Sciences, and after two and a half days agreed on the need for a new institution that could provide solid science to guide governments and individuals in addressing population questions.”[35] That new institution was to become the Population Council. Six of the Council’s ten founding members were eugenicists.[36]

According to the Population Council’s website, it “did not itself espouse any form of population policy. Instead, through grants to individuals and institutions, it invested in strengthening the indigenous capacity of countries and regions to conduct population research and to develop their own policies.

The Council also funded seminal work in U.S. universities and further developed its own in-house research expertise in biomedicine, public health, and social science.”[37]

In 2008, Matthew Connelly, a professor at Columbia University, wrote a book called, “Fatal Misconception: The Struggle to Control World Population,” in which he critically analyzes the history of the population control movement. He documents the rise of the field through the eugenics movement:

In 1927 a Rockefeller-funded study of contraception sought “some simple measure which will be available for the wife of the slum-dweller, the peasant, or the coolie, though dull of mind.” In 1935 one representative told India’s Council of State that population control was a necessity for the masses, adding that “it is not what they want, but what is good for them.” The problem with the natives was that “they are born too much and they don’t die enough,” a public-health official in French Indochina stated in 1936.[38]

Connelly’s general thesis was “how some people have long tried to redesign world population by reducing the fertility of other’s.” Further: Connelly examines population control as a global transnational movement because its main advocates and practitioners aimed to reduce world population through global governance and often viewed national governments as a means to this end. Fatal Misconceptions is therefore an intricate account of networks of influential individuals, international organizations, NGOs, and national governments.[39]

As one review in the Economist pointed out, “Much of the evil done in the name of slowing population growth had its roots in an uneasy coalition between feminists, humanitarians and environmentalists, who wished to help the unwillingly fecund, and the racists, eugenicists and militarists who wished to see particular patterns of reproduction, regardless of the desires of those involved.” The Economist further wrote:

As the world population soared, the population controllers came to believe they were fighting a war, and there would be collateral damage. Millions of intra-uterine contraceptive devices were exported to poor countries although they were known to cause infections and sterility. “Perhaps the individual patient is expendable in the general scheme of things,” said a participant at a conference on the devices organised in 1962 by the Population Council, a research institute founded by John D. Rockefeller, “particularly if the infection she acquires is sterilising but not lethal.” In 1969 Robert McNamara, then president of the World Bank, said he was reluctant to finance health care “unless it was very strictly related to population control, because usually health facilities contributed to the decline of the death rate, and thereby to the population explosion.”[40]

A review in the New York Review of Books pointed out that this movement coincided a great deal with the feminist movement in advancing women’s reproductive rights. However, “these benefits were seen by many US family planning officials as secondary to the goal of reducing the absolute numbers of people in developing countries. The urgency of what came to be known as the “population control movement” contributed to a climate of coercion and led to a number of serious human rights abuses, especially in Asian countries.”[41] Dominic Lawson, writing a review of Connelly’s book for The Sunday Times, explained that:

the population-control movement was bankrolled by America’s biggest private fortunes – the Ford family foundation, John D Rockefeller III, and Clarence Gamble (of Procter & Gamble). These gentlemen shared not just extreme wealth but a common anxiety: the well-to-do and clever (people like them, obviously) were now having much smaller families than their ancestors, but the great unwashed – Chinamen! Indians! Negroes! – were reproducing themselves in an irresponsible manner. What they feared was a kind of Darwinism in reverse – the survival of the unfittest.[42]

As the New Scientist reported, while contraceptives and women’s fertility rights were being expanded, “For much of the past half-century, population control came first and human rights had to be sacrificed.” Further, the New Scientist wrote that Connelly “lays bare the dark secrets of an authoritarian neo-Malthusian ethos that created an international population agenda built around control.” One such horrific notion was “the official policies that made it acceptable to hand out food aid to famine victims only if the women agreed to be sterilized.”[43] In a sad irony, this seemingly progressive movement for women’s rights actually had the effect of resulting in a humanitarian disaster, disproportionately affecting women of the developing world.

In 1968, biologist Paul Ehrlich wrote his widely influential book, ‘The Population Bomb,’ “in which he predicted that global overpopulation would cause massive famines as early as the 1970s.”[44] In his book, he refers to mankind as a “cancer” upon the world:

A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells; the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people. Treating only the symptoms of cancer may make the victim more comfortable at first, but eventually he dies – often horribly. A similar fate awaits a world with a population explosion if only the symptoms are treated. We must shift our efforts from treatment of the symptoms to the cutting out of the cancer. The operation will demand many apparent brutal and heartless decisions. The pain may be intense. But the disease is so far advanced that only with radical surgery does the patient have a chance to survive.[45]

The American political elite fully embraced this population paradigm of viewing the world and relations with the rest of the world. President Lyndon Johnson was quoted as saying, “I’m not going to piss away foreign aid in nations where they refuse to deal with their own population problems,” while his successor, Richard Nixon, was quoted as saying, “population control is a must … population control must go hand in hand with aid.”[46] Robert McNamara, President of the World Bank and former Secretary of Defense in the Johnson administration, said that he opposed World Bank programs financing health care “unless it was very strictly related to population control, because usually health facilities contributed to the decline of the death rate, and thereby to the population explosion.”[47]

Ehrlich was also influential in tracking India’s rapid population growth into the 1970s. The rapid population growth in India was attributed at the time to the result of the public health system the British had set up under the colonial government, as well as the fact that, as a means to maintaining a relationship of dependence with Britain, the British had discouraged industrialization in India. As famine was around the corner in India, President “Johnson used food aid to pressure the Indian government to meet its family planning targets,” and “By the early 1970s, Bangladesh was spending one third of its entire health budget on family planning and India was spending 60 percent.”[48] Further:

[B]etween the 1960s and 1980s, millions of people in India and other Asian countries were sterilized or had IUDs [intrauterine devices], as well as other contraceptives, inserted in unhygienic conditions. Numerous cases of uterine perforation, excessive bleeding, infections, and even death were reported.[49]

The Population Council knowingly sent un-sterile IUDs to India, and in the 1970s, nearly half a million women in forty-two developing countries were treated with defective IUDs that “heightened the risk of infection and uterine perforation,” after the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) had “quietly bought up thousands of the devices at a discount for distribution overseas.” Then sterilization was introduced as a means for “keeping the quotas” on population control in India, as “sterilization was made a condition for receiving land allocations and water for irrigation, as well as electricity, rickshaw licenses, and medical care.” A Swedish diplomat touring a Swedish/World Bank population program at the time was quoted as saying, “Obviously the stories… on how young and unmarried men are more or less dragged to the sterilization premises are true in far too many cases.”[50]

In 1967, the UN Fund for Population Activities was created, and in 1971, “the General Assembly acknowledged that UNFPA [United Nations Population Fund] should play a leading role within the UN system in promoting population programmes.”[51] In 1970, Nixon created the Commission on Population Growth and the American Future, known as the Rockefeller Commission, for its chairman, John D. Rockefeller 3rd. In 1972, the final report was delivered to Nixon. Among the members of the Commission (besides Rockefeller) were David E. Bell, Vice President of the Ford Foundation, and Bernard Berelson, President of the Population Council. Among the conclusions were that, “Population growth is one of the major factors affecting the demand for resources and the deterioration of the environment in the United States. The further we look into the future, the more important population becomes,” and that, “From an environmental and resource point of view, there are no advantages from further growth.” Further, the report warned:

The American future cannot be isolated from what is happening in the rest of the world. There are serious problems right now in the distribution of resources, income, and wealth, among countries. World population growth is going to make these problems worse before they get better. The United States needs to undertake much greater efforts to understand these problems and develop international policies to deal with them.[52]

In 1974, National Security Study Memorandum (NSSM) 200 was issued under the direction of US National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger, otherwise known as “Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests.” Among the issues laid out in the memorandum was that, “Growing populations will have a serious impact on the need for food especially in the poorest, fastest growing LDCs [Lesser Developed Countries],” and “The most serious consequence for the short and middle term is the possibility of massive famines in certain parts of the world, especially the poorest regions.”

Further, “rapid population growth presses on a fragile environment in ways that threaten longer-term food production.” The report plainly stated that, “there is a major risk of severe damage to world economic, political, and ecological systems and, as these systems begin to fail, to our humanitarian values.”[53]

The memorandum lays out key policy recommendations for dealing with the “crisis” of overpopulation. They stated that “our aim should be for the world to achieve a replacement level of fertility, (a two-child family on the average), by about the year 2000,” and that this strategy “will require vigorous efforts by interested countries, U.N. agencies and other international bodies to make it effective [and] U.S. leadership is essential.” They suggested a concentration on specific countries: India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Mexico, Indonesia, Brazil, the Philippines, Thailand, Egypt, Turkey, Ethiopia and Colombia.[54]

They recommended the “Integration of population factors and population programs into country development planning,” as well as “Increased assistance for family planning services, information and technology,” and “Creating conditions conducive to fertility decline.” The memorandum even specifically mentioned that, “We must take care that our activities should not give the appearance to the LDCs [Lesser Developed Countries] of an industrialized country policy directed against the LDCs.”[55] Essentially, NSSM 200 made population control a key strategy in US foreign policy, specifically related to aid and development. In other words, it was eugenics as foreign policy.

In 1975, Indira Gandhi, the Prime Minister of India, declared martial law. Her son Sanjay was appointed as the nation’s chief population controller. Sanjay

“proceeded to flatten slums and then tell the residents that they could get a new house if they would agree to be sterilized. Government officials were given sterilization quotas. Within a year, six million Indian men and two million women were sterilized. At least 2,000 Indians died as a result of botched sterilization operations.” However, the following year there was an election, and Indira Gandhi’s government was thrown out of power, with that issue playing a major factor.[56]

Next, however, China became the major focus of the population control movement, which “offered technical assistance to China’s “one child” policy of 1978-83, even helping to pay for computers that allowed Chinese officials to track “birth permits,” the official means by which the government banned families from having more than one child and required the aborting of additional children.”[57] Further:

Even China’s draconian population programs received some support in the 1980s from the US-funded International Planned Parenthood Federation and the UN Population Fund. Before China launched its infamous “One Child Policy,” concerns were being raised about its “voluntary” family planning program. In 1981, Chinese and American newspapers reported that “vehicles transporting Cantonese women to hospitals for abortions were ‘filled with wailing noises.’ Some pregnant women were reportedly ‘handcuffed, tied with ropes or placed in pig’s baskets.'”

After 1983, coercion became official Chinese policy. “All women with one child were to be inserted with a stainless-steel, tamper-resistant IUD, all parents with two or more children were to be sterilized, and all unauthorized pregnancies aborted,” according to the One Child Policy. During this time, the International Planned Parenthood Federation and the UN Population Fund continued to support China’s nongovernmental Family Planning Association, even though some of its top officials also worked for the government.[58]

The UN was not a passive participant in population control measures, as it actively supported these harsh programs, and in many cases, rewarded governments for their vicious tactics in reducing population growth:

In 1983, Xinzhong Qian and Indira Gandhi were awarded the first United Nations Population Award to recognize and reward their accomplishments in limiting the population growth in China and India in the previous decade. During the 1970s, officials in these countries had launched extremely ambitious population programs that were supposed to improve the quality of the population and halt its growth. The measures used were harsh. For example, slum clearance resulting in the eradication of whole urban neighbourhoods and the widespread sterilization of their inhabitants was an important part of India’s ‘Emergency’ campaign.

In Delhi, hundreds of thousands of people were driven from their homes in events that resulted in numerous clashes, arrests, and deaths, while a total of eight million sterilizations were recorded in India in 1976.[59]

Horrifically, “between the 1960s and 1980s, millions of people in India and other Asian countries were sterilized or had IUDs, as well as other contraceptives, inserted in unhygienic conditions. Numerous cases of uterine perforation, excessive bleeding, infections, and even death were reported, but these programs made little effort to treat these conditions, or even determine their frequency, so we don’t know precisely how common they were.”[60]

In the late 1980s, revelations in Brazil uncovered the NSSM 200 in Brazil since its implementation in 1975 under the Ford Presidency. An official government investigation was launched, and it was discovered that, “an estimated 44% of all Brazilian women aged between 14 and 55 had been permanently sterilized.”

Further, the programs of sterilization, undertaken by a number of international organizations, were coordinated under the guidance of USAID.[61]

At the UN’s 1994 World Population Conference in Cairo, Third World delegates to the conference emphasized the need for development policies as opposed to demographic policies; that the focus must be on development, not population. This was essentially a setback for the radical population control movement; however, it wasn’t one they couldn’t work around. There was still a great deal of support among Western elites and co-opted developing world elites for the aims of population control. As Connelly articulated:

It appealed to the rich and powerful because, with the spread of emancipatory movements and the integration of markets, it began to appear easier and more profitable to control populations than to control territory. That’s why opponents were correct in viewing it as another chapter in the unfinished history of imperialism.[62]

It was around this point that the population control movement, while continuing on its overall aims of curbing population growth of Third World nations, began to further merge itself with the environmental movement. While always working alongside the environmental movement, this period saw the emergence of a more integrated approach to policy agendas.

Environmentalism as Eugenics

Michael Barker extensively covered the connection between the Rockefeller and Ford foundations in funding the environmental movement in the academic journal, Capitalism Nature Socialism. As Barker noted, following World War II, the public became increasingly concerned with the environment as the “chemical-industrial complex” grew at an astounding rate.[63] Since Rockefeller interests were heavily involved in the chemical industry, the rising trend in environmental thought and concern had to quickly be controlled and steered in a direction favourable to elite interests.

Two important organizations in shaping the environmental movement were the Conservation Foundation and Resources for the Future, which largely relied upon Rockefeller and Ford Foundation funding, and both conservation organizations had interestingly helped to “launch an explicitly pro-corporate approach to resource conservation.”[64] Laurance Rockefeller served as a trustee of the Conservation Foundation, and donated $50,000 yearly throughout the 50s and 60s.

Further, the Conservation Foundation was founded by Fairfield Osborn, whose cousin, Frederick Osborn, became another prominent voice in conservation.[65]

Frederick Osborn was also working with the Rockefeller’s Population Council and was President of the American Eugenics Society.

In 1952, the Ford Foundation created the organization Resources for the Future (RFF), (the same year that the Rockefellers created the Population Council), and the original founders were also “John D. Rockefeller Jr.’s chief advisors on conservation matters.” Laurance Rockefeller joined the board of the RFF in 1958, and the RFF got $500,000 from the Rockefeller Foundation in 1970.[66] The Ford Foundation would also go on to create the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), and the Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund.[67] McGeorge Bundy, who was President of the Ford Foundation from 1966 until 1979, once stated that, “everything the foundation did could be regarded as ‘making the world safe for capitalism’.”[68]

Certainly one of the pre-eminent, if not the most prominent environmental organizations in the world is the World Wildlife Foundation (WWF). The WWF was founded on September 11, 1961, by Sir Julian Huxley, the first Director General of the UN organization, UNESCO.[69] Sir Julian Huxley was also a life trustee of the British Eugenics Society from 1925, and its President from 1959-62. In the biography of Julian Huxley on the British Eugenics Society’s website (now known as the Galton Institute – a genetics research center), it stated that, “Huxley believed that eugenics would one day be seen as the way forward for the human race,” and that, “A catastrophic event may be needed for evolution to move at an accelerated pace, as the extinction of the dinosaurs gave the mammals their chance to take over the world. It is much the same with ideas whose time has not yet come; they must survive periods when they are not generally welcome. Like the small mammals in dinosaur times they must await their opportunity.”[70]

In 1962, Rachel Carson, an American marine biologist, published her seminal work, Silent Spring, which has long been credited with helping launch the modern environmental movement. Her book was largely based around the criticism of pesticides as harmful to the environment and human and animal health. Of particular note, she is seen as being the starting force for the campaign against DDT. Carson died in 1964, but her legacy was set in stone by the emerging environmental movement.

The Environmental Defense Fund was founded in 1967 with the specific aim to ban DDT. Some of its initial funding came from the Ford Foundation.[71] This also spurred the formation of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), an official US government agency, in 1970. In 1972, the EPA banned the use of DDT in the United States. Since this time, “DDT prohibitions have been expanded and enforced by NGO pressure, coercive treaties, and threats of economic sanctions by foundations, nations and international aid agencies.”[72]

DDT is widely regarded as a carcinogen, and most have never questioned the banning of DDT until understanding the effects of DDT usage beyond the environmental aspect. In particular, we need to look at Africa to understand the significant role of DDT and why we need to re-evaluate its potential usage, weighing the pros and cons of doing so. We must bring in the “human element” and balance that out with the “environmental element” instead of just simply writing off the human aspect to the issue.

The World Health Organization (WHO) said in 2000, that, “malaria infected over 300 million people. It killed nearly 2,000,000 – most of them in sub-Saharan Africa. Over half the victims are children, who die at the rate of two per minute or 3,000 per day,” and that, “Since 1972, over 50 million people have died from this dreaded disease. Many are weakened by AIDS or dysentery, but actually die of malaria.” In 2002 alone, 80,000 Ugandans died from malaria, half of which were children.[73] The fact is, that:

No other chemical comes close to DDT as an affordable, effective way to repel mosquitoes from homes, exterminate any that land on walls, and disorient any that are not killed or repelled, largely eliminating their urge to bite in homes that are treated once or twice a year with tiny amounts of this miracle insecticide.[74]

Donald Roberts, Professor of Tropical Public Health at the Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, explained that, “DDT is long-acting; the alternatives are not,” and that, ultimately, when it comes to the issue of poor countries and poor people, “DDT is cheap; the alternatives are not. End of Story.”[75]

Richard Tren, President of Africa Fighting Malaria, said that, “In the 60 years since DDT was first introduced, not a single scientific paper has been able to replicate even one case of actual human harm from its use.” At the end of World War II, DDT was used on nearly every concentration camp survivor to prevent typhus, and the “widespread use of DDT in Europe and the United States played vital roles in eradicating malaria and typhus on both continents.”

Further, in 1979, a World Health Organization (WHO) review of DDT use could not find “any possible adverse effects of DDT,” and said it was the “safest pesticide used for residual spraying and vector control programs.”[76]

However, organizations such as the WHO, United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP), the World Bank, Greenpeace, World Wildlife Fund, and a variety of others still remained adamantly opposed to the use of DDT. While DDT is not outright banned, it is extremely difficult to have it used in places like Africa due to funding. The funding for health care and disease-related programs comes largely from western aid agencies and NGOs, and “The US Agency for International Development [USAID] will not fund any indoor residual spraying and neither will most of the other donors,” explained Richard Tren, which “means that most African countries have to use whatever [these donors] are willing to fund (bed nets), which may not be the most appropriate tool.”[77]

A Ugandan Health Minister said in 2002 that, “Our people’s lives are of primary importance. The West is concerned about the environment because we share it with them. But it is not concerned about malaria because it is not a problem there. In Europe, they used DDT to kill anopheles mosquitoes that cause malaria. Why can’t we use DDT to kill the enemy in our camp?”[78]

Michael Crichton, an author and PhD molecular biologist, plainly stated, “Banning DDT is one of the most disgraceful episodes in the twentieth century history of America. We knew better, and we did it anyway, and we let people around the world die, and we didn’t give a damn.” As author Paul Driessen eloquently explained, the West “would never tolerate being told they had to protect their children solely by using bed nets, larvae-eating fish and medicinal treatments. But they have been silent about conditions in Africa, and about the intolerable attitudes of environmental groups, aid agencies and their own government[s].”[79]

James Lovelock, a scientist, researcher, environmentalist and futurist, became famous for popularizing his idea known as the Gaia hypothesis. He first started writing about this theory in journals in the early 1970s, but it shot to fame with the publication of his 1979 book, “Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth.” The general theory is that the Earth acts as a single organism, where all facets interact and react in a particular way that promotes an optimal environment on Earth. Thus, the theory was named after the Greek Earth goddess, Gaia. In the opening paragraph of his book, he stated that, “the quest for Gaia is an attempt to find the largest living creature on Earth.”[80] His theory provoked a fair amount criticism within the scientific community, with some referring to it as merely a metaphorical description of Earth processes.[81]

Lovelock has also been known to make wild predictive statements. In 2006, he wrote an article for the Independent, in which he stated that, “My Gaia theory sees the Earth behaving as if it were alive, and clearly anything alive can enjoy good health, or suffer disease,” and that the Earth is “seriously ill, and soon to pass into a morbid fever that may last as long as 100,000 years.”[82]

In 2008, the Guardian interviewed Lovelock, who contended that it was “too late” to do anything about global warming, that catastrophe was inevitable, and that, “about 80%” of the world’s population [will] be wiped out by 2100.”[83] In August of 2009, Lovelock became a patron of the Optimum Population Trust, a British population control organization. Upon his becoming a patron, he stated that, “Those who fail to see that population growth and climate change are two sides of the same coin are either ignorant or hiding from the truth. These two huge environmental problems are inseparable and to discuss one while ignoring the other is irrational.” He added, “How can we possibly decrease carbon emissions and land use while the number of emitters and the space they occupy remorselessly increases? When will the environmentalists who claim to be green recognise the truth and speak out?”[84]

Taxes and trades in carbon and carbon credits virtually commodify our atmosphere, so that the very air we breathe becomes property that is bought and sold. A tax on carbon is a tax on life. Since the lifeblood of an industrial society is oil, this requires carbon emissions in order to develop. The restraints on carbon, particularly the notion of trading carbon credits – i.e., trading the ‘right’ to pollute a certain amount – will disproportionately affect the developing world, which cannot afford to finance its own development. Corporations and banks will trade and own the world’s carbon credits, granting them the exclusive right to pollute and control the world’s resources and environment. The carbon trading market could become twice the size of the world oil market within ten years time.[85]

In regards to the Copenhagen Climate talks, which essentially broke down in December of 2009, the real source of this failure lies in a document that revealed the true nature of the negotiations, referred to as the ‘Danish Text.’ The ‘Danish Text’ was a leaked Danish government document which outlined a draft agreement “that hands more power to rich countries,” as, “The draft hands effective control of climate change finance to the World Bank” and “would make any money to help poor countries adapt to climate change dependent on them taking a range of actions.”[86] In other words, it becomes the new means of exerting “conditionality” upon the developing, and increasingly the developed world. ‘Conditionality’ implying – of course – a restructuring of society along lines designated by the World Bank.

While these are but examples of the influence and shaping of science to mold society and control humanity, much more discussion and debate is needed on these issues. While science can be used for the benefit of mankind, so too can it be used for the control and oppression of humanity. The people who run our societies view us as needing to be controlled, so they redirect the social apparatus into systems of control and coercion. Science can allow us to understand an idea or organism; but in doing so, it can also allow us to understand how to dominate and control that idea or organism. We must continually engage in a discussion of our changing society to better understand the nature of its changes and how that could affect us both positively and negatively.

If not for the Technological (or ‘Technetronic’) Revolution, elites would not have access to such powerful means of control; but, simultaneously, people have never had such great access to each other through mass communications and the Internet. So while environmental science can allow us to better understand our environment, something we seem still to be very much an adolescent in accomplishing, it also unleashes an ability, and what’s greater – a temptation – to control and shape the environment. Science can be used to both free and imprison the human mind. It is imperative that we approach and discuss the sciences (and all issues) from this perspective, not from a narrow-minded and divisive black-and-white world of ‘left’ and ‘right’, of religion or science. We cannot simply view criticism and opposition to social and scientific endeavours as ‘backwards’, or based on ‘religious doctrine’. There are rational reasons and purposes for criticism and debate on all of these issues, and rational positions of dissent.

Issues like climate change are generally divided upon those who ‘believe’ in climate change, and those who are termed ‘deniers’, which is a disingenuous and divisive approach to rational debate. It silences the critical scientists, who do not get funding from governments or corporations. It classifies those who dissent as ‘deniers’, employing rhetoric like that used against Holocaust deniers, whereas the majority of the dissent within the scientific community comes from those who simply see the role of other forces (often natural) in shaping and changing our climate, such as solar radiation. They do not ‘deny’ climate change, but they dissent on the causes and consequences. Is their opinion not worth hearing? If we are reshaping our entire global political and economic spheres as a result of our supposedly ‘collective’ perception of this issue – as we certainly are – then is it not of the utmost importance that we hear from other voices, especially those of dissent, in order to better understand the issue?

Merging Man and Machine: The Future of Humanity

Eisenhower warned, “The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present – and is gravely to be regarded,” and that, “we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.”[87]

Bill Joy, a computer scientist and co-founder of Sun Microsystems, who was co-chair of the presidential commission on the future of IT research, wrote an article for Wired Magazine in 2000 entitled, “Why the Future Doesn’t Need Us.” Joy explained the possibilities in a technological society of the near future, that “new technologies like genetic engineering and nanotechnology were giving us the power to remake the world.” One startling development in the world is that of robot technology and its potential impact upon society. Joy explains:

Accustomed to living with almost routine scientific breakthroughs, we have yet to come to terms with the fact that the most compelling 21st-century technologies – robotics, genetic engineering, and nanotechnology – pose a different threat than the technologies that have come before. Specifically, robots, engineered organisms, and nanobots share a dangerous amplifying factor: They can self-replicate. A bomb is blown up only once – but one bot can become many, and quickly get out of control.[88]

Joy explains that while these technologies can, and consistently are promoted and justified in the name of doing good (such as curing diseases, etc.), “with each of these technologies, a sequence of small, individually sensible advances leads to an accumulation of great power and, concomitantly, great danger.”

Joy ominously warns that:

The 21st-century technologies – genetics, nanotechnology, and robotics (GNR) – are so powerful that they can spawn whole new classes of accidents and abuses.

Most dangerously, for the first time, these accidents and abuses are widely within the reach of individuals or small groups. They will not require large facilities or rare raw materials. Knowledge alone will enable the use of them.

Thus we have the possibility not just of weapons of mass destruction but of knowledge-enabled mass destruction (KMD), this destructiveness hugely amplified by the power of self-replication.

