ANOTHER STATE PROTECTED MURDERER GOES FREE

July 23, 2010

No charge for police officer over G20 protest death
(Reuters) – A riot squad officer, filmed shoving a man to the ground during violent G20 protests in London last year, will not face criminal charges over his death, Britain’s chief prosecutor said on Thursday.
http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKTRE66L03020100722
OH WHAT A SUPRISE!!!!
In the last 10 years over 400 people have died by the hand of the police force, so far ZERO HAVE FACED CHARGES!!!!
The Economist stated in 2009:
“ Bad apples … are seldom brought to justice: no policeman has ever been convicted of murder or manslaughter for a death following police contact, though there have been more than 400 such deaths in the past ten years alone. The IPCC is at best overworked and at worst does not deserve the “I” in its name.
THESE ARE NOT BAD APPLES!! LOOK AT THE VIDEO , THIS WAS DONE IN A GROUP AND IN GROUPS THEY LIED, GAVE FALSE STATEMENTS AND PERVERTED THE COURSE OF JUSTICE , AND NOT FOR THE FIRST TIME!!!
https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/07/16/raoul-moat-tony-blair-or-the-police-who-is-the-biggest-murderer/
THERE IS ALSO A LOT OF EVIDENCE FOR POLICE PRE-MEDITATED VIOLENCE AND MURDER IN THE CASE OF IAN TOMLINSON
The G20 security operation was codenamed “Operation Glencoe”, The Guardian reported speculation among protesters that the operation had been named after the 1692 Glencoe massacre in the Scottish Highlands; a spokesman for the Met said before the protests that the police were “up for it”!
The Guardian alleges that he may have removed his shoulder number and covered the bottom of his face with his balaclava before hitting Tomlinson. The Daily Mail writes that this image shows the officer’s shoulder ID was missing. According to The Mail on Sunday, TSG officers have been known to swap shoulder IDs, then claim, if accused of wrongdoing, that their unit was elsewhere at the time and that it must be a case of mistaken identity
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/apr/09/g20-ian-tomlinson-police-video
PLEASE LOOK AT THE VIDEO THIS STATE PROTECTED MURDERER HAS COVERED HIS FACE WITH A BALACLAVA AND HAS REMOVED HIS SHOULDER BADGE NUMBER, THIS IS OBVIOUS PRE-MEDITATION!!!!!
Second expert has ‘no doubt’ PC’s actions contributed to G20 death . Pathologist who carried out second postmortem on Ian Tomlinson makes his views public for first time
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/jul/22/second-expert-pc-actions-g20-death
PLAIN AND SIMPLE THIS IS STATE MURDER
https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/10/03/more-state-murderers-go-free/
WHILE WE ARE AT IT, REMEMBER THOSE NASTY “BLACK BLOC ANARCHISTS!”? THEY SEEM TO BE ABLE TO DESTROY BANKS ETC (ALL HEAVILY INSURED BANKS OF COURSE) IN FRONT OF PRESS CAMERAS WHILE NO POLICE ARE PRESENT?!?! HOW CAN THAT BE?
THE “BLACK BLOC ANARCHISTS” ARE AGENT PROVOCATURE POLICEMEN JUST “UP FOR IT!”
https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/07/04/g20-agent-provocateurs-the-police-are-the-black-bloc-anarchists/

“All government, of course, is against liberty. The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary. Most people want security in this world, not liberty.”
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out… without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable. It doesn’t take a majority to make a rebellion; it takes only a few determined leaders and a sound cause.”
“Whether the mask is labeled Fascism, Democracy, or Dictatorship or the Proletariat, our great adversary remains the Apparatus-the bureaucracy, the police, the military…. No matter what the circumstances, the worst betrayal will always be to subordinate ourselves to this Apparatus, and to trample underfoot, in its service, all human values in ourselves and in others.”– The French worker philosopher Simone Weil,1945
https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/03/11/elected-dictatorship-posing-as-democracy/
https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/11/04/libertarian-vs-authoritarian-todays-real-politic/
https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/how-much-does-government-cost-and-is-it-worth-it-no/
https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/government-should-go-on-strike-to-prove-they-are-worth-thier-money/
https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/03/23/government-it-may-not-be-reliable-but-at-least-its-consistant-consistantly-corrupt/
SCOTTISH SOLUTION
https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/01/14/a-direct-democracy-independant-scotland/
https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/11/01/more-good-reasons-for-scottish-independance/
History was begun in mythology by an act of disobedience , it may well end in reality with an act of obedience.
Its is humanities diversity that will save us
It is humanities conformity that will kill us!
HUMANITY UNITED IN DIVERSITY!!!

Advertisements

Raoul Moat ,Tony Blair or the Police , who is the biggest murderer?

July 16, 2010

 “Now all my lies are proved untrue
And I must face the men I slew.
What tale shall serve me here among
Mine angry and defrauded young?”
(Epitaphs of War, Rudyard Kipling, 1865-1936.)

BODY COUNT

TONY BLAIR – 1.3 MILLION and still counting

UK POLICE FORCE–  The Economist stated in 2009:
“ Bad apples … are seldom brought to justice: no policeman has ever been convicted of murder or manslaughter for a death following police contact, though there have been more than 400 such deaths in the past ten years alone. The IPCC is at best overworked and at worst does not deserve the “I” in its name.

RAOUL MOAT – 1 dead , 1 injured

Raoul Moat ,seems to be filling the MSM headlines today. Apparently we should all be very afraid as he has attacked his girlfriend, and shot her lover, and shot a policeman .WHAT A MONSTER! More “ooga booga” from the MainStream Media Presstitutes, just to keep you thinking the armed police are worth all that taxpayers money and the average bobby on the beat is a nice honest guy protecting and serving the community.

OF COURSE THIS IS COMPLETE BOLLOCKS!!!!

The police FORCE is a state sponcered criminal organisation. The Police have MURDERED many INNOCENT CITIZENS and LIED and committed PURGERY and OBSTRUCTED THE COURSE OF JUSTICE but for some reason , they are NEVER CHARGED?? These are NOT “ROGUE” officers ,these acts are done in groups ,and in groups they cover for each other. The Police are a culture of criminality and NO DIFFERENT from any other armed mob or mafia. IMHO its about time the citizens started defending themselves from police brutality!! If a couple of dead innocent civilians are the price of vigilance to maintain our freedoms(Charles Mendez and Ian Tomlinson) , then a couple of dead police should also be just as acceptable….. it is after all ,supposed to be thier job and an occupational hazzard! OR are we supposed to think the police officers life is worth more than our own lives? Just like it seems politions believe that thiers lives are worth a lot more than the lives of those they are supposed TO SERVE!!!!!! Just like the days of MAD! Mutually Assured Destruction! That was mutually assured destruction for YOU and ME , our PUBLIC SERVANTS had nice comfortable NUCLEAR BUNKERS ,paid for by YOU the TAXPAYER!!!!

WE THE TAXPAYER GOT “DUCK AND COVER” THE MOVIE

TONY BLAIR

The LIAR and TRAITOR and WAR CRIMINAL that is Tony Blair is responsible for the deaths and suffering of COUNTLESS MILLIONS OF INNOCENT PEOPLE.

BUT just like the police force , Tony will LIE and NOT be procecuted for it …. well in the UK and USA he will not be ,BUT he did have to flee from Malaysia

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/04/28/tony-blair-very-close-to-being-indicted-for-war-crime-in-malaysia/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/02/07/where-have-all-the-burger-eating-war-monkeys-gone-cry-havoc-and-unleash-the-dogs-of-war-crimes/

Blair of course, walked from this carnage, to be Middle East Peace Envoy, telling Parliament on his resignation: “As I learned … it is important to be able to bring people together …” He can undoubtedly do delusion with some of the greats. As William Blum recently pointed out :

‘General Augusto Pinochet of Chile, mass murderer and torturer: “I would like to be remembered as a man who served his country.”

P.W. Botha, former president of apartheid South Africa: “I am not going to repent. I am not going to ask for favours. What I did, I did for my country.”

Pol Pot, mass murderer of Cambodia: “I want you to know that everything I did, I did for my country.”

Tony Blair, former British prime minister, defending his role in the murder of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis: “I did what I thought was right for our country.” ‘(2)

Patriotism is indeed the last refugee of the scoundrel.

SO TONY DID IT ALL FOR BRITAIN …………

Blair certainly did what he “thought was right” for Tony Blair. As Peter Oborne pointed out in March : “We now know that the wretched Blair has multiplied his personal fortune many times over by trading off the connections he made while in Downing Street. Shockingly, he fought a long battle to conceal the source of his new-found wealth, and only this month did it finally become public that one of his largest clients was a South Korean oil company, the UI Energy Corporation, with extensive interests in Iraq … he has also made £1million from advising the Kuwaiti royal family. It can be fairly claimed that Blair has profiteered as a result of the Iraq War in which so many hundreds of thousands of people died … in the league of shame, Tony Blair is arguably the worst of them all.”

Tony Blair tried to keep the public in the dark over his dealings with South Korean oil firm UI Energy Corporation
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1260204/Tony-Blairs-legacy-sleaze-cleaned-up.html#ixzz0tAqgpoDn

He also spent a great deal of effort covering up PEDOPHILE RINGS ,that seemed to point straight to his advisors and cabinet ministers.

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/01/07/uk-government-blackmailed-into-war-blair-covers-mps-paedophile-ring-and-the-dunblane-massacre/

BUT THIS IS THE ENDLESS MERRY-GO-ROUND OF CORRUPT POLITIONS , NEW LABOUR OR OLD TORY , NO DIFFERENCE , ALL CORRUPT AND NONE WILL BLOW THE WHISTLE!! NO INVESTIGATION WILL TAKE PLACE!

Cash-for-access scandal MPs in line for peerages (even if voters think they’re ‘sleazy pigs’)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1259928/Stephen-Byers-cash-access-scandal-MPs-line-peerages.html

They will also still qualify for ‘golden goodbye’ payments when they step down at the election. Mr Byers and Mr Hoon will each receive the £64,766 maximum. Miss Hewitt and MP Margaret Moran, who was also filmed offering to influence policy, will get £54,403.
Downing Street said the Prime Minister ‘completely condemns the claims made by the former ministers’ but saw no reason for an inquiry into the scandal.

BLOOD MONEY!!! OR 30 PIECES OF SILVER IN OLD MONEY

And the rewards for being an ally in mass starvation and murder, keep rolling in.The latest is the 2010 Liberty Medal, awarded by the US Constitution Centre (plus $100,000 prize money. Small change compared to the estimated $20 million he’s raked in since leaving office, but every little helps.)

The Liberty Medal, according to the Constitution Center: “.. reflects the values of the US Constitution – a belief in justice, fairness, self-governance … a balance between individual rights and communal responsibility, in the power of the epople … and in resolving issues through deliberation,, compromise and respect for diverse viewpoints.”

It is to be presented to him by his close friend and fellow Iraqi childrens’ tormenter, “Bomber” Bill Clinton, who says of Blair :  ” … Tony continues to demonstrate the same leadership, dedication and creativity in promoting economic opportunity in the Middle East and the resolution of conflicts rooted in religion around the world, and is building the capacity of developing nations to govern honestly and effectively. I’m pleased the Constitution Center is awarding him the Liberty Medal in recognition of his work to promote the actions necessary to make peace, reconciliation, and prosperity possible.

“Economic opportunity” indeed.

If your head is not yet over a bucket, David Eisner, President and CEO of the National Constitution Center, said: “Tony Blair has significantly furthered the expansion of freedom, self-governance, equality and peaceful coexistence. This award recognizes both his dedication to and his success in building understanding among nations and creating lasting solutions in areas of conflict.”

“TeflonTony” responded: “It is an honor to receive the Liberty Medal … Freedom, liberty and justice are the values by which this medal is struck.  Freedom, liberty and justice are the values which I try to apply to my work … preparing the Palestinians for statehood.  They are the values which drive … as we try to show that people of different faiths can live together constructively, in peace and harmony.” 

A month earlier he had been awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by George W. Bush for being ” … a true friend of the United States (who has) at his very centre (belief) in freedom.” Tell that to the Afghans, Iraqis, Palestinians with the ghettoised people of Gaza. He was in good company, receiving it with Australia’s former Prime Minister John Howard and Columbian President Alvaro Uribe, both adherents to Blair and Bush’s particularly unique interpretation of freedom.  

In July 2009, he pitched up to collect his Fenner Brockway Award, in London (for: ” …shared vision … global role in working for justice and security.”) with a black eye. Had someone finally found a dark night, a dark alley and a baseball bat? 

Incidentally, six of those who were awarded the Liberty Medal, have gone on to receive the Nobel Peace Prize. It was Tom Lehrer who said: “Satire became redundant the day Henry Kissinger was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.” No longer.

Blair may already share something with Kissinger: checking with his legal advisers every time he boards a ‘plane, should he be arrested for war crimes on arrival.

http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=20136

SO IF RAUOL MOAT HAD MANAGED TO MURDER ANOTHER MILLION INNOCENTS ,HE TOO ,MIGHT OF BEEN UP FOR A NOBEL PEACE PRIZE OR A FREEDOM MEDAL!!!

ACTUALLY THE UK HAS BEEN LED BY WANTED WAR CRIMINALS SINCE 1979…. DOES IT MAKE YOU PROUD TO BE BRITISH?

The Spanish Senate, acting to confirm a decision already taken under pressure from powerful governments accused of grave crimes, will limit Spain’s laws of universal jurisdiction. FORTUNATELY, ahead of the change of law, a legal case was filed at the Audiencia Nacional against four United States presidents and four United Kingdom prime ministers for commissioning, condoning and/or perpetuating multiple war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide in Iraq.
 
This case, naming George H W Bush, William J Clinton, George W Bush, Barack H Obama, Margaret Thatcher, John Major, Anthony Blair and Gordon Brown, is brought by Iraqis and others who stand in solidarity with the Iraqi people and in defence of their rights and international law.
 Iraq: 19 years of intended destruction
The intended destruction — or genocide — of Iraq as a state and nation has been ongoing for 19 years, combining the imposition of the most draconian sanctions regime ever designed and that led to 1.5 million Iraqi deaths, including 500,000 children, with a war of aggression that led to the violent deaths of over one million more.

Destroying Iraq included the purposeful targeting of its water and sanitation system, attacking the health of the civilian population. Since 1990, thousands of tons of depleted uranium have been dropped on Iraq, leading in some places to a 600 per cent rise in cancer and leukaemia cases, especially among children. In both the first Gulf War and “Shock and Awe” in 2003, an air campaign that openly threatened “total destruction”, waves of disproportionate bombing made no distinction between military and civilian targets, with schools, hospitals, mosques, churches, shelters, residential areas, and historical sites all destroyed.

COMPARED TO TONY BLAIR AND THE UK POLICE FORCE , RAOUL MOAT IS AN AMATUER AND CERTAINLY NOT AS BIG A THREAT TO PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY !!!

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/01/07/uk-government-blackmailed-into-war-blair-covers-mps-paedophile-ring-and-the-dunblane-massacre/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/03/31/pastors-of-muppets-and-masters-of-puppets-and-other-paedophiles/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/06/22/us-government-spreading-freedom-and-democracy-since-1945/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/06/11/911-the-case-for-an-inside-job/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/01/10/the-real-uk-legacy-of-the-iraq-and-afghan-wars-death-stalks-our-streets-and-the-world/

DO NOT EXPECT THE CON-DEMS TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT STOPPING FAKE WAR , PEDOPHILIA ,CORRUPTION , TORTURE AND BLACKMAIL
THEY HAVE THE SAME BACKERS THEY USE THE SAME PEDOPHILE RINGS AND HAVE THE SAME BLACKMAILERS

The Guardian described yesterday as the “almost unprecedented” release of “security service reports of interviews with detainees in Guantánamo Bay and other overseas detention centres,” the coalition government failed in its attempt to persuade the High Court to bring a temporary halt to a civil claim for damages filed by six former Guantánamo prisoners, unleashing, instead, a torrent of previously classified and deeply disturbing documents.

These reveal, shockingly, how the Labour government was happy for British nationals and residents seized in Afghanistan and Pakistan to be rendered to Guantánamo by the Bush administration, and how, in one case — that of Martin Mubanga, seized in Zambia — Tony Blair’s office intervened to prevent attempts by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office to have him returned to the UK, leading to his imprisonment in Guantánamo for two years and nine months.

BUT THE CON-DEM CRIMINALS WILL COVER ,PROTECT AND PARDON THE NEW LABOUR CRIMINALS

In paving the way for its announced inquiry into British complicity in torture, the coalition government attempted, without success, to persuade the High Court that, as the Guardian put it, “proceedings should be delayed while attempts at mediation are made” before the inquiry begins.
http://alethonews.wordpress.com/2010/07/15/uk-sought-rendition-of-british-nationals-to-guantanamo-tony-blair-directly-involved/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/07/07/child-sex-lies-and-videotape-a-story-of-government-and-cover-ups-or-how-to-shoot-politions-and-get-away-with-it/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/01/09/a-list-of-child-sex-offenders-inside-the-british-government/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/07/04/g20-agent-provocateurs-the-police-are-the-black-bloc-anarchists/

IF YOU HAVE DONE NOTHING WRONG PROVE IT IN A COURT OF LAW , IF YOU CANNOT PROVE THIS ,THEN YOU CANNOT SHOW YOU ARE GOVERNING LAWFULLY WITH THE CONCENT OF THE PEOPLE.

THEREFORE YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO RULE THE PEOPLE , AND YOU ARE AN “ILLEGITIMATE” GOVERNMENT! UNLAWFULLY RULING WITHOUT THE CONCENT OF THE PEOPLE!


The Last Act of any Government is to Loot the Nation….do you have the feeling you’re being robbed?

July 13, 2010

Why do we pay taxes?

Well for me it was so the sick can be heeled , the young can be educated ,the elderly can be given digfnity in thier twilight years and the general national infrastucutre can be maintained for the good of all.

I have no problems paying taxes for these good and decent reasons.

BUT OUR GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES AND THE WORLD BANK AND IMF DO NOT THINK TAXES ARE FOR THESE THINGS. IN FACT THEY HAVE TOLD EUROPEAN GOVERNMENTS NOT TO SPEAND TAXES ON THESE “WASTEFUL” THINGS!!! AUSTERITY MEASURES THEY CALL IT!!!!!

BUT the government believes OUR TAXES are for ILLEGAL wars of aggression ,fought for the benefit of big Business and the Israel lobby.So instead of healthy ,educated youths and dignified OAPs ,the government spent it on a pile of dead and mutilated bodies and trained psychotic killers. Great value for money ,….. and of course Afghanistan and Iraq where a BIG threats to the UK and USA and these actions of slaughtering and torturing the locals is reducing terrorism….BUT THAT IS WHAT OUR GOVERNMENT IS TELLING US!!!

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/10/are-us-wars-in-iraq-and-afghanistan-well-intended-mistakes-what-we-now-know-from-the-evidence/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/09/iranian-oil-bourse-the-real-reason-for-war-with-iran/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/06/11/911-the-case-for-an-inside-job/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/04/07/military-heroes-or-welfare-zeros/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/01/10/the-real-uk-legacy-of-the-iraq-and-afghan-wars-death-stalks-our-streets-and-the-world/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/12/29/usa-harbouring-terrorists-should-the-un-declare-war-on-this-rogue-terrorist-nation/

Those that give up liberty for security,.. deserve,…and will end up with, …neither’

Also according to our government representatives OUR TAXES are for bailing out incompitant and irresponsible bankers ,who by thier own rules of capitalism should be bankrupt.Why didn’t we bailout the car industry or the steel or coal industry , at least they manufactured something that we could sell! Why are we bailing out incompitant bankers?!? Won’t they just do the same thing again, this is NOT the first time these people have put us in this situation! and I don’t think the world will be happy investing in the UK or USA while it is being run by the same bunch of irresponsbile and corrupt individuals!!! BUT THE GOVERNMENT SEEMS TO THINK IT WILL!!

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/22/the-fedbank-bailouts-and-fascist-coups-the-great-depressionnaziscommies-and-the-bush-family/

Don’t we want responsible financial operators instead? But then I don’t want to be run by the Chinese Communist Party which suprisinigly have turned out to be the best venture capitalists on the planet!!!

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/02/08/is-the-us-already-bankrupt-and-trading-in-fake-gold/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/02/25/its-official-the-economy-will-recover-when-pigs-fly/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/03/11/elected-dictatorship-posing-as-democracy/

I HAVE BIG PROBLEMS PAYING TAXES FOR THESE “GOVERNMENT” REASONS!!! IN FACT IF ITS AN ILLEGAL WAR , WE SHOULD BE ABLE TO SUE BLAIR AND THE OTHER LIARS AND WAR CRIMINALS FOR THE COSTS!!

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/04/28/tony-blair-very-close-to-being-indicted-for-war-crime-in-malaysia/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/02/07/where-have-all-the-burger-eating-war-monkeys-gone-cry-havoc-and-unleash-the-dogs-of-war-crimes/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/10/05/us-government-terrorists-still-in-power-iran-contra-to-911/

THUS RELIEVING A LOT OF UK DEBT, WHICH IS NOT THE TAXPAYERS RESPONSIBILITY. THE NATION SHOULD DEFAULT TODAY , LET THE BANKS FALL ,NOT THE PEOPLE BE SOLD IN DEBT SLAVERY!!!

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/05/09/bank-corruption-and-fraudthe-who-the-how-and-the-why-and-the-simple-solution/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/10/12/us-government-making-a-killing-on-war/

THE PRIVATE BANKERS AND THIER PRIVATE INVESTORS HAVE ALSO RUN UP DEBTS ILLEGALLY . THESE DEBTS ARE NOT THE TAXPAYERS , THE IRRESPONSIBLE BANKS SHOULD BE ASSET STRIPPED AND THIER OWNERS TAKEN TO COURT FOR FRAUD CHARGES!! THATS WHAT HAPPENS TO IRRESPONSIBLE BUSINESSES IN FREE MARKETS!!!

A LESSON FOR THE BRIGHTEST AND THE BEST. FREE MARKET CAPITALISM EXPLAINED its not that difficult , so you see we do not need the brightest and the best.

1.Availability of credit allows money to flow between savers and borrowers.
2.Resources and funds are allocated to various projects or investments during a boom phase.
3.Eventually borrowing becomes excessive and leads to malinvestment,
4.At this stage, adherence to free market theory would allow for an efficient cleansing period and a healthy recovery period. How? Irresponsible and  unprofitable businesses fail. Bad debts get liquidated. Excess resources go on sale, flow into more stable ventures and pool together with more profitable  resources controlled by healthy corporations or entities
http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article6497.html

NEWSFLASH , UK ,USA BANKS FOUND TO BE UNPROFITABLE AND IRRESPONSIBLE . THEREFORE YOU GET ASSET STRIPPED AND REPLACED BY RESPONSIBLE AND PROFITABLE BUSINESS MODELS!!

ACTUALLY WESTERN BANKERS COMMITTED FRAUD ON A GRAND SCALE AND SHOULD BE IN JAIL AND SUED FOR DAMAGES!!!

ECUADOR ,THEY DECLARED THE DEBT ILLEGAL!! THEY ARE NOW DEBT FREE!!

In November 2008, Ecuador became the first country to undertake an examination of the legitimacy and structure of its foreign debt. An independent debt audit commissioned by the government of Ecuador documented hundreds of allegations of irregularity, illegality, and illegitimacy in contracts of debt to predatory international lenders. The loans, according to the report, violated Ecuador’s domestic laws, US Securities and Exchange Commission regulations, and general principles of international law. Ecuador’s use of legitimacy as a legal argument for defaulting set a major precedent; indeed, the formation of a debt auditing commission sets a precedent.

http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/10-ecuador-declares-foreign-debt-illegitimate/

ICELAND JUST REFUSED TO PAY THE DEBT AND ARRESTED THE FRAUDULENT BANKERS. ICELAND TOO IS DEBT FREE!!!!…. BUT THAT IS DIRECT DEMOCRACY FOR YOU!!!

The(Icelandic) government opposed the idea of a direct democratic decision.
Until the last minute the government had tried to discourage the voters from voting. The Prime Minister and the Minister of Finance both said they would not participate in the referendum. They saw it as a “waste of money” and a “farce”!!! … (and paying for other peoples debts is non-farcical and  good value for money?!? maybe its the Icelandic government that is a farce and a waste of money! IMHO its certainly is in the UK and USA)

The Icelandic referendum, the voice of the people against the blackmailing power of the international financial elites might now have become precedent for other countries in similar situations.
What the bankers seem to fear above all things is a direct democracy in financial matters.

And no doubt that´s quite a reasonable fear, for such a democracy would lead to more and more people getting informed about financial matters and the money-creation process itself.
The knowledge about this process coupled with the instruments of a direct democracy would lead eventually and without any doubt to a monetary reform and a loss of power for the international bankers.

THE ICELANDIC GOVERNMENT WANTED TO TURN THE PEOPLE INTO DEBT SLAVES, FORTUNATELY THE “DIRECT DEMOCRATIC” ICELANDIC PEOPLE SAID “NO” AND ARRESTED THE BANKERS WHILE THE PREVIOUS GOVERNMENT POLITIONS FLED!!

Iceland: Int’l Arrest Warrant Against Top Bank Official
by Lowana Veal (reykjavik)Wednesday, May 12, 2010
Inter Press Service
Vigorously pursuing those allegedly responsible for Iceland’s 2008 financial crisis, investigators have got issued an international arrest warrant against Sigurdur Einarsson, chairman of the board of governors of the failed Kaupthing Bank.

An Interpol notice on Tuesday said Einarsson was wanted on charges of counterfeiting, forgery and fraud.

Einarsson, who lives in London, was said to be reluctant to come to Reykjavik for fear of being arrested and Icelandic authorities have refused to offer any assurances.
http://www.globalissues.org/news/2010/05/12/5564
Yet another day of Iceland banking arrests
Posted on11 May 2010.
Ingolfur Helgason, the former Director of Kaupthing Iceland, and Steingrimur Karason, former CEO of the bank’s risk management department, were both arrested today upon arriving back in Iceland. They went straight to interrogation with the Special Prosecutor and are being held in police cells.
http://www.icenews.is/index.php/2010/05/11/yet-another-day-of-iceland-banking-arrests/

Bankers jailed, sued as Iceland seeks culprits for crisis
Since Iceland’s three largest banks — Kaupthing, Landsbanki and Glitnir — collapsed in late 2008, their former executives and owners have largely been living untroubled lives abroad.
But the publication last month of a parliamentary inquiry into the island nation’s profound financial and economic crisis signaled a turning of the tide, laying much of the blame for the downfall on the former bank heads who had taken “inappropriate loans from the banks” they worked for.
On Wednesday, the administrators of Glitnir’s liquidation announced they had filed a two-billion-dollar (1.6-billion-euro) lawsuit in a New York court against former large shareholders and executives for alleged fraud.
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.4090f16a5abf84c5a5adff0665cbc792.3a1&show_article=1

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/05/14/bailout-faltering-banker-arrests-beginning/

Reykjavik, Iceland; 4:00 UTC, June 16th 2010.
 
The WikiLeaks advised proposal to build an international “new media haven” in Iceland, with the world’s strongest press and whistleblower protection laws, and a “Nobel” prize for for Freedom of Expression, has unanimously passed the Icelandic Parliament.50 votes were cast in favor, zero against, one abstained. Twelve members of parliament were not present.