I think it is no exaggeration to say we are on the cusp of the further perfection of extreme evil, an evil whose possibility spreads well beyond that which weapons of mass destruction bequeathed to the nation-states, on to a surprising and terrible empowerment of extreme individuals.[89]

In other words: we are entering an era faced with the “scientific dictators” of Huxley’s nightmare vision in ‘Brave New World’. Joy explained that by 2030, “we are likely to be able to build machines, in quantity, a million times as powerful as the personal computers of today.” Thus:

As this enormous computing power is combined with the manipulative advances of the physical sciences and the new, deep understandings in genetics, enormous transformative power is being unleashed. These combinations open up the opportunity to completely redesign the world, for better or worse: The replicating and evolving processes that have been confined to the natural world are about to become realms of human endeavor.[90]

Joy examined the transformative nature of robotics, as an intelligent robot may be built by 2030, “And once an intelligent robot exists, it is only a small step to a robot species – to an intelligent robot that can make evolved copies of itself.” Further, “A second dream of robotics is that we will gradually replace ourselves with our robotic technology, achieving near immortality by downloading our consciousnesses.” Joy further warns of the potential for an arms race to develop in these technologies, just as took place in the nuclear, radiological and biological weapons of the 20th century.[91]

Joy aptly explained that in the 20th century, those technologies were largely the products of governments, whereas in the 21st century, the new technologies of genetic engineering, nanotechnology and robotics (GNR), are the products of corporations and capitalism. Thus, the driving force is that of competition, desire, and the economic system. Hence, there is far less regulation and discussion of these new technologies than there was of the 20th century technologies, as the new technologies are developed in privately owned labs, not public. Joy often quotes a passage from Kaczynski’s Unabomber Manifesto regarding a future dystopia, which Joy feels has “merit in the reasoning.” In the event that human control over machines is retained (as opposed to the machines taking over):

[C]ontrol over large systems of machines will be in the hands of a tiny elite – just as it is today, but with two differences. Due to improved techniques the elite will have greater control over the masses; and because human work will no longer be necessary the masses will be superfluous, a useless burden on the system. If the elite is ruthless they may simply decide to exterminate the mass of humanity. If they are humane they may use propaganda or other psychological or biological techniques to reduce the birth rate until the mass of humanity becomes extinct, leaving the world to the elite.

Or, if the elite consists of soft-hearted liberals, they may decide to play the role of good shepherds to the rest of the human race. They will see to it that everyone’s physical needs are satisfied, that all children are raised under psychologically hygienic conditions, that everyone has a wholesome hobby to keep him busy, and that anyone who may become dissatisfied undergoes “treatment” to cure his “problem.” Of course, life will be so purposeless that people will have to be biologically or psychologically engineered either to remove their need for the power process or make them “sublimate” their drive for power into some harmless hobby. These engineered human beings may be happy in such a society, but they will most certainly not be free. They will have been reduced to the status of domestic animals.[92]

A horrifying vision indeed; but one which builds upon the ideas of Huxley, Russell and Brzezinski, who envisioned a people who – through biological and psychological means – are made to love their own servitude. Huxley saw the emergence of a world in which humanity, still a wild animal, is domesticated; where only the elite remain wild and have freedom to make decisions, while the masses are domesticated like pets. Huxley opined that, “Men and women will grow up to love their servitude and will never dream of revolution. There seems to be no good reason why a thoroughly scientific dictatorship should ever be overthrown.”[93]

We Can Have a Scientific Dictatorship, or…

We can create an alternative. We use, strengthen, mobilize, decentralize, and mobilize the global political awakening into a global movement of people not simply politically aware, but politically active and engaged. A world where people do not simply observe the apparatus of political, economic and social power influencing their lives; but in which the people actively seek to change it to better suit their lives and their freedom. We need to understand each other better; but to do that, we cannot view each other through the harsh and deceptive lens of power.

To understand each other, we must know each other. People must communicate with one another around the world; ideas must be exchanged between people and discussed, debated, and decided upon; the people must determine their own futures. Take the elites out of the equation: if you do not want them to dominate your lives, do not give them the power to do so. Talk to each other and determine your own polities, economies and societies. Do not entrust dying ideas and diseased institutions to determine your future for you.

The tools and systems of social control are vast and evasive; they penetrate the very psychology and biology of the individual. The elite feel that they are entrusted – due to their supposed ‘innate’ superior intelligence and specialization – to control society and reshape it as they see fit, to actively mold and construct public opinion and ideas. They have a belief that people are essentially irrational emotional beings, and that they must be controlled by an elite or else the world would be in chaos. This is what underpins the ideas of ‘stability’ and ‘order’. The state has been used to fight every progressive form of change that society has ever developed for its betterment: women’s rights, racial rights, civil rights, the anti-war movement, gay rights, etc. Initially, the impulse – the immediate reaction of the state – is to oppress social movements and to suppress human freedoms. This approach often leads to a situation in which social movements are only accepted by the state when they are co-opted by the state or powerful economic forces, which then exert their influence over the state to alter the policy.

If we gain stability and order at the cost of our very humanity, is it worth it? Do we really need this eternal guidance, which has been constant through almost all of human history, to treat the human species as if it was in a constant state of adolescence, never quite prepared to make its own decisions or go out in the world on its own? Well it is time for humanity to grow up, leave the strange comfort of mental authoritarianism. The strive for human autonomy has only just begun; only now is all of humanity politically awakened; only now – and never before – has all of known humanity had such a great and perfect opportunity to remake the world, retake power, re-imagine individuality and revitalize freedom.

Our world is governed not by a conspiracy, but by ideas: ideas of power, money, the state, military, empire, race, religion, sex, gender, politics and people. The only challenge to those ideas, are new ideas. There are roughly 6,000 members of the ‘global elite,’[94] there are over 6.8 billion people in the world. That sounds like a lot of potential for new ideas. The greatest resource for the future of humanity is not in the ‘control’ of humanity, which is doomed to ultimate failure, but for the release and encouragement of the human mind and spirit.

People can understand the science and mechanics of the brain, the functions of psychology, the ability of human strength; but still, today, we do not know how all that biology can create Beethoven’s 9th Symphony. Humanity is still very much a mystery to humans, and it would seem likely that the best answers to the questions of ‘how should we live?’ and ‘how should our societies function?’ are best answered with the bigger question of ‘why are we here’?

If the purpose of people and humanity is to consume and dominate, then our present situation seems only natural. If we were meant for more, then we must become more. If we were meant to be free, we must become free. Ideas are powerful things: they can build empires, and collapse them just as easily.

In 1967, Dr. Martin Luther King delivered one of his most moving and important speeches, “Beyond Vietnam,” in which he spoke out against war and empire. He left humanity with sobering words:

I am convinced that if we are to get on the right side of the world revolution, we as a nation must undergo a radical revolution of values. We must rapidly begin the shift from a “thing-oriented” society to a “person-oriented” society. When machines and computers, profit motives and property rights are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, materialism, and militarism are incapable of being conquered.[95]
 
Andrew Gavin Marshall is a Research Associate with the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG), and is studying Political Economy and History in Canada.

He is co-editor, with Michel Chossudovsky, of the recent book, “The Global Economic Crisis: The Great Depression of the XXI Century,” available to order at Globalresearch.ca.

Endnotes
[1]        Aldous Huxley, Brave New World and Brave New World Revisited. (Harper Perennial, New York, 2004), page 255
[2]        Ibid, page 259.
[3]        Bertrand Russell, The Impact of Science on Society, (Routledge, 1985), page 40
[4]        Ibid, page 66.
[5]        Ibid, page 62.
[6]        Ibid, page 58.
[7]        Ibid, page 117.
[8]        Ibid, page 118.
[9]        Ibid, page 63.
[10]      Aldous Huxley, The Ultimate Revolution, March 20, 1962. Berkeley Language Center – Speech Archive SA 0269: http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/Speech/VideoTest/audiofiles.html#huxley
[11]      Dwight D. Eisenhower, Eisenhower’s Farewell Address to the Nation. January 17, 1961: http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/ike.htm
[12]      Zbigniew Brzezinski, Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era. (Viking Press, New York, 1970), page 97
[13]      Edwin Black, Eugenics and the Nazis — the California connection. The San Francisco Chronicle: November 9, 2003:
http://articles.sfgate.com/2003-11-09/opinion/17517477_1_eugenics-ethnic-cleansing-master-race
[14]      Michael Barker, The Liberal Foundations of Environmentalism: Revisiting the Rockefeller-Ford Connection. Capitalism Nature Socialism: Volume 19, Number 2, June 2008
[15]      Bruno Waterfield, Dutch Prince Bernhard ‘was member of Nazi party’. The Telegraph: March 5, 2010:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/netherlands/7377402/Dutch-Prince-Bernhard-was-member-of-Nazi-party.html
[16]      Julian Huxley, UNESCO Its Purpose and Its Philosophy (1946). Preparatory Commission of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation, page 61.
[17]      Ibid, page 21.
[18]      Ibid, pages 37-38.
[19]      Ibid, page 38.
[20]      Ibid.
[21]      Ibid, page 18.
[22]      Edwin Black, War Against the Weak: Eugenics and America’s Campaign to Create a Master Race. (New York: Thunders’s Mouth Press, 2004), page 418
[23]      MARTIN MORSE WOOSTER, The War Against Fertility. The Wall Street Journal: April 1, 2008:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120700566688178565.html?mod=hpp_europe_leisure
[24]      Garland E. Allen, “Is a New Eugenics Afoot?” Science Magazine, October 5, 2001: Vol. 294, no. 5540:
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/294/5540/59
[25]      Ibid.
[26]      Ibid.
[27]      Niall Firth, Human race will ‘split into two different species’. The Daily Mail: October 26, 2007:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-489653/Human-race-split-different-species.html
[28]      Edwin Black, War Against the Weak: Eugenics and America’s Campaign to Create a Master Race (New York: Thunder’s Mouth Press, 2004), 11-12
[29]      Ibid, pages 12-13.
[30]      Ibid, page 19.
[31]      Ibid, page 28.
[32]      Ibid, page 416.
[33]      Ibid, page 418.
[34]      Simon Butler, The Dark History of Population Control. Climate and Capitalism: November 23, 2009: http://climateandcapitalism.com/?p=1293
[35]      History, ABOUT THE POPULATION COUNCIL. The Population Council: September 10, 2008: http://www.popcouncil.org/about/history.html
[36]      MARTIN MORSE WOOSTER, The War Against Fertility. The Wall Street Journal: April 1, 2008: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120700566688178565.html?mod=hpp_europe_leisure
[37]      History, ABOUT THE POPULATION COUNCIL. The Population Council: September 10, 2008: http://www.popcouncil.org/about/history.html
[38]      Review, Horrid History. The Economist: May 24, 2008
[39]      Heli Kasanen, BOOK REVIEW: Fatal misconception: the struggle to control world population, By Matthew Connelly: The Electronic Journal of Sustainable Development, 2009, 1(3), page 15
[40]      Review, Horrid History. The Economist: May 24, 2008
[41]      Helen Epstein, The Strange History of Birth Control. The New York Review of Books: August 18, 2008: http://www.powells.com/review/2008_08_18.html
[42]      Dominic Lawson, Fatal Misconception: The Struggle to Control World Population by Matthew Connelly. The Sunday Times: May 18, 2008:
http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/books/non-fiction/article3938455.ece
[43]      Fred Pearce, Fatal Misconception by Matthew Connelly. The New Scientist: May 21, 2008:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19826572.400-review-ifatal-misconceptioni-by-matthew-connelly.html
[44]      Jack M. Hollander, The Real Environmental Crisis: Why Poverty, Not Affluence, Is the Environment’s Number One Enemy. (University of California Press: Berkeley, 2003), page 30
[45]      Lara Knudsen, Reproductive Rights in a Global Context. (Vanderbilt University Press: 2006), page 3
[46]      Simon Butler, The Dark History of Population Control. Climate and Capitalism: November 23, 2009: http://climateandcapitalism.com/?p=1293
[47]      Nicholas D. Kristof, Birth Control for Others. The New York Times: March 23, 2008: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/23/books/review/Kristof-t.html
[48]      Helen Epstein, The Strange History of Birth Control. The New York Review of Books: August 18, 2008: http://www.powells.com/review/2008_08_18.html
[49]      Ibid.
[50]      Ibid.
[51]      UNFPA, UNFPA and the United Nations System. About UNFPA: http://www.unfpa.org/about/unsystem.htm
[52]      Population and the American Future, The Report of The Commission on Population Growth and the American Future. The Center for Research on Population and Security: March 27, 1972:
http://www.population-security.org/rockefeller/001_population_growth_and_the_american_future.htm#Commission
[53]      NSSM 200, Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests. National Security Study Memorandum (NSSM) 200: April 24, 1974: http://www.population-security.org/11-CH3.html#summary
[54]      Ibid.
[55]      Ibid.
[56]      MARTIN MORSE WOOSTER, The War Against Fertility. The Wall Street Journal: April 1, 2008:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120700566688178565.html?mod=hpp_europe_leisure
[57]      Ibid.
[58]      Helen Epstein, The Strange History of Birth Control. The New York Review of Books: August 18, 2008: http://www.powells.com/review/2008_08_18.html
[59]      Heli Kasanen, BOOK REVIEW: Fatal misconception: the struggle to control world population, By Matthew Connelly: The Electronic Journal of Sustainable Development, 2009, 1(3), page 15
[60]      Helen Epstein, The Strange History of Birth Control. The New York Review of Books, August 18, 2008: http://www.powells.com/review/2008_08_18.html
[61]      F. William Engdahl, Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation. (Global Research, Montreal: 2007), page 65
[62]      Simon Butler, The Dark History of Population Control. Climate and Capitalism: November 23, 2009: http://climateandcapitalism.com/?p=1293
[63]      Michael Barker, The Liberal Foundations of Environmentalism: Revisiting the Rockefeller-Ford Connection. Capitalism Nature Socialism: Volume 19, Number 2, June 2008: page 15
[64]      Ibid, pages 19-20.
[65]      Ibid, page 20.
[66]      Ibid, page 22.
[67]      Ibid, page 25.
[68]      Ibid, page 26.
[69]      WWF, A History of WWF: The Sixties. World Wildlife Fund: November 13, 2005: http://www.panda.org/about_wwf/who_we_are/history/sixties/index.cfm
[70]      John Timson, Portraits of the Pioneers: Sir Julian Huxley, FRS. The Galton Institute: December 1999 Newsletter: http://www.galtoninstitute.org.uk/Newsletters/GINL9912/julian_huxley.htm
[71]      Michael Barker, The Liberal Foundations of Environmentalism: Revisiting the Rockefeller-Ford Connection. Capitalism Nature Socialism: Volume 19, Number 2, June 2008: page 25
[72]      Paul Driessen, Eco-Imperialism: Green Power, Black Death. (Merril Press: 2004), page 67
[73]      Ibid, page 66.
[74]      Ibid, page 67.
[75]      Ibid, page 68.
[76]      Ibid, page 69.
[77]      Ibid, page 71.
[78]      Ibid, page 72.
[79]      Ibid, page 73.
[80]      James Lovelock, Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth. (Oxford: 1979), page 1
[81]      S.J. Gould, Kropotkin was no crackpot. Natural History, June 1997: pages 12-21
[82]      James Lovelock, The Earth is about to catch a morbid fever that may last as long as 100,000 years. The Independent: January 16, 2006:
http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/james-lovelock-the-earth-is-about-to-catch-a-morbid-fever-that-may-last-as-long-as-100000-years-523161.html
[83]      Decca Aitkenhead, ‘Enjoy life while you can’. The Guardian: March 1, 2008:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian/2008/mar/01/scienceofclimatechange.climatechange
[84]      OPT, GAIA SCIENTIST TO BE OPT PATRON. News Release: August 26, 2009:
 http://www.optimumpopulation.org/releases/opt.release26Aug09.htm
[85]      Terry Macalister, Carbon trading could be worth twice that of oil in next decade. The Guardian: November 29, 2009:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/nov/29/carbon-trading-market-copenhagen-summit
[86]      John Vidal, Copenhagen climate summit in disarray after ‘Danish text’ leak. The Guardian: December 8, 2009:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/08/copenhagen-climate-summit-disarray-danish-text
[87]      Dwight D. Eisenhower, Eisenhower’s Farewell Address to the Nation. January 17, 1961: http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/ike.htm
[88]      Bill Joy, Why the future doesn’t need us. Wired Magazine: April 2000: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.04/joy.html
[89]      Ibid.
[90]      Ibid.
[91]      Ibid.
[92]      Ibid.
[93]      Time, The Press: Brave New Newsday. Time Magazine: June 9, 1958: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,868521,00.html
[94]      Laura Miller, The rise of the superclass. Salon: March 14, 2008: http://www.salon.com/books/review/2008/03/14/superclass
[95]      Rev. Martin Luther King, Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence. Speech delivered by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., on April 4, 1967, at a meeting of Clergy and Laity Concerned at Riverside Church in New York City: http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/45a/058.html

MORE ARTICLES BY ANDREW GAVIN MARSHELL

Andrew Gavin Marshall is a frequent contributor to Global Research.  Global Research Articles by Andrew Gavin Marshall

http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=20028

The Global Political Awakening and the New World Order
The Technological Revolution and the Future of Freedom, Part 1
by Andrew Gavin Marshall
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=19873

Revolution and Repression in America
The Technological Revolution and the Future of Freedom, Part 2
by Andrew Gavin Marshall
http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=19951

Falling Debt Dynamite Dominoes, The Coming Financial Catastrophe
Stock-Markets / Credit Crisis 2010
Feb 22, 2010 – 03:37 AM
By: Andrew_G_Marshall

 Understanding the Nature of the Global Economic Crisis – The people have been lulled into a false sense of safety under the rouse of a perceived “economic recovery.” Unfortunately, what the majority of people think does not make it so, especially when the people making the key decisions think and act to the contrary. The sovereign debt crises that have been unfolding in the past couple years and more recently in Greece, are canaries in the coal mine for the rest of Western “civilization.” The crisis threatens to spread to Spain, Portugal and Ireland; like dominoes, one country after another will collapse into a debt and currency crisis, all the way to America.

Many Congressmen were told that if they failed to pass the bailout package, they were threatened with martial law.[22] Sure enough, Congress passed the bill, and the financial coup had been a profound success.

No wonder then, in early 2009, one Congressman reported that the banks “are still the most powerful lobby on Capitol Hill. And they frankly own the place.”[23] Another Congressman said that “The banks run the place,” and explained, “I will tell you what the problem is – they give three times more money than the next biggest group. It’s huge the amount of money they put into politics.”[24]

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article17404.html

Advertisements

G20 Agent Provocateurs. The Police are the Black Bloc “Anarchists”

July 4, 2010

IF you are going to protest against the globalist agenda and world government and things like the G20 etc. expect the government apparatus to kill at least one of you  ,this is the subliminal message the government is sending out (and get away with it of course,the government will protect its murderers and torturers, but imagine if a protestor killed a policeman or ,god forbid , a polition!!!!) and they ,the government and its lackees ,will plant agent provocateurs to start fights, thus giving them the excuse to come in with a heavy hand to “restore order” from those nasty “anarchists”!!

For those that have read my blog before , I am sure you realise that I AM A UNREPENTANT ANARCHIST , and damn proud of it. I will debate with anyone on this topic.Politically I classify myself as a LIBERTARIAN SOCIALIST

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/11/04/libertarian-vs-authoritarian-todays-real-politic/

Just like Al Quada being a false flag operation run by the CIA/Mossad and the IRA was run by MI5 and the British army, that’s why the “NO SURRENDER” IRA suddenly surrendered when terrorsim became an “islamic” thing,sponsered by the Middle East,and not an Irish thing sponsered by plastic paddies , the American “Irish”.

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/12/29/usa-harbouring-terrorists-should-the-un-declare-war-on-this-rogue-terrorist-nation/

The people that are being reported in the MainStreamMedia as “Black Bloc Anarchists” ARE NOT ANARCHISTS THEY ARE POLICEMEN!!!! As an anarchist myself ,that has been on a few protests, I can definately say , we do not all buy our combat boots wholesale from the same supplier , we do not all wear the same black clothes and bandanas,this is just so “NOT ANARCHIST” mentality, it beggars belief!!

HOWEVER THE POLICE FORCE DO BUY THIER COMBAT BOOTS WHOLESALE AND THIER BLACK COMBAT CLOTHING

Police agent Provocatures posing as "Black Bloc Anarchists"

 http://peacebytruth.wordpress.com/2010/07/14/g20-toronto-riots-perpetrated-by-agents-provocateurs-of-the-police/

 <object width=”640″ height=”385″><param name=”movie” value=”http://www.youtube.com/v/MaeuV2RNL3o&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xd0d0d0&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1″></param><param name=”allowFullScreen” value=”true”></param><param name=”allowScriptAccess” value=”always”></param><embed src=”http://www.youtube.com/v/MaeuV2RNL3o&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xd0d0d0&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1” type=”application/x-shockwave-flash” allowfullscreen=”true” allowScriptAccess=”always” width=”640″ height=”385″></embed></object>

CBC Report at Montebello 2007
 See the distinctive yellow dots on the thick corrugated soles of the boots which are the giveaway.The Quebec Provincial Police were then forced after three days of  public outrage to admit that these three men were indeed their officers operating undercover.

 

Fast Forward to the Toronto 2010 G20 Protest Riot
On Saturday June 26, 2010, the Globe and Mail published on their website a number of photographs taken at the afternoon riot in downtown Toronto precipitated by the ‘black bloc.’
Using these photos, I am going to show you that once again, the ‘black bloc’ provocateurs and the armoured police are wearing the exact same shoes.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/g20-day-of-protest/article1619712/

Thanks to the Globe and Mail for these very helpful photos.

MONTREAL–With the proof caught on video, Quebec provincial police were forced to admit yesterday that three undercover agents were playing the part of protesters at this week’s international summit in Montebello, Que.
But the Quebec police force denied they were attempting to provoke protesters into violence. Rather, they said the three were planted in the crowd to locate any protesters who were not peacefully demonstrating. Police said the trio’s cover was blown when they refused to toss any objects.
The police said after viewing a video clip from YouTube.com and video shot by police officers, they were able to confirm the three were Quebec provincial police officers.
Earlier, both Quebec police and the RCMP denied any of their officers were involved.
http://www.thestar.com/News/Canada/article/249429
PLEASE CHECK THE YOUTUBE VIDEO
These Police where carrying STONES!!!! WHY??? Could it be the POLICE ARE LYING AGAIN???

AND AGAIN THE POLICE AGENT PROVOCATUERS ARE CAUGHT STARTING  VIOLENCE

The Black Block Infiltrated On Canadian TV “POLICE BUSTED”

SUBLIMINALS FROM CRIMINALS

Everyday we are bombarded with Mainstream Media Presstitute statements like “its a state of anarchy here”

When IN FACT what they are describing is an “IMPOSITION OF LAW” the complete OPPOSITE OF ANARCHY!! What we are IN REALITY witnessing is the second LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS , “the more you impose law, the more you accelerate chaos” Ignore this universal law at your peril!!! Therefore “strong government” can ONLY CREATE CHAOS , as it tries to impose its will. Iraq and Afghanistan are NOT in “states of anarchy” ,they are suffering from an “imposition of Law”!! Can I ask , how can a government reduce crime by passing a LAW? It can only create a NEW CRIMINAL CLASS and thus increase CRIME and CHAOS!! If you want to reduce crime , just repeal laws !!! IT IS THAT SIMPLE!!!

COUNTRIES LIKE SWITZERLAND AND ICELAND ARE IN STATES OF ANARCHY. THESE COUNTRIES HAVE DIRECT DEMOCRACY ,A FORM OF ANARCHY. ……SO REMEMBER TO THINK OF SWITZERLAND THE NEXT TIME ANARCHY IS MENTIONED ON TV, AND SEE HOW CLOSE IT IS TO WHAT IS BEING SHOWN ON TV BY THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA PRESSTITUTE “AS A STATE OF ANARCHY”!!

Officially the Swiss Confederation (Confoederatio Helvetica in Latin, hence its ISO country codes CH and CHE), is a federal republic consisting of 26 cantons. its a Federal state, with parliamentary system and direct democracy .

Direct democracy, classically termed pure democracy,[1] comprises a form of democracy and theory of civics wherein sovereignty is lodged in the assembly of all citizens who choose to participate. Depending on the particular system, this assembly might pass executive motions, make laws, elect or dismiss officials, and conduct trials. Direct democracy stands in contrast to representative democracy, (UK/USA elected dictatorships)where sovereignty is exercised by a subset of the people, usually on the basis of election……OR the choice of Tweedle Dee or Tweedle Dum (BOTH with the same backer , so in reality, its a one-party system)…….  FYI “Direct democracy” is a form of ANARCHISM!

FYI The Swiss have avoided illegal wars and have less crime and a higher standard of living and more freedoms and less terrorism , (foreign or domestic)! The Icelandic people have said NO the bankers bailouts and YES to banker arrests! The “anarchistic” Icelandic people are now DEBT FREE, the “subjected” Brits and Yanks are up to thiers necks in other peoples debts!! They have been sold into debt slavery by “thier democratic representatives”! The subjected people of the UK and USA have also lost thier FREEDOMS because of thier government representatives, and the subjected peoples of the UK and USA cannot question the actions of THIER government representatives, unless the government decides it will investigate itself!!!!!!!! ……… and they call this democracy?!?! ITS NOT ,YOU KNOW!!! Its actually closer to the rule of the 30 Tyrants , yet again the complete opposite of democracy!!

The Thirty Tyrants (Greek: οἱ τριάκοντα τύραννοι) were a pro-Spartan oligarchy installed in Athens after its defeat in the Peloponnesian War in 404 BC. Contemporary Athenians referred to them simply as “the oligarchy” or “the Thirty” (οἱ Τριάκοντα); the expression “Thirty Tyrants” is due to later historians.[1] Its two leading members were Critias and Theramenes.