Vote results are available at http://www.althingi.is/dba-bin/atkvgr.pl?nnafnak=43014  

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/06/17/iceland-land-of-the-debtfree-home-of-the-brave-wikileaks/

BUT THE UK,USA AND THE EU ARE REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACIES, SO NO VOTE FOR THE COMMON MAN IN THE UK ,USA AND EU.ENJOY YOUR FREEDOM PEASANT AND PAY YOUR TAXES!! BUT I DO NOT WANT SOMETHING THAT REPRESENTS DEMOCRACY , I WANT DEMOCRACY!!!!

BUT GOVERNMENTS LIE , LIE AND LIE AGAIN.”REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY” IS A FAILED EXPERIMENT. IT HAS BECOME STATE CAPITALISM .

It is only FASCISTS that believe in government. Todays politions ,leftwing or rightwing ,are ALL STATE CAPITALIST FASCISTS. The only difference is one side prefers BIG GOVERNMENT and the other prefers BIG CORPORATIONS. The 2 cheeks af the same arse. Can YOU REALLY tell the difference?

State capitalism has various different meanings, but is usually described as a society wherein the productive forces are controlled and directed by the state in a capitalist manner, even if such a state calls itself socialist. Corporatized state agencies and states that own controlling shares of publicly-listed firms, and thus acting as a capitalist itself, are two examples of state capitalism

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_capitalism

OF COURSE THIS IS JUST FASCISM!!

Fascism should more appropriately be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power.
Benito Mussolini, fascist dictator of Italy (1922-1943)

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/government-should-go-on-strike-to-prove-they-are-worth-thier-money/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/03/23/government-it-may-not-be-reliable-but-at-least-its-consistant-consistantly-corrupt/

WE modern civilised people , look down ours noses at Aztecs that practiced human sacrifice. They slaughtered 10,000′s of people in the belief that if they did not ,thier civilisation would end. WE have murdered over a million in Iraq alone , purely because WE believe that if we do NOT , our western civilisation would end! What pathetic primitive tribal barbarians we still are , just with bigger sticks!!

We think we are clever , classless and free…….but we are still fuckin peasants as far as I can see. …… and fascist ones at that!!

John Lenon – Working Class Hero

REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY (STATE CAPITALISM) IS TOTALLY CORRUPT TO ITS CORE, IT PROTECTS PAEDOPHILES ,FRAUDSTERS AND CONSTANTLY STARTS WARS!! HITLER WAS VOTED INTO POWER BY A RESPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY , G.W. BUSH WAS VOTED IN TWICE!! TODAY THE UK GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES HAVE JUST HANDED THE PEOPLE A £78,000 DEBT FOR UK EVERY HOUSEHOLD………THE PEOPLE DID NOT CREATE THIS DEBT ,THEY ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS DEBT….ENJOY YOUR DEBT SLAVERY PEASANTS!!!!

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/03/31/pastors-of-muppets-and-masters-of-puppets-and-other-paedophiles/

“Democracy is a form of government that cannot long survive,for as soon as the people learn that they have a voice in the fiscal policies of the government,they will move to vote for themselves all the money in the treasury, and bankrupt the nation.”

Karl Marx

TODAY THE GOVERNMENT IS LYING TO US WHILE IT QUIETLY LOOTS THE NATION!

UK debt is ‘twice as much as we thought’
Daily Mail
12 July 2010, 7:37am

The true scale of the national debt is £2 trillion – more than twice the official figure, an alarming study shows.
 
Burden: Paying for civil service pensions will swell UK debts

The black hole in the public accounts equates to £78,000 for every household in the country.
The ‘real’ state of the national finances is exposed in a study published today by the Centre for Economics and Business Research, which warns of a series of mammoth debts that aren’t revealed by the official figures.
The national debt – forecast to reach £932m by next spring – does not include a number of expensive liabilities, such as the cost of civil service and town hall pensions and projects funded under the Public Finance Initiative.
Putting these liabilities into the official figure would add £1.13 trillion to Britain’s whopping overdraft, according to CEBR.
Under the worrying scenario, the debt would jump from 62% to 138% of Britain’s income.
In its study, CEBR warned that the Government cannot formulate a plan to revive the economy while the liabilities remain hidden.
Charles Davis, an economist at CEBR, said: ‘Clarity and transparency on the public sector finances has never been more vital in the context of recent concerns over public sector debt, particularly in the advanced economies.’
The report, which found that public sector pensions are by far the biggest liability excluded from the official record, will provide ammunition for the Government as it prepares to slash civil service pay and perks.
Unfunded public sector and local government pension liabilities, which the Government will need to pay in the future, amount to a staggering £1.08 trillion, according to CEBR.
Also written out of the accounts are the full cost of projects financed through the PFI, which by CEBR’s calculation adds a further £43bn. So-called contingent liabilities, such as Network Rail, add £2bn to the total.

Read more: http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/news/article.html?in_article_id=508582&in_page_id=2&ito=1565#ixzz0tXXJayRD

BUT FOR GOVERNMENT A SCARED AND IGNORANT POPULATION IS BEST. A CONFIDENT AND EDUCATED PEOPLE DO NOT NEED GOVERNMENT STICKING THIER NOSES INTO THIER LIVES!! IGNORANCE PRODUCES PROFITS AND THE IGNORANT CAN BE MADE TO BELIEVE ABSURDITIES AND THEN WILL COMMITT ATROCITIES

“Sell a man a fish, he eats for a day, teach a man how to fish, you ruin a wonderful business opportunity.”
 Karl Marx

THE BAILOUT WAS A SELL OUT FROM THE START AND HAS NOT A HOPE OF WORKING ,BUT THAT WAS NEVER THE POINT.THE BAILOUT SO FAR HAS JUST BEEN FOR LIQUID MONEY .THIS IS JUST THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG. THIS IS LIQUID LENDING MONEY, WE STILL HAVE THE ASSET MARKET
Trouble in Hedgefundistan: “Its gonna get a lot worse”
http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article1600.html
AND THE DERIVITIVES MARKETS TO BAILOUT!!!
Bailout Secret- To Prevent $68 Trillion Derivatives Collapse Chain Reaction
http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article6495.html
AND AFTER TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN BANKER BAILOUTS THERE IS NOTHING LEFT IN THE KITTY FOR THE AVERAGE JOE!
https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/02/20/the-joe-stack-attack-born-free-and-taxed-to-death/

THIS WAS ALL ABOUT LOOTING THE NATION

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/22/the-fedbank-bailouts-and-fascist-coups-the-great-depressionnaziscommies-and-the-bush-family/

Citigroup Warns Customers It May Refuse To Allow Withdrawals

“Effective April 1, 2010, we reserve the right to require (7) days advance notice before permitting a withdrawal from all checking accounts. While we do not  currently exercise this right and have not exercised it in the past, we are required by law to notify you of this change,” Citigroup said on statements  received by customers all over the country.
http://www.businessinsider.com/citigroup-warns-customers-it-may-refuse-to-allow-withdrawals-2010-2
OF COURSE CITIGROUP SAYS ITS NOTHING TO WORRY ABOUT
BUT………
As we reported back in 2008, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., which guarantees individual accounts up to $100,000, only has about $50 billion to “insure”  about $1 trillion in assets across the nation’s financial institutions.
This revelation prompted fears that an accelerating amount of bank closures could absorb FDIC funds and leave holders of money market and traditional savings  accounts exposed.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/citigroup-warns-customers-it-may-refuse-to-allow-withdrawals.html

BUT IN THE WEST US AND UK BUSINESSES ARE STILL DEVALUING!!!!!

Britain’s banks have been downgraded as credit risks by ratings agency Standard and Poors. This means they are no longer regarded as among the safest bets in the world.
http://www.silobreaker.com/british-banks-downgraded-5_2263193997923057688

General Electric lost its top credit rating from Moody’s Investors Service on Monday because of higher risks at the conglomerate’s struggling GE Capital lending unit.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/24/business/24electric.html

THE CHINESES HAVE DE-VALUED THE WEST AND ITS ASSETS , NOTHING IS MENTIONED ON THE WESTERN MSM.
Chinese rating agency strips Western nations of AAA status
China’s leading credit rating agency has stripped America, Britain, Germany and France of their AAA ratings, accusing Anglo-Saxon competitors of ideological bias in favour of the West.
Dagong Global Credit Rating Co used its first foray into sovereign debt to paint a revolutionary picture of creditworthiness around the world, giving much greater weight to “wealth creating capacity” and foreign reserves than Fitch, Standard & Poor’s, or Moody’s.

The US falls to AA, while Britain and France slither down to AA-. Belgium, Spain, Italy are ranked at A- along with Malaysia.

 Meanwhile, China rises to AA+ with Germany, the Netherlands and Canada, reflecting its €2.4 trillion (£2 trillion) reserves and a blistering growth rate of 8pc to 10pc a year.

Dominique Strauss-Kahn, chief of the International Monetary Fund, agreed on Monday that the rising East is a transforming global force. “Asia’s time has come,” he said.
The IMF expects Asia to grow by 7.7pc in 2010, vastly outpacing the eurozone at 1pc and the US at 3.3pc. Emerging nations hold 75pc of the world’s $8.4 trillion (£5.6 trillion) of reserves.

ANTI-UNIONISTS , SCOTTISH NATIONALISTS AND LIBERTARIANS SHOULD NOTICE SMALL COUNTRIES AND ECONOMIES ARE THE LEAST EFFECTED AND BEST SUITED TO RESPOND TO THE FINANCIAL TSUNAMI
Dagong rates Norway, Denmark, Switzerland, and Singapore at AAA, along with the commodity twins Australia and New Zealand.

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/01/14/a-direct-democracy-independant-scotland/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/11/04/libertarian-vs-authoritarian-todays-real-politic/

Chinese president Hu Jintao said in April that the world needs “an objective, fair, and reasonable standard” for rating sovereign debt. Dagong appears to have stepped into the role, saying its objective was to assess countries using methods that would “not be affected by ideology”.

“The reason for the global financial crisis and debt crisis in Europe is that the current international credit rating system does not correctly reveal the debtor’s repayment ability,” said Guan Jianzhong, Dagong’s chairman.

The agency, known in China for rating companies, said its goal is to “correct the defects” of the existing system and offer a counter-weight to Western agencies.
Dagong appears to base growth potential on past performance but this can be misleading, especially in states enjoying technology catch-up. Japan was a high-flyer in 1970s and 1980s before stalling when the Nikkei bubble burst. It has been trapped in near perma-slump ever since.
China may start to face some of Japan’s demographic problems by the middle of this decade when the working age population peaks.
The Western rating agencies put a high value on a long-established rule of law and government institutions that have proved resilient over many decades, or even centuries. China’s political system may appear strong – as did the Soviet Union’s – but only time will tell whether its foundations are brittle. The violent upheavals of the Cultural Revolution are still a very fresh memory.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/china-business/7886077/Chinese-rating-agency-strips-Western-nations-of-AAA-status.html

BUT ALSO THERE ARE WESTERN VOICES OF WARNING
Recession, Deflation and Deficits Economic Outlook 2010
Economics / US Economy
Jul 12, 2010 – 06:11 PM
 By: John_Mauldin
This means that if an economy starts with real GDP of $14.3 trillion (i.e. the level for 2009), and it is shocked by a surge in deficit spending, such as has been the case in the U.S., GDP will grow, but the economy will then eventually return to essentially where it began. However, the deficit spending shock leaves the economy in a more precarious overall condition because the same sized economy must now support a higher level of debt. Additionally, the private sector’s share, which was 79.4% in 2009, will be reduced in favor of a larger governmental share, which was 20.6% in 2009.
Second, the other side of fiscal policy – taxes – also poses another major obstacle to a return to sustained economic growth. The scientific work indicates that the government tax multiplier has a negative impact on economic growth. Academicians estimate that the drag on the overall economy from a $1 increase in taxes is between $1 to $3 over time.
Third, the U.S. economy remains extremely over-indebted. In the first quarter, the total debt to GDP ratio was 357%, 100 percentage points higher than in 1998. The best scholarly work indicates that the process of over indulging on debt ends badly – economic deterioration, systematic risk and in the normative case deflation. The private sector has deleveraged slightly either due to conditions imposed by the capital markets or their own choice. Nevertheless, the private sector remains massively over-leveraged.
Fourth, monetary policy is not working in spite of the widespread contention that the Fed is wildly printing money. The line of reasoning by many observers is that the Fed’s actions will soon lead to faster economic activity but with rapid inflation.
http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article21046.html

BUT THANKS TO BIG GOVERNMENT AND BIG BUSINESS, THE STOCK MARKET IS STILL MANIPULATED AND HOPELESSLY OVERVALUED

Trader on Bloomberg says markets are manipulated and volumes ‘ficticious’.Not only are the new high tech/high speed transactions giving big banks an overwhelming trading advantage over retail investors, they’re also creating a false impression about the health of the stock market.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4cRYI2x60Q&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwhatreallyhappened%2Ecom%2F&feature=player_embedded

Stock Market 40% Over Valued, Hussman on Valutions and Earnings Estimates
Stock-Markets / Stock Market Valuations
Jul 13, 2010 – 01:38 AM
 By: Mike_Shedlock
On a valuation basis, the S&P 500 remains about 40% above historical norms on the basis of normalized earnings. The disparity between our valuation assessment and the putative undervaluation being touted by Wall Street analysts is so great that a few remarks are in order. First, virtually every assessment that “stocks are cheap” here is based on the ratio of the S&P 500 to year-ahead operating earnings estimates, and often comes with a comparison of the resulting “earnings yield” with the depressed 10-year Treasury yield. What’s fascinating about this is that this is the same basis on which analysts deemed stocks to be about 40% undervalued just prior to the 2007 top, following which the market plunged by more than half. There’s a great deal of analysis regarding forward operating earnings that I published in 2007, but probably the most comprehensive piece was Long Term Evidence on the Fed Model and Forward Operating P/E Ratios from August 20, 2007.
http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article21049.html

THE FASCIST COUP IN AMERICA THIS TIME HAS BEEN SUCCESSFUL BUT IT HAS ALSO KILLED THE PATIENT!! OBVIOUSLY NOT THE BRIGHTEST OR THE BEST!!
Fascist Business System Breeds Corruption & Receivership
Politics / Credit Crisis Bailouts
Sep 24, 2008 – 02:56 PM
 By: Jim_Willie_CB

The Fascist Business Model has criminal fraud & corruption as its chief characteristic, alienation & resentment as its chief foreign effect, and systemic failure & collapse as its chief outcome.