The Thirty severely reduced the rights of Athenian citizens. Imposing a limit on the number of citizens allowed to vote (limiting the franchise for example to the wealthiest citizens) was a standard move on the part of wealthy people who objected to being bossed around by the votes of the “rabble” in a broad-based democracy where all free adult males could vote. (today partisipation in a vote is NOT automatic , you have to be “eligable to vote” on the electoral role)Participation in legal functions — which had previously been open to all Athenians — was restricted by the 30 to a select group of 500 persons(today we are limited to “vetted”political party representatives). Only 3,000 Athenians were granted the right to carry weapons or receive a jury trial.(today public servants can killed and torture with impunity, thanks to representative democracy)

The Thirty Tyrants forced many Athenians into exile and threw their leaders into jail.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/30_tyrants

ICELANDIC ANARCHISTS ARREST FRAUDULENT BANKERS

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/05/14/bailout-faltering-banker-arrests-beginning/

YOU DO NOT LIVE IN A DEMOCRACY !!!ITS AN ELECTED DICTATORSHIP POSING AS DEMOCRACY. IF ITS NOT A DICTATORSHIP YOU WILL BE ABLE TO TELL ME WHAT YOU GET TO VOTE ON OTHER THAN YOUR DICTATOR, THAT RULES BY “EDICTS” AND WE THE PEOPLE HAVE NO POWER OVER?

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/03/11/elected-dictatorship-posing-as-democracy/

UNFORTUNATELY POWER CORRUPTS AND ABSOLUTE POWER ATTRACTS THE ABSOLUTELY CORRUPT , THAT IS WHY CORRUPTION IS RUNNING THE GOVERNMENT AND PAEDOPHILES ARE PROTECTED BY THE POWERS THAT BE!!!

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/01/07/uk-government-blackmailed-into-war-blair-covers-mps-paedophile-ring-and-the-dunblane-massacre/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/01/09/a-list-of-child-sex-offenders-inside-the-british-government/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/03/31/pastors-of-muppets-and-masters-of-puppets-and-other-paedophiles/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/06/05/malice-in-blunderland-obama-bp-and-goldman-suckspirates-of-the-caribean-iv-the-black-spot/

PROFFESSIONAL SOLDIERS OR PAID STATE BOOT BOYS AND STATE TRAINED KILLERS ARE SENT ON BIG BUSINESS AND BIG GOVERNMENT RACKETS. THIER ACTIONS CREATE TERRORISM NOT REDUCE IT!!!

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/04/07/military-heroes-or-welfare-zeros/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/05/08/darwin-award-for-soldiers-and-israel-will-natural-selection-end-war-and-israel/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/01/10/the-real-uk-legacy-of-the-iraq-and-afghan-wars-death-stalks-our-streets-and-the-world/

HERE IS A SHORT LIST OF THE USA SPREADING FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY SINCE 1945

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/06/22/us-government-spreading-freedom-and-democracy-since-1945/

THE “ANARCHIST DIRECT DEMOCRACY” SWISS HAVE NO STANDING ARMY!!!!!! The Swiss Confederation has a long history of neutrality—it has not been in a state of war internationally since 1815.The Swiss Armed Forces, including the Land Forces and the Air Force, are composed of conscripts: professional soldiers constitute only about 5 percent of the military personnel.The structure of the Swiss militia system stipulates that the soldiers keep their own personal equipment, including all personal weapons, at home.

THERE IS NOT AN ARMY ON EARTH THAT COULD TAKE SWITZERLAND!!! BUT ALSO THERE IS NOT A COUNTRY ON EARTH, THE SWISS ARMY COULD INVADE!! SWITZERLAND IS FULL OF REAL MONEY (NOT UK AND USA I.O.U.s ) IT IS THE HOME OF THE U.N., INTERNATIONAL BANKING INTERESTS ,THE RED CROSS,AND MANY MORE GLOBAL ORGANISATIONS , YET NO-ONE IS EVEN THREATENING THEM WITH INVASION OR TERRORISM ……AND THEY HAVE NO ARMY?!?! SO MAYBE ARMIES DO NOT STOP WAR BUT CREATE WAR!!!!!

MEANWHILE POLICEMEN REGULARLY MURDER THIER CITIZENS LIE AND OBSTRUCT JUSTICE AND PERVERT JUSTICE AND GET AWAY WITH IT. IMAGINE THE MSM RESPONSE IF IT WAS A POLICEMAN KILLED IN THE SAME BRUTAL WAY BY A PROTESTOR AND HIS BUDDIES LIED TO COVER IT UP?!?!

Another cover-up of the police killing of Jean Charles de Menezes
The second report by the Independent Police Complaints Commission on the killing of Jean Charles de Menezes is yet another sordid episode in the cover-up of the brutal state execution of an innocent man.
Jean Charles, a Brazilian, was shot at Stockwell underground station on July 22, 2005. The young electrician was on his way to work when he was surrounded by plainclothes armed police on a train and shot without warning, seven times in the head and once in the shoulder.
In the immediate aftermath of his slaying, the police mounted a campaign of disinformation to back up their claim that de Menezes was a suicide bomber—connected with the failed plot the previous day, July 21. Reports claimed that he had been wearing bulky clothing to disguise a suicide belt, and that when challenged by police officers, had sought to evade arrest by jumping a ticket barrier at the station and running on to a train.
This story was kept up, even after the police were fully aware that they had killed an entirely blameless man. Only later were police forced to admit that none of their accounts of the events leading up to de Menezes’s death were true.
Jean Charles had been wearing light summer clothes, and had walked leisurely into the underground station—even stopping to buy a newspaper—unaware that he was being followed by armed police. It was not until he had boarded the train that de Menezes would have had any inkling of what was to befall him. Having taken his seat, he was suddenly seized by one plainclothes officer, whilst another proceeded to shoot directly into his head. A total of eleven bullets were fired, to the horror of other passengers.
It subsequently emerged that de Menezes was the victim of a shoot-to-kill policy—Operation Kratos—secretly adopted by the police and the highest echelons of the government more than two years before.
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2007/aug2007/mene-a06.shtml

Police officers in Jean Charles de Menezes shooting escape punishment

Relatives of Jean Charles de Menezes have been told that police officers involved in the fatal shooting will not face punishment

An IPCC spokesman said: “The IPCC has today advised lawyers acting for Jean Charles de Menezes’ family, the Metropolitan Police and the Metropolitan Police Authority that it will stand by its decision not to recommend disciplinary actions against the officers involved in the fatal shooting of Mr de Menezes in July 2005.

“In making this decision, the IPCC has carefully considered the family’s representations, the evidence identified by its own investigation and all subsequent legal proceedings.”

Frontline officers who stormed the Tube carriage were also accused of falsely claiming to shout “armed police”.

After the inquest, the de Menezes family called for perjury charges against officers who said they shouted a warning.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/lawandorder/6253971/Police-officers-in-Jean-Charles-de-Menezes-shooting-escape-punishment.html

The UK POLICE MURDERERS
Anti-war MP George Galloway has accused London Metropolitan Police of engaging in “a deliberate conspiracy to bring about scenes of violent disorder” during President George W. Bush’s visit to the UK last week.
Galloway has written a letter to the Home Secretary in which he names a senior police officer thought to have been operating as an undercover “agent provocateur”.
The Respect Party MP details incitements that the officer made towards police and how the man encouraged other protesters to charge baton-wielding officers and hurl projectiles at them
http://www.infowars.com/police-used-agents-provocateurs-at-uk-bush-protests/

Inquest opens into G20 death of Ian Tomlinson
New evidence prompts hearing as former senior officer Brian Paddick calls for arrest of police officer involved
An inquest opened today into the death of Ian Tomlinson, the 47-year-old newspaper seller who collapsed and died shortly after being assaulted by a police officer at the G20 protests.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/apr/09/g20-ian-tomlinson-police

The video shows Tomlinson being struck on the leg from behind by a police officer wielding an expandable baton, then pushed to the ground by the same officer. It appears to show no provocation on Tomlinson’s part—he was not a protester, and at the time he was struck, the footage shows him walking along with his hands in his pockets. He walked about 200 feet after the incident, but collapsed and died moments later
After The Guardian published the video, the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) began a criminal inquiry from which the police were removed. A second postmortem, ordered by the IPCC and Tomlinson’s family, indicated that Tomlinson had died from an abdominal haemorrhage, the cause of which remains unknown. The officer in question, who has not been named, was interviewed on suspicion of manslaughter, and a third postmortem was conducted at the request of his defence team, the results of which have not been released. The IPCC completed its investigation in August 2009 and passed its file to the Crown Prosecution Service. No charges have been announced
The incident was compared to previous deaths involving either police contact or allegedly inadequate investigations, such as the deaths of Blair Peach (1979), Stephen Lawrence (1993), and Jean Charles de Menezes (2005),
SO AGAIN ALL THE POLICE INVOLVED GAVE FALSE STATEMENTS , SO EVEN WITHOUT MURDER CHARGES THAT’S ,PURGERY ,PERVERTING THE COARSE OF JUSTICE, AIDING AND ABETTING A MURDERER, AND CONSPIRACY!!! WHY ARE NONE OF THESE CHARGES BEING FOLLOWED UP?
THERE IS ALSO A LOT OF EVIDENCE FOR POLICE PRE-MEDITATED VIOLENCE AND MURDER

The G20 security operation was codenamed “Operation Glencoe”, The Guardian reported speculation among protesters that the operation had been named after the 1692 Glencoe massacre in the Scottish Highlands; a spokesman for the Met said before the protests that the police were “up for it”!
The Guardian alleges that he may have removed his shoulder number and covered the bottom of his face with his balaclava before hitting Tomlinson. The Daily Mail writes that this image shows the officer’s shoulder ID was missing. According to The Mail on Sunday, TSG officers have been known to swap shoulder IDs, then claim, if accused of wrongdoing, that their unit was elsewhere at the time and that it must be a case of mistaken identity
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/apr/09/g20-ian-tomlinson-police-video

Police and military units savagely attacked peaceful protesters in a Pittsburgh park last night, cracking heads with billy clubs, deploying LRAD sound cannons and shooting rubber bullets at close range, according to Infowars’ Jason Bermas. Fellow Infowars reporter Rob Dew was arrested during the melee.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/infowars-reporter-rob-dew-arrested-at-g20.html
IMAGINE if this had happened in Iran or Venezuala? The headlines would be full of disgust and hatred towards a totalitarian regime running an undemocratic country. It would be supporting the protesters and urging them on in some “colour coded” fake revolution!!
BUT if its good old Western cops beating heads then they must be defending freedom ,from terrorists etc.etc..
What utter nonsense and actually INSTITUTIONALISED RASCIM!!!

BUT ITS NOT JUST THE UK AND USA WHERE THE POLICE ARE FASICIST BOOT BOYS AND GOVERNMENT MURDERERS AND TORTURERS (IMHO Police are just school bullys)

Italian police ‘framed G8 protesters’
Italian police have been accused of fabricating evidence against anti-globalisation protesters at last year’s G8 summit in Genoa by planting petrol bombs at their headquarters and falsely accusing them of stabbing a police officer.
According to a magistrates’ investigation, the police improvised lies to justify a bloodsoaked raid at the Diaz school, which was being used by protesters as a headquarters. The raid, which left dozens injured after being kicked, punched and beaten with batons, prompted an international outcry.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/jun/22/globalisation.rorycarroll
The bloody battle of Genoa
When 200,000 anti-globalisation protesters converged on the Italian city hosting the G8 summit in 2001, all but a handful came to demonstrate peacefully. Instead, many were beaten to a pulp by seemingly out-of-control riot police. But was there something more sinister at play? And will the victims ever see proper justice? Nick Davies reports
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jul/17/italy.g8

Police Gunman Shouted ‘I’m Going to Kill You:’G8 Protester

ROME – An Italian anti-globalization protester who witnessed the fatal shooting of another demonstrator at the G8 summit in Genoa described in an interview Tuesday how the officer who fired the fatal shot shouted “I’m going to kill you.”
“I was there when Carlo (Giuliani) was killed, shot with a pistol in the face,” the unnamed demonstrator told Italian newspaper Il Corriere della Sera, adding that he took part in the attack on a police vehicle shortly before the killing.
“I was also throwing stones and other objects at the jeep. I saw the gun aimed and I heard the officer shout ‘bastards, I’m going to kill you, I’m going to kill you’,” the demonstrator told the paper.
“I shouted ‘let’s go, let’s go, he’s going to shoot.’ Just before I ran off… I heard two close shots, then a third. I was safe, down a side street and there was a man lying dead on the tarmac in a puddle of blood.”
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines01/0731-02.htm
Where weapons planted on this protester
anti-capitalist Briton awaiting trial says Greek police planted Molotov cocktails and other weapons on him. Perhaps uniquely, there is video footage of the arrest which supports his case.
The arrest of anti-capitalist demonstrators has become so much a part of the fabric of set piece events like the G8, World Trade Organisation or European Union summits that the media takes them for granted.
But the tactics used by the police on such occasions, often with the support of politicians, deserve regular scrutiny because important civil liberties are at stake. The fact that a Briton and two Spaniards are in jail in Greece, facing sentences of up to 25 years, is a case in point.
Simon Chapman, of Basildon in Essex, was one of many protesters at the most recent EU summit held at Thessaloniki in June. He was with what he calls the “anti-authoritarian/anarchist bloc” when the police decided to make arrests.
They fired CS gas canisters and allegedly used their batons to beat Simon to the ground, where he was also kicked. His head injuries required stitches. At the point of arrest, he was wearing a rucksack, the main purpose of which, he says, was to carry his water bottle. But he was charged with possessing something much more sinister – a cluster of Molotov cocktails, an axe and a hammer. Hence the jail term he faces
if convicted.
Caught on camera
Many arrested people have sought to discredit the police by alleging the planting of evidence. It is particularly common in drugs cases.
But Simon’s allegations carry rather more weight because a cameraman from Greek television was recording the sequence of events. The shot of the arrest clearly shows Simon, as he says, with a rucksack coloured blue and purple.
The lens then switches to the other side of the road where a police officer is displaying an open black rucksack containing the Molotov cocktails, and other weapons. Two police officers carry this bag across the road and dump it on the pavement next to Simon. The sequence ends with Simon surrounded by three black rucksacks. Meanwhile, the blue and purple one – his own – has disappeared
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/london/2003/09/278238.html
Youths Rampage Across Greece After Teen’s Death
Two Police Officers Charged In Fatal Shooting, One With Murder
http://cbs13.com/national/greece.riots.spread.2.882174.html

FAKE TERRORISM

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/06/11/911-the-case-for-an-inside-job/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/12/29/usa-harbouring-terrorists-should-the-un-declare-war-on-this-rogue-terrorist-nation/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/10/05/us-government-terrorists-still-in-power-iran-contra-to-911/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/01/02/evidence-mounts-for-us-complicity-in-christmas-false-flag-terrorism/

GOVERNMENTS LIE TO MAKE WAR ,REMEMBER ,GOVERNMENT START WARS AND CREATE DEBTS. BUT WE THE PEOPLE FIGHT WARS AND PAY THE DEBTS IN REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY!!! WHY?? GOVERNMENT LIES!!! MAYBE ITS TIME TO GIVE THEM SOME OF THIER OWN MEDICINE…..MAYBE ITS TIME TO MAKE THEM REALISE THEY ARE PUBLIC SERVANTS AND WE ARE THE TAXPAY MASTERS!! MAYBE ITS TIME TO MAKE THEM REALISE THEY ARE NOT ABOVE THE LAW ,IF THEY HAVE DONE NOTHING WRONG ,LET THEM PROVE IT IN A COURT OF LAW , JUST LIKE THIER TAXPAY MASTERS HAVE TO DO!!!!!!!

FAKE WAR

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/09/iranian-oil-bourse-the-real-reason-for-war-with-iran/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/10/are-us-wars-in-iraq-and-afghanistan-well-intended-mistakes-what-we-now-know-from-the-evidence/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/12/16/yugoslavia-another-blair-illegal-war-of-agression-and-the-icc-kangaroo-court/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/10/05/philippines-another-us-fake-war-in-the-making/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/02/06/haiti-a-history-of-us-profiteering-and-the-5th-largest-us-embassy/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/01/30/war-on-drugs-officially-lost-another-fake-us-war-another-total-us-defeat/

FAKE ECONOMICS

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/02/08/is-the-us-already-bankrupt-and-trading-in-fake-gold/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/02/25/its-official-the-economy-will-recover-when-pigs-fly/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/05/09/bank-corruption-and-fraudthe-who-the-how-and-the-why-and-the-simple-solution/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/03/the-record-of-the-federal-reserve/

The modern banking system manufactures money out of nothing. The process is perhaps the most astounding piece of sleight of hand that was ever invented. Banking was conceived in inequity and born in sin . . . Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them but leave them the power to create money, and, with a flick of a pen, they will create enough money to buy it back again . . . Take this great power away from them, and all great fortunes like mine will disappear, for then this would be a better and happier world to live in. . . . But, if you want to continue to be the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, then let bankers continue to create money and control credit.
– Sir Josiah Stamp, Director of the Bank of England, 1927

“If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their money, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them (around the banks), will deprive the people of their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.”

Thomas Jefferson

THE GLOBAL PROBLEM

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/02/a-short-history-of-global-domination-or-rockefella-rothschild-and-the-capitalist-communist-nwo-con/

A SCOTTISH SOLUTION , BUT WOULD WORK JUST AS GOOD IN OTHER COUNTRIES.

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/01/14/a-direct-democracy-independant-scotland/

SOCIETY DOES NOT NEED GOVERNMENT

Neither Adam Smith nor Karl Marx believed in government. To Adam Smith government was nothing more than a trade and standards commision , the Invisible hand. To Karl Marx and Lenin the state would do nothing but wither away. “When there is state ,there is no freedom , when there is freedom there is no state”

It is only FASCISTS that believe in government. Todays politions ,leftwing or rightwing ,are ALL STATE CAPITALIST FASCISTS. The only difference is one side prefers BIG GOVERNMENT and the other prefers BIG CORPORATIONS. The 2 cheeks af the same arse. Can YOU REALLY tell the difference?

State capitalism has various different meanings, but is usually described as a society wherein the productive forces are controlled and directed by the state in a capitalist manner, even if such a state calls itself socialist. Corporatized state agencies and states that own controlling shares of publicly-listed firms, and thus acting as a capitalist itself, are two examples of state capitalism

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_capitalism

OF COURSE THIS IS JUST FASCISM!!

Fascism should more appropriately be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power.
Benito Mussolini, fascist dictator of Italy (1922-1943)

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/government-should-go-on-strike-to-prove-they-are-worth-thier-money/

WE modern civilised people , look down ours noses at Aztecs that practiced human sacrifice. They slaughtered 10,000’s of people in the belief that if they did not ,thier civilisation would end. WE have murdered over a million in Iraq alone , purely because WE believe that if we do NOT , our western civilisation would end! What pathetic primitive tribal barbarians we still are , just with bigger sticks!!

We think we are clever , classless and free…….but we are still fuckin peasants as far as I can see. …… and fascist ones at that!!

John Lenon – Working Class Hero

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/04/05/subliminals-from-criminals-and-the-peephole-for-the-people-msm-vs-wikileaks-the-fight-is-on/

“All government, of course, is against liberty. The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary. Most people want security in this world, not liberty.”
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out… without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable. It doesn’t take a majority to make a rebellion; it takes only a few determined leaders and a sound cause.”

“Whether the mask is labeled Fascism, Democracy, or Dictatorship or the Proletariat, our great adversary remains the Apparatus-the bureaucracy, the police, the military…. No matter what the circumstances, the worst betrayal will always be to subordinate ourselves to this Apparatus, and to trample underfoot, in its service, all human values in ourselves and in others.”– The French worker philosopher Simone Weil,1945

History was begun in mythology by an act of disobedience , it may well end in reality with an act of obedience.

Its is humanities diversity that will save us

It is humanities conformity that will kill us!

HUMANITY UNITED IN DIVERSITY!!!


Subliminals from Criminals and the Peephole for the people, MSM vs Wikileaks the fight is on.

April 5, 2010

A free press is the backbone to any free society ,the Fourth Estate . But our Mainstream Media is no longer the Fourth Estate guarding our freedoms ,it has become the Fifth Column within our society. No longer producing investigative journalism and questioning government actions and motives. Instead it bangs the drum for government policy ,it spins and twists the news ,and it cencors other news ,in short it bends public opinion behind government policy.

THE SUBLIMINALS FROM CRIMINALS – THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA PRESSTITUTES

Orwell Rolls in His Grave  

This chilling documentary film examines the relationship between the media, corporate America, and government. In a country where the “top 1% control 90% of the wealth”, the film argues that the media system is nothing but a “subsidiary of corporate America.”

Director: Robert Kane Pappas – Run Time 1 Hour 46 Minutes

http://www.blinkx.com/watch-video/orwell-rolls-in-his-grave/uzofnmrLfsWMiFete1AhKw

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/12/28/alternative-viewing-for-the-new-year/

Examples of HOLLYWOOD pre-conditioning

http://eclipptv.com/viewVideo.php?video_id=11036

THE CENCORSHIP OF IMPORTANT STORIES HAVE BEEN GOING ON FOR A LONG TIME. THE 1933 ATTEMPTED NAZI COUP OF AMERICA

The Business Plot (also the Plot Against FDR and the White House Putsch) was an alleged political conspiracy in 1933 wherein wealthy businessmen and corporations plotted a coup d’état to overthrow United States President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Backed by Wall Street financiers including J.P. Morgan & Co., the Du Pont interests, Remington Arms ,”A BBC documentary claims Prescott Bush, father and grandfather to the 41st and 43rd US Presidents respectively, was also connected.”

The Congressional committee report confirmed Butler’s testimony :

In the last few weeks of the committee’s official life it received evidence showing that certain persons had made an attempt to establish a fascist government in this country…There is no question that these attempts were discussed, were planned, and might have been placed in execution when and if the financial backers deemed it expedient.

Why do we know so little about this???

In 1934, newspapers were controlled by an élite — according to then-Interior Secretary Harold L. Ickes, 82 per cent of daily newspapers monopolised their communities; the media down-played Gen. Butler’s testimony to protect the interests of advertisers and their owners.

MEDIA CONTROL TODAY IS EVEN WORSE .MAINSTREAM MEDIA HAS BEEN A PRESSTITUTE FOR A LONG TIME.(This why our democray has failed, our “Fourth Estate” has turned into the “Fifth Column”…. propaganda not news)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Plot

http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/history/document/document·shtml

THE HIDDEN HISTORY OF NAZI COUPS

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/02/33/

TODAY 2010 THERE ARE WAR CRIMES WARRENTS ISSUED FOR THE LEADERS OF THE USA AND THE UK. OF COURSE DO NOT EXPECT THIS TO BE REPORTED BY THE MSM PRESSTITUTES

The last leader of the USA that did NOT have a war crimes warrent issued with his name on it was Jimmy Carter. The last UK leader that did not have a war crimes warrent issued with his name on it was James Callaghan in 1979 !!!!!

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/02/07/where-have-all-the-burger-eating-war-monkeys-gone-cry-havoc-and-unleash-the-dogs-of-war-crimes/

A HIDDEN HISTORY OF GLOBAL DOMINATION

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/02/a-short-history-of-global-domination-or-rockefella-rothschild-and-the-capitalist-communist-nwo-con/

A HIDDEN HISTORY OF GOVERNMENT OPPRESSION

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/02/governments-traitors-terrorists-and-drug-dealers/

THE HIDDEN HISTORY OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/03/the-record-of-the-federal-reserve/

Apart from NOT reporting news that makes the “powers that be” look bad ,they also REPEAT UNTRUTHS until we mistakenly precieve them as FACTS

PLEASE DO NOT GET STUCK IN A MEDIA R.U.T. (Repeated Until True)

RUTS TO WATCH OUT FOR

SOCIETY NEEDS GOVERNMENT

Well if you concider yourself a TRUE Capitalist or a Socialist ,you should know this is a LIE. Neither Adam Smith nor Karl Marx believed in government. To Adam Smith government was nothing more than a trade and standards commision , the Invisible hand. To Karl Marx and Lenin the state would do nothing but wither away. “When there is state ,there is no freedom , when there is freedom there is no state”

It is only FASCISTS that believe in government. Todays politions ,leftwing or rightwing ,are ALL STATE CAPITALIST FASCISTS. The only difference is one side prefers BIG GOVERNMENT and the other prefers BIG CORPORATIONS. The 2 cheeks af the same arse.

State capitalism has various different meanings, but is usually described as a society wherein the productive forces are controlled and directed by the state in a capitalist manner, even if such a state calls itself socialist. Corporatized state agencies and states that own controlling shares of publicly-listed firms, and thus acting as a capitalist itself, are two examples of state capitalism

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_capitalism

OF COURSE THIS IS JUST FASCISM!!

Fascism should more appropriately be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power.
Benito Mussolini, fascist dictator of Italy (1922-1943)

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/government-should-go-on-strike-to-prove-they-are-worth-thier-money/

THE GOVERNMENT IS YOUR FRIEND

These are the people that came up with MAD Mutually Assured Destruction. That is Mutually Assured Destruction for YOU and ME ,the government had nice safe nuclear bunkers ,paid for by YOU the taxpayer. The taxpayer got “Duck and cover” the infomercial

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixy5FBLnh7o&feature=player_embedded

In Medeval times a peasant was was expected to give about 3 months of labour to his liege (the king) Today with tax etc ,the average modern peasant gives over 50% of his labour worth to his liege (the government) You think you are clever classless and free?

This is the organisation that takes your money to pay and protect the police as they shoot innocent people in the strreet and beat people to death and LIE  about it and still get away without punishment

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/28/western-police-states-murder-inc/

Today the government steals from the kitty (expenses) takes bribes (brown envelopes and lobby groups) LIES blatantly and frequently starts wars, sponcers terrorists and enables paedophiles. To be able to do all these things the MAJORITY of the government must be involved otherwise they would be hounded out of office by the non-corrupt politions .

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/01/09/a-list-of-child-sex-offenders-inside-the-british-government/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/02/governments-traitors-terrorists-and-drug-dealers/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/12/29/usa-harbouring-terrorists-should-the-un-declare-war-on-this-rogue-terrorist-nation/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/12/14/eu-to-hand-over-financial-transactions-data-to-us-government/

GOVERNMENTS PREVENT WAR

Governments start wars . NOT people

Governments profit from wars , NOT people

People fight wars , NOT government

Gulf of Tonkin

Tonkin Gulf incident, which occurred on August 4, 1964, was also a naval battle, but this time, may have involved the “Tonkin Ghosts”[7], and no actual NVN Torpedo Boat attacks. The outcome of this second incident was the passage by Congress of the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, which granted President Lyndon B. Johnson the authority to assist any Southeast Asian country whose government was considered to be jeopardized by “communist aggression”. The resolution served as Johnson’s legal justification for deploying US conventional forces and the commencement of open warfare against North Vietnam

[I]t is not simply that there is a different story as to what happened; it is that no attack happened that night. […] In truth, Hanoi’s navy was engaged in nothing that night but the salvage of two of the boats damaged on August 2.

http://uruknet.com/index.php?p=m64760&hd=&size=1&l=e

Pearl Harbour

“[Your information is] too precise, too complete to be believed. The questionnaire plus the other information you brought spell out in detail exactly where, when, how, and by whom we are to be attacked. If anything, it sounds like a trap.”

FBI response to the top British spy, Dusko Popov (code named “Tricycle”) on August 10, 1941, dismissing Popov’s report of the complete Japanese plan for the attack on Pearl Harbor.

Pearl Harbor: The Verdict Of History by Gordon Prange, appendix 7 published in 1986. Based on records from the JOINT CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE on the Investigation of the Pearl Harbor Attack, Nov 15, 1945 to May 31, 1946.

http://uruknet.com/index.php?p=m64767&hd=&size=1&l=e

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/02/a-short-history-of-global-domination-or-rockefella-rothschild-and-the-capitalist-communist-nwo-con/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/02/07/where-have-all-the-burger-eating-war-monkeys-gone-cry-havoc-and-unleash-the-dogs-of-war-crimes/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/10/12/us-government-making-a-killing-on-war/

GOVERNMENTS PREVENT TERRORISM

Every time there is a terrorist attack, the nations blamed say that it was a “false flag” operation. This is what America did to cover up My Lai. We were lying. Germans claimed Poland invaded Germany in 1939. An educated guess is that 75% of terrorist attacks we hear of were staged, never happened or were done by “radical groups” that were first infiltrated, then controlled and eventually financed and supplied by intelligence agencies. Intelligence agencies are, in actuality, the biggest terrorist organizations in the world. The CIA has blown up more buses, airplanes and markets than almost anyone else. The Mossad may be number one, followed by, well, everyone, the RAW, ISI, MI-6, IRA and dozens of others.

During the Italian strategy of tension in which several bombings in the 1970s, attributed to far-left organizations, were in fact carried out by far-right organizations cooperating with the Italian secret services (see Operation Gladio, 1969 Piazza Fontana bombing, 1972 Peteano attack by Vincenzo Vinciguerra, 1973 assassination attempt of former Interior Minister Mariano Rumor, 1980 Bologna massacre, etc. and various investigations, for example by Guido Salvini).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_flag

The Dossier – Shadow Secrets (2008)

Compiled, edited and produced by TheDossier, this new film looks at the origins and history of the Afghan Mujahedin & al-Qaeda and their associations with various intelligence agencies including the CIA, FBI, MI6 and those of Saudi Arabia & Pakistan. 9/11 was not an intelligence failure; 9/11 was an intelligence success – it was supposed to happen. The US govt

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=570337210861977354

http://www.thedossier.ukonline.co.uk/video_september11.htm

Osama Bin Laden worked for the CIA for over 8 years , as Tim Osman

Tim Osman (Ossman) has recently become better known as Osama Bin Ladin. “Tim Osman” was the name assigned to him by the CIA for his tour of the U.S. and U.S. military bases, in search of political support and armaments. […] There is some evidence that Tim Osman … visited the White House. There is certainty that Tim Osman toured some U.S. military bases, even receiving special demonstrations of the latest equipment. Why hasn’t this been reported in the major media?

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/binladen_cia.html

Is Osama Bin Laden A CIA Asset named Tim Osman ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-Da9ghk-sk&feature=related

Osama Bin Laden Al Kaida Tim Osman CIA Agent

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHj_qe2p3zs&NR=1

Pakistan Zadari – Osama was an Operator for the United States

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-e2f1bd7vs

Remember Osama Bin Laden brother was George W. Bush’s business partner in Arbusto Oil.

http://www.williambowles.info/bush/arbusto.htm

http://911review.org/Sept11Wiki/Arbusto.shtml

Osama Bin Laden’s father is George H.W. Bush’s business partner in the Carlyle Group.

http://brasschecktv.com/page/46.html

http://www.hereinreality.com/carlyle.html
Ex-Italian President: Intel Agencies Know 9/11 An Inside Job
Man who set up Operation Gladio tells Italy’s largest newspaper attacks were run by CIA, Mossad
 Former Italian President and the man who revealed the existence of Operation Gladio Francesco Cossiga has gone public on 9/11, telling Italy’s most respected newspaper that the attacks were run by the CIA and Mossad and that this was common knowledge amongst global intelligence agencies.

Cossiga was elected President of the Italian Senate in July 1983 before winning a landslide 1985 election to become President of the country in 1985.

Cossiga gained respect from opposition parties as one of a rare breed – an honest politician – and led the country for seven years until April 1992.

Cossiga’s tendency to be outspoken upset the Italian political establishment and he was forced to resign after revealing the existence of, and his part in setting up, Operation Gladio – a rogue intelligence network under NATO auspices that carried out bombings across Europe in the 60’s, 70’s and 80’s
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/december2007/120407_common_knowledge.htm
http://www.corriere.it/politica/07_novembre_30/osama_berlusconi_cossiga_27f4ccee-9f55-11dc-8807-0003ba99c53b.shtml

REMEMBER THE LAST PEOPLE THAT BOMBED THE WTC WHERE THE FBI IN 1993

Alex Jones on the 1993 WTC Bombing: FBI facilitated the 1993 attacks?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6612404919108240876

telephone conversations between FBI informant Emad Salem and his Bureau contacts reveal secret U.S. Government complicity in the February 26, 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center in New York City in which six people were killed and more than a thousand were injured.

The question regarding the bombing boils down to the following:  Did the FBI do the bombing,utilizing informant Salem as an “agent provocateur” or did it fail to prevent an independent Salem and his associates from doing it?  The taped conversations seem to indicate the former:

http://www.lectlaw.com/files/cur46.htm

“There exists a shadowy Government with its own Air Force, its own Navy, its own fundraising mechanism, and the ability to pursue its own ideas of national interest, free from all checks and balances, and freefrom the law itself.”– Senator Daniel K. Inouye – Iran Contra Hearings

Coverup: Behind the Iran Contra Affair (1988)
Coverup exposes a tale of politics, drugs, hostages, weapons, assassinations, covert operations and the ultimate plan to suspend the US Constitution.

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/10/05/us-government-terrorists-still-in-power-iran-contra-to-911/

911 was conducted during “Global Guardian” and “Vilgilant Guardian” training exercise. This simulated multiple aircraft hijacks on the US in  NORADS monitoring systems AT EXACTLY THE SAME TIME AS THE 911 HIJACKINGS TOOK PLACE!!!! Global Guardian is performed in conjunction with “Vigilant Guardian”, the annual training exercise conducted by NORAD in which a threat to North American airspace is simulated. The simulated scenario is varied from year to year.The September 11 attacks in 2001 occurred during that year’s Global Guardian and Vigilant Guardian joint exercises.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Guardian

OSAMA BIN LADEN DENIED RESPONSIBILITY FOR 911

After initial denial, in 2004 Osama bin Laden claimed responsibility for the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osama_bin_laden#September_11.2C_2001_attacks

In 2004 Osama Bin Laden was already DEAD! Osama Bin Laden has been dead for years . He needs kidney Dialysis ,without it he would die. The CIA met with Bin Laden in a US Hospital in Dubai just before 911.Benazir Bhutto announced Bin Laden’s death during a BBC interview,the BBC cut it out of the interview. She was later shot.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1212851/Has-Osama-Bin-Laden-dead-seven-years–U-S-Britain-covering-continue-war-terror.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnychOXj9Tg

These figures translate to about 100 million Americans that question or find fault with the official 9/11 story, far from a trivial number and far too many to dismiss as conspiracy nuts and part of the lunatic fringe.

http://www.sott.net/articles/show/205933-100-million-Americans-question-or-find-fault-with-the-official-9-11-story

INFO ON OTHER GOVERNMENT TERRORISTS AND DRUG DEALERS
More4 News – Can We Trust the Security Services?
News report looking into the activities of MI5 and their involvement with the IRA. Features an interview with former MI5 double agent, Kevin Fulton, who claims that his former handler was current MI5 boss, Jonathan Evans
BBC Newsnight – Musharraf defends his spy service (ISI)
A UK Ministry of Defence paper says Pakistan’s intelligence service, ISI, indirectly backs terrorism by supporting religious parties in the country. Indian police also claim that the ISI planned the train blasts in Mumbai. In Musharraf’s new book, he claims that the killer of American Journalist Daniel Pearl, was in fact a British MI6 agent, Omar Sheikh. Sheikh is alleged to have wired $100,000 to lead 9/11 hijacker Mohammed Atta, on the orders of former ISI director-general Lt-Gen Mahmud Ahmad. An alleged bomb plotter has also accused the ISI of running terrorist training camps
The 7.30 Report (ABC) – Inside the world of espionage: Stella Rimington
Kerry O’Brien interviews the former director general of MI5. She says the so-called “war on terror” was a mistake and that politicians have overreacted to the terrorist threat, eroding civil liberties in the process. Rimington retired from MI5 a decade ago after 27 years in the service more
Jon Ronson – Tottenham Ayatollah: revisited
Filmed in 1997, but revisited in 2005, this documentary attempts to examine Sheikh Omar Bakri Mohammed – previously involved with the Muslim Brotherhood and creator of the banded radical Islamist organisation Al-Muhajiroun. It now appears that he was an informant for MI5; when this began is unclear. Others with connections to UK intelligence include: Abu Hamza al-Masri, Mohammed Quayyum Khan, Haroon Rashid Aswat, Abu Qatada, Bisher al-Rawi and Omar Nasiri. Also featured in this film is the organisation’s legal expert Anjem Choudary
The Dossier – Shadow Secrets (2008)
Compiled, edited and produced by TheDossier, this new film looks at the origins and history of the Afghan Mujahedin & al-Qaeda and their associations with various intelligence agencies including the CIA, FBI, MI6 and those of Saudi Arabia & Pakistan
Channel 4 News – British terror suspect escapes in Pakistan
A British man who’s been accused of involvement in a plot to blow up planes flying from London to the US has escaped from custody in Pakistan. It appears that Rashid Rauf is connected with Pakistan’s intelligence service, the ISI
Shearer, Kosh, Flynn – Declassified: The Taliban (2005)
In 1979, the CIA armed and funded the Mujahedin, leaving a programme worth millions of dollars in the hands of the Pakistani intelligence service (ISI). Among the Mujahedin was a rich Saudi called Osama bin Laden. By 1984, the US was spending $200 million a year on the Afghan/Soviet war. After five years, President Reagan and the CIA decided to triple the budget for weapons to the Mujahedin. The Taliban emerge later in the mid-1990s out of the Pakistani madrassas. During this period, the ISI introduce bin Laden to Taliban leaders
Alex Gibney – Taxi to the Darkside
In this shocking film, Gibney tells the story of Dilawar, a young Afghan taxi driver arrested and questioned by the US forces at Bagram airbase. Just days after his arrest he was dead. Gibney exposes the extraordinary methods employed by Dilawar’s interrogators – described by many contributors as torture. He then traces the chain of command which authorised the techniques, ending up at the White House itself. He sees how the methods migrated from Bagram to Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib.
With unprecedented access to senior White House figures, as well as Dilawar’s interrogators, this is a chilling journey into the darker reaches of the war on terror
 
BBC Timewatch – Gladio (1992)
Three-part series investigating the secret activities of ’stay behind’ units in Europe after the Second World War. Exposes the clandestine terrorist activities of these groups in Belgium & Italy, and their involvement with the CIA. Directed by Allan Francovich
part one – The Ring Masters stream/download windows media player
part two – The Puppeteers stream/download windows media player
part three – The Foot Soldiers stream/download windows media player
 
SBS Dateline – Inside Indonesia’s War on Terror
This controversial report which includes extracts from an interview with the former President of Indonesia, points to the involvement of the Indonesian Military Intelligence and Police in the 2002 Bali bombing
Michael Busse & Rosa Maria Bobbi – Death in Rome
Aldo Moro, leader of the Christian Democratic Party, regarded as the next president of Italy, was murdered in 1978. Armed with new facts and witness statements, this documentary by award winning directors provides clear proof of state complicity in Moro’s assassination
Allan Francovich – The Maltese Double Cross
Investigation into the downing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland. Produced in 1994, this film raises serious questions about what really happened

Sky Television – Conspiracies: Lockerbie & the CIA
Mainstream documentary that looks at the various scenarios surrounding the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie in December 1988. Was a CIA heroin trafficking operation compromised, allowing a bomb to be placed on board?

Sky Television – Secrets of the CIA (2005)
New mainstream documentary run-down of the global devastation caused by the Central Intelligence Agency over the last 60 years. Features commentary with authors and journalists. Fails to mention that the “interests” to be protected are on Wall Street
Bill Moyers – the Secret Government: the Constitution in Crisis
Short film about CIA involvement in various past atrocities, all in the name of ‘national security’
Gary Webb – In his own words
A tribute to the Pulitzer prize-winning reporter who broke the story of the CIA’s involvement in the importation of cocaine into the US.
Webb died in December 2004 from self-inflicted gunshots to the head

NBC Dateline – CIA drug trafficking – Contra connection
News special that examines the connections between the CIA and the Contras. Features Ricky Ross, Cele Castillo, John Kerry and Gary Webb

Crack the CIA – A short film about the CIA and how they are involved in drug trafficking

Secrets of the CIA
A documentary featuring former CIA personnel who are speaking out about the agency
BBC Newsnight – ‘The poor marched on the city centre’
Greg Palast takes a look at the failed coup attempt by the US, in the world’s fourth largest oil exporting country, Venezuela
Mike Springman – US consulate and foreign service official
Springman went public (after internal efforts failed) to expose the State Dept/CIA conduiting terrorists into the US

Peter Wright

The former principal science officer of MI5, pictured right, provoked a crisis in intelligence circles with the publication in 1987 of Spycatcher, his incendiary memoir outlining claims that the Security Service plotted to remove Harold Wilson from office and its Director General, Roger Hollis, was a Soviet spy. Margaret Thatcher’s government fought a long and ultimately pointless legal battle to prevent publication, propelling worldwide sales beyond 2 million copies.
Richard Tomlinson
The New Zealand-born MI6 agent, far right, was a star recruit to Britain’s overseas intelligence agency, serving in Bosnia and infiltrating Iranian intelligence. But a glittering career was abruptly ended in 1995 when he was sacked for reasons that remain unexplained and prevented from taking his case to an employment tribunal. He was arrested in 1997 for breaching the Official Secrets Act on the basis of a four-page synopsis of a tell-all book on his service and jailed for 12 months. He told the Princess Diana inquest that MI6 trained its officers in the use of strobe lights to cause traffic accidents.
 
Cathy Massiter
Middle-ranking MI5 officer lifted the lid on its surveillance of trade unions and organisations such as CND in the 1980s. She revealed in a documentary that the service bugged the phones of Patricia Hewitt, former health secretary, and Harriet Harman, deputy Labour leader, because they were suspected Communist sympathisers.
Former FBI translator Sibel Edmonds dropped a bombshell on the Mike Malloy radio show, guest-hosted by Brad Friedman (audio, partial transcript).
In the interview, Sibel says that the US maintained ‘intimate relations’ with Bin Laden, and the Taliban, “all the way until that day of September 11.”
These ‘intimate relations’ included using Bin Laden for ‘operations’ in Central Asia, including Xinjiang, China. These ‘operations’ involved using al Qaeda and the Taliban in the same manner “as we did during the Afghan and Soviet conflict,” that is, fighting ‘enemies’ via proxies.
lukery’s diary :: ::
As Sibel has previously described, and as she reiterates in this latest interview, this process involved using Turkey (with assistance from ‘actors from Pakistan, and Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia’) as a proxy, which in turn used Bin Laden and the Taliban and others as a proxy terrorist army.
Control of Central Asia
The goals of the American ’statesmen’ directing these activities included control of Central Asia’s vast energy supplies and new markets for military products.
“There exists a shadowy Government with its own Air Force, its own Navy, its own fundraising mechanism, and the ability to pursue its own ideas of national interest, free from all checks and balances, and free from the law itself.”– Senator Daniel K. Inouye – Iran Contra Hearings

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/02/governments-traitors-terrorists-and-drug-dealers/

A HIDDEN HISTORY OF GOVERNMENT FALSE FLAG TERRORISM

http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/COINTELPRO/cointelpro.html

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/01/02/evidence-mounts-for-us-complicity-in-christmas-false-flag-terrorism/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/12/29/usa-harbouring-terrorists-should-the-un-declare-war-on-this-rogue-terrorist-nation/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/12/14/eu-to-hand-over-financial-transactions-data-to-us-government/

REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY IS GOOD. DIRECT DEMOCRACY IS BAD

If I mention I believe in ANARCHY to the average person ,they immediately recoil as if I announced I support rape ,murder ,theft , rioting in the streets with guns and bombs and the survival of the fittest. Of course this is the opposite of the TRUTH and people believe this is Anarchy because of the Subliminals from Criminals via theMainstream Media and government. IN REALITY it is government that supports murder and rape including our children , it is the government that puts murderers and rapists on our streets and the streets of foreign lands and gives them immunity from prosecution. A million innocents have been murdered in Iraq and the government will make sure no-one is prosecuted.

http://uruknet.com/index.php?p=m64767&hd=&size=1&l=e

 It is the government that starts wars NOT people power(direct democracy/anarchy), BUT it is the people that fight wars NOT government. ANARCHY MEANS NO CENTRALISED GOVERNMNET , DIRECT DEMOCRACY IS  A FORM OF ANARCHY

Direct democracy, classically termed pure democracy, is a form of democracy and a theory of civics in which sovereignty is lodged in the assembly of all citizens who choose to participate. Depending on the particular system, this assembly might pass executive motions, make laws, elect or dismiss officials, and conduct trials. Direct democracy stands in contrast to representative democracy, where sovereignty is exercised by a subset of the people, usually on the basis of election.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_democracy

FYI Switzerland has been a direct democracy for along time. It has NOT been at war since 1815 and it has NO STANDING ARMY. It has less corruption ,less crime,higher living standards it is involved in less illegal wars and it has NOT voted WAR CRIMINALS INTO POWER! Hitler was voted into power by a reprentative democracy.

ICELAND MOVES TO DIRECT DEMOCRACY AND STOPS THE BANKER BAILOUT

No matter what reasonable and respected voices had to say on the matter. The government opposed the idea of a direct democratic decision.
Until the last minute the government had tried to discourage the voters from voting. The Prime Minister and the Minister of Finance both said they would not participate in the referendum. They saw it as a “waste of money” and a “farce”.

The Icelandic referendum, the voice of the people against the blackmailing power of the international financial elites might now have become precedent for other countries in similar situations.
What the bankers seem to fear above all things is a direct democracy in financial matters.

And no doubt that´s quite a reasonable fear, for such a democracy would lead to more and more people getting informed about financial matters and the money-creation process itself.
The knowledge about this process coupled with the instruments of a direct democracy would lead eventually and without any doubt to a monetary reform and a loss of power for the international bankers.

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/11/04/libertarian-vs-authoritarian-todays-real-politic/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/01/14/a-direct-democracy-independant-scotland/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/03/11/elected-dictatorship-posing-as-democracy/

http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/6-lobbyists-buy-congress/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/02/18/the-israel-lobby-the-elephant-in-the-room-and-its-drenched-in-blood/

http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/19-bank-bailout-recipients-spent-to-defeat-labor/

http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/14-congress-invested-in-defense-contracts/

http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/1-us-congress-sells-out-to-wall-street-sources/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/government-should-go-on-strike-to-prove-they-are-worth-thier-money/

WAR IS GOOD

Rank  ↓ Country  ↓ CAB USD, bn  ↓
1  People’s Republic of China 371.833
2  Germany 252.501
3  Japan 210.967
4  Saudi Arabia 95.762
5  Russia 76.163
6  Switzerland 70.797
7  Norway 59.983
8  Netherlands 52.522
176  Greece -44.218
177  Italy -52.725
178  Australia -56.342
179  United Kingdom -105.224
180  Spain -145.141
181  United States -731.214

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/02/25/its-official-the-economy-will-recover-when-pigs-fly/

THE USA , UK , SPAIN AND AUSTRALIA the countries that all lead the call to WAR on Iraq and Afghanistan, ALL respresentative democracies .ALL LIED INTO WAR by thier government representatives. TODAY ALL HOPELESSLY IN DEBT! Today US and UK bankers demand bailouts and attack the PIGS (Portugal ,Ireland ,Greece and Spain) BUT WHY DO THEY FINANCIALLY ATTACK THESE COUNTRIES ? These countries do NOT have the debt of the USA ? BUT these countries are ALL leftwing libertarian governments that DO NOT SUPPORT THE WAR!! Italy used to be a little piggy but today is NOT,Italy used to be leftwing and anti-war,but today is not…. COINCIDENCE? War is a business racket!

“War is just a racket. A racket is best described, I believe,as something that is not what it seems to the majority of people.Only a small inside group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few at the expense of the masses.”

I spent 33 years (in the Marines)…most of my time being a high-class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism…

I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-1912. I helped make Mexico and especially Tampico safe for American oil interests in 1914. I brought light to the Dominican Republic for the American sugar interests in 1916. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City (Bank) boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the rape of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefit of Wall Street…

In China in 1927 I helped see to it that Standard Oil went on its way unmolested. I had a swell racket. I was rewarded with honors, medals, promotions. I might have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was operate in three city districts. The Marines operated on three continents

GOVERNMENT ENABLES WAR MONGERS AND OTHERS THAT MASS MURDER FOR PROFIT . OBAMA IS A GOOD REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRATIC WAR SALESMAN

Leaked CIA Report: ‘Apathy Key To War,Obama A Great War Salesman’
By politicaltheatricsPublished: March 26, 2010

I use twitter as a means to broadcast an array of thoughts,ideas and also to publicize articles in regards to imperialism,colonialism,anti-Zionism etc.
I happen to follow @jeremyscahill the breakthrough journalist who is the author of Blackwater.
Today Mr.Scahill began tweeting about a CIA Report which states that ‘apathy key 2 US war, Obama is great war salesman,use Afghan women more 2 sell war.’

“Afghan women could serve as ideal messengers in humanizing” the war, encouraging European troop involvement”

Thanks to Mr.Scahill I have the leaked CIA Report to publish on Political Theatrics:

http://www.politicaltheatrics.net/2010/03/leaked-cia-report-apathy-key-to-warobama-a-great-war-salesman/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/10/12/us-government-making-a-killing-on-war/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/12/16/yugoslavia-another-blair-illegal-war-of-agression-and-the-icc-kangaroo-court/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/02/governments-traitors-terrorists-and-drug-dealers/

DON,T WORRY WE’RE AMERICAN , WE’RE HERE TO HELP.

The United States carried out extremely serious interventions into more than 70 nations in the last 60 years. The normal reason was to get rid of democratically elected leftwing libertarian governments and replace them with rightwing authoritarians. This has helped no-one except the American ruling class.
https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/02/governments-traitors-terrorists-and-drug-dealers/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/02/06/haiti-a-history-of-us-profiteering-and-the-5th-largest-us-embassy/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/02/07/where-have-all-the-burger-eating-war-monkeys-gone-cry-havoc-and-unleash-the-dogs-of-war-crimes/

DRUGS ARE BAD , THE WAR ON DRUGS IS GOOD

This 1999 documentary from Dutch TV explains how the “War on Drugs” has led to a loss of civil liberties while at the same time it has become a cash generator for police departments (through asset seizure) and a source of prisoners needed by the growing, privatized “Prison Industrial Complex”. However, it has not had much of an effect at all as far as its supposed purpose of eliminating or, at least significantly reducing, the illegal drug trade.
http://www.blinkx.com/video/war-on-drugs-prison-profiteering-total-scam/qui6yO6_iyYMqCVTzpXesQ
Indeed, opium production in Afghanistan — much of it in the regions where Canadian and British troops are supposed to be in charge — shot up dramatically last year.
The 49 per cent increase in the opium harvest, right under the noses of NATO forces, represented a doubling of the crop from 2000, when the fundamentalist Taliban were still in control, and solidified Afghanistan’s position as the chief supplier of illegal opium to the world.
But the latest Afghan numbers are so large that the country now accounts for 92 per cent of the illicit global opium crop.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/ backgroun…fghanistan.html
The Afghanistan province being patrolled by British troops will produce at least one third of the world’s heroin this year, according to drug experts who are forecasting a harvest that is both a record for the country and embarrassing for the western funded war on narcotics.
British officials are bracing themselves for the result of an annual UN poppy survey due later this summer. Early indications show an increase on Helmand’s 1999 record of 45,000 hectares (112,500 acres) and a near-doubling of last year’s crop.
“It’s going to be massive,” said one British drugs official. “My guess is it’s going to be the biggest ever.” UN, American and Afghan officials agreed.
“It could be over 50,000 hectares, or over 50% of the total [Aghan] crop,” said General Muhammad Daud, the deputy interior minister for counter-narcotics.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/ …stan.drugstrade
NICE ONE GUYS…NOW WHO CAN I SUE FOR THIS??

Another thing ,prohibition CREATES CRIME!!!! Do you think the alcohol prohibition was a good thing? It saw the rise of the Mafia ,which is still a strong force in crime today , all thanks to alcohol prohibition.

In fact while its “illegal” its a very good non-taxed revenue for those that can milk it! For example the government and lobby groups.

“Afghan drug trafficking brings US $50 billion a year”
The US is not going to stop the production of drugs in Afghanistan as it covers the costs of their military presence there, says Gen. Mahmut Gareev, a former commander during the USSR’s operations in Afghanistan.
http://www.russiatoday.com/Top_News/2009-08-20/afghanistan-us-drug-trafficking.html

Chavez said Venezuela would support Morales’s crusade to protect coca crops against US eradication campaigns aimed at stopping cocaine production. Addressing his Bolivian counterpart, he said: “Evo, we know this battle is hard, you can always count on our support for that battle here, in the United Nations, in the Organisation of American States, and in the world to defend the coca farmers, who are being demonised.”
http://www.euronews.net/2006/01/04/morales-gets-backing-from-venezuela-for-defence-of-coca-farmers/
FYI
AMERICANS DRINK COCA LEAVES EVERYDAY – COKE ITS THE REAL THING!!!