Broad war often follows. How anybody could think the sharing of bank and oil executives with federal government leadership as a move toward progress on the evolution chart, that is moronic. Surely, it is about political power and corruption. The military budget is sacred, and private contractor deals are made without bids. Now five to six energy giants will hog all Iraqi oil service contracts. The terrorism topic is untouchable for dispute. A Coup d’Etat is in progress as the Wall Street con men and fraud kings have taken implicit control of the USGovt. This will be recognized in time, even while resistance is evident. To me the ongoing drama smacks of a comedy of corruption. US citizens are in shock & awe, while foreigners are aghast in disgust.

The United States has transformed itself, the most radical degraded aspects having occurred in the last eight years. Many might object or cringe at repeated mention of the Fascist Business Model implemented by the Clinton Administration, and carried to extreme by the Bush II Administration. It is a harsh departure from Beacon of Freedom.
Too bad, fact of life!
http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article6447.html

BUT THESE ARE NOT THE “BRIGHTEST AND BEST”. IN 1933 GERMAN FASCISTS TOOK A DEVISTATED COUNTRY AND ECONOMY AND WITHIN YEARS MADE A FASCIST STATE SUPERPOWER THAT NEARLY BEAT THE WORLD!! TODAY US/ZIONIST FASCISTS HAVE TAKEN A SUPERPOWER NATION AND WITHIN YEARS TURNED IT INTO A DEVISTATED COUNTRY.AFTER 9 YEARS THEY STILL ARE GETTING THIERS BUTTS KICKED IN AFGHANISTAN!!……BUT MAYBE DROPPING A MILLION DOLLARS OF CRUISE MISSILE ORDENANCE ON TWENTY DOLLARS OF REAL ESTATE WILL NOT WIN A WAR!!!  ……….BUT IT MIGHT HELP EXPLAIN THE ECONOMY, STUPID!!!!

FOR THE USA, THE END IS NIGH…….CHINA IS RISING

Central banks start to abandon the U.S. dollar
There’s mounting evidence that central bankers have little faith in the greenback these days. Can we blame them?
by Heidi N. Moore, contributor
There are those who would argue that the financial crisis was caused by over-enthusiastic worship of the Almighty Dollar. Call it brutal financial karma, but that church is looking pretty empty these days.
A new report from Morgan Stanley analyst Emma Lawson confirms what many had suspected: the dollar is firmly on its way to losing its status as the reserve currency of the world. We already knew that central banks have preferred gold to dollars, and that they’re even selling their gold for cash; now, according to Lawson’s data, it seems that those central banks prefer almost anything to dollars.
Call it diversification, if you must, but the trendline indicates that central banks are finally putting their money where their anti-dollar mouths are. The dollar has been in free-fall since 2007.
And just last week, the United Nations released a report concluding that the dollar should no longer be the world’s reserve currency because it is not stable enough. The dollar is down 5% over the past month, and even currency traders don’t see it as a safe haven any more.
Just last week, America’s debt lept $166 billion in a single day. That one-day run-up is greater than the entire U.S. annual deficit in 2007.
http://wallstreet.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2010/07/09/central-banks-start-to-abandon-the-u-s-dollar/
Ferguson said the financial crisis that started in 2007 has “has accelerated a fundamental shift in the balance of power,” with the U.S. shedding power and China absorbing it.

“I’ve just come back from China — a two-week trip there — and the thing I heard most often was, ‘You can’t lecture us about the superiority of your system anymore. We don’t need to learn anything from you about financial institutions and forget about democracy. We see where it has got you.’”

The affable British scholar tried to keep it light. He used a stage whisper to tell the Aspen Institute audience, “I know you’re not comfortable with the word ‘empire,’ especially just after the Fourth of July, but you are the Redcoats now.”
He said the U.S. is now deeply in the red as a country because of a combination of the Great Recession, the resulting federal stimulus and financial bailout programs, two wars, the Bush tax cuts, and a growth in social entitlement programs.

And economic debt can lead to a sudden loss of military power and global respect, Ferguson said.

“By combating our crisis of private debt with an extraordinary expansion of public debt, we inevitably are going to reduce the resources available for national security in the years ahead,” Ferguson said. “Because as a debt grows, so the interest payments you have to make on it grow, even if interest rates stay low. And on current projections, the federal debt is going to be absorbing around 20 percent — a fifth of all the taxes you pay — within just a few years.
http://www.aspendailynews.com/print/141349

CHINA NOW CALLS THE SHOTS

IN THEORY BECAUSE OF CHINESE FINANCIAL DIVERSIFICATION (DUMPING DOLLARS) CHINA COULD DUMP ALL ITS $2 TRILLION ASSETS ON THE MARKET AND WATCH THE DOLLAR COLLAPSE OVERNIGHT AND END THE AMERICAN ECONOMY DEAD!!!! THE CHINESE WOULD SEE THIER NON-DOLLARS ASSETS RISE IN PRICE WITH THE DOLLAR COLLAPSE, IN THEORY CHINA COULD ACTUALLY MAKE MONEY DUMPING ITS DOLLARS!!!

THIS IS CHINA’S NUCLEAR OPTION!!!!
China Is Through Screwing Around, Seeks to Deploy Reserves to Buy Real Assets
Folks, China is through screwing around. They’ve made it clear that don’t HAVE to buy our debt and are quite comfortable putting their money to use elsewhere. The fact that the Fed is now buying Debt from the Treasury in this sneaky fashion makes it clear that without the Fed, we might have seen failed auctions.
And the dollar and Treasuries are on borrowed time. Indeed, the dollar may very well start the next wave of this financial crisis. If that happens, gold could very well explode through the roof.
http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article12583.html
U.S. Govt Yuan Bond Threat to U.S. Dollar
The Chinese are in town to meet with the USGovt officials on continued debt support. The public will surely NOT be told what is discussed. One informed contact wrote this morning that the US lies as a terminal patient in the Intensive Care Ward, and seeks a death with dignity from its Chinese creditor doctors. The challenge to China is to protect its main core of US$-based reserves, and to protect future investments.
The USGovt might soon issue bonds, except not in US$ denomination, but rather in Yuan currency. Out of the gate (with debt signposts), the USGovt must purchase gigantic swaths of Yuan and pay with USDollars. The result is a quantum decline in the US$ exchange rate
The USDollar exchange rate would fall with each debt issuance
The loan balance in USGovt debt would rise with a declining USDollar
The Yuan currency would be further established as a global reserve alternative
Continued trade settlement in Yuan terms would be enabled
Rise in entire cost structure to the USEconomy from commodity pricing
The risk of USTreasury Bond default grows with each passing new issuance
Rumors are ripe that in a March trip to Beijing, Secy State Hillary cut a deal promising Eminent Domain on US property in return for continued USTreasury Bond support. So maybe a shopping basket of thousands of homes, hundreds of commercial buildings, scads of idle industrial plants, and a few million acres of farmland are soon to be seized by the Chinese in exchange for USTreasury Bond debt. One must wonder. The American people, i.e. USA Inc shareholders, will be the last to know in this criminal syndicate environment, a hatched cloud from the Fascist Business Model. Seemingly on a quarterly basis, something must be handed to the Chinese for continued USTBond support. The USTreasury officials and USFed have lied through their teeth about avoiding direct monetization.
http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article12386.html
The US Embassy in Beijing confirmed the deal to the source. Hillary closed the deal. A quid-pro-quo agreement was struck, continued USTBond purchases in return for Eminent Domain option to exercise by China for property seizure, “ to physically take, inside the USA, land, buildings, factories, perhaps even entire cities.” The concepts of colonization and carpet-bagging should come to mind!
WELCOME TO THE CHINESE COMMUNIST REPUBLIC OF CALIFORNIA ,just around the corner if the US Government has its way.
THE YANKS BETTER START LEARNING CHINESE ,OR STOP LISTENING TO YOUR GOVERNMENT!!!! MAYBE THE REPUBLICS OF TEXAS , HAWAII  , ALASKA , CALIFORNIA ,ARIZONA ,ETC. ARE THE WAY TO GO

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/02/a-short-history-of-global-domination-or-rockefella-rothschild-and-the-capitalist-communist-nwo-con/

BRITS , WE SHOULD JUST DISBAND THE HOPELESSLY INDEBTED UK PARLIMENT AND RELAUNCH THE REPUBLIC OF SCOTLAND WITH GOLD STANDARD SCOTTISH POUNDS AND THE KINGDOM OF ENGLAND WITH GOLD BACKED ENGLISH POUNDS!!! SAME ADVICE FOR MY CELTIC COUISINS IN WALES AND NORTHERN IRELAND ..WE COULD ALL BE DEBT FREE TOMORROW!!!

Rank  ↓ Country  ↓ CAB USD, bn  ↓
1  People’s Republic of China 371.833
2  Germany 252.501
3  Japan 210.967
4  Saudi Arabia 95.762
5  Russia 76.163
6  Switzerland 70.797
7  Norway 59.983
8  Netherlands 52.522
176  Greece -44.218
177  Italy -52.725
178  Australia -56.342
179  United Kingdom -105.224
180  Spain -145.141
181  United States -731.214

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/02/25/its-official-the-economy-will-recover-when-pigs-fly/

THE USA , UK , SPAIN AND AUSTRALIA the countries that all lead the call to WAR on Iraq and Afghanistan, ALL respresentative democracies .ALL LIED INTO WAR by thier government representatives. TODAY ALL HOPELESSLY IN DEBT! Today US and UK bankers demand bailouts and attack the PIGS (Portugal ,Ireland ,Greece and Spain) BUT WHY DO THEY FINANCIALLY ATTACK THESE COUNTRIES ? These countries do NOT have the debt of the USA ? BUT these countries are ALL leftwing libertarian governments that DO NOT SUPPORT THE WAR!! Italy used to be a little piggy but today is NOT,Italy used to be leftwing and anti-war,but today is not…. COINCIDENCE? War is a business racket!

“War is just a racket. A racket is best described, I believe,as something that is not what it seems to the majority of people.Only a small inside group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few at the expense of the masses.”

I spent 33 years (in the Marines)…most of my time being a high-class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism… General Smedley Butler.

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/06/22/us-government-spreading-freedom-and-democracy-since-1945/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/02/07/where-have-all-the-burger-eating-war-monkeys-gone-cry-havoc-and-unleash-the-dogs-of-war-crimes/

A SYSTEM OF DIRECT DEMOCRACY SHOULD REPLACE THE TOTALLY CORRUPT ELECTED DICTATORSHIP!!!

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/01/14/a-direct-democracy-independant-scotland/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/11/04/libertarian-vs-authoritarian-todays-real-politic/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/02/governments-traitors-terrorists-and-drug-dealers/

BTW TODAY THE USA HAS NO SPACE PROGRAM TO SPEAK OF. NASA HAS TO ASK RUSSIA IF IT WANTS TO PUT SOMEONE IN SPACE , IT HAS TO ASK EUROPE TO PUT SATELITES IN SPACE. HOW THE MIGHTY HAVE FALLEN , BUT I THINK THEY HAVE A LOT FUTHER TO FALL!!!!!

LETS HOPE SOME DELUSIONAL RELIGIOUS ZIONIST NEO-CON DOES NOT PUSH THE NUCLEAR BUTTON BELIEVING HE IS A “TOOL OF GOD”

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/11/29/zionism-modern-nazism/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/03/02/the-greatest-hoax-ever-abrahamic-monotheism-is-it-really-just-satanism/

WE HAVE BEEN HERE BEFORE , PLEASE TAKE ANDREW JACKSONS ADVICE!
Never take counsel of your fears.”
 The Jacksonians opposed government granted monopolies to banks, especially the national bank, which was a central bank known as the Second Bank of the  United States. Jackson fought to end the government monopoly to the Bank and got great opposition from Nicholas Biddle, the bank chairman. Biddle first  dismissed Jackson efforts, but as the initiative gained popular support, he got more concerned. There was an attempt to murder Jackson at that time but the  pistols failed. Jackson would later claim that he had proof the bankers were behind this attempt. Jackson was able to gain popular support because the Bank  money manipulations and inflation had created a big recession, and it had inflated land prices, benefiting big land owners and stopping economical  development. In a last attempt to stop Jackson, Biddle burst the bubble his inflationary policies had created, and brought about a deflationary correction.  This put pressure on Jackson, but after a year of recession, the economy was clean by the deflationary correction, and the Bank was out of “ammunition”.  Jackson had won the battle. The Bank continued his operations as a state bank, but had to close years after. Once retired, everytime Jackson was asked what  was his biggest achievement as president he answered: “I killed the Bank”.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacksonian_democracy

ANDREW JACKSON was the ONE president that CLEARED AMERICAN DEBT ,when faced with financial ruin How did he manage it?

The Bank is trying to kill me, but I shall kill it!”

ANDREW JACKSONS VIEW OF THE BANKS….NO BAILOUT.

You are a nest of vipers and thieves, and by the grace of the almighty God, I will root you out!”