When the cocaine business went south (geographically as well as metaphorically), Coke pulled the cocaine out of the formula – although they still use coca leaves today to flavour the drink. In fact, they own a pharmaceutical company called Stepan Chemicals in Chicago, whose primary purpose is to take the cocaine out of the coca.

BIG BUSINESS WANTS HEMP ILLEGAL
The first cars where made from hemp and ran on hemp oil . Paper was made from hemp and so where the original jeans.Hemp stood in the way of Big business .Oil,Steal, Paper and textile industries all stood to loose Big time if a cheap alternative was allowed on the market.

Henry Ford’s first Model-T was built to run on hemp gasoline and the CAR ITSELF WAS CONSTRUCTED FROM HEMP! On his large estate, Ford was photographed among his hemp fields. The car, ‘grown from the soil,’ had hemp plastic panels whose impact strength was 10 times stronger than steel; Popular Mechanics, 1941.
 
Rudolf Diesel, the inventor of the diesel engine, designed it to run on vegetable and seed oils like hemp; he actually ran the thing on peanut oil for the 1900 World’s Fair. Henry Ford used hemp to not only construct cars but also fuel them.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7Ar_AvtMdc

http://www.illuminati-news.com/marijuana-conspiracy.htm

Pharmaceutical companies are NO fan of Hemp/marijuana either…

Pot Is an Anti-Cancer Drug
The active ingredient in marijuana appears to target cancerous brain cells for destruction while leaving healthy cells alone, according to a study conducted by researchers from the Complutense University in Madrid, and published in the Journal of Clinical Investigation.

Cannabis may prevent osteoporosis 
Researchers first conducted an experiment in mice that had been engineered to carry three different grafts of human brain cancer. They injected the mice daily with the molecule tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) near the site of the tumors once each day. The chemical appeared to stimulate the cancerous cells to engage in a process known as autophagy, in which cells initiate their own breakdown.

“These results may help to design new cancer therapies based on the use of medicines containing the active principle of marijuana and/or in the activation of autophagy,” researcher Guillermo Velasco said.

THESE WOULD BE CHEAP ALTERNATIVES TO EXPENSIVE DESIGNER DRUGS THAT BIG PHARMA THRIVE ON!

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/01/30/war-on-drugs-officially-lost-another-fake-us-war-another-total-us-defeat/

BIG CORPORATION PHARMECUTICAL DRUGS ARE GOOD

The terms iatrogenesis and iatrogenic artifact refer to inadvertent adverse effects or complications caused by or resulting from medical treatment or advice.

Iatrogenesis is a major phenomenon, and a severe risk to patients. A study carried out in 1981 more than one-third of illnesses of patients in a university hospital were iatrogenic, nearly one in ten were considered major, and in 2% of the patients, the iatrogenic disorder ended in death. Complications were most strongly associated with exposure to drugs and medications

The total number of iatrogenic deaths shown in the following table is 783,936. It is evident that the American medical system is the leading cause of death and injury in the United States. Death by Medicine—-Carolyn Dean, MD, ND, Martin Feldman, MD, Gary Null, PhD, Debora Rasio, MD (2003/4)

Death by Medicine – According to a review study, more deaths are caused annually in the U.S. by medical treatment and diagnostic procedures than by heart disease or cancer.

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/02/26/health-in-the-21st-cenutry-is-killing-us/

IN REALITY BIG PHARMA IS THE BIGGEST KILLER IN THE USA ,IT IS ALSO THE BIO-WEAPONS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY…. COINCIDENCE?

ABRAHAMIC MONOTHEISM IS GOOD

Loads of TV coverage about Jews , Christians and Islam.BUT the FACT that the archeological results tend to be ignored and anything that goes against religious DOGMA is still cencord. The Abrahamic Monotheistic Inquistion is still alive and well and continues to enable child molesters ,supports mass murder and land theft in the middle east and oppress women.

THE JEWISH INQUISITION

A keynote research paper showing that Middle Eastern Jews and Palestinians are genetically almost identical has been pulled from a leading journal.
Academics who have already received copies of Human Immunology have been urged to rip out the offending pages and throw them away.
Such a drastic act of self-censorship is unprecedented in research publishing and has created widespread disquiet, generating fears that it may involve the suppression of scientific work that questions Biblical dogma.
‘I have authored several hundred scientific papers, some for Nature and Science, and this has never happened to me before,’ said the article’s lead author, Spanish geneticist Professor Antonio Arnaiz-Villena, of Complutense University in Madrid. ‘I am stunned.’
The article has been removed from Human Immunology’s website, while letters have been written to libraries and universities throughout the world asking them to ignore or ‘preferably to physically remove the relevant pages’. Arnaiz-Villena has been sacked from the journal’s editorial board.

One of them said: ‘If Arnaiz-Villena had found evidence that Jewish people were genetically very special, instead of ordinary, you can be sure no one would have objected to the phrases he used in his article. This is a very sad business.’
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2001/nov/25/medicalscience.genetics

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/02/the-invention-of-judaism/

THE CHRISTIAN INQUISITION

The Golden Bough attempts to define the shared elements of religious belief, ranging from ancient belief systems to relatively modern religions such as Christianity. Its thesis is that old religions were fertility cults that revolved around the worship of, and periodic sacrifice of, a sacred king.
This king was the incarnation of a dying and reviving god, a solar deity who underwent a mystic marriage to a goddess of the Earth, who died at the harvest, and was reincarnated in the spring. Frazer claims that this legend is central to almost all of the world’s mythologies.
The book scandalized the British public upon its first publication, because it included the Christian story of Jesus in its comparative study, thus inviting an agnostic reading of the Lamb of God as a relic of a pagan religion

The Chapter on “Christianity” is still removed from the Golden Bough today.

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/02/the-invention-of-christianity/

THE ISLAMIC INQUISITION

Question Islam and this will happen…MY youngest child’s friend is Levre Van Gogh, his father Theo Van Gogh , was murdered by ISLAMIC FUNDAMENTALISTS for criticising Islam.
Van Gogh worked with writer Ayaan Hirsi Ali to produce the film Submission, which was critical of the treatment of women in Islam. On 2 November 2004 he was assassinated by Mohammed Bouyeri, a Dutch-Moroccan Muslim.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theo_van_Gogh_(film_director)
https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/02/the-invention-of-islam/

Abrahamic monotheism is just original fascism ,if you think god collects foreskins ,makes Real estate deals and hires paedophiles and women haters to do his PR ,then you have been indoctrinated beyond reason.

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/03/02/the-greatest-hoax-ever-abrahamic-monotheism-is-it-really-just-satanism/

ISRAEL IS GOOD

The Americans were responsible for creation of a gangster state headed by an utterly unscrupulous set of leaders,” – Sir John Troutbeck wrote in his letter to the foreign secretary, Ernest Bevin on June 2, 1948.

60 years later this is still true.Israel has voted a long list of terrorists ,Nazi collaborators and war criminals as prime ministers.

Inside Britain’s Israel Lobby [1/2]

Dispatches investigates one of the most powerful and influential political lobbies in Britain, which is working in support of the interests of the State of Israel.Despite wielding great influence among the highest realms of British politics and media, little is known about the individuals and groups which collectively are known as the pro-Israel lobby.
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=7fd_1258474918

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/02/18/the-israel-lobby-the-elephant-in-the-room-and-its-drenched-in-blood/

The Guardian reported on 2 April that Anat Kam, 23, an Israeli journalist “has been under secret house arrest since December on charges that she leaked highly sensitive classified military documents that suggest the Israeli military breached a court order on assassinations in the occupied West Bank”.

Seemingly, in the “Jews only democracy”, people (even kosher citizens) are put under house arrest even when they are trying to suggest a breach of the state’s Supreme Court orders.

Anat Kam will go on trial in two weeks time on treason and espionage charges and could face up to 14 years in jail. In the “democratic” Jewish state, a court-imposed gagging order is preventing media coverage of the arrest and charges in Israel. I am left puzzled here as it seems that Israelis can be prosecuted for reporting illegal activities.

A leading Haaretz journalist, Uri Blau, who has also been linked to the case, has had to escape Israel. He is now in London, apparently for fear he will be targeted for his reporting.
http://www.redress.cc/palestine/gatzmon20100403

The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff has warned congress about the danger Israel poses to America’s well being. General Petraeus says Israel is a danger to our troops and our National Security…Is congress listening?

Hell no. I write this article hoping us–WE THE PEOPLE–will finally stand up and hold the WHORES in congress accountable for our men and women who are dying for the state of Israel.

Take just one half hour out of your day and go to http://ussliberty.wordpress.com and you will learn all you need to know about our so called “ally” Israel. Please go to right side of page to the links section and hit “USS LIBERTY” and you are on your way.

http://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2010/03/26/israel%E2%80%99s-take-over-of-america-in-its-final-phase/

The Lavon Affair refers to the scandal over a failed Israeli covert operation in Egypt known as Operation Susannah, in which Israeli military intelligence planted bombs in Egyptian, American and British-owned targets in Egypt in the summer of 1954 in the hopes that “the Muslim Brotherhood, the Communists, ‘unspecified malcontents’ or ‘local nationalists’” would be blamed.[1] It became known as the Lavon Affair after the Israeli defense minister Pinhas Lavon, who was forced to resign because of the incident,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lavon_Affair

The USS Liberty incident was an attack on a United States Navy technical research ship, USS Liberty, by Israeli jet fighter planes, followed shortly by motor torpedo boats, on June 8, 1967, during the on-going Six-Day War. The combined air and sea attack killed 34 crew members (naval officers, seamen, two Marines, and a civilian), wounded 171 crew members, and severely damaged the ship. At the time, the ship was in international waters north of the Sinai Peninsula, about 25.5 nautical miles (47.2 km) northwest from the Egyptian city of Arish.
“ The evidence was clear. Both Admiral Kidd and I believed with certainty that this attack, which killed 34 American sailors and injured 172 others, was a deliberate effort to sink an American ship and murder its entire crew. Each evening, after hearing testimony all day, we often spoke our private thoughts concerning what we had seen and heard. I recall Admiral Kidd repeatedly referring to the Israeli forces responsible for the attack as ‘murderous bastards.’ It was our shared belief, based on the documentary evidence and testimony we received first hand, that the Israeli attack was planned and deliberate, and could not possibly have been an accident.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Liberty_incident#Ongoing_controversy_and_unresolved_questions

WHY DOES ISRAEL EVEN EXIST THERE IS ALREADY A JEWISH HOMELAND BIROBIDZHAN

A documentary film, L’Chayim, Comrade Stalin! on Stalin’s creation of the Jewish Autonomous Oblast and its partial settlement by thousands of Russian and Yiddish-speaking Jews was released in 2003. As well as relating the history of the creation of the proposed Jewish homeland, the film features scenes of life in contemporary Birobidzhan and interviews with Jewish residents.

According to the NY Times, Stalin established the city to protect secular Jews

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birobidjan

Far from Jews being forcibly exiled to Birobidjan, there were extensive worldwide efforts to promote this Soviet Jewish homeland project, including ‘Ambidjan’, the American Birobidjan Committee, whose officials included Albert Einstein and the prominent American Jewish author B.Z. Goldberg

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/11/29/zionism-modern-nazism/

MEANWHILE IN REALITY ,IF ANY CULTURE OR RACE HAS A GENETIC AND HISTORICAL  CLAIM ON THE LEVANT ,ITS THE ARYAN CELTIC PEOPLE. THE FIRST CIVILISATION , THE FIRST TEMPLE BUILDERS
The Levant The Natufian culture existed in the Mediterranean region of the Levant 12,000 to 9600 BCE. It was a Mesolithic culture, but unusual in that it was sedentary, or semi-sedentary, before the introduction of agriculture.Settlements occur in the woodland belt where oak and Pistacia species dominated. The underbrush of this open woodland was grass with high frequencies of grain.The round houses have a diameter between 3 and 6 meters, they contain a central round or subrectangular fireplace
Ain Mallaha was a Natufian settlement built and settled circa 10,000–8,000 BCE. The site is located in Northern Israel, and is in an area surrounded by hills and located by an ancient lake, Lake Huleh. The inhabitants are known to have eaten gazelle, fallow deer, wild boar, red and roe deer, hare, tortoise, reptiles, and fish. Also known as Eynan (Hebrew) or Mallaha (Arabic), this Natufian village was colonized in three phases. The first two phases were comprised of massive stone-built structures with smaller ones in the third phase. The phases occurred from 12,000 to 9600 BCE.Hundreds of Natufian graves have been excavated in Israel, Jordan, Syria, and Lebanon.In 2008, the grave of a Natufian ‘priestess’ was discovered (in most media reports referred to as a shaman or witch doctor ). The burial contained complete shells of 50 tortoises, which are thought to have been brought to the site and eaten during the funeral feast
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/11/081104-israel-shaman-missions.html
This temple site is the oldest known man-made place of worship.Through the radiocarbon method, the end of stratum III could be determined at circa 9,000 BC ; its beginnings are estimated to 11,000 BC or earlier. Stratum II dates to about 8,000 BC.
Thus, the complexes originated before the so-called Neolithic Revolution, the beginning of agriculture and animal husbandry, which is assumed to begin after 9,000 BC.The oldest occupation layer (stratum III) contained monolithic pillars linked by coarsely built walls to form circular or oval structures. So far, four such buildings, with diameters between 10 and 30m have been uncovered. Geophysical studies suggest 16 further structures
But the construction of the Göbekli Tepe complex implies organisation of a degree of complexity not hitherto associated with pre-Neolithic societies. The archaeologists estimate that up to 500 persons were required to extract the 10-20 ton pillars (in fact, some weigh up to 50 tons) from local quarries and move them 100 to 500m to the site.The monoliths are decorated with carved relief of animals or of abstract pictograms. These signs cannot be classed as writing, but may represent commonly understood sacred symbols, as known from Neolithic cave paintings elsewhere.
After 8000 BC, the site was abandoned and purposely covered up with soil.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6bekli_Tepe

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/03/the-history-of-the-celtic-people/

So if the Jewish people would like to move out , so the rightful owners can take over we can call it quits. If any Jewish person would like to stay I am sure we can build a ghetto for you and if you complain or attempt to defend yourself, we’ll bomb the shit out of you, and see how you like it.

BUT IN REALITY IF I WAS TO DO THIS ,SOME PEOPLE MIGHT CALL ME  A NAZI RACE SUPERICIST (and rightly so)…. SO WHAT IS THE JEWISH EXCUSE ,THEY DO NOT EVEN HAVE DNA OR ARCHEOLOGICAL BACKING.

Israel only exists because of delusional people that believe in a god that collects foreskins and does real estate deals .It would be just as valid to create a country based on building gods landing pad!  These “chosen ones” refuse to sign the Non Proliferation Treaty or let weapons inspectors in and are currently defying over 220 UN Resolutions.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_Nations_resolutions_concerning_Israel

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/03/25/only-mad-dogs-and-the-israel-lobby-go-out-in-the-middle-east-sun/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/02/the-invention-of-judaism/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/03/02/the-greatest-hoax-ever-abrahamic-monotheism-is-it-really-just-satanism/

IRAN IS BAD

Iran has signed the Non Proliferation Treaty and lets weapons inspectors into its facilities. The UN weapons inspectors have found nothing illegal.Iran has no WMD’s and even if they started making them ,we have more .Did DETERENCE STOP WORKING?

SO what could the REAL reason be for the Main Stream Media Presstitutes to be stuck in an anti-Iran media RUT? Operation Ajax II ,sponcered by oil and Israel. 

OPERATION AJAX

In 1951 Dr. Mohammed Mossadegh was elected prime minister. As prime minister, Mossadegh became enormously popular in Iran after he nationalized Iran’s oil reserves. In response, Britain embargoed Iranian oil and, amidst Cold War fears, invited the United States to join in a plot to depose Mossadegh, and in 1953 President Dwight D. Eisenhower authorized Operation Ajax.

The BBC spearheaded Britain’s propaganda campaign, broadcasting the go-code launching the coup d’état against Iran’s elected government.

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/09/iranian-oil-bourse-the-real-reason-for-war-with-iran/

THE INTERNET IS DANGEROUS

According to our government representatives , and thier Main Stream Media propaganda presstitutes, the internet is full of criminals , terrorists and paedophiles and the government is the best person to protect us from these fiends. Of course this is a complete LIE! Its the government that is full of criminals , terrorists and paedophiles ,it is the INTERNET THAT WILL EXPOSE THIS!

The Internet is the FORTH ESTATE that the MSM used to be. It is STILL FREE FROM CENCORSHIP , despite the best efforts of the government . It will remain so THANKS TO WIKILEAKS AND THE PEOPLE OF ICELAND  

Iceland could become a journalism haven if a proposal put forward by some Icelandic MPs, aided by Wikileaks, succeeds. Julian Assange, editor of Wikileaks, said that the idea is to “try and reform Iceland’s media law to be a very attractive jurisdiction for investigative journalists.” The article notes one area in which supporters of the Icelandic Modern Media Initiative need to tread carefully: “…the troubles of the financial sector may lead some Icelanders to be sceptical of efforts to transform their country and [one supporter] is aware of the need not to make exaggerated claims.” A British opponent of the idea (and supporter of the UK’s draconian libel laws) is quoted: “The provisions allowing defendants to counter-sue ‘libel tourists’ in their home courts could transform the humble Icelander into a legal superman, virtually untouchable abroad for comment written — and uploaded — at home.”

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/02/21/icelandthe-pheonix-from-the-fire-as-the-long-boats-enter-the-accountant-sea/

BLACK= Heavy cencorship

RED = Under Survellience and tracking

YELLOW =Limited Cencorship

BLUE = FREE

File:Internet blackholes.svg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reporters_Without_Borders

The fight for free access to information is being played out to an ever greater extent on the Internet. The emerging general trend is that a growing number of countries are attemptimg to tighten their control of the Net, but at the same time, increasingly inventive netizens demonstrate mutual solidarity by mobilizing when necessary.

The Internet: a space for information-sharing and mobilizing

In authoritarian countries in which the traditional media are state-controlled, the Internet offers a unique space for discussion and information-sharing, and has become an ever more important engine for protest and mobilization. The Internet is the crucible in which repressed civil societies can revive and develop.

http://www.rsf.org/ennemis.html

http://www.rsf.org/en-ennemi36676-Burma.html

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/03/24/virtual-ww3internet-freedom-and-the-war-in-cyberspace/

INTERNET TAKES THE LEAD OVER MAINSTREAM MEDIA

Internet tops TV viewing in Canada: Ipsos poll

For the first time ever, Canadians are spending more time surfing the web than they are watching television, a new poll shows.

http://www.ottawasun.com/news/canada/2010/03/22/13314206-qmi.html

OF COURSE AUTHORITARIANS ,LIKE STATE CAPITALISTS, FASCISTS AND THE MILTARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX WANT THIS STOPPED

This document is a classifed (SECRET/NOFORN) 32 page U.S. counterintelligence investigation into WikiLeaks.
“The possibility that current employees or moles within DoD or elsewhere in the U.S. government are providing sensitive or classified information to wikileaks.org cannot be ruled out”. It concocts a plan to fatally marginalize the organization. Since WikiLeaks uses “trust as a center of gravity by protecting the anonymity and identity of the insiders, leakers or whisteblowers”, the report recommends

“The identification, exposure, termination of employment,criminal prosecution, legal action against current or former insiders, leakers, or whistlblowers could potentially damage or destroy this center of gravity and deter others considering similar actions from using the Wikileaks.org Web site”.
[As two years have passed since the date of the report, with no WikiLeaks’ source exposed, it appears that this plan was ineffective]. As an odd justificaton for the plan, the report claims that “Several foreign countries including China,Israel, North Kora, Russia, Vietnam, and Zimbabwe have denounced or blocked access to the Wikileaks.org website”.
The report provides further justification by enumerating embarrassing stories broken by WikiLeaks—U.S. equipment expenditure in Iraq, probable U.S. violations of the Cemical Warfare Convention Treaty in Iraq, the battle over the Iraqi town of Fallujah and human rights violations at Guantanmo Bay. Note that the report contains a number of inaccurances, for instance, the claim that WikiLeaks has no editorial control. The report concludes with 13 items of intelligence to be answered about WikiLeaks

http://file.wikileaks.org/files/us-intel-wikileaks.pdf

JUST GOES TO SHOW THAT “MILITARY INTELLIGENCE” IS A CONTRADICTION IN TERMS

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/03/24/virtual-ww3internet-freedom-and-the-war-in-cyberspace/

ASSASSINATIONS ARE GOOD

Administration Says Drone Strikes Are Legal and Necessary

Last night, the State Department’s legal adviser, Harold Koh, delivered a keynote address to the American Society of International Law’s annual meeting in Washington. He spoke in part about the administration’s use of lethal force against terrorists, specifically drone attacks, and whether this was legal under international law and the laws of armed conflict. Koh’s remarks were the most consequential on this subject to date, and the ripple effects will be felt throughout the Obama administration’s foreign policy for months and possibly years to come.

The bottom line was this: Lethal strikes against terrorists, including those involving unmanned drone aircraft, “comply with all applicable law, including the laws of war,” Koh said

OF COURSE THIS IS BULLSHIT AND THEY KNOW IT!!!!
“these operations are conducted consistently with law of war principles…”
TO CONDUCT OPERATIONS WITHIN THE LAWS OF WAR TAKES A DECLARATION OF WAR !!!……AS FAR AS I KNOW THE USA HAS NOT DECLARED WAR ON PAKISTAN.

TORTURE IS GOOD

IN WWII we executed Japanese officers that ordered waterboarding on our troops.So either today we execute our waterboarders or the equivilent (life imprisonment) or we need to apologise to the Japanese.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torture_and_the_United_States

WE ARE SPREADING FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY

NO WE ARE NOT!!!

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/02/governments-traitors-terrorists-and-drug-dealers/

OBAMA IS A SOCIALIST AND RON PAUL IS A LIBERTARIAN

Obama is a state capitalist Fascist and Ron Paul is an Objectivist.

TRUE SOCIALISM IS LIBERTARIANISM AND TRUE LIBERTARIANISM IS ANARCHO COMMUNISM!

Anarchists have been using the term “libertarian” to describe themselves and their ideas since the 1850s. The revolutionary anarchist Joseph Dejacque published Le Libertaire, Journal du Mouvement social in New York between 1858 and 1861 Max Nettlau, A Short History of Anarchism, p. 75]. According to anarchist historian Max Nettlau, the use of the term “libertarian communism” dates from November, 1880 when a French anarchist congress adopted it [Ibid., p. 145]. The use of the term “Libertarian” by anarchists became more popular from the 1890s onward after it was used in France in an attempt to get around anti-anarchist laws and to avoid the negative associations of the word “anarchy” in the popular mind (Sebastien Faure and Louise Michel published the paper Le Libertaire — The Libertarian — in France in 1895, for example). Since then, particularly outside USA, it has always been associated with anarchist ideas and movements. Taking a more recent example, in the USA, anarchists organised “The Libertarian League” in July 1954, which had staunch anarcho-syndicalist principles and lasted until 1965. The US-based “Libertarian” Party, on the other hand has only existed since the early 1970s, well over 100 years after anarchists first used the term to describe their political ideas (and 90 years after the expression “libertarian communism” was first adopted). It is that party, not the anarchists, who have “stolen” the word.

  This “Free Market” US version of Libertarianism should more correctly be called Ayn Rand Objectivism with Austrian Free Market economics glued on. It is an obviously self defeating philosophy. WHY? Well anyone who understands the capitalist free market economic system knows it is better called the Boom and Bust economy.

A Brief description of the Capitalist system , Adam Smith’s AND RAND “Radical” capitalism ,as I see it!
1.Availability of credit allows money to flow between savers and borrowers.
2.Resources and funds are allocated to various projects or investments during a boom phase.
3.Eventually borrowing becomes excessive and leads to malinvestment,
4.At this stage, adherence to free market theory would allow for an efficient cleansing period and a healthy recovery period. How? Irresponsible and unprofitable businesses fail. Bad debts get liquidated. Excess resources go on sale, flow into more stable ventures and pool together with more profitable resources controlled by healthy corporations or entities
http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article6497.html

This is called a BOOM AND BUST CYCLE!!!After a couple of Free market Boom and Bust cycles the majority of the resourses would end up in the hands of a minority again. The majority is under the thumb again ,Libertarian or not!!! That is why this is a self defeating philisophy! It was Adam Smiths Laisse Faire capitalism that produced the new rich of the industrial revolution and new robber barons, instead of the meritocracy that he envisaged. Marx’s major work was “Capital” and was a critique of why capitalism failed to produce a meritocracy, Ayn Rands radical capitalism would just produce the same results. You cannot put a price on natural resourses ,this leads to corruption and theft and the destruction of resourses. Just like you cannot steal a mans labour,what a man carves out for himself from the resourses avaiable to him , is HIS AND HIS ALONE …its does NOT belong to the state or the community.

HERE IS FREE MARKET ANARCHISM EXPLAINED (OBJECTIVISM) IMHO it cannot work because it buys and sells resourses ,thus making modern robber barons and it STEALS the working mans labour. When YOU work for someone else and they own the resourses YOU WILL BE EXPLOITED (like a disneyland employee). In this description of Objectivist ,free market anarchism, DISNEYLAND and MORMON COMMUNITIES are given as working examples of Objectivism…… I WOULD NEVER CALL DISNEYLAND AN EXAMPLE TO ASPIRE TOO…..WOULD YOU?

http://www.lewrockwell.com/casey/casey45.1.html

Libertarian socialism aims to create a society in which all violent or coercive institutions would be dissolved, and in their place every person would have free, equal access to tools of information and production, or a society in which such coercive institutions and hierarchies were drastically reduced in scope.
This equality and freedom would be achieved through the abolition of authoritarian institutions such as an individual’s right to own resourses(including the state) ,in order that direct control of the means of production and resources will be gained by the working class and society as a whole. The worker would own his own labour not the state or the community .
 Only a libertarian-socialist system of ownership can maximise individual freedom. Needless to say, state ownership — what is commonly called “socialism” — is, for anarchists, not socialism at all. In fact,state “socialism” is just a form of capitalism, with no socialist content whatever. As Rudolf Rocker noted, for anarchists, socialism is “not a simple question of a full belly, but a question of culture that would have to enlist the sense of personality and the free initiative of the individual; without freedom it would lead only to a dismal state capitalism which would sacrifice all individual thought and feeling to a fictitious collective interest.” [quoted by Colin Ward, “Introduction”, Rudolf Rocker, The London Years, p. 1]

I BELIEVE IN TRUE LIBETARIANISM (unlike Alex Jones or Ron Paul who just like the label ,and are being decietful by describing themselves as  LIBERTARIANS ,when in FACT they are Free market Anarchists or Objectivists) BUT IN A TRUE LIBERTARIAN SOCIETY BOTH LEFTWING AND RIGHTWING LIBERTARIAN SYSTEMS CAN EXIST SIDE BY SIDE.