ANDREW JACKSON’S VIEW ON CORPORATIONS

Corporations have neither bodies to kick nor souls to damn.

ANDREW JACKSONS VIEW ON THE BRIGHTEST AND THE BEST

Hemans gallows ought to be the fate of all such ambitious men who would involve their country in civil wars, and all the evils in its train that they might  reign & ride on its whirlwinds & direct the Storm– The free people of these United States have spoken, and consigned these wicked demagogues to their proper  doom.

THE SIMPLE SOLUTION LIBERTARIAN SOCIALISM …THE REAL LIBERTARIANS!!!!

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/11/04/libertarian-vs-authoritarian-todays-real-politic/

AND DIRECT DEMOCRACY ……NOT AN ELECTED DICTATORSHIP aka REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY!!!

Direct democracy, classically termed pure democracy, is a form of democracy and a theory of civics in which sovereignty is lodged in the assembly of all citizens who choose to participate. Depending on the particular system, this assembly might pass executive motions, make laws, elect or dismiss officials, and conduct trials. Direct democracy stands in contrast to representative democracy, where sovereignty is exercised by a subset of the people, usually on the basis of election.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_democracy

FINANCIAL SPOKESPERSONS RESPONDS

Financial Spokesperson No.1

“ROOLS?!?! We don’t need no stinkin ROOLS!!!”

Financial Spokesperson No.2

“OK everybody , just give us the money and no-one will get hurt!!!”

POLITICAL COMMENT

I used to think politions where useless until I realised they are biodegradable!!!

VIOLENCE BREEDS VIOLENCE

EDUCATION BREEDS UNDERSTANDING

PEACE TO EVERYONE


(Child) Sex ,Lies and Videotape ,a story of Government and cover-ups…OR how to shoot politions and get away with it!!!

July 7, 2010

Its time to wake up people.Power corrupts and absolute power attracts the absolutely corrupt. Paedophilia and power go hand in hand , be it religious power or secular power .If you live in the USA, UK , Australia , Lithuania , Belgium then you are being governed by PAEDOPHILES. OR more accurately thier BLACKMAILERS!!!! It is more than probable that it is the same in EVERY REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY (Elected Dictatorship)

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/03/11/elected-dictatorship-posing-as-democracy/

Here are a few examples

UK PAEDOPHLIES IN POWER

NATO boss and Blair government insider Lord Robertson has threatened to sue Scotland’s leading independent newspaper over internet allegations that he not only used his influence as a Freemason to procure a gun licence for child killer Thomas Hamilton, but was also a member of a clandestine paedophile ring reportedly set up by Hamilton for the British elite.

On 13 March 1996, Hamilton, armed with four hand-guns, opened fire on a junior school class, killing 16 children and one teacher before turning the gun on himself, shattering forever the idyllic 13th century Scottish town of Dunblane.

The controversy is certain to topple the Blair government, which has already issued a D-Notice to gag the press from revealing the names of known paedophiles within the British executive, including at least two senior ministers; and the case highlights the government’s antipathy toward the Sunday Herald and its brand of independent journalism that has, among other things, exposed the role played by the domestic security agency, MI5, in helping the IRA to carry out terrorist atrocities.

As reported by this journalist last month at Propaganda Matrix and Counter Punch, and by the Sunday Herald’s Home Affairs Editor, Neil Mackay, the British intelligence services are actively engaged in preventing any further child sex revelations that could incite further hostility to an already unpopular Prime Minister and destroy the morale of troops set to invade Iraq. An intelligence officer told Mackay that “a ‘rolling’ Cabinet committee had been set up to work out how to deal with the potentially ruinous fall-out for both Tony Blair and the government if arrests occur.”

Robertson considers action over web allegation
http://news.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=290762003

Alleged Pedophiles at Helm of Britain’s War Machine
http://www.propagandamatrix.com/alleged_pedophiles.html

Call to lift veil of secrecy over Dunblane
http://www.guardian.co.uk/guardianpolitics/story/0,3605,895056,00.html

MP aide facing porn charge
http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2002400885,00.html

Child porn arrests ‘too slow’
http://www.sundayherald.com/30813

Don’t look now
http://www.observer.co.uk/comment/story/0,6903,877634,00.html

A FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT List of CHILD SEX OFFENDERS in the UK GOVERNMENT

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/01/09/a-list-of-child-sex-offenders-inside-the-british-government/

FOR MORE ON PAEDOPHILES IN THE UK GOVERNMENT AND THIER EFFECTS ,PLEASE READ THIS BLOG

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/01/07/uk-government-blackmailed-into-war-blair-covers-mps-paedophile-ring-and-the-dunblane-massacre/

US PAEDOPHILES IN POWER

The Franklin Credit Union
Child-Sex Ring Scandal
Take Your Victim To The White House As A Guest of the GOP

Lawrence King was a 300 pound, black Republican pedophile who was in charge of the Franklin Credit Union. He was alleged to have operated a call-boy business in partnership with Harold Andersen, then publisher of the Omaha Herald, among others.

King enjoyed Republican society and took his conservative politics seriously. In 1987 he donated $25,350 to Citizens for America, an organization that arranged speaking tours around the country for Lt. Col. Oliver North.

In October 1988, King’s Franklin Community Credit Union was raided by the FBI and IRS. A month later the Treasury Department filed suit to recover the $34 million that had disappeared from Franklin’s vaults under King’s management. King became the subject of the Nebraska Senate’s investigation conducted by the specially created “Franklin Committee” to probe charges of embezzlement. In November 1988, King’s offices were raided by the FBI and $40 million was discovered missing. Within weeks, the Nebraska Senate, which initially opened the inquiry to find out where the money had gone, instead found itself questioning young adults and teenagers who said that they had been child prostitutes.  Many had been residents of Boystown – though both boys and girls were eventually involved.  Social workers and state child-care administrators accused King of running a child prostitution ring. The charges grew, with the former police chief of Omaha, the publisher of the state’s largest daily newspaper, and several other political associates of King, finding themselves accused of patronizing the child prostitution ring.

BIG FISH ARE PROTECTED WHILE THE SMALL FISH ARE CHARGED , JUST TO SHOW THAT THE GOVERNMENT IS TOUGH ON COMBATING PAEDOPHILIA .THAT IS WHY THERE IS SO MUCH CENCORSHIP SURROUNDING THIS ,IT IS IMPERITIVE FOR THEM TO CONTROL THE INFORMATION ON THIS SUBJECT!!!

Operation Ore – May 2002 – Ongoing

Launched after FBI passed credit card details of 7300 alleged British subscribers to a child porn gateway.
About 1300 arrested, including teachers, care workers, social workers, soldiers, surgeons and 50 police officers.
The investigation, which will run at least until July 2003, has focused on anyone with access to children and in positions of authority, such as the police or magistrates.

8 YEARS ON AND STILL NO CHARGES!!!!  BUT POLICE OFFICERS RUNNING THE CHILD ABUSE CASES ARE FOUND TO BE PAEDOPHILES!!!!!

Soham policemen on child porn charges
The policeman who comforted the parents of murdered schoolgirl Jessica Chapman has been charged with offences relating to the possession of indecent images of children.
Detective Constable Brian Stevens, 41, who last month read aloud a poem at a memorial service for the girls, was charged on Friday night, Cambridgeshire Police said.
Pc Antony Goodridge, 34, who also worked on the Soham murder inquiry, was also charged with offences relating to the possession of indecent images of children.
Both officers have been suspended from duty and will appear before magistrates at Bury St Edmunds on Saturday morning
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/2256707.stm

Detective Constable Brian Stevens, 41 – an officer on the Holly and Jessica double-murder case – has been charged with indecently assaulting three children and possessing indecent photos.

ITS THE SAME IN THE USA

Officials: NJ Cop Bribed Sex Abuse Victims With Drugs
NEWARK, N.J. (WPIX) – A 20-year-veteran of the Newark police force is behind bars for allegedly covering up sexual relationships with minors by supplying them with cocaine and marijuana.
FBI officials launched a probe into Lally’s dealings last spring, after receiving reports that he engaged in sexually explicit acts with several minors and had the minors engage in sexual acts with each other, with him and with third parties
Lalley allegedly contacted the victim Jan. 4 and urged him to lie about their sexual relationship. Officials say in taped phone conversations on Jan. 12 and 19, Lalley continued to direct the victim to conceal their sexual relationships and persuaded him to reach out to two other victims and direct them to do the same.
The sex romps reportedly took place at Lally’s home and at the Newark police station where he was employed.
http://www.wpix.com/news/wpix-newark-cop-charged-with-obstruction,0,2610520.story

IN AUSTRALIA THE POLICE(SMALL FISH) ARE CHARGED WHILE THE JUDGES AND POLITIONS(BIG FISH) CONTINUE THERE PAEDOPHILE PRACTICES

N.S.W. Police Service and the aftermath of the Royal Commission into the NSW Police Service and Paedophilia.
Paedophilia Case Development.

The Paedophile Case detailed in this Paper has been found to have been substantiated by a judgment of the NSW District Court on Monday 18th August 1997.

(This is despite the fact that the Police Royal Commission, Certain Journalists and the NSW Police Service itself appeared to be of the view that the allegations were unsubstantiated………….serious questions may now need to be asked concerning their previous efficacy and bonafides)
http://www.smuggled.com/nswpol1.htm

This Royal Commission, which lasted approximately two years, uncovered crimes and institutionalised corruption throughout the NSW Police Service (as it was then known) by a large number of officers, most notably detectives. This unexpected discovery by the Royal Commission led to a widening of its terms of reference to include the investigation of paedophilia and sex crimes outside the Police Service and implicated members of the legal fraternity(including Judges). However, critics of the Royal Commission argue that it should have had a wider terms of reference, namely the New South Wales Parliament and New South Wales Criminal Justice System but considering the political ramifications that would have resulted, this did not occur
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_South_Wales_Police_Force#Wood_Royal_Commission

SO BASICALLY THIS PAEDOPHILE RING IN THE AUSTRALIAN PARLIMENT AND JUSTICE SYSTEM WILL BE IGNORED AND COVERED UP

IN FRENCH POLITICS CHILD RAPE IS NO BIG DEAL!!! NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN!!

French minister in boy sex tourism claim

A senior aide to French President Nicolas Sarkozy defended Culture Minister Frederic Mitterrand who is facing calls for his resignation for having written about paying boys for sex.

“I got into the habit of paying for boys,” Mitterrand wrote, adding that his attraction to young male prostitutes continued even though he knew the sordid details of this traffic.
   
All these rituals of the market for youths, the slave market excited me enormously … the abundance of very attractive and immediately available young boys put me in a state of desire.”

“I have not heard Frederic Mitterrand say anything against France’s position of fighting sex tourism,” Guaino said.
   
Interior Minister Brice Hortefeux said Mitterrand was respected for his competence in the role of culture minister.

BELGIUM PAEDOPHILE RINGS

Belgian sex ring ‘ignored’
Tuesday, 22 January, 2002, 02:25 GMT
A Belgian television station has broadcast a clandestine interview with the paedophile murder suspect,Marc Dutroux, who is awaiting trial on charges of abducting, raping and killing four girls.
Dutroux was arrested in 1996 in a case which rocked the nation. Two of the children who he abducted starved to death in makeshift dungeons under his house.
In the interview with the Flemish-language station VTM Dutroux admitted locking up the girls but did not acknowledge responsibility for their deaths.

He also said he had been part of a wider paedophile network but said the justice system did not want to pursue it.
“There is a well-grounded [paedophile] ring,” he said. “I maintained regular contact with people in this ring. However, the law does not want to investigate this lead.”

Dutroux has already served time for a paedophile conviction. He was set free in 1992 after serving three years of a 13-year sentence for raping five girls.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/1774436.stm

SO it would seem , unless you think that all these countries are full of paedophiles,Liars , mass murderers and fraudsters that the institution of “”representative democracy ” itself  attracts and protects and enables this sort of individual

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/03/23/government-it-may-not-be-reliable-but-at-least-its-consistant-consistantly-corrupt/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/government-should-go-on-strike-to-prove-they-are-worth-thier-money/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/04/28/tony-blair-very-close-to-being-indicted-for-war-crime-in-malaysia/

IT SEEMS IT IS STILL GOING ON TODAY IN THE USA , AS WHISTLEBLOWERS SEEMED TO BE SILENCED

A speech given by Nancy Schaefer on Child Protection Services The System Can Not be trusted It does not serve The People of USA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TcDTJlPWbE&feature=player_embedded
Nancy Schaefer and her husband were found shot to death in their homes yesterday in what police are claiming is a murder/suicide. The corporate accounts of her death do not mention her efforts to expose the CPS as part of an illicit “Franklin Affair” style child trafficking ring.With Pedophilia bringing down the once-untouchable Vatican, “Franklin Affair” style child trafficking rings everywhere are in a panic, and may be “cleaning house” where necessary.

HERE IS THE PROPER RESPONSE TO PAEDOPHILES    DRASIUS KEYDS PUBLIC HERO!!!!!……..SHOOT THE BASTARDS , AND LET THE “LITHUANIAN” AUTHORITIES COVER IT UP!!

Lithuania: Father Kills Pedophile Judge and Senior Politician

A dad who shot dead a judge and a senior politician because they molested his three-year old daughter has become a national hero after going on the run in Lithuania.
Horrified Drasius Keyds, 37, gunned down the perverted pair on Monday after police turned a deaf ear to his pleas for justice for his tortured tot.
Now in hiding, Keyds has become a hero on YouTube and Facebook with hundreds of thousands of fans from all over the world pledging support.

“You are a hero to all of us,” reads one Facebook message. “What you did is nothing but justice.”

Mugs and t-shirts with his image on them have begun appearing alongside the logo “Drasius: Lone-avenger .Keyds’ nightmare began a year ago when daughter Deimantela told him about a meeting set up by his then fiancee with judge Jonas Furmanavicziusa and the Speaker of Lithuania’s parliament , Andrius Us.

The pair allegedly raped and abused the youngster who reported her ordeal to her father.

But a year long campaign for a police investigation failed when detectives told Keyds there was not enough evidence to proceed with a case.
Now the fugitive dad is being offered a safe haven in neighbouring countries like Poland

According to this blog, the Judge and the Politician were also Jewish.(Its not just the Catholics ,its an Abrahamic monotheist trend )

OF COURSE THE POLICE HAD PLENTY OF EVIDENCE THEY JUST DID NOT WANT TO CHARGE THE PAEDOPHILES, AS THEY WHERE THE POLITIONS , JUDGES AND THE POLICE

Lithaunian newspaper has reported on the 22 Jan 2010
that Europol (which employs 620 staff and is based in Hague)in years of 2007-2008 have passed over information to their Lithuanian collegues of over 5 thousand IP addresses that were downloading child abuse videos . However this information was left to rott because the heads of Lithunian justice system have seen that the pedofiles links lead to the courts, parliament and presidency palace.
PLEASE SUPPORT DRASIUS HERE
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Drasius-Kedys/159710653374

http://www.eutimes.net/2009/10/lithuania-father-kills-pedophile-judge-and-senior-politician/

BUT IT DOES SHOW THAT IF WE START SHOOTING THE PAEDOPHILES IN POWER , IT TOO WILL BE COVERED UP!!! THE LAST THING THE REPRESENTATIVE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS WANT IS THIS CAN OF WORMS OPENNED IN PUBLIC!!!!! …..IT WOULD MEAN THE END OF REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY!!!!  …AND GOOD RIDDENCE TO BAD RUBBISH I SAY!!!

SO MY ADVICE TO ANYONE IN THIS SITUATION IS ,TOO TRY TO GET JUSTICE THROUGH NON-VIOLENT “LEGAL” WAYS , BUT IF THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE ,JUST BLOW THE F*CKERS AWAY!!! THE CHANCES ARE YOU WILL GET AWAY WITH IT!!! AND IT WILL SCARE THE SH1T OUT OF THE ACTIVE PAEDOPHILES AND MAYBE STOP THEM OR AT LEAST MAKE THEM THINK TWICE BEFORE BUGGERING HIS NEXT LITTLE BOY!

 IMHO  THIS IS SELF DEFENCE AND THEREFORE JUSTIFIED!! AS A FATHER I BELIEVE IT IS THE FATHERS DUTY TO PROTECT HIS CHILDREN ,EVEN IF IT MEANS GIVING UP HIS OWN LIFE IN DOING SO!!!

TO THOSE THAT STILL BELIEVE IN THE NEED FOR “REPRESENTATIVE GOVERNMENT” PLEASE REGULARLY HAND YOU CHILDREN IN TO THIER AUTHORITIES , AS IF THEY ARE RAPING AND SODOMISING YOUR KIDS ,THEY ARE MORE LIKELY TO LEAVE MINE ALONE , I DO NOT BELIEVE IN REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY , I BELIEVE IN DIRECT DEMOCRACY!!!

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/01/14/a-direct-democracy-independant-scotland/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/11/04/libertarian-vs-authoritarian-todays-real-politic/

IT DOES NOT MATTER WHAT COUNTRY OR CULTURE , GOVERNMENT ,POLICE AND JUDICIAL SERVICES ATTRACT AND ENABLE PAEDOPHILES AS WELL AS OTHER CRIMINALS THAT SEEK POWER OVER PEOPLE. POWER CORRUPTS AND ABSOLUTE POWER ATTRACTS THE ABSOLUTELY CORRUPT AND CENCORSHIP ENABLES THEM!!!

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/03/31/pastors-of-muppets-and-masters-of-puppets-and-other-paedophiles/

It does not matter if it is secular or religious power. The only reason that paedophile priests are being hunted down like the rabid dogs they are , is because nobody fears for thier immortal souls anymore , most of us see Abrahamic monotheism in all its forms , Jewish , Christian and Moslum as the invented load of ignorant biggotted nonsense that it is. It is nothing more than original fascism ,invented to make slaves of free men and women .There is a BIG difference between knealing down and bending over, and the it is better to GIVE than RECIEVE as the church says…so are YOU bending over and recieving “gods” love , or does he prefer your kids?

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/02/the-invention-of-judaism/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/02/the-invention-of-christianity/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/02/the-invention-of-islam/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/03/02/the-greatest-hoax-ever-abrahamic-monotheism-is-it-really-just-satanism/

FOR MORE ON THE US GOVERNMENT PAEDOPHILE RINGS- THE FRANKLIN SCANDAL

http://www.franklinscandal.com/franklindocumentary/index.html

THE FRANKLIN SCANDAL: A Story of Powerbrokers, Child Abuse & Betrayal posted by [Redacted] on Monday,

November 9, 2009

THE FRANKLIN SCANDAL: A Story of Powerbrokers, Child Abuse & Betrayal
Jeff Long/Rock Creek Free Press
The FRANKLIN SCANDAL is the story of a nationwide pedophile ring that pandered children to a cabal of the rich and powerful. The ring’s pimps were a pair of political powerbrokers who used Boys Town as a pedophiliac reservoir, had access to the highest levels of our government, and connections to the CIA.

A tragic tale that tears at your heart and rips your soul, THE FRANKLIN SCANDAL is the true story of a child-pandering network and the masking of its very existence through a massive cover-up orchestrated from the utmost pinnacle of power—using the CIA, FBI, Secret Service and a corrupt judicial process.

This book shows how a major part of that cover-up was accomplished, how officers of the court suborned their duties … and afterwards were given promotions: one is a sitting federal judge.

The shocking disclosures begin at an old brick warehouse tied to the CIA and their front group, the Finders, in a seedy section of Washington, DC, progressing through the $40 million-dollar bust-out of a nondescript Midwestern credit union—with a fancy bedroom in its basement—and then back to a DC party house with hidden cameras. The alleged front man for the group was a rising star in the Republican party, Lawrence E. King. He opened the 1984 GOP national convention with a rousing rendition of the Star-Spangled Banner, and threw a party for 600 people that included cabinet officials and President Reagan’s daughter at Southfork Ranch—the swanky mansion used for the Dallas TV series.

After accounts of severe abuse told by the frightened children were squelched, a state legislative committee was formed to examine the alarming affair. The Nebraska legislators nearly exposed the ring in 1990, but its unveiling had the potential to produce seismic political aftershocks: a rash of deaths and a full court press by federal and local law enforcement effected an immaculate cover-up. Its lead investigator’s airplane mysteriously exploded in midair, his omnipresent briefcase went missing, and all of his investigative records were subpoenaed by the FBI two days later. With that the case was shut down—until now.

Journalist Nick Bryant has traveled over 40,000 miles and spent nearly seven years uncovering this authoritative history. He has had his life threatened, his cars searched, and his actions monitored.

Bryant located several of the young victims, who are now adults, and coaxed them to emerge from the shadows—some telling their story for the first time ever. The victims talk about flights all around the country, and there are hundreds of flight logs to back this up. The most frequent destination?

Washington, DC, the District of Criminals—to a party house wired for pictures and sound. State and federal grand juries in Nebraska and a grand jury in the District of Columbia played an integral role in the cover-up, and the author has had access to thousands of documents that would ultimately be sealed by two of the grand juries.

The media through either commission or omission also abetted the cover up of the trafficking network.

Various news organizations have attempted to break aspects of this story, but the reports have either been ignored or mysteriously shelved. ABC backed away from pursuing this story, while, conversely, CBS appears to have abetted its concealment—making it obvious that very powerful people have a vested interest in safeguarding this secret. In 1993, the Discovery Channel had contracted with British-based TV station, Yorkshire Television, to produce a documentary of this scandal for American television. It was due to air nationwide on the Discovery Channel on May 3, 1994, with advertisements in TV Guide, newspapers and inserts across the nation—but no one ever saw the program. Last minute and without explanation, it was pulled from the air. All known copies were destroyed due pressure applied through back room channels by influential members of Congress. Both Discovery Channel and Yorkshire Television had been reimbursed for their costs in the production of the documentary. In late 1995 however, Senator John DeCamp received by mail, anonymously, the only surviving pirated copy—it is now available on the internet for posterity.

Conspiracy of Silence: The Franklin Cover-Up

In addition to demonstrating breathtaking government corruption, THE FRANKLIN SCANDAL demonstrates that politicians, captains of industry, and media personalities are compromised. The approval rating of the United States Congress hit an historic low of 12% in October 2008, showing that the vast majority of citizens think the Congress is not serving us, the American people. The Franklin Scandal shows a reason why. There is another checks-and-balances system in effect—one that has been hidden from the public: blackmail.

YES YOUR REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL IS PROBABLY BLACKMAILED! IF HE WAS NOT ,HE WOULD BE ABLE TO EXPOSE THE ONES WHO ARE!!!

Bryant also tracked down members of the sex ring, and persuaded them to talk. Conducting hundreds of hours of interviews and digesting thousands of documents, Bryant has written the definitive narrative of our country’s most suppressed scandal. More than just an exposé, this is also an amazing chronicle of courage, faith, and fortitude amidst great betrayal. Bryant brings this explosive report directly to the court of public opinion, in search of justice for the devastated children and consequences for those who have helped to perpetuate this horror. This book is a wake-up call for everyone who cares about children … and our Republic.

For additional information please visit FranklinScandal.com. For a preview of Nick Bryant’s upcoming documentary, visit aDangerousMovie.com. The publisher is donating 50% of the book’s proceeds to organizations that assist abused children.

http://redactednews.blogspot.com/2009/11/franklin-scandal-story-of-powerbrokers.html

About the Author – Nick Bryant’s writing has recurrently focused on the plight of disadvantaged children in the United States, and he’s been published in numerous national journals, including the Journal of Professional Ethics, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, Journal of Social Distress and Homelessness, Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, and Journal of School Health. He is the co-author of America’s Children: Triumph of Tragedy, addressing the medical and developmental problems of lower socioeconomic children in America.

US News and World Report
The only mainstream press available about the CIA front group the Finders.

Conspiracy of Silence – John Decamp – The Franklin Cover-Up Scandal

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5333564964072795934#

http://www.franklinscandal.com/franklindocumentary/index.html

The Press links

http://www.francesfarmersrevenge.com/stuff/archive/oldnews2/boystown/franklinarchive.htm

http://www.francesfarmersrevenge.com/stuff/archive/oldnews2/boystown/WTpage1.gif

http://www.francesfarmersrevenge.com/stuff/archive/oldnews2/boystown/WTpage2.gif

http://www.francesfarmersrevenge.com/stuff/archive/oldnews2/boystown/spencearrestedsmall.gif

http://www.francesfarmersrevenge.com/stuff/archive/oldnews2/boystown/luridkingsmall.gif

http://www.francesfarmersrevenge.com/stuff/archive/oldnews2/boystown/

Franklin Scandal the movie

http://www.franklinscandal.com/cos/

YES OUR POLITIONS ARE BEING BLACKMAILED AND ARE THE BLACKMAILERS . THE US GOVERNMENT PIMPS OUT KIDS FOR FUN AND PROFIT AND BLACKMAIL

Snooping on Allies Embarrasses U.S.

The Clinton camp ducks alleged bugging of Seattle summit, Insight discovers State Department ‘pimp’ account and foreign embassies express shock about FBI-led espionage caper.  Blackmail, lies and deceit may be the only fitting description of    the 1993 Seattle Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, or APEC, summit where dignitaries from 17 countries are reported to have been placed under electronic surveillance by American agents. As Insight first reported last month, the Clinton administration is said by intelligence and security specialists — who admitted being involved — to have bugged the conclave and then provided classified secrets to the Democratic National Committee, or DNC (See “Sex, Spies and Videotape at Clinton’s APEC Summit,” Sept.29). This in turn allegedly was used as bait to barter with potential big-buck donors for large contributions to the Democratic coffers, sources in and out of government claim. . . . .       . . . . Insight also detailed in earlier reports a series of alleged criminal activities, including the procuring of boys to engage in sexual activities with diplomats; FBI agents accepting thousands of dollars of kickbacks; and, the most serious offense, the White House providing top-secret trade information to two West Coast law firms working off the books for the DNC.
       . . . . The covert mission was so large that the government purchased about $250,000 in electronic surveillance equipment, including Konica cameras, from at least three private suppliers, according to classified records reviewed by Insight. American spies then collected raw economic data on Asian businesses through agents of the FBI, the Customs Service, Naval Intelligence, the Air Force Office of Special Investigations, the NSC, and the National Security Agency, or NSA, sources say.
   . . . . The FBI is believed to have bugged more than 300 locations, with electronic audio and video surveillance devices used to monitor 10,000 to 15,000 conversations — much of it real-time data that was bounced from satellites to the NSA.      . . . . Larry Klayman, executive director of Judicial Watch, a private legal watchdog group suing the Commerce Department for trade records, suggests the bugging may be related to a possible surveillance operation on the late commerce secretary Ron Brown,suspected of taking bribes involving Vietnam contracts. But that alone doesn’t explain how the DNC could have ended up with top-secret information.
   . . . . Ironically, Clinton boasted that this summit was based on a new spirit of trust in U.S. relations with Canada, Australia, Brunei, China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, New Zealand, the Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Mexico and Papua New Guinea. Little wonder that exposure by Insight of this covert mission has been met with outrage around the world.
               . . . . Many embassies of the targeted nations asked if Insight knew who was compromised by the child-sex ring. No senior political leader was involved –it was “secondary” people, such as assistants to those responsible for cutting trade deals, intelligence sources say. It still is unclear who provided the boys to the dignitaries, but Insight has learned that the alleged sexual activities occurred in rooms at the West Coast Vance Hotel in Seattle.
   . . . . When Pete Shimondale, the general manager of the hotel, was asked by Insight about the sexual allegations, he responded, “Oh God. I didn’t start here until 1994.” He said authorities have not been out to question him or review records of hotel guests but declined to comment further.
    . . . . The boys are believed to have been 15 to 17 years old. As shocking as this may be, some say it’s routine. A former Bush economic adviser observes, “The sex? That’s done all the time. If a foreign diplomat wants a companion, the State Department provides it. It doesn’t matter if it’s a man or woman. They have a special fund set up for that.” Another former NSC official who requested anonymity says other countries also do it. “I was offered every sexual favor you can imagine. I turned it down all the time. After  a while they left me alone and stopped offering me.”