Anarchism has historically gained more support and influence in Spain than anywhere else, especially before Francisco Franco’s victory in the Spanish Civil War of 1936-1939.
There were several variants of anarchism in Spain: the peasant anarchism in the countryside of Andalusia; urban anarcho-syndicalism in Catalonia, particularly its capital Barcelona; and what is sometimes called “pure” anarchism in other cities such as Zaragoza. However, these were complementary trajectories, and shared a great deal of ideological similarities.
In the 20th century, this violence began to fade, and the movement gained speed with the rise of anarcho-syndicalism and the creation of the huge libertarian trade union, the CNT. General strikes became common, and large portions of the Spanish working class adopted anarchist ideas. The FAI was created as a purely anarchist association, with the intention of keeping the CNT focused on the principles of anarchism.
Anarchists played a central role in the fight against Franco during the Spanish Civil War. At the same time, a far-reaching social revolution spread throughout Spain, where land and factories were collectivized and controlled by the workers. All remaining social reforms ended in 1939 with the victory of Franco, who had thousands of anarchists executed.

THE SLAVE TRADE WAS A WHITE MANS INVENTION.

The word Slave originates from the word SLAV. White skinned Eastern Europeans ,these where the “normal” victims of the “Slave Trade” sold in Islamic African and Byzantine Slav Markets. The American slave trade was a Jewish racket using Islamic African Slave markets that had already been trading SLAVS for a thousand years!!!……. and today the “slave trade” is still used as a divide and rule tool on the people of America,with African Americans viewing European Americans as Slave Traders!!!! It would be hysterically funny if it was not so tragic.

The Muslim powers of Iberia both raided for slaves and purchased slaves from European merchants, often the Jewish Radhanites, one of the few groups that could easily move between the Christian and Islamic worlds. Who Brought the Slaves to America?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8533633099218104720#

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/06/barbadoed-scotlands-sugar-slaves-redlegs-and-other-white-slaves/

AMERICA LAND OF THE FREE

The high proportion of prisoners in some developed countries is from various causes, but the attitude toward drug-taking plays a considerable part.
Prison population per 100,000 inhabitants
United Statesof America 756
Russian Federation 611
New Zealand 186
United Kingdom 148
The US has historically the highest percentage of it population in jail .More than Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia or Apartide South Africa. For more on this you might find this an interesting post.
https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/01/30/war-on-drugs-officially-lost-another-fake-us-war-another-total-us-defeat/

I HAVE A MIND OF MY OWN,THE MSM BOOB TUBE PRESSTITUTES TOLD ME SO…….

I turn on the television and look at the talking heads telling us what to think, what to wear, what to believe and what to say and and I see the pedicures, manicures, 200 dollar hair cuts, 1000 dollar suits,  protected by body guards all the while trying to CONvince us they are like we are and I just want to choke the living shit out of  the likes of Sean Hannity, Bill O’rielly, Glen Beck, Rush Limbaugh on and on to what must be infinity and it really pisses me off, but I don’t know.. I Must be Weird.
http://tshtf.blogspot.com/2010/03/i-must-be-weird.html

PLEASE DO NOT GET STUCK IN A R.U.T. (Repeat Until True)

THE PEEPHOLE FOR THE PEOPLE – WIKILEAKS AND THE DIRECT DEMOCRACY OF ICELAND

This setup would guarantee a safeplace for whistleblowers. IMHO THE INTERNET IS AN ELECTRONIC JUNGLE WHERE ONLY THE TRUTH LASTS LONG IN BRIGHT DAYLIGHT. It is the internet that has ripped holes in many official government conspiracy theories.

WikiLeaks has probably produced more scoops in its short life than the Washington Post has in the past 30 years ”
—  The National, November 19, 2009

Over the last few years, WikiLeaks has been the subject of hostile acts by security organizations. In the developing world, these range from the appalling assassination of two related human rights lawyers in Nairobi last March (an armed attack on my compound there in 2007 is still unattributed) to an unsuccessful mass attack by Chinese computers on our servers in Stockholm, after we published photos of murders in Tibet. In the West this has ranged from the overt, the head of Germany’s foreign intelligence service, the BND, threatening to prosecute us unless we removed a report on CIA activity in Kosovo, to the covert, to an ambush by a “James Bond” character in a Luxembourg car park, an event that ended with a mere “we think it would be in your interest to…”.

Developing world violence aside, we’ve become used to the level of security service interest in us and have established procedures to ignore that interest.

But the increase in surveillance activities this last month, in a time when we are barely publishing due to fundraising, are excessive. Some of the new interest is related to a film exposing a U.S.massacre we will release at the U.S. National Press Club on April 5.

The spying includes attempted covert following, photographng, filming and the overt detention & questioning of a WikiLeaks’ volunteer in Iceland on Monday night. I, and others were in Iceland to advise Icelandic parliamentarians on the Icelandic Modern Media Initiative, a new package of laws designed to protect investigative journalists and internet services from spying and censorship. As such, the spying has an extra poignancy.

The possible triggers:

•our ongoing work on a classified film revealing civilian casualties occurring under the command of the U.S, general, David Petraeus.
•our release of a classified 32 page US intelligence report on how to fatally marginalize WikiLeaks (expose our sources, destroy our reputation for integrity, hack us).
•our release of a classified cable from the U.S. Embassy in Reykjavik reporting on contact between the U.S. and the U.K. over billions of euros in claimed loan guarantees.
•pending releases related to the collapse of the Icelandic banks and Icelandic “oligarchs”.
We have discovered half a dozen attempts at covert surveillance in Reykjavik both by native English speakers and Icelanders. On the occasions where these individuals were approached, they ran away. One had marked police equipment and the license plates for another suspicious vehicle track back to the Icelandic private VIP bodyguard firm Terr. What does that mean? We don’t know. But as you will see, other events are clear.

U.S. sources told Icelandic state media’s deputy head of news, that the State Department was aggressively investigating a leak from the U.S. Embassy in Reykjavik. I was seen at a private U.S Embassy party at the Ambassador’s residence, late last year and it is known I had contact with Embassay staff, after.

On Thursday March 18, 2010, I took the 2.15 PM flight out of Reykjavik to Copenhagen–on the way to speak at the SKUP investigative journalism conference in Norway. After receiving a tip, we obtained airline records for the flght concerned. Two individuals, recorded as brandishing diplomatic credentials checked in for my flight at 12:03 and 12:06 under the name of “US State Department”. The two are not recorded as having any luggage.

Iceland doesn’t have a separate security service. It folds its intelligence function into its police forces, leading to an uneasy overlap of policing and intelligence functions and values.

On Monday 22, March, at approximately 8.30pm, a WikiLeaks volunteer, a minor, was detained by Icelandic police on a wholly insignificant matter. Police then took the opportunity to hold the youth over night, without charge–a highly unusual act in Iceland. The next day, during the course of interrogation, the volunteer was shown covert photos of me outside the Reykjavik restaurant “Icelandic Fish & Chips”, where a WikiLeaks production meeting took place on Wednesday March 17–the day before individuals operating under the name of the U.S. State Department boarded my flight to Copenhagen.

Our production meeting used a discreet, closed, backroom, because we were working on the analysis of a classified U.S. military video showing civilian kills by U.S. pilots. During the interrogation, a specific reference was made by police to the video—which could not have been understood from that day’s exterior surveillance alone. Another specific reference was made to “important”, but unnamed Icelandic figures. References were also made to the names of two senior journalists at the production meeting.

Who are the Icelandic security services loyal to in their values? The new government of April 2009, the old pro-Iraq war government of the Independence party, or perhaps to their personal relationships with peers from another country who have them on a permanment intelligence information drip?

Only a few years ago, Icelandic airspace was used for CIA rendition flights. Why did the CIA think that this was acceptable? In a classified U.S. profile on the former Icelandic Ambassador to the United States, obtained by WikiLeaks, the Ambassador is praised for helping to quell publicity of the CIA’s activities.

Often when a bold new government arises, bureaucratic institutions remain loyal to the old regime and it can take time to change the guard. Former regime loyalists must be discovered, dissuaded and removed. But for the security services, that first vital step, discovery, is awry. Congenitally scared of the light, such services hide their activities; if it is not known what security services are doing, then it is surely impossible to know who they are doing it for.

Our plans to release the video on April 5 proceed. We have asked relevant authorities in the Unites States and Iceland to explain. If these countries are to be treated as legitmate states, they need to start obeying the rule of law. Now.

       —Julian Assange (editor@wikileaks.org)

EDITORIAL:U.S. must stop spying on WikiLeaks
Fri Mar 26 08:44:46 UTC 2010

WikiLeaks to reveal Pentagon murder-coverup at US National Press Club, Apr 5, 9am
War on whistleblower: CIA spies on WikiLeaks for ‘Pentagon murder cover-up’ exposure?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mX_kcPyRw50&feature=player_embedded

http://snardfarker.ning.com/profiles/blogs/wikileaks-to-reveal-pentagon

“Wikileaks leaked video of Civilians killed in Baghdad – Full video” 

WARNING This video may contain content that is inappropriate for some users

<object width=”640″ height=”385″><param name=”movie” value=”http://www.youtube.com/v/is9sxRfU-ik&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1″></param><param name=”allowFullScreen” value=”true”></param><param name=”allowScriptAccess” value=”always”></param><embed src=”http://www.youtube.com/v/is9sxRfU-ik&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1” type=”application/x-shockwave-flash” allowfullscreen=”true” allowScriptAccess=”always” width=”640″ height=”385″></embed></object>

http://www.youtube.com/verify_age?next_url=/watch%3Fv%3Dis9sxRfU-ik%26feature%3Dplayer_embedded

“Whether the mask is labeled Fascism, Democracy, or Dictatorship or the Proletariat, our great adversary remains the Apparatus-the bureaucracy, the police, the military…. No matter what the circumstances, the worst betrayal will always be to subordinate ourselves to this Apparatus, and to trample underfoot, in its service, all human values in ourselves and in others.”– The French worker philosopher Simone Weil,1945

“All government, of course, is against liberty. The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary. Most people want security in this world, not liberty.”
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out… without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable. It doesn’t take a majority to make a rebellion; it takes only a few determined leaders and a sound cause.”

IF VOTING COULD CHANGE ANYTHING THEY WOULD BAN IT, AND NO MATTER WHO YOU VOTE FOR ,THE GOVERNMENT ALWAYS GETS IN!!

REMEMBER QUESTION EVERYTHING

TRUTH CAN HANDLE AWKWARD QUESTIONS

ITS LIES AND EVIL THAT NEED CENCORSHIP AND DOGMA AND GODS AND GOVERNMENTS


Its Official the Economy will Recover…..When PIGS Fly!

February 25, 2010

DUMB,DUMB,DUMB,DUMB,DUMB,DUMB,DUMB,DUMB, DUMB,DUMB,DUMB,DUMB,DUMB,DUMB,DUMB,DUMB
FLASH   AAAAAAAHHHHHHH!!
HE’S SCREWED EVERYONE OF US
FLASH GORDON BROWN SAVIOUR OF THE FINACIAL UNIVERSE
“Flash! We only have 8 hours to save the banking world”
CRY HAVOC AND UNLEASH THE PIGS OF FINANCE …….but which Pigs are we taking about?
PIIGS and PIGS are acronyms used by international bond analysts, academics, and by the international economic press that refer to the economies of Portugal,  Italy, Ireland, Greece, and Spain, especially in regards to matters relating to sovereign debt markets. When rendered as “PIGS”, the “I” originally refered  to Italy, but has occasionally become an interchangeable reference to Ireland. Some news and economic organisations have limited or banned their use due to  criticism regarding perceived offensive connotations.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PIGS_(economics)
PORTUGAL – Leftwing and VERY LIBERAL (Portugal has DECRIMINALISED ALL DRUGS),
IRELAND- Leftwing ,
GREECE – Socialist ,
SPAIN    -a Socialist and liberal country
………ITALY (NO longer a PIG) used to be leftwing and is now right of centre ….could just be coincidence that all these countries that the bankers are after ,seem left of centre,  most where right of centre when the banking crisis was forming.
SECULAR SOCIALISTS NOT what Western Capitalists like at all!!!

MEANWHILE THE PIGS IN THE TROUGH AKA THE BRIGHTEST AND THE BEST…..SAY LET ME IN LITTLE PIGGY
The “Brightest and the best” assure us that if Greece just follows thier orders ,all will be well. REMEMBER these people are the very people that got us into  this mess!!!!
They assure the public that Greece’s politicians are willing to impose spending cuts and tax increases that will push the ratio of the deficit to the Gross  Domestic Product from 12.7% in 2009 to 8.7% this year and 3% in 2012. This is the promise of Greece’s Prime Minister, George Papandreau. He is the leader of  the Panhellenic Socialist Movement. He has been the President of the Socialist International since 2006. He was born in Minnesota. He has a masters degree in  sociology. Trust him!
Here is a country that cannot balance its budget. It refuses to cut wages of its union-protected government employees. Its public sector workers rioted last  week to protest the minimal austerity measures announced by the government. Yet, we are assured by a commissioner of the Economic and Monetary Affairs  Commission, that “We expect that in due course the Greek government will take the necessary additional measures.” In due course. One of these days. Real Soon  Now.
On Friday, February 12, news from Europe came that there would be a bailout of some kind. Now we are told that Greece must jump through some very tight  fiscal hoops to get aid. Greece’s government must stop looking only to the interests of Greek voters. Bloomberg reported:
Austrian Finance Minister Josef Proell said the region had to “act in the interest” of the euro currency and it was up to Greece to cut its deficit before  the EU offers help.
“Nobody can spare Greece the task of cleaning up its own house, Proell said in Brussels. “Only then will we decide whether financial signals have to be  sent,” he said. Germany’s Wolfgang Schaeuble also said additional measures that Greece should take will be considered.
Wait a minute! It will take months for the Greek government to produce fiscal results. In the meantime, how will Greece’s government borrow more money to  stay afloat? How much will it pay to borrow? How will the crisis be deferred while the Eurocrats are waiting to see the official figures – from a government  that has misled the banks from the beginning?
http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article17338.html

“Greece’s government must stop looking only to the interests of Greek voters. Bloomberg reported: ”

GREECE TELL THESE CROOKS TO TAKE A LONG WALK OF A SHORT PIER WITH A HEAVY LOAD
The GREEK GOVERNMENT is there to represent the Greek People NOT BLOOMBERG THE FINANCIAL MARKETS THE EURO OR THE EU!!!!!
BUT POLITIONS ARE JUST AS CORRUPT AS BANKERS …THE GREEK PEOPLE understand this..

Greek Police, Protesters Clash in Nationwide Strike
Feb. 24 (Bloomberg) — Greek police fired tear-gas and clashed with demonstrators in central Athens after a march organized by unions to oppose Prime  Minister George Papandreou’s drive to cut the European Union’s biggest budget deficit.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=auLLhrWZiKi8&pos=8
Please look at what Iceland is doing ,or Argentina for inspiration.

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/02/21/icelandthe-pheonix-from-the-fire-as-the-long-boats-enter-the-accountant-sea/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/government-should-go-on-strike-to-prove-they-are-worth-thier-money/

OR ECUADOR ,THEY DECLARED THE DEBT ILLEGAL!!

In November 2008, Ecuador became the first country to undertake an examination of the legitimacy and structure of its foreign debt. An independent debt audit commissioned by the government of Ecuador documented hundreds of allegations of irregularity, illegality, and illegitimacy in contracts of debt to predatory international lenders. The loans, according to the report, violated Ecuador’s domestic laws, US Securities and Exchange Commission regulations, and general principles of international law. Ecuador’s use of legitimacy as a legal argument for defaulting set a major precedent; indeed, the formation of a debt auditing commission sets a precedent.

http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/10-ecuador-declares-foreign-debt-illegitimate/

ECUADOR IS ALSO SHOWING HOW TO DO REAL ENVIRONMENTALISM ,NOT CLIMATEGATE FAKE CARBON TAX ENVIRONMENALISM

In September 2008 Ecuador became the first country in the world to declare constitutional rights to nature, thus codifying a new system of environmental protection.

http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/18-ecuadors-constitutional-rights-of-nature/

THESE FINANCIAL GENIUSES THAT DEMAND GREECE ETC DO THIER BIDDING ARE CROOKS AND THIER CURE WILL KILL YOU!!!

Remember that bailout $700 Billion….Well it was actually $23.7 TRILLION and it still has NOT WORKED!!
FED GAVE Banks Access to 23.7 TRILLION DOLLARS NOT $700 Billion!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lDJc0PZV-Bk&feature=player_embedded#
THE MARKETS ARE BEING MANIPULATED
Trader on Bloomberg says markets are manipulated and volumes ‘ficticious’.Not only are the new high tech/high speed transactions giving big banks an  overwhelming trading advantage over retail investors, they’re also creating a false impression about the health of the stock market.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4cRYI2×60Q&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwhatreallyhappened%2Ecom%2F&feature=player_embedded
THE BAILOUT DID NOT WORK , DEBT IS STILL RISING
The Senate voted on December 24 to allow the federal government to borrow an additional $290 billion, thereby increasing the total federal debt from $12.1  trillion to about $12.4 trillion.
http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/congress/2647-congress-votes-to-raise-debt-limit
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The U.S. Senate Thursday voted narrowly to increase the government’s borrowing authority to $14.3 trillion, which would allow the  Treasury Department to continue servicing the country’s spiraling national debt through most of 2010.
http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2010/01/28/us/politics-usa-congress-debt.html?_r=1
US AND UK BUSINESSES ARE STILL DEVALUING!!!!!
Britain’s banks have been downgraded as credit risks by ratings agency Standard and Poors. This means they are no longer regarded as among the safest bets in  the world.
http://www.silobreaker.com/british-banks-downgraded-5_2263193997923057688
General Electric lost its top credit rating from Moody’s Investors Service on Monday because of higher risks at the conglomerate’s struggling GE Capital  lending unit.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/24/business/24electric.html

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/03/the-record-of-the-federal-reserve/

IF ONLY THESE PIGS HAD FLOWN INTO ACTION INSTEAD, WE MIGHT NOT BE IN THE MESS WE ARE TODAY!!
The Flying Squad is a branch of the Specialist Crime Directorate, within London’s Metropolitan Police Service.The Squad’s purpose is to investigate  commercial armed robberies, along with the prevention and investigation of other serious armed crime.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_Squad

A LESSON FOR THE BRIGHTEST AND THE BEST. CAPITALISM EXPLAINED its not that difficul;t , so you see we do not need the brightest and the best.

1.Availability of credit allows money to flow between savers and borrowers.
2.Resources and funds are allocated to various projects or investments during a boom phase.
3.Eventually borrowing becomes excessive and leads to malinvestment,
4.At this stage, adherence to free market theory would allow for an efficient cleansing period and a healthy recovery period. How? Irresponsible and  unprofitable businesses fail. Bad debts get liquidated. Excess resources go on sale, flow into more stable ventures and pool together with more profitable  resources controlled by healthy corporations or entities
http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article6497.html

AT THE MOMMENT THE BRIGHTEST AND THE BEST GET MONEY FOR LESS THAN 1% INTEREST(BANK LENDING RATES) AND LEND IT FOR AT LEAST 5% INTEREST(PUBLIC BORROWING  RATES). A MONKEY WITH LEARNING DIFFICULTIES COULD MAKE MONEY IN THIS SETUP!!!!!!!!!!
BUT EVEN WITH THIS SETUP ,THESE FINANCIAL MUPPETS HAVE LOST BILLIONS , BUT STILL DEMAND BONUES!!!!

RBS braced for bonus row with planned £1.3bn payout
• Taxpayer-owned bank to announce results on Thursday
• HSBC bosses push for pay rises of up to 30%

Loss-making Royal Bank of Scotland is braced for a row over City pay next week when it is expected to admit that its bonus pot for 22,000 investment bankers  has reached £1.3bn – against last year’s £1bn.
The Edinburgh-based bank is awaiting approval from UK Financial Investments, the body that looks after the taxpayer’s 84% stake in the bank, for its proposed  bonus pool.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/feb/19/rbs-bonus-row

These “brightest and best” free market capitalists expect the taxpayer to pay the 4 BILLION in LOSSES AND 1.3 BILLION in BONUSES!!
FYI RBS EMPLOYEES ARE GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES WHILE THE TAXPAYER HOLDS 84% OF THESE DEVALUED SHARES. IF YOU UNDERSTAND FREE MARKET CAPITALISM YOU WOULD REALISE  THAT YOUR BANK SHOULD OF GONE BUST AND YOU SHOULD BE UNEMPLOYED. THUS NO WAGES NEVERMIND A BONUS!!!
AND AS RBS LOST NEARLY 4 BILLIONS POUNDS WHERE EXACTLY DO YOU EXPECT TO GET THE MONEY TO PAY THIS BONUS? SORRY THE MARKET HAS SPOKEN AND YOU ARE UNPROFITABLE  AND IRRESPONSIBLE BY YOUR OWN STANDARDS, SO STOP BLUBBING!!!
ACTUALLY THE FRAUD SQUAD SHOULD OF BEEN CALLED IN AGES AGO, FRAUD ,CORRUPTION , MARKET MANIPULATION ETC .ETC.
THE BRIGHEST AND THE BEST OR A BUNCH OF GREEDY CRIMINAL FRAUDSTERS THAT ARE ALREADY BUST?
https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/02/08/is-the-us-already-bankrupt-and-trading-in-fake-gold/

OF COURSE THE FED DOES NOT WANT AUDITED, ITS BUST ,ITS CORRUPT AND ITS FAILED IN ITS DUTY!!!!!!!
https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/03/the-record-of-the-federal-reserve/

The board of directors of each Federal Reserve Bank District also have regulatory and supervisory responsibilities. For example, a member bank (private bank)  is not permitted to give out too many loans to people who cannot pay them back. This is because too many defaults on loans will lead to a bank run.
The punishment for making false statements or reports which overvalue an asset is also stated in the U.S. Code:[44]
Whoever knowingly makes any false statement or report, or willfully overvalues any land, property or security, for the purpose of influencing in any  way…shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both.
These aspects of the Federal Reserve System are the parts intended to prevent or minimize speculative asset bubbles which ultimately lead to severe market  corrections. The recent bubbles and corrections in energies, grains, equity and debt products and real estate cast doubt on the efficacy of these controls.
SO WHY ARE THE BANKERS NOT FACING $1,000,000 FINES AND 30 YEARS IMPRISONMENT?!?!

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/10/11/criminal-bankers-explainedjail-not-bail/

THE UK CREDIT CRUNCH
The reason why the banks are going bust in simple terms is:

Bradford and Bingley’s slow 12 month death march towards the same fate as Northern Rock finally looks set to have come to an end with expectations on Sunday  that the beleaguered bank will be nationalised with a view to a break of the bank and liquidation of assets so as to cover in part the estimated £20 billion  bailout cost that is required to fill the gap between assets and liabilities. The toxic mortgages will probably end up with the government owned Northern  Rock bank which will increasingly be seen as the UK Governments Toxic Mortgage Dump where the tulip backed securities of further bank busts and partial  bailouts will end up.
The banks traded in complex derivatives products between themselves, in what is termed as the over the counter market. The exposure to the Securitized debt  packages was further exaggerated by the use of leverage of in many cases more than 30X the banks assets against valuations based on complex models that  inflated the packages values during the boom times which allowed huge profits and bonuses to be banked (Fraud?). However the critical point is in the final  link in a long chain of sliced and diced debt packages was the US housing market.
Now many banks are left with assets that are worth LESS than 50% of their “mark to market” booked value. Now that does not mean a 50% loss for the banks on  investments, remember the greedy banks deployed LEVERAGE of as much as 30 times of assets, so capital of say £100 million is controlling risk of as much as  £3,000 million. Therefore a 50% loss results in a loss of value of £1,500 million, that’s 15 TIMES the capital. Hence the banks have been reluctant to price  their debt packages at the real market price as that would mean that the bank is effectively bankrupt with losses far greater than the banks capital base. So  the market remains frozen until all of the illiquid mortgage backed debt has been transferred over to the tax payers in exchange for liquid cash, hence  prompting the US Mother of All bailouts plan.
http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article6498.html
THIS IS JUST THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG. THIS IS LIQUID LENDING MONEY, WE STILL HAVE THE ASSET MARKET
Trouble in Hedgefundistan: “Its gonna get a lot worse”
http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article1600.html
AND THE DERIVITIVES MARKETS TO BAILOUT!!!
Bailout Secret- To Prevent $68 Trillion Derivatives Collapse Chain Reaction
http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article6495.html
AND AFTER TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN BANKER BAILOUTS THERE IS NOTHING LEFT IN THE KITTY FOR THE AVERAGE JOE!
https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/02/20/the-joe-stack-attack-born-free-and-taxed-to-death/

Citigroup Warns Customers It May Refuse To Allow Withdrawals

“Effective April 1, 2010, we reserve the right to require (7) days advance notice before permitting a withdrawal from all checking accounts. While we do not  currently exercise this right and have not exercised it in the past, we are required by law to notify you of this change,” Citigroup said on statements  received by customers all over the country.
http://www.businessinsider.com/citigroup-warns-customers-it-may-refuse-to-allow-withdrawals-2010-2
OF COURSE CITIGROUP SAYS ITS NOTHING TO WORRY ABOUT
BUT………
As we reported back in 2008, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., which guarantees individual accounts up to $100,000, only has about $50 billion to “insure”  about $1 trillion in assets across the nation’s financial institutions.
This revelation prompted fears that an accelerating amount of bank closures could absorb FDIC funds and leave holders of money market and traditional savings  accounts exposed.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/citigroup-warns-customers-it-may-refuse-to-allow-withdrawals.html

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. said Tuesday that its deposit-insurance fund fell to $20.9 billion at the end of 2009, a $12.6 billion drop in the final  three months of the year, as bank failures continued at a pace not seen since the savings and loan crisis. The fund’s reserve ratio was -0.39% at the end of  the quarter, the lowest on record for the combined bank and thrift fund.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/fdic-hits-record-default-level-as-deposit-insurance-fund-plunges-by-12-7-billion-to-negative-20-9-billion.html

BUT WE HAVE GOT OURSELVES OUT OF THIS MESS BEFORE….HOW?
SIMPLE
HERE IS HOW ANDREW JACKSON FREED AMERICA FROM DEBT
Andrew Jackson was the last of three sons of Scotch-Irish immigrants.
Andrew Jackson was the only President to pay off the national debt.  He was the first President to be born in a log cabin, and the first to ride a train.
THE BANKS ATITUDE TO ANDREW JACKSON

“The Bank is trying to kill me, but I shall kill it!”