     . . . . The operation was approved by the “Secret Court,” which clears such national-security operations, according to intelligence specialists. This court legally may authorize wiretapping, and all its writs and rulings are permanently sealed.

     . . . . In fact, monitoring of G-7 economic summits under prior administrations was approved through the Secret Court, says a former National Security Council official under Reagan,

 BUT WHO WATCHS THE WATCHMEN?

IT SEEMS THE ISRAELIS…….

24 December 2001

According to Fox News, “virtually all records and billing in the U.S. are done for the telephone companies by Amdocs Ltd., an Israeli-based private telecommunication company, contracting with the 25 biggest phone companies in America, and more worldwide,” said Fox chief political correspondent Carl Cameron in a four-part series—the video and transcript content of which were removed from Fox’s website

Fox News, beginning mid-December, reported a four-part series on alleged Israeli spying on the US telecommunication systems through firms which provide telephone billing and assist FBI wiretaps. Recently the series was withdrawn by Fox News without explanation. The series has been recovered from private archives for publication here.

“It is virtually impossible [for any U.S. citizen] to make a call on normal phones without generating an (Israel-based) Amdocs record of it,” said Fox’s Carl Cameron in part I of his special investigation of Israeli spying in America before and after the September 11 attacks,

The U.S. law enforcement wiretaps, authorized by the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA), appear to have been breached by organized crime units working inside Israel and the Israeli intelligence service, Mossad.
 The spy ring enabled criminals to use reverse wiretaps against U.S. intelligence and law enforcement operations. The illegal monitoring may have resulted in the deaths of several informants and reportedly spoiled planned anti-drug raids on crime syndicates

BUT NO LEGAL ACTION WILL BE TAKEN AGAINST THEM………………ITS THE LAW

The Senate voted today to approve the House version of the new Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) bill, “President Bush’s Surveillance Program,” and retroactive telephone company immunity from civil and/or criminal lawsuits for past compliance with presidential directives to eavesdrop on electronic communications of American citizens without a warrant.

THIS COULD EXPLAIN THE STRENGTH OF THE ISRAEL LOBBY

THE UK ISRAEL LOBBY

Inside Britain’s Israel Lobby [1/2]

Dispatches investigates one of the most powerful and influential political lobbies in Britain, which is working in support of the interests of the State of Israel.

Despite wielding great influence among the highest realms of British politics and media, little is known about the individuals and groups which collectively are known as the pro-Israel lobby.
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=7fd_1258474918

UK Government does what its Israelli masters tell it again

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/12/17/uk-government-does-what-its-israelli-masters-tell-it-again/

THIS WOULD WORK JUST AS WELL FOR ANY LOBBY GROUP OR POLITICAL OR RELIGIOUS MEGALOMANIAC FANATICAL GROUP!


The Global Political Awakening and the New World Order

July 6, 2010

We WE are in the midst of the most explosive development in all of human history. Humanity is experiencing a simultaneously opposing and conflicting geopolitical transition, the likes of which has never before been anticipated or experienced. Historically, the story of humanity has been the struggle between the free-thinking individual and structures of power controlled by elites that seek to dominate land, resources and people. The greatest threat to elites at any time – historically and presently – is an awakened, critically thinking and politically stimulated populace. This threat has manifested itself throughout history, in different places and at different times. Ideas of freedom, democracy, civil and human rights, liberty and equality have emerged in reaction and opposition to power structures and elite systems of control.

The greatest triumphs of the human mind – whether in art, science or thought – have arisen out of and challenged great systems of power and control. The greatest of human misery and tragedy has arisen out of the power structures and systems that elites always seek to construct and manage. War, genocide,persecution and human degradation are directly the result of decisions made by those who control the apparatus of power, whether the power manifests itself as intellectual, ecclesiastical, spiritual, militaristic, or scientific. The most malevolent and ruthless power is that over the free human mind: if one controls how one thinks, they control the individual itself. The greatest human achievements are where individuals have broken free the shackles that bind the mind and let loose the inherent and undeniable power that lies in each and every individual on this small little planet.

Currently, our world is at the greatest crossroads our species has ever experienced. We are in the midst of the first truly global political awakening, in which for the first time in all of human history, all of mankind is politically awakened and stirring; in which whether inadvertently or intentionally, people are thinking and acting in political terms. This awakening is most evident in the developing world, having been made through personal experience to be acutely aware of the great disparities, disrespect, and domination inherent in global power structures. The awakening is spreading increasingly to the west itself, as the majority of the people living in the western developed nations are thrown into poverty and degradation. The awakening will be forced upon all people all over the world. Nothing, no development, ever in human history, has posed such a monumental threat to elite power structures.

This awakening is largely driven by the Technological Revolution, which through technology and electronics, in particular mass media and the internet, have made it so that people across the world are able to become aware of global issues and gain access to information from around the world. The Technological Revolution, thus, has fostered an Information Revolution which has, in turn, fed the global political awakening.

Simultaneously, the Technological Revolution has led to another unique and unprecedented development in human history, and one that is diametrically opposed, yet directly related to the global political awakening. For the first time in human history, free humanity is faced with the dominating threat of a truly global elite, who have at their hands the technology to impose a truly global system of control: a global scientific dictatorship. The great danger is that through the exponential growth in scientific techniques, elites will use these great new powers to control and dominate all of humanity in such a way that has never before been experienced.

Through all of human history, tyrants have used coercive force and terror to control populations. With the Technological Revolution, elites increasingly have the ability to control the very biology and psychology of the individual to a point where it may not be necessary to impose a system of terror, but rather where the control is implemented on a much deeper, psychological, subliminal and individual biological manner. While terror can prevent people from opposing power for a while, the scientific dictatorship can create a personal psycho-social condition in which the individual comes to love his or her own slavery; in which, like a mentally inferior pet, they are made to love their leaders and accept their servitude.

So we are presented with a situation in which humanity is faced with both the greatest threat and the greatest hope that we have ever collectively experienced in our short human history. This essay, the third part in the series, “The Technological Revolution and the Future of Freedom,” examines the ideas behind the global scientific dictatorship, and how it may manifest itself presently and in the future, with a particular focus on the emergence of ‘new eugenics’ as a system of mass control.

Free humanity faces the most monumental decision we have ever been presented with: do we feed and fuel the global political awakening into a true human psycho-social revolution of the mind, creating a new global political economy which empowers and liberates all of humanity; or… do we fall silently into a ‘brave new world’ of a global scientific oppression, the likes of which have never before been experienced, and whose dominance would never be more difficult to challenge and overcome?

We can either find a true freedom, or descend into a deep despotism. We are not powerless before this great ideational beast. We have, at our very fingertips the ability to use technology to our benefit and to re-shape the world so that it benefits the people of the world and not simply the powerful. It must be freedom for all or freedom for none.

What is the ‘Scientific Dictatorship’?

In 1932, Aldous Huxley wrote his dystopian novel, “Brave New World,” in which he looked at the emergence of the scientific dictatorships of the future. In his 1958 essay, “Brave New World Revisited,” Huxley examined how far the world had come in that short period since his book was published, and where the world was heading. Huxley wrote that:

In politics the equivalent of a fully developed scientific theory or philosophical system is a totalitarian dictatorship. In economics, the equivalent of a beautifully composed work of art is the smoothly running factory in which the workers are perfectly adjusted to the machines. The Will to Order can make tyrants out of those who merely aspire to clear up a mess. The beauty of tidiness is used as a justification for despotism.[1]

Huxley explained that, “The future dictator’s subjects will be painlessly regimented by a corps of highly trained social engineers,” and he quotes one “advocate of this new science” as saying that, “The challenge of social engineering in our time is like the challenge of technical engineering fifty years ago. If the first half of the twentieth century was the era of technical engineers, the second half may well be the era of social engineers.” Thus, proclaims Huxley, “The twenty-first century, I suppose, will be the era of World Controllers, the scientific caste system and Brave New World.”[2]

In 1952, Bertrand Russell, a British philosopher, historian, mathematician, and social critic wrote the book, “The Impact of Science on Society,” in which he warned and examined how science, and the technological revolution, was changing and would come to change society. In his book, Russell explained that:

I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is mass psychology. Mass psychology is, scientifically speaking, not a very advanced study… This study is immensely useful to practical men, whether they wish to become rich or to acquire the government. It is, of course, as a science, founded upon individual psychology, but hitherto it has employed rule-of-thumb methods which were based upon a kind of intuitive common sense. Its importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda. Of these the most influential is what is called ‘education’. Religion plays a part, though a diminishing one; the Press, the cinema and the radio play an increasing part.

What is essential in mass psychology is the art of persuasion. If you compare a speech of Hitler’s with a speech of (say) Edmund Burke, you will see what strides have been made in the art since the eighteenth century. What went wrong formerly was that people had read in books that man is a rational animal, and framed their arguments on this hypothesis. We now know that limelight and a brass band do more to persuade than can be done by the most elegant train of syllogisms. It may be hoped that in time anybody will be able to persuade anybody of anything if he can catch the patient young and is provided by the State with money and equipment.

This subject will make great strides when it is taken up by scientists under a scientific dictatorship.[3]Russell went on to analyze the question of whether a ‘scientific dictatorship’ is more stable than a democracy, on which he postulated:

Apart from the danger of war, I see no reason why such a regime should be unstable. After all, most civilised and semi-civilised countries known to history have had a large class of slaves or serfs completely subordinate to their owners. There is nothing in human nature that makes the persistence of such a system impossible. And the whole development of scientific technique has made it easier than it used to be to maintain a despotic rule of a minority. When the government controls the distribution of food, its power is absolute so long as it can count on the police and the armed forces. And their loyalty can be secured by giving them some of the privileges of the governing class. I do not see how any internal movement of revolt can ever bring freedom to the oppressed in a modern scientific dictatorship.[4]

Drawing on the concept popularized by Aldous Huxley – of people loving their servitude – Bertrand Russell explained that under a scientific dictatorship:

It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even in  totalitarian countries. Fichte laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished… Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible. Even if all are miserable, all will believe themselves happy, because the government will tell them that they are so.[5]

Russell explained that, “The completeness of the resulting control over opinion depends in various ways upon scientific technique. Where all children go to school, and all schools are controlled by the government, the authorities can close the minds of the young to everything contrary to official orthodoxy.”[6] Russell later proclaimed in his book that, “a scientific world society cannot be stable unless there is a world government.”[7] He elaborated:

Unless there is a world government which secures universal birth control, there must be from time to time great wars, in which the penalty of defeat is widespread death by starvation. That is exactly the present state of the world, and some may hold that there is no reason why it should not continue for centuries. I do not myself believe that this is possible. The two great wars that we have experienced have lowered the level of civilization in many parts of the world, and the next is pretty sure to achieve much more in this direction. Unless, at some stage, one power or group of powers emerges victorious and proceeds to establish a single government of the world with a monopoly of armed force, it is clear that the level of civilization must continually decline until scientific warfare becomes impossible – that is until science is extinct.[8]

Russell explains that eugenics plays a central feature in the construction of any world government scientific dictatorship, stating that, “Gradually, by selective breeding, the congenital differences between rulers and ruled will increase until they become almost different species. A revolt of the plebs would become as unthinkable as an organized insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton.”[9]

In a 1962 speech at UC Berkeley, Aldous Huxley spoke about the real world becoming the ‘Brave New World’ nightmare he envisaged. Huxley spoke primarily of the ‘Ultimate Revolution’ that focuses on ‘behavioural controls’ of people. Huxley said of the ‘Ultimate Revolution’:

In the past, we can say, that all revolutions have essentially aimed at changing the environment in order to change the individual. There’s been the political revolution, the economic revolution . . . the religious revolution. All these aimed as I say not directly at the human being but at his surroundings, so by modifying his surroundings you did achieve – at one remove – an effect upon the human being.

Today, we are faced, I think, with the approach of what may be called the ‘Ultimate Revolution’ – the ‘Final Revolution’ – where man can act directly on the  mind-body of his fellows. Well needless to say some kind of direct action on human mind-bodies has been going on since the beginning of time, but this has generally been of a violent nature. The techniques of terrorism have been known from time immemorial, and people have employed them with more-or-less ingenuity, sometimes with utmost crudity, sometimes with a good deal of skill acquired with a process of trial and error – finding out what the best ways of using torture, imprisonments, constraints of various kinds . . .

If you are going to control any population for any length of time, you must have some measure of consent. It’s exceedingly difficult to see how pure terrorism can function indefinitely, it can function for a fairly long time; but sooner or later you have to bring in an element of persuasion, an element of getting people to consent to what is happening to them.

Well it seems to me the nature of the Ultimate Revolution with which we are now faced is precisely this: that we are in process of developing a whole series of techniques, which will enable the controlling oligarchy – who have always existed and will presumably always exist – to get people to love their servitude. This is the ultimate in malevolent revolution…

There seems to be a general movement in the direction of this kind of Ultimate Control, this method of control, by which people can be made to enjoy a state of affairs by which any decent standard they ought not to enjoy; the enjoyment of servitude . . .