ANDREW JACKSONS VIEW OF THE BANKS….NO BAILOUT.

“You are a nest of vipers and thieves, and by the grace of the almighty God, I will root you out!”

ANDREW JACKSON’S VIEW ON CORPORATIONS

Corporations have neither bodies to kick nor souls to damn.

ANDREW JACKSONS VIEW ON THE BRIGHTEST AND THE BEST

Hemans gallows ought to be the fate of all such ambitious men who would involve their country in civil wars, and all the evils in its train that they might  reign & ride on its whirlwinds & direct the Storm– The free people of these United States have spoken, and consigned these wicked demagogues to their proper  doom.
WE HAVE BEEN HERE BEFORE , PLEASE TAKE ANDREW JACKSONS ADVICE!
“Never take counsel of your fears.”
 The Jacksonians opposed government granted monopolies to banks, especially the national bank, which was a central bank known as the Second Bank of the  United States. Jackson fought to end the government monopoly to the Bank and got great opposition from Nicholas Biddle, the bank chairman. Biddle first  dismissed Jackson efforts, but as the initiative gained popular support, he got more concerned. There was an attempt to murder Jackson at that time but the  pistols failed. Jackson would later claim that he had proof the bankers were behind this attempt. Jackson was able to gain popular support because the Bank  money manipulations and inflation had created a big recession, and it had inflated land prices, benefiting big land owners and stopping economical  development. In a last attempt to stop Jackson, Biddle burst the bubble his inflationary policies had created, and brought about a deflationary correction.  This put pressure on Jackson, but after a year of recession, the economy was clean by the deflationary correction, and the Bank was out of “ammunition”.  Jackson had won the battle. The Bank continued his operations as a state bank, but had to close years after. Once retired, everytime Jackson was asked what  was his biggest achievement as president he answered: “I killed the Bank”.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacksonian_democracy

Andrew Jackson was the only President to pay off the national debt.
SO WHY ARE WE NOT ROOTING OUT THIS NEST OF VIPERS?!?!
https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/02/a-short-history-of-global-domination-or-rockefella-rothschild-and-the-capitalist-communist-nwo-con/

SOLUTION-
Make the banks pay back ALL taxpayer money ,with the interest. Those that fall ,we asset strip and put thier assets on sale. We start criminal enquires into  the causes of the bank failures and bailouts. Any banker OR polition found guilty should be stripped of all thier assets unless they can prove they bought  them with money NOT related to bank fraud or corruption!!
CLOSE THE CRIMINAL AND FRAUDULANT BANK OF ENGLAND AND FEDERAL RESERVE AND END FRACTIONAL RESERVED BANKING PRACTICES
INSTALL A DIRECT DEMOCRACY BASED ON LIBERTARIAN SOCIALIST IDEALS
https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/01/14/a-direct-democracy-independant-scotland/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/11/04/libertarian-vs-authoritarian-todays-real-politic/

THE ALTERNATIVE
OF COURSE WORLD WAR III MIGHT TAKE OUR MINDS OFF THE FINANCIAL CRISIS AND POLITICAL CORRUPTION
NEOCONS THE ANTI-HIPPIES…….. ALL THEY ARE SAYING IS GIVE WAR A CHANCE!
If we are to learn anything from history,it should be that when economic crisis hits, for politions war is a good distraction and an economic manufacturing  generator.
https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/02/a-short-history-of-global-domination-or-rockefella-rothschild-and-the-capitalist-communist-nwo-con/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/10/12/us-government-making-a-killing-on-war/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/10/05/us-government-terrorists-still-in-power-iran-contra-to-911/

As Andrew Jackson realised that War was a massive cash generator for bankers,that was why he kicked out this nest of vipers. We must realise that World Wars  and wars around the world are big business for banks and those with stock portfolios, like politions.

The Panic of 1907, also known as the 1907 Bankers’ Panic, was a financial crisis that occurred in the United States when the New York Stock Exchange fell  close to 50% from its peak the previous year. Panic occurred, as this was during a time of economic recession, and there were numerous runs on banks and  trust companies. The 1907 panic eventually spread throughout the nation when many state and local banks and businesses entered into bankruptcy. Primary  causes of the run include a retraction of market liquidity by a number of New York City banks and a loss of confidence among depositors, exacerbated by  unregulated side bets at bucket shops.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panic_of_1907
The Panic of 1910-1911 was a slight economic depression that followed the enforcement of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. It mostly affected the stock market and  business traders who were smarting from the activities of trust busters, especially with the breakup of the Standard Oil Company.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panic_of_1910%E2%80%931911
RESULT
1912 US Rigged election .3 pro-tax and pro bank runners
1913 The Ferderal Reserve Act is passed under “unusual” circumstances
WORLD WAR I (1914–1918),
This lead to the ROARING 20’s…… and another stock market bubble…
THEN
The Wall Street Crash of 1929,also known as the Great Crash, and the Stock Market Crash of 1929, was the most devastating stock market crash in the history  of the United States, taking into consideration the full extent and duration of its fallout
Anyone who bought stocks in mid-1929 and held onto them saw most of his or her adult life pass by before getting back to even
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wall_Street_Crash_of_1929
The USA goes bankrupt in 1933 and just survives a corporate Wall Street backed Nazi fascist coup.
https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/02/33/
RESULT
WORLD WAR II (1939–1945),
This lead to the rise of America as a manufacturing Super power ,briefly before stock market bubbles bring it down again….

The financial crisis of 2007–present is a global financial crisis triggered by a liquidity shortfall in the United States banking system. It has resulted in  the collapse of large financial institutions, the “bail out” of banks by national governments and downturns in stockmarkets around the world. It is  considered by many economists to be the the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression of the 1930s.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_crisis_of_2007%E2%80%932010
The government bailout of banks triggers National bankruptcies.
RESULT
WORLD WAR III?
WAR WITH IRAN ANYONE?
https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/09/iranian-oil-bourse-the-real-reason-for-war-with-iran/

We currently seem to be in the middle of OPERATION AJAX II

The 1953 Iranian coup d’état deposed the democratically elected government of Iranian Prime Minister Mohammed Mosaddeq.[1][2][3] In a plan called Operation  Ajax (less commonly TPAJAX), the United States’ Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) organized and executed the overthrow of the nationalist government of Prime  Minister Mosaddeq, at the request of, and with support from the British government. This enabled Mohammad Reza Pahlavi to become an authoritarian monarch[4],  who went on to rule Iran for 26 years until he was overthrown in 1979
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Ajax
SO THE CIA AND THE UK DEFENDED OIL INTERESTS. OVERTHREW A DEMOCRATIC SECULAR SOCIALIST GOVERNMENT AND REPLACED THIS WITH A RIGHT WING AUTHORITARIAN  REGIME!!!!
THIS ULTIMATELY LEAD TO THE RISE OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN!!!
BUT THE US GOVERNMENT HAS NO PROBLEMS DEALING WITH RELIGIOUS NUTTERS OR RIGHTWING NUTTERS!!! ISRAEL OR IRAN OR CONTRAS
https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/02/18/the-israel-lobby-the-elephant-in-the-room-and-its-drenched-in-blood/
https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/10/05/us-government-terrorists-still-in-power-iran-contra-to-911/
ITS THE SECULAR LEFTWING THE US HAS PROBLEMS WITH
IRAQ was sanctioned for False reasons as well before the Gulf War II. During the sanctions Iraq was selling its Oil to the UN in Euro’s in the Oil for Food  program.If the reasons for sanctions could be internationally proven false ,then oil is on the market being sold in Euros instead of dollars. Coincidently  today both Iran and Venezuala sell oil for non-dollar prices.
The Oil-for-Food Programme, established by the United Nations in 1995 (under UN Security Council Resolution 986) and terminated in late 2003, was  established with the stated intent to allow Iraq to sell oil on the world market in exchange for food, medicine, and other humanitarian needs for ordinary  Iraqi citizens without allowing Iraq to rebuild its military.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil-for-Food_Programme
Iraq sold its Oil in EURO’s
http://www.un.org/Depts/oip/background/oilexports.html
The Ba’athist party was a “socialist party”
The Arab Socialist Ba’ath Party (also spelled Ba’th or Baath which means “resurrection or renaissance”; Arabic: حزب البعث العربي الاشتراكي‎) is a political  party in the Arab World advocating the related concepts of Arab nationalism, Pan-Arabism, and Arab socialism.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ba%27ath_Party
FYI
YUGOSLAVIA was a Secular Socialist country as well before the war. YUGOSLAVIA was found innocent ,NATO committed an ACT of War and a War crimes that included  organ harvesting!!
https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/12/16/yugoslavia-another-blair-illegal-war-of-agression-and-the-icc-kangaroo-court/
Slobodan Milošević (sometimes transliterated as Miloshevich; Serbian pronunciation: [sloˈbodan miˈloʃevitɕ]  ( listen); Serbian Cyrillic: Слободан Милошевић;  20 August 1941 – 11 March 2006) was President of Serbia and of Yugoslavia. He served as the President of Socialist Republic of Serbia and Federal Serbia from  1989 until 1997 in three terms and as President of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia from 1997 to 2000. He also led the Socialist Party of Serbia from its  foundation in 1990.
 In February 2007, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) cleared Serbia of genocide, but ICJ’s president stated that Milošević was aware of the risk of  massacres occurring and did not act to prevent them
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slobodan_Milo%C5%A1evi%C4%87

WHAT ABOUT A SMALL PRE-WAR IN AFRICA ,LIKE SOMALIA OR NIGERIA.
AFRICOM has been situated in Stuttgard since 2007 ,……something must be holding things up..

The U.S. military command in Africa, AFRICOM, has assumed responsibility for much of the day-to-day duties once performed by the State Department and other  civilian agencies. More often than not, the uniformed military is the dispenser of a wide range of U.S. foreign aid in Africa, as part of a general  militarization of U.S. relations with the rest of the planet.
AFRICOM Created in February of 2007, launched in October of 2008 and headquartered in Stuttgart, Germany because it couldn’t find a home base in Africa to  protect U.S. interest abroad, this entity has been “charged with supporting U.S. military partners in Africa.”
Still NO African country want this “AFRICON” based within their borders. For very good reasons when we see what been going on at the Hiati US Embassy . HQ  for coups , covert operations, false flags and training death squads that cover the whole Central and South American area. Expect more false flag operations  in Africa to give an excuse and create the climate for a AFRICOM base in Africa,…preferably in a place with lots of oil and natural resourses. Maybe Somalia  or Nigeria.
https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/02/06/haiti-a-history-of-us-profiteering-and-the-5th-largest-us-embassy/

In recent times, wars in the Middle East such as the Gulf War and the invasion of Iraq have been described as wars for oil. In many cases, critics have  accused the U.S. of engaging in realpolitik in the cynical sense of political action without regard for principle or morals. A war planned for economic gain  can be seen as a conspiracy in the conventional sense of a secret plot — particularly when the public is presented with false pretexts for war. It has been  suggested that war is a perfect way of distracting citizens, as an electoral tactic, from difficulties facing the current administration. This premise is the  basis of the film Wag the Dog, and the George Orwell novel 1984. Some have claimed that this was the motivation behind the Falklands War. At that time the  National Reorganization Process, the right-wing dictatorship that ruled Argentina between 1976 and 1983, was facing increasing discontent among the  population and this may have contributed to the decision to invade the Falkland Islands.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_conspiracy_theories#Wars

FOR A LIST OF USA SPREADING FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY SINCE 1945 PLEASE READ
https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/02/governments-traitors-terrorists-and-drug-dealers/
MORE RELATED POSTS
https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/13/somali-pirates-guided-by-london-intelligence-team-report-says/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/10/16/internet-victory-over-old-regime-traders-in-death-and-misery-named-and-shamed/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/12/14/bbc-deletes-important-story-on-toxic-waste-dumping-in-the-ivory-coast-after-legal-threats-12-dec-2009/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/10/are-us-wars-in-iraq-and-afghanistan-well-intended-mistakes-what-we-now-know-from-the-evidence/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/10/05/philippines-another-us-fake-war-in-the-making/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/12/14/anthrax-swine-flu-and-government-bio-terrorism/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/01/29/blair-on-trial-or-chilcot-on-trial/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/01/30/war-on-drugs-officially-lost-another-fake-us-war-another-total-us-defeat/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/12/29/usa-harbouring-terrorists-should-the-un-declare-war-on-this-rogue-terrorist-nation/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/01/02/evidence-mounts-for-us-complicity-in-christmas-false-flag-terrorism/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/22/the-fedbank-bailouts-and-fascist-coups-the-great-depressionnaziscommies-and-the-bush-family/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/12/16/yugoslavia-another-blair-illegal-war-of-agression-and-the-icc-kangaroo-court/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/02/18/the-israel-lobby-the-elephant-in-the-room-and-its-drenched-in-blood/

MEANWHILE IN THE UK…SOMETHING WICKED THIS WAY COMES

Economic muppet and saviour of the banking universe Flash Gordon Brown,is dreaming of Maggie Thatcher again. Hey the Falklands worked well for Maggie , why  not try it again?
This seems to have been the idea with Bush Jr. and GULF WAR II- THIS TIME ITS PRESONAL… I’m lookin for the guy that shot my pa -Sheriff G.W. Bush
The Falklands Conflict- WAR ,WHAT IS IT GOOD FOR………. Well if you are a polition , its good for getting public support , distracting the public from  your corruption and incompitence , it will increase thier stock portfolio and it will produce many juicey non-bid contracts to be awarded to the lobby group  with the fattest envelope , ….and lots of cool photo oportunities ,when you can pretend to be brave while never actually putting yourself in physical risk.
This does worry me ,as Flash Gordon Brown , saviour of the financial universe, …and economic muppet. He does like his Maggie Thatcher, and we all know (those  of us old enough to remember) that in 1980 she was the most unpopular PM in history,UNTIL….the Falklands “Conflict”, but I think we can call it a war today,  and then on a wave of Rule Britiania Maggie’s monetorists are put in power in a landslide.
 
FALKLANDS CONFLICT
The Falklands War (Spanish: Guerra de las Malvinas/Guerra del Atlántico Sur), also called the Falklands Conflict/Crisis, was fought in 1982 between Argentina  and the United Kingdom (UK) over the disputed Falkland Islands and South Georgia and the South Sandwich IslandsArgentina to renew case for Falklands autonomy
The conflict was the result of a protracted diplomatic confrontation regarding the sovereignty of the islands. Neither state officially declared war and the  fighting was largely limited to the territories under dispute and the South Atlantic. The initial invasion was characterised by Argentina as the  re-occupation of its own territory, and by the UK as an invasion of a British dependent territory.
Coincidently BOTH countries where being run by very unpopular right wing regimes with serious economic troubles. War in this case was a good distraction from  the economic woes and got the populations behind the unpopular governments. Maggie Thatcher was swept to power on the wave of Falklands victory,previously  she was the most unpopular PM on record.

FALKLANDS CONFLICT II

Argentina is to make its case for sovereignty over the Falkland Islands to other Latin American countries, as tensions over potential oil reserves in the  South Atlantic grow.
The country’s foreign minister, Jorge Taiana, will ask other countries in a meeting of the Rio Group in Mexico to back his government’s claim to control the  waters to “Las Islas Malvinas”.The row over the disputed islands has reignited after the discovery of £60bn-worth of gas and oil reserves off the Falklands.
In London, Gordon Brown insisted international law allows British firms to operate freely in the area. Argentina has said their operations violate its  sovereignty and announced this week that boats sailing from its ports to the islands would need a permit.
“It is perfectly within our rights to be able to do this. I think the Argentinians actually understand that,” said Mr Brown. “Sensible discussions will  prevail on this.”
Argentina has threatened to stop an oil rig, the Ocean Guardian, which is due to start work in the waters of the Falklands Economic Zone. The UK has warned  it will be on international waters and any Argentinian interference would be in breach of international law.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/argentina-to-renew-case-for-falklands-autonomy-1904130.html
REMEMBER
There is already a war crimes warrent with Gordon Browns name on it,
https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/10/11/blair-and-bush-and-co-war-criminals-named-and-shamed-now-lets-hunt-them-down-like-the-dogs-they-are/
He looks like hes going to loose the next election,and with the economy in the state it is, a war is a good distraction from government corruption and  incompitance and good for public moral, OH and they have discovered OIL …so what has he got too loose….the Oil Lobby will definately be pushing this one.

MEANWHILE SOMEWHERE IN A FORMER SOVIET REPUBLIC
GEORGIA

The specific conflict between Georgia and South Ossetia and Abkhazia has its roots in the following. First, the Southern Ossetes , who until 1990 formed an  autonomous region of the Georgian Soviet republic, seek to unite in one state with their co-ethnics in North Ossetia , an autonomous republic of the Russian  Soviet republic and now the Russian Federation . There is an historically grounded Ossete fear of violent Georgian nationalism and the experience of Georgian  hatred of ethnic minorities under then Georgian leader Zviad Gamsakhurdia, which the Ossetes see again under Georgian President, Mikhel Saakashvili.  Saakashvili was brought to power with US financing and US covert regime change activities in December 2003 in what was called the Rose Revolution. Now the  thorns of that rose are causing blood to spill.
http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article5834.html

GEORGIA II

The notorious tie eating President is cooking up something nasty……..
http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/7247/Georgian_President_Saakashvili_eats_his_tie_on_TV/
Destabilization in the North Caucasus: Georgian President Saakashvili “Ready for New War”?
Georgia’s President Mikhail Saakashvili and his supporters are ready to start a new war and plunge the country into chaos again. A statement to that effect  came from the leader of the opposition “Democratic Movement – United Georgia” Party, ex-Speaker of parliament Nino Burdjanadze.
The party’s statements circulated on Saturday say the Georgian parliament is acting behind Russia’s back preparing an address to the people and legislatures  of North Caucasian republics which may destabilize the situation in the North Caucasus given the current circumstances.
The opposition statements say Saakashvili is pushing the country into war because he is fully aware that his days as president are over but he prefers to be  expelled by Russia rather than toppled by the people of Georgia
IN ALL THESE WARS ,THE PEOPLE NEVER WANTED TO GO TO WAR ,THEY HAD TO BE PRESAUDED BY GOVERNMENTS LIES AND DECIEPTIONS.
GOVERNMENTS START WARS ,NOT PEOPLE
BUT
PEOPLE FIGHT WARS ,NOT GOVERNMENTS
HOW DO THEY MANAGE TO SPIN ALL THIS TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC……SIMPLE
 This chilling documentary film examines the relationship between the media, corporate America, and government. In a country where the “top 1% control 90% of  the wealth”, the film argues that the media system is nothing but a “subsidiary of corporate America.”
Director: Robert Kane Pappas – Run Time 1 Hour 46 Minutes
Orwell Rolls In His Grave
http://www.blinkx.com/watch-video/orwell-rolls-in-his-grave/mFrmDjaLl9YiyiT_8kE2Dg
FIGHTING FOR PEACE IS LIKE F*CKING FOR VIRGINITY!!!
IT IS HUMANITY’S DIVERSITY THAT WILL SAVE US
IT IS HUMANITY’S CONFORMITY THAT WILL KILL US!!


War On Drugs Officially Lost!! Another fake US war , another total US defeat

January 30, 2010

War is Over , Give Peace a Chance

http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/17438347/how_america_lost_the_war_on_drugs

The war on drugs has produced MORE DRUGS and a reduction in civil liberties, coincidently this is exactly what is happening with TWAT (The War Against Terror) A good result for AUTHORITARIAN REGIMES but NOT for FREE libertarian societies.

This 1999 documentary from Dutch TV explains how the “War on Drugs” has led to a loss of civil liberties while at the same time it has become a cash generator for police departments (through asset seizure) and a source of prisoners needed by the growing, privatized “Prison Industrial Complex”. However, it has not had much of an effect at all as far as its supposed purpose of eliminating or, at least significantly reducing, the illegal drug trade.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=864268000924014458#

THE WAR ON DRUGS IS JUST AS FAKE AS THE WAR ON TERROR!

SO WHO BENEFITS FROM THE WAR ON DRUGS?   BIG GOVERNMENT AND BIG BUSINESS ….AUTHORITARIANS

“Afghan drug trafficking brings US $50 billion a year”
The US is not going to stop the production of drugs in Afghanistan as it covers the costs of their military presence there, says Gen. Mahmut Gareev, a former commander during the USSR’s operations in Afghanistan.
http://www.russiatoday.com/Top_News/2009-08-20/afghanistan-us-drug-trafficking.html

WAR ON TERROR AND THE WAR ON DRUGS
Indeed, opium production in Afghanistan — much of it in the regions where Canadian and British troops are supposed to be in charge — shot up dramatically last year.
The 49 per cent increase in the opium harvest, right under the noses of NATO forces, represented a doubling of the crop from 2000, when the fundamentalist Taliban were still in control, and solidified Afghanistan’s position as the chief supplier of illegal opium to the world.
But the latest Afghan numbers are so large that the country now accounts for 92 per cent of the illicit global opium crop.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/ backgroun…fghanistan.html
The Afghanistan province being patrolled by British troops will produce at least one third of the world’s heroin this year, according to drug experts who are forecasting a harvest that is both a record for the country and embarrassing for the western funded war on narcotics.
British officials are bracing themselves for the result of an annual UN poppy survey due later this summer. Early indications show an increase on Helmand’s 1999 record of 45,000 hectares (112,500 acres) and a near-doubling of last year’s crop.
“It’s going to be massive,” said one British drugs official. “My guess is it’s going to be the biggest ever.” UN, American and Afghan officials agreed.
“It could be over 50,000 hectares, or over 50% of the total [Aghan] crop,” said General Muhammad Daud, the deputy interior minister for counter-narcotics.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/ …stan.drugstrade
REMEMBER THE TALIBAN HAD STOPPED ALL OPIUM PRODUCTION. THERE NEVER WAS HEROIN PRODUCTION(REFINED OPIUM) IN AFGHANISTAN BEFORE NATO ARRIVES. AND WHAT HAPPENED WHEN THE CIA ARRIVED IN SOUTH AMERICA?

Sky Television – Conspiracies: Lockerbie & the CIA
Mainstream documentary that looks at the various scenarios surrounding the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie in December 1988. Was a CIA heroin trafficking operation compromised, allowing a bomb to be placed on board?

Gary Webb – In his own words
A tribute to the Pulitzer prize-winning reporter who broke the story of the CIA’s involvement in the importation of cocaine into the US.
Webb died in December 2004 from self-inflicted gunshots to the head

NBC Dateline – CIA drug trafficking – Contra connection
News special that examines the connections between the CIA and the Contras. Features Ricky Ross, Cele Castillo, John Kerry and Gary Webb

Crack the CIA – A short film about the CIA and how they are involved in drug trafficking

Secrets of the CIA
A documentary featuring former CIA personnel who are speaking out about the agency

NICE ONE GUYS…NOW WHO CAN I SUE FOR THIS??

For over 40 years the USA has been at war with drugs. That’s “some” drugs , NOT ALL DRUGS. Pharmaceutical drugs made by big companies with lobby groups are positively encouraged,even if they have NOT properly tested thier chemical drugs.

Legal Immunity for Pharmaceutical Industry

The US Secretary of Health and Human Services, Kathleen Sebelius, has just signed a decree granting vaccine makers total legal immunity from any lawsuits that result from any new “Swine Flu” vaccine. Moreover, the $7 billion US Government fast-track program to rush vaccines onto the market is being done without even normal safety testing.
The mass vaccinations are to be carried out predominantly for pregnant women and children. So far, neither the WHO nor the CDC or any other scientific body has demonstrated required scientific proof for the existence of the alleged H1N1 Influenza A new virus. The decree by the Department of Health and Human Services grants immunity to those making a “swine flu” vaccine, under the provisions of a 2006 law for public health emergencies.

http://www.currentconcerns.ch/index.php?id=845

Swine Flu was a HOAX ,just like it was the last time. Then the “vaccine” killed more people than the supposed “deadly swine flu virus”

FYI This is not the first time the U.S. Government has used the LIE of “Swine Flu” to try to accomplish its evil goals.  In 1976, they wreaked havoc on the American people with their disastrous “Swine Flu” vaccine that caused numerous horrendous injuries and deaths.

http://www.goodnewsaboutgod.com/studies/medical/swine_flu.htm

“From the Archives: Radio Public Service Announcements ~ The Swine Flu Epidemic of 1975-76.”

This is a recording session held with Jimmy the Greek to produce a series of public service announcements promoting widespread vaccination in anticipation of a wide-spread outbreak of Swine Flu in the winter of 1975-76. The PSAs were produced by the Centers for Disease Control, which spearheaded a massive inoculation campaign. No swine flu epidemic came, and unfortunately the vaccine proved to be worse than the disease. Thousands experienced serious side effects, and nearly 100 people died. The government’s aggressive initiative ended in an embarrasing public health fiasco. This recording comes from the Records of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1921 – 1995, National Archives (NARA II).

SIMPLE TRUTH.THE ONLY PEOPLE THAT HAVE BENEFITED ARE BIG BUSINESS AND BIG GOVERNMENT

SWINE FLU was a hoax so that Pharmaceutical companies can recoup losses spent on research making a drug that is totally useless and so that governments can have a “bogeyman” to scare us with and protect us from , thus showing thier usefulness,with the frightened masses baying for protection.

For more on this subject,please read these blogs

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/12/14/anthrax-swine-flu-and-government-bio-terrorism/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/04/who-admits-to-releasing-pandemic-virus-into-population-via-mock-up-vaccines/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/04/why-wont-healthcare-workers-take-the-swine-flu-vaccine/

Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman Loera reported head of the Sinaloa cartel in Mexico, ranked 701st on Forbes’ yearly report of the wealthiest men alive, and worth an estimated $1 billion, today officially thanked United States politicians for making sure that drugs remain illegal. According to one of his closest confidants, he said, “I couldn’t have gotten so stinking rich without George Bush, George Bush Jr., Ronald Reagan, even El Presidente Obama, none of them have the cajones to stand up to all the big money that wants to keep this stuff illegal. From the bottom of my heart, I want to say, Gracias amigos, I owe my whole empire to you.”

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-henry-sterry/mexican-drug-lord-officia_b_179596.html

THE SIMPLE SOLUTION THAT BIG GOVERNMENT AND BIG BUSINESS DO NOT WANT!!!! LEGALISATION!!!!!

LEGALISATION WORKS , CHECK PORTUGAL OR ARGENTINA OR MEXICO OR BOLIVIA OR VENEZUALA

Portugal, which in 2001 became the first European country to officially abolish all criminal penalties for personal possession of drugs, including marijuana, cocaine, heroin and methamphetamine.

At the recommendation of a national commission charged with addressing Portugal’s drug problem, jail time was replaced with the offer of therapy. The argument was that the fear of prison drives addicts underground and that incarceration is more expensive than treatment — so why not give drug addicts health services instead?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/aug/31/mexico-argentina-decriminalise-drugs
Chavez said Venezuela would support Morales’s crusade to protect coca crops against US eradication campaigns aimed at stopping cocaine production. Addressing his Bolivian counterpart, he said: “Evo, we know this battle is hard, you can always count on our support for that battle here, in the United Nations, in the Organisation of American States, and in the world to defend the coca farmers, who are being demonised.”
http://www.euronews.net/2006/01/04/morales-gets-backing-from-venezuela-for-defence-of-coca-farmers/
FYI
AMERICANS DRINK COCA LEAVES EVERYDAY – COKE ITS THE REAL THING!!!

When the cocaine business went south (geographically as well as metaphorically), Coke pulled the cocaine out of the formula – although they still use coca leaves today to flavour the drink. In fact, they own a pharmaceutical company called Stepan Chemicals in Chicago, whose primary purpose is to take the cocaine out of the coca.

IF YOU or ME tried this at home we would be in JAIL!!!!!
THE REAL REASON HEMP/MARIJUANA WAS MADE ILLEGAL!

BIG BUSINESS WANTS HEMP ILLEGAL
The first cars where made from hemp and ran on hemp oil . Paper was made from hemp and so where the original jeans.Hemp stood in the way of Big business .Oil,Steal, Paper and textile industries all stood to loose Big time if a cheap alternative was allowed on the market.

Henry Ford’s first Model-T was built to run on hemp gasoline and the CAR ITSELF WAS CONSTRUCTED FROM HEMP! On his large estate, Ford was photographed among his hemp fields. The car, ‘grown from the soil,’ had hemp plastic panels whose impact strength was 10 times stronger than steel; Popular Mechanics, 1941.
 
Rudolf Diesel, the inventor of the diesel engine, designed it to run on vegetable and seed oils like hemp; he actually ran the thing on peanut oil for the 1900 World’s Fair. Henry Ford used hemp to not only construct cars but also fuel them.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7Ar_AvtMdc

http://www.illuminati-news.com/marijuana-conspiracy.htm

Hemp grows like a weed, requires no fertilizer and pesticides (truly organic), reduces the use of our forests–the lungs of our planet—, replenishes rather than depletes the soil and its fiber is strong and beautiful. The new hemp particle boards are rock solid. The French build entire houses out of hemp!

Industrial hemp/cannabis sativa has been an important element in cultures around the world for thousands of years. The first paper was made of hemp. Levi Strauss made the first jeans in hemp. Our ancestors crossed the frontier in wagons covered in hemp canvas. My grandfather, John G. Crusius, and my father, Lowell Crusius, were “Hemp for Victory” farmers during World War II. After the 1937 Marijuana Tax Act was passed, the US Navy stopped using industrial hemp for its rope source and began importing manila hemp(musa textilis) from the Philippines.

http://thehemproad.com/

Also Hemp can be grown on Fallow land , thus 30% of argocultural land is waiting for hemp production of FUEL , PAPER , CLOTH etc.. all without loosing 1 piece of argocultural land that we use for food production!

As a final pointer for American , when Columbus sailed the ocean blue in 1492 , he did so with hemp sails ,held up by hemp ropes on ships waterproofed by hemp tar following hemp maps under hemp oil lamps ,while wearing hemp clothing!!!

America would not have been descovered without hemp!

BTW

The American constitution is WRITTEN ON HEMP!!!

For the government the benefit is it can be used as a THREAT against its population. Helps keep the population scared and ignorant and can be used as an excuse to arrest “troublemakers”

Pharmaceutical companies are NO fan of Hemp/marijuana either…

Pot Is an Anti-Cancer Drug
The active ingredient in marijuana appears to target cancerous brain cells for destruction while leaving healthy cells alone, according to a study conducted by researchers from the Complutense University in Madrid, and published in the Journal of Clinical Investigation.

Cannabis may prevent osteoporosis 
Researchers first conducted an experiment in mice that had been engineered to carry three different grafts of human brain cancer. They injected the mice daily with the molecule tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) near the site of the tumors once each day. The chemical appeared to stimulate the cancerous cells to engage in a process known as autophagy, in which cells initiate their own breakdown.

“These results may help to design new cancer therapies based on the use of medicines containing the active principle of marijuana and/or in the activation of autophagy,” researcher Guillermo Velasco said.

THESE WOULD BE CHEAP ALTERNATIVES TO EXPENSIVE DESIGNER DRUGS THAT BIG PHARMA THRIVE ON!

Marijuana Is Safer: So Why Are We Driving People to Drink?

For 35 years the federal government has been well aware – yet publicly denied – that cannabis possesses potent anti-cancer and anti-tumor properties. Even under the Obama administration, which promised to “base [their] public policies on the soundest of science,” the myth that pot promotes cancer persists. In fact, the White House’s website, whitehousedrugpolicy.gov, presently warns, “Marijuana has the potential to promote cancer of the lungs and other parts of the respiratory tract.”

Or not.

In a clinical abstract published online on journal of Cancer Prevention Research website in July, a team of U.S. investigators reported – with absolutely no mainstream media fanfare – that lifetime marijuana use is associated with a “significantly reduced risk” of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Investigators at Rhode Island’s Brown University, along with researchers at Boston University, Louisiana State University, and the University of Minnesota assessed the lifetime marijuana use habits of 434 cases (patients diagnosed with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma from nine medical facilities) compared to 547 matched controls.

Authors reported, “After adjusting for potential confounders (including smoking and alcohol drinking), 10 to 20 years of marijuana use was associated with a significantly reduced risk of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNDCC).”

Perhaps even more notably, subjects who smoked marijuana and consumed alcohol and tobacco (two known high-risk factors for head and neck cancers) also experienced a reduced risk of cancer, the study found.

Of course, this isn’t the first time that U.S. investigators have documented an inverse association between pot use and cancer. A separate 2006 population case-control study, funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health and conducted by the University of California at Los Angeles, also reported that lifetime use of cannabis was not positively associated with cancers of the lung or aerodigestive tract, and further noted that certain moderate users of the drug experienced a reduced cancer risk compared to non-using controls.

Predictably, the federal government’s goal when green-lighting the UCLA study was to conclusively establish just the opposite result, as explained recently by its lead researcher Dr. Donald Tashkin.

In an interview with the McClatchy newspaper chain in June, Tashkin admitted that he expected his study would find that pot was associated with “increased health effects.” Instead, he summarized, “What we found instead was no association (between marijuana smoking and cancer) and even a suggestion of some protective effect.”

Perhaps that explains why Tashkin’s study, the largest trial of its kind, is inexplicably absent from the White House’s website.

Tashkin added, “[A]t this point, I’d be in favor of (marijuana) legalization. I wouldn’t encourage anybody to smoke any substances. But I don’t think it should be stigmatized as an illegal substance. Tobacco smoking causes far more harm. And in terms of an intoxicant, alcohol causes far more harm (than marijuana).”

Indeed it does. In fact, according to the findings of a study published online August 3 in the journal Cancer Epidemiology, even moderate alcohol consumption (defined as six drinks or less per week) is positively associated with an elevated risk of various cancers – including stomach cancer, rectal cancer, and bladder cancer. The study is the second to be published this year indicating that those who consume even minor amounts of booze are at increased risk for cancer. In February, a British study of some 1.3 million women age 50 to 64 reported that imbibing in as little as one alcoholic beverage per day significantly elevated females’ risk of cancer, particularly breast cancer.

For those of us who have closely studied the physiological effects of pot and alcohol the two substances contrasting association with cancer isn’t surprising. Ethanol, the psychoactive ingredient in booze, is converted by the body to acetaldehyde, a known carcinogen. By contrast, the active components in marijuana – known as cannabinoids – are relatively non-toxic and actually mimic chemicals naturally produced by the body (so-called endocannabinoids) that are necessary for maintaining one’s proper health.

 As I write in my new book Marijuana Is Safer: So Why Are We Driving People to Drink (Chelsea Green Publishing, 2009), alcohol consumption is toxic to cells and healthy organs, can depress the central nervous system (inducing unconsciousness, coma, and death), and is strongly associated with increased risks of injury and acts of violence. The use of marijuana, on the other hand, is incapable of causing fatal overdose – cannabinoids do not act upon the brain stem – and its use is inversely associated with aggression and injury.

 why our laws target and prosecute those adults who choose to make the rational choice to relax with a substance that is objectively safer, both to the user and to society as a whole, than alcohol. Perhaps when the President finishes his beer, he can provide an answer.
August 12, 2009
http://www.lewrockwell.com/armentano-p/armentano-p42.1.html

So if YOU are against “drugs” BUT YOU drink beer and smoke tobacco you are just an ignorant hipocrite!

OR

Maybe its because you get your information from FOX NEWS and Bill O’Reilly. I mean what a load of BULLSHIT at least his bimbettes have an excuse of being blond and should give up journalistic research and just try and have more fun, blonds are good at that!!! Bill I lived in Amsterdam and YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!!! It s safer and freer than the USA!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTPsFIsxM3w

THE GOVERNMENT IS HAPPY FOR YOU TO NEEDLESSLY DIE OF CANCER AND IGNORANCE SO LONG AS THEY GET THIER LOBBY GROUP PAYMENTS, AND GRAVY TRAIN JOBS TO WALK INTO, AFTER THIER GOVERNMENT POST IS OVER!

SOLUTION

DIRECT DEMOCRACY

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/01/14/a-direct-democracy-independant-scotland/

LIBERTARIAN SOCIALISM

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/11/04/libertarian-vs-authoritarian-todays-real-politic/

UPDATE

Drug money saved banks in global crisis, claims UN advisor
Drugs and crime chief says $352bn in criminal proceeds was effectively laundered by financial institutions

Antonio Maria Costa, head of the UN Office on Drugs and Crime, said he has seen evidence that the proceeds of organised crime were “the only liquid investment capital” available to some banks on the brink of collapse last year. He said that a majority of the $352bn (£216bn) of drugs profits was absorbed into the economic system as a result.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/global/2009/dec/13/drug-money-banks-saved-un-cfief-claims


Government should go on strike to prove they are worth thier money!

January 11, 2010

I am sick and tired of UNLESS politions harping on about “how tough” they got it and how its impossible to survive on thier wages and and how UNDERVALUED THEY ARE!!!!!!!!!!

SORRY BUT I DO NOT BELIEVE A WORD OF IT!!!!!

YOU (The MP) get paid from the same “kitty” as Nurses and Teachers and Firemen ,for example. Can I ask the public who deserves the money the most?

Do you think an MP is worth more than a Nurse or a teacher or a firemen?       I DO NOT!!!!!!!!!

If nurses went on strike , people would DIE in great numbers , these HEROES deserve a pay rise!!!!

If teachers went on strike ,our kids would NOT be educated , these people earn thier money!!!!!

If firemen go on strike , we face another “Great fire of London”, these people too are earning thier money.

SO MP’S AND POLITIONS ,YOU GET PAID FROM THE SAME TAXPAYER KITTY AS NURSES ETC, SO IF YOU HAVE ISSUES ABOUT PAY AND THINK YOU ARE WORTH MORE THAN A NURSE……

GO ON STRIKE AND PROVE YOUR WORTH THE MONEY!!!!!!!!

FYI IF YOU(MP) want to be paid the equivilant of “private sector” pay ,so as to keep the brightest and the best in the Halls of Power, then please STOP COMPLAINING AND GO AND WORK FOR THE PRIVATE SECTOR!

BUT I think the private sector would NOT pay you as YOU do NOT have the TALENT ,IMHO that’s why YOU became a polition instead of a  private sector head of indusrty .

I would be happier paying Nurses and Teachers the equivilant of private sector pay , before a pay a polition ONE SINGLE PENNY!!!!!

Simple Truth is that politions are NOT the brightest and the best , they are just moths attracted to the bright light of power and corruption. Actually the very people we should keep AWAY FROM INSTITUTIONS OF POWER!

A good example of what the “brightest and the best” can do is the financial industry! Still demanding “taxpayer” BONUES from companies that would NO LONGER EXIST if they where left to free market forces!!! The brightest and the best I DO NOT THINK SO!!!!

SO WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF POLITIONS GO ON STRIKE?

AN IMPROVEMENT IN THE STANDARD OF LIVING ….. AND MORE FREEDOMS PREHAPS?

This is what happened when the government of Argentina collapsed in 2001 and fled with its pockets stuffed with anything of value. The last act of any government is TO LOOT THE NATION!!!!!

ARGENTINA HAS SEEN A FORM OF DIRECT DEMOCRACY SINCE 2001

on 20 December 2001 Argentina dove into its worst institutional and economic crisis since the 1890 Barings financial debacle. There were violent street protests, which clashed with police and resulted in several fatalities. The increasingly chaotic climate, amid riots accompanied by cries that “they should all go”, finally resulted in the resignation of President de la Rúa.

Three presidents followed in quick succession over two weeks, culminating in the appointment of interim President Eduardo Duhalde by the Legislative Assembly on 2 January 2002. Argentina defaulted on its international debt, and the peso’s 11 year-old tie to the U.S. dollar was rescinded,

After the non-violent collapse of the Argentinean government in 2001/2002, the social and economic organization of Argentina has undergone major changes, though how important these changes are remains to be seen. Worker occupations of factories and popular assemblies have both been seen functioning in Argentina, and both are the kind of action endorsed by anarchists: the first is a case of direct action and the latter a case of direct democracy. Approximately 200 “recovered” factories (fábricas recuperadas) are now self-managed and collectively owned by workers. In the large majority of them, pay is completely egalitarian; generally no professional managers are employed, or managers are collectively controlled in the other cases. These co-operatives have organised themselves into networks. Solidarity and support from external groups such as neighborhood assemblies and unemployed (piquetero) groups have often been important for the survival of these factories. Similar developments have taken place in Brazil and Uruguay.[6] In 2004, Avi Lewis and Naomi Klein (author of No Logo) released the documentary The Take, which is about these events.

These anarchic , libertarian ideas has seen a rise in living standards and freedoms of the people of Argentina

ECONOMICALLY ARGENTINA HAS ALSO BOOMED

BUT OF COARSE DO NOT EXPECT TO HEAR ABOUT ARGENTINA’S CONVERSION ON THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA!!!!!

SO REMIND ME , WHY ARE WE PAYING POLITIONS ANYTHING AT ALL!!!!

LETS COMPARE THE EFFECTIVNESS OF STATE GOVERNMENT WITH THE EFFECTIVNESS OF PEOPLE POWER

Well a good example might be the Thialand Boxing Day Tsunami.

Our government was “On Christmas holidays” when the Tsunami hit unexpectedly on Boxing Day. By the time Tony Blair managed to get off his holiday chair and back to the UK and get in front of a camera to announce what his reaction would be.

THERE WAS ALREADY DOCTORS ,NURSES AND OTHER VOLUNTEERS ON SITE AND FINANCED BY NGO’s …NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATIONS

PEOPLE POWER IN ACTION….THESE PEOPLE MAKE ME PROUD TO BE HUMAN… AND all before Tony Blair could get in front of a camera and show his generousity by promising more of OUR MONEY and sending useless “state” aid.

IN CONTRAST

LETS LOOK AT THE “HURRICANE KATRINA” RESPONSE FROM THE WORLD’S MOST EXPENSIVE GOVERNMENT.

THEY KNEW WHERE AND WHEN THE HURRICANE WOULD HIT DAYS IN ADVANCE!!!!!

The government spent its time stopping NGO’s from entering the scene of devastation and probably caused MORE DEATHS!!!!

THIS IS NOT AN UNUSUAL RESULT ….REMEMBER HURRICANE ANDREW 1992?

Over 5,200 dead from Andrew.  Media are CENSORED, they LIE
FEMA is our mortal ENEMY!  It is EVIL

http://www.revlu.com/Andrew.html

THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED DURING HURRICANE ANDREW 1992

The injuries of those who survived were mind boggling. I had a broken jaw with eight teeth knocked out. Huge shards of glass impaled my body so deeply, they were impossible to remove without the aid of a scalpel. My head injuries were so severe it permanently affected my eyesight.

But I was only one amongst thousands of severely injured victims who struggled to survive the aftermath. For ten long days, we were roped-off from the outside world by United States military forces, leaving us stranded with no food, no water, no medical supplies or shelter. Suffering from severe shell-shock, we waited and waited for rescue teams to arrive but that just never happened. None of the injured in the roped-off areas were ever rescued from the devastation. It was the worst gut-wrenching betrayal I have ever experienced. I saw grown men lying on the ground in the fetal position, moaning and groaning pathetically, as they tried to hug and rock themselves.

My son was amongst them.

Don’t get me wrong, United States military forces were indeed present in the roped-off areas within hours of Andrew ending. But they were not there to help survivors.

http://www.bariumblues.com/deadly_silences.htm

Not until I managed to escape the aftermath did I discover that the “thermo-king” sections of these same refrigerator trucks, jam-packed with wall-to-wall body bags, ended up being stored at Card Sound Navy Base, located in an isolated area just above the Florida Keys. The inside temperature was kept cool by portable generators until the bodies were either incinerated or just plain dumped into huge open grave pits.

Those working on the body pick-up operation were forced to take what is known as the Oath of Sworn Secrecy, which is strictly enforced by the government. Many of them plunged into shock, once exposed to the ghastly devastation and countless mutilated bodies.
The survivors of hurricane Andrew and the rest of the American people were betrayed by their own government.

BUT that’s what governments do , they PROVIDE EXCUSES NOT RESULTS!!!!!

SO I SAY ,FIRE THE POLITIONS TODAY, THE LOT OF THEM!!!…. AND LETS HAVE A DIRECT DEMOCRACY

BUT..what anarchic nonsense …It’ll never work……. You’re a dreamer…..well just end up as a basket case ….the sky will fall…the world will end  is the usual brain washes response.

BUT WHAT ABOUT SWITZERLAND? … A DIRECT DEMOCRACY ,A VERSION OF ANARCHISM, OR PEOPLE POWER!

Is anyone going to say Switzerland is a disfunctional or inefficient state with high crime rates and low living standards and life expectancy?

Officially the Swiss Confederation (Confoederatio Helvetica in Latin, hence its ISO country codes CH and CHE), is a federal republic consisting of 26 cantons. its a Federal state, with parliamentary system and direct democracy .

Direct democracy, classically termed pure democracy,[1] comprises a form of democracy and theory of civics wherein sovereignty is lodged in the assembly of all citizens who choose to participate. Depending on the particular system, this assembly might pass executive motions, make laws, elect or dismiss officials, and conduct trials. Direct democracy stands in contrast to representative democracy, (UK/USA)where sovereignty is exercised by a subset of the people, usually on the basis of election……OR the choice of Tweedle Dee or Tweedle Dum…….  FYI “Direct democracy” is a form of ANARCHISM!

FYI The Swiss have avoided illegal wars and have less crime and a higher standard of living!

THE SWISS HAVE NO STANDING ARMY!!!!!! The Swiss Confederation has a long history of neutrality—it has not been in a state of war internationally since 1815.The Swiss Armed Forces, including the Land Forces and the Air Force, are composed of conscripts: professional soldiers constitute only about 5 percent of the military personnel.The structure of the Swiss militia system stipulates that the soldiers keep their own personal equipment, including all personal weapons, at home.

THERE IS NOT AN ARMY ON EARTH THAT COULD TAKE SWITZERLAND!!!

IT IS TIME TO FOLLOW THE SWISS EXAMPLE , DISBAND THE PARLIMENTRY DICTATORSHIP ,THE UK AND USA HAVE AN “ELECTED DICTATORSHIP” (what else do YOU get to vote on, except YOUR dictator?) …….OR “PARLIMENTRY DEMOCRACY” AS LYING POLITIONS CALL IT

This way we can expose paedophiles in government instead of covering for them for a 100 years, and stop illegal mass murder, for profit and delusional ideology!!!

AND ITS TIME TO DISBAND OUR STANDING ARMIES (WHICH HAVE DONE NOTHING BUT INVADE OTHER PEOPLES COUNTRIES!!!!!!)

This would stop ” blackmailed ” MP’s using the army to invade other countries that are no threat to us and inflicting untold damage and suffering on the world.

The army would become the “People’s Militia” where the majority of the population make up the armed forces, I’d like to see some pompous liar of a polition boss this army around and send it to commit atrocities around the world!

IMHO

LIBERTARIAN SOCIALISM IS THE ANSWER

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/11/04/libertarian-vs-authoritarian-todays-real-politic/

SO GOVERNMENT, PLEASE GO ON STRIKE AND PROVE YOU ARE WORTH THE TAXPAYERS MONEY !!!!!

BECAUSE I DO NOT BELIEVE YOU!!!!


In praise of… Wikileaks ……and the Guardian

November 27, 2009
  • The Guardian, Thursday 22 October 2009
  • A brown paper envelope for the digital age, Wikileaks.org is now home to more than 1m documents that governments and big business would rather the public did not see. The site – similar to Wikipedia in style, but otherwise independent of it – serves as an uncensorable and untraceable depository for the truth, able to publish documents that the courts may prevent newspapers and broadcasters from being able to touch. This month it has come of age in Britain, hosting the Minton report on the activities of oil trader Trafigura, even while the firm was trying to use its solicitors to prevent the press from revealing its contents. It was Wikileaks, too, that this week published a membership list of the British National party, revealing how few activists it has. Earlier this year, Lord Oakeshott, using parliamentary privilege, pointed those curious about Barclays’ tax activities to Wikileaks to read the evidence. Useful in Britain, it is invaluable in less free societies, such as China, where the authorities play a cat-and-mouse game with Wikileaks’ Swedish webhosts to try to block access. So far Wikileaks has stayed ahead, with technology leaving the law lagging behind. The site exists in a sort of legal limbo, not private, but not yet fully accepted by courts as part of the public domain. It takes power away from the powerful and hands it to citizens, controversial but essential example of what the web does best: offering unrestricted dispersal of information so that people can judge for themselves.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/oct/22/in-praise-of-wikileaks

    IMHO
    Wikileaks is another excellent example of Libertarianism working! Please feel FREE to check out what is happening in YOUR AREA that the government and big business and the MainStreamMedia Presstitutes DO NOT want YOU to KNOW!

    PLEASE SPREAD THIS LINK!!

    http://wikileaks.org/

    For more on this topic please see my Libertarian vs Authoritarian Today’s REAL Politic blog. Its time to take the power back!

     https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/11/04/libertarian-vs-authoritarian-todays-real-politic/

    The Wiki phenomina has been a great benefit to all of humanity that can access it. It has been shown that the worst offenders for posting FALSE informations are the very authorities that claim its full of false information.

    According to the BBC, WikiScanner found that some editorial contributions to Wikipedia had originated from computers operated by the Diebold company, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and the Vatican.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WikiScanner

    It has been shown that Wikipedia contains LESS factual errors per catagory than the encyclopedia Britanica,even with the Vatican and other world authoritarians filling it with LIES!

    It is thanks to Wikileaks that the Trifigura gag order was by-passed and the public got to hear ,NOT just about the polution and corrupt business practices BUT also the effort put into covering these work practices up ,rather than CLEAN the practices up!

    You can be very sure that YOUR POLITION will be doing everything he/she can to find away to CLOSE DOWN this ESSENTIAL SITE that ensures our very liberty at a time of global government DECIET AND CONSPIRACY!!! Wait for the effort to cast doubt on the reliablity of such sourses etc..etc.. This is the typical response , attack the messenger when you cannot attack the message!

    For more on this topic please check these blogs.

    https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/10/12/us-government-making-a-killing-on-war/

    https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/10/05/us-government-terrorists-still-in-power-iran-contra-to-911/

    https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/22/the-fedbank-bailouts-and-fascist-coups-the-great-depressionnaziscommies-and-the-bush-family/

    https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/03/the-record-of-the-federal-reserve/

    https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/02/a-short-history-of-global-domination-or-rockefella-rothschild-and-the-capitalist-communist-nwo-con/

    https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/02/governments-traitors-terrorists-and-drug-dealers/

    https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/10/are-us-wars-in-iraq-and-afghanistan-well-intended-mistakes-what-we-now-know-from-the-evidence/

    https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/11/26/tony-blair-liar-and-traitor-and-eu-reject/

    https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/09/iranian-oil-bourse-the-real-reason-for-war-with-iran/

    BUT I do have to give praise to the Guardian for running such an article in praise of an uncencored and uncontrolled  internet news site.

    REMEMBER

    THERE’S NO JUSTICE , THERE’S JUST US!!!