I am inclined to think that the scientific dictatorships of the future – and I think there are going to be scientific dictatorships in many parts of the world – will be probably a good deal nearer to the Brave New World pattern than to the 1984 pattern. They will be a good deal nearer, not because of any humanitarian qualms in the scientific dictators, but simply because the ‘brave new world’ pattern is probably a good deal more efficient than the other. That if you can get people to consent to the state of affairs in which they are living – the state of servitude – if you can do this, then you are likely to have a much more stable, a much more lasting society; much more easily controllable society than you would if you were relying wholly on clubs, and firing squads and concentration camps.[10]

In 1961, President Eisenhower delivered his farewell address to the nation in which he warned of the dangers to democracy posed by the military-industrial complex: the interconnected web of industry, the military, and politics creating the conditions for constant war. In that same speech, Eisenhower warned America and the world of another important change in society:

Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been overshadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research.

Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers.

The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present – and is gravely to be regarded.

Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.[11]

In 1970, Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote about “the gradual appearance of a more controlled and directed society,” in the “technetronic revolution”; explaining:

Such a society would be dominated by an elite whose claim to political power would rest on allegedly superior scientific know-how. Unhindered by the restraints of traditional liberal values, this elite would not hesitate to achieve its political ends by using the latest modern techniques for influencing public behavior and keeping society under close surveillance and control. Under such circumstances, the scientific and technological momentum of the country would not be reversed but would actually feed on the situation it exploits.[12]

New Eugenics

Many sciences and large social movements are directed by the same foundations and money that financed the eugenics movement in the early 20th century. The Rockefeller foundations, Ford, Carnegie, Mellon, Harriman, and Morgan money that flowed into eugenics led directly to ‘scientific racism,’ and ultimately the Holocaust in World War II.[13] Following the Holocaust, Hitler had discredited the eugenics movement he admired so much in America. So the movement branched off into forming several other social engineering projects: population control, genetics, and environmentalism. The same foundations that laid the foundations for eugenic ideology – the belief in a biological superiority and right to rule (justifying their power) – then laid the foundations for these and other new social and scientific movements.

Major environmental and conservation organizations were founded with Rockefeller and Ford Foundation money,[14] which then continued to be central sources of funding to this day; while the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) was founded in 1961 by Sir Julian Huxley, Aldous Huxley’s brother, who was also the President of the British Eugenics Society. Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands became the organization’s first president. Prince Bernhard also happened to be one of the founders of the elite global think tank, the Bilderberg Group, which he co-founded in 1954; and he was previous to that, a member of the Nazi Party and an SS officer.[15] Sir Julian Huxley also happened to be the first Director-General of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO). In 1946, Huxley wrote a paper titled, “UNESCO: It’s Purpose and its Philosophy.” In it, he wrote that the general focus of UNESCO:

is to help the emergence of a single world culture, with its own philosophy and background of ideas, and with its own broad purpose. This is opportune, since this is the first time in history that the scaffolding and the mechanisms for world unification have become available, and also the first time that man has had the means (in the shape of scientific discovery and its applications) of laying a world-wide foundation for the minimum physical welfare of the entire human species…[16]

At the moment, it is probable that the indirect effect of civilisation is dysgenic instead of eugenic; and in any case it seems likely that the dead weight of genetic stupidity, physical weakness, mental instability, and disease-proneness, which already exist in the human species, will prove too great a burden for real progress to be achieved. Thus even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for Unesco to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable…[17]

Still another and quite different type of borderline subject is that of eugenics. It has been on the borderline between the scientific and the unscientific, constantly in danger of becoming a pseudo- science based on preconceived political ideas or on assumptions of racial or class superiority and inferiority. It is, however, essential that eugenics should be brought entirely within the borders of science, for, as already indicated, in the not very remote future the problem of improving the average quality of human beings is likely to become urgent; and this can only be accomplished by applying the findings of a truly scientific eugenics…[18]

It is worth pointing out that the applications of science at once bring us up against social problems of various sorts. Some of these are direct and obvious. Thus the application of genetics in eugenics immediately raises the question of values- what qualities should we desire to encourage in the human beings of the future?[19]

On page 6 of the UNESCO document, Sir Julian Huxley wrote that, “in order to carry out its work, an organisation such as Unesco needs not only a set of general aims and objects for itself, but also a working philosophy, a working hypothesis concerning human existence and its aims and objects, which will dictate, or at least indicate, a definite line of approach to its problems.”[20] While much of the language of equality and education sounds good and benevolent, it is based upon a particular view of humanity as an irrational, emotionally driven organism which needs to be controlled. Thus, the ‘principle of equality’ becomes “The Fact of Inequality”:

Finally we come to a difficult problem-that of discovering how we can reconcile our principle of human equality with the biological fact of human inequality… The democratic principle of equality, which is also Unesco’s, is a principle of equality of opportunity-that human beings should be equal before the law, should have equal opportunities for education, for making a living, for freedom of expression and movement and thought. The biological absence of equality, on the other hand, concerns the natural endowments of man and the fact of genetic difference in regard to them.

There are instances of biological inequality which are so gross that they cannot be reconciled at all with the principle of equal opportunity. Thus low-grade mental defectives cannot be offered equality of educational opportunity, nor are the insane equal with the sane before the law or in respect of most freedoms. However, the full implications of the fact of human inequality have not often been drawn and certainly need to be brought out here, as they are very relevant to Unesco’s task.[21]

Many of these “genetic inequalities” revolve around the idea of intellectual superiority: the idea that there is no equality among the intellectually inferior and superior. That inequality is derived from human biology – from genetics; it is a “human fact.” It just so happens that elites who propagate this ideology, also happen to view the masses as intellectually inferior; thus, there can be no social equality in a world with a technological intellectual elite. So eugenics must be employed, as the UENSCO paper explains, to address the issues of raising human welfare to a manageable level; that the time will come where elites will need to address the whole of humanity as a single force, and with a single voice. Eugenics is about the social organization and control of humanity. Ultimately, eugenics is about the engineering of inequality. In genetics, elites found a way to take discrimination down to the DNA.

Genetics as Eugenics

Award-winning author and researcher, Edwin Black, wrote an authoritative history of eugenics in his book, “War Against the Weak,” in which he explained that,

“the incremental effort to transform eugenics into human genetics forged an entire worldwide infrastructure,” with the founding of the Institute for Human Genetics in Copenhagen in 1938, led by Tage Kemp, a Rockefeller Foundation eugenicist, and was financed with money from the Rockefeller Foundation.[22] While not abandoning the eugenics goals, the new re-branded eugenics movement “claimed to be eradicating poverty and saving the environment.”[23]

In a 2001 issue of Science Magazine, Garland Allen, a scientific historian, wrote about genetics as a modern form of eugenics. He began by citing a 1998 article in Time Magazine which proclaimed that, “Personality, temperament, even life choices. New studies show it’s mostly in your genes.” Garland explains the implications:

Coat-tailing on major advances in genetic biotechnology, these articles portray genetics as the new “magic bullet” of biomedical science that will solve many of our recurrent social problems. The implication is that these problems are largely a result of the defective biology of individuals or even racial or ethnic groups. If aggressive or violent behavior is in the genes, so the argument goes, then the solution lies in biomedical intervention–gene therapy in the distant future and pharmacotherapy (replacing the products of defective genes with drug substitutes) in the immediate future.

By promoting such claims, are we heading toward a new version of eugenics? Are we getting carried away with the false promise of a technological fix for problems that really lie in the structure of our society? My answer to these questions is “yes,” but with some important qualifications that derive from the different historical and social contexts of the early 1900s and the present…

The term eugenics was coined in 1883 by the Victorian polymath Francis Galton, geographer, statistician, and first cousin of Charles Darwin. It meant to him “truly- or well-born,” and referred to a plan to encourage the “best people” in society to have more children (positive eugenics) and to discourage or prevent the “worst elements” of society from having many, if any, children (negative eugenics). Eugenics became solidified into a movement in various countries throughout the world in the first three decades of the 20th century, but nowhere more solidly than in the United States and, after World War I, in Germany.[24]

While genetic traits such as eye colour and the like were proven to be hereditary, “eugenicists were more interested in the inheritance of social behaviors, intelligence, and personality.” Further:

American eugenicists also strove to disseminate the results of eugenic research to the public and to lawmakers. They supported the idea of positive eugenics [encouraging the ‘best’ to become better], but focused most of their energies on negative eugenics [to encourage the ‘worst’ to become fewer]. Eugenicists wrote hundreds of articles for popular magazines, published dozens of books for the general (and some for the scientific) reader, prepared exhibits for schools and state fairs, made films, and wrote sermons and novels.[25]

American eugenicists, fully backed by the financial support of the major American philanthropic fortunes, passed eugenics legislation in over 27 states across the United States, often in the form of forced sterilizations for the mentally ‘inferior’, so that, “By the 1960s, when most of these laws were beginning to be repealed, more than 60,000 people had been sterilized for eugenic purposes.” As Garland Allen wrote:

For the wealthy benefactors that supported eugenics, such as the Carnegie, Rockefeller, Harriman, and Kellogg philanthropies, eugenics provided a means of social control in a period of unprecedented upheaval and violence. It was these same economic elites and their business interests who introduced scientific management and organizational control into the industrial sector…

[In 1994] we saw the resurrection of claims that there are genetic differences in intelligence between races, leading to different socio-economic status.Claims about the genetic basis for criminality, manic depression, risk-taking, alcoholism, homosexuality, and a host of other behaviors have also been rampant in scientific and especially popular literature. Much of the evidence for such claims is as controversial today as in the past.

We seem to be increasingly unwilling to accept what we view as imperfection in ourselves and others. As health care costs skyrocket, we are coming to accept a bottom-line, cost-benefit analysis of human life. This mind-set has serious implications for reproductive decisions. If a health maintenance organization (HMO) requires in utero screening, and refuses to cover the birth or care of a purportedly “defective” child, how close is this to eugenics? If gene or drug therapy is substituted for improving our workplace or school environments, our diets and our exercise practices, how close is this to eugenics? Significant social changes are expensive, however. If eugenics means making reproductive decisions primarily on the basis of social cost, then we are well on that road.[26]

Genetics unleash an unprecedented power into human hands: the power of unnatural creation and the manipulation of biology. We do not yet fully understand nor comprehend the implications of genetic manipulation in our food, plants, animals, and in humans, themselves. What is clear is that we are changing the very biology of our environment and ourselves in it. While there are many clear and obvious benefits to genetic technology, such as the ability to enhance ailing senses (sight, hearing, etc.) and cure diseases, the positive must be examined and discussed with the negative repercussions of genetic manipulation so as to better direct the uses of this powerful technology.

Debates on issues such as stem-cell research and genetic manipulation often focus on a science versus religion aspect, where science seeks to benevolently cure mankind of its ailments and religion seeks to preserve the sanctity of ‘creation’. This is an irrational and narrow manner to conduct a real debate on this monumental issue, painting the issue as black and white, which it most certainly is not. Science can be used for good as well as bad, and human history, most especially that of the 20th century, is nothing if not evidence for that fact. Incredible scientific ingenuity went into the creation of great weapons;the manipulation of the atom to kill millions in an instant, or the manufacturing of biological and chemical weapons. The problem with the interaction of science and power is that with such great power comes the temptation to use and abuse it. If the ability to create a weapon like an atom bomb seems possible, most certainly there are those who seek to make it probable. Where there is temptation, there is human weakness.

So while genetics can be used for benevolent purposes and for the betterment of humankind, so too can it be used to effectively create a biological caste system, where in time it would be feasible to see a break in the human race, where as human advancement technologies become increasingly available, their use is reserved to the elite so that there comes a time where there is a biological separation in the human species. Oliver Curry, an evolutionary theorist from the London School of Economics predicted that “the human race will have reached its physical peak by the year 3000” and that, “The human race will one day split into two separate species, an attractive, intelligent ruling elite and an underclass of dim-witted, ugly goblin-like creatures.”[27] Such was the plot of H.G. Wells’ classic book, “The Time Machine,” who was himself, a prominent eugenicist at the turn of the 20th century. While this would be a long time from now, its potential results from the decisions we make today.

Population Control as Eugenics

Not only was the field of genetics born of eugenics, and heavily financed by the same monied-interests that seek social control; but so too was the field of population control. In environmental literature and rhetoric, one concept that has emerged over the years as playing a significant part is that of population control. Population is seen as an environmental issue because the larger the population, the more resources it consumes and land it occupies. In this concept, the more people there are the worse the environment becomes. Thus, programs aimed at controlling population growth are often framed in an environmentalist lens. There is also a distinctly radical element in this field, which views population growth not simply as an environmental concern, but which frames people, in general, as a virus that must be eradicated if the earth is to survive.
 
However, in the view of elites, population control is more about controlling the people than saving the environment. Elites have always been drawn to population studies that have, in many areas, helped construct their worldview. Concerns about population growth really took hold with Thomas Malthus at the end of the 18th century. In 1798, Malthus wrote a “theory on the nature of poverty,” and he “called for population control by moral restraint,” citing charity as a promotion of “generation-to-generation poverty and simply made no sense in the natural scheme of human progress.” Thus, the idea of ‘charity’ became immoral. The eugenics movement attached itself to Malthus’ theory regarding the “rejection of the value of helping the poor.”[28]

The ideas of Malthus, and later Herbert Spencer and Charles Darwin were remolded into branding an elite ideology of “Social Darwinism”, which was “the notion that in the struggle to survive in a harsh world, many humans were not only less worthy, many were actually destined to wither away as a rite of progress. To preserve the weak and the needy was, in essence, an unnatural act.”[29] This theory simply justified the immense wealth, power and domination of a small elite over the rest of humanity, as that elite saw themselves as the only truly intelligent beings worthy of holding such power and privilege.

Francis Galton later coined the term “eugenics” to describe this emerging field. His followers believed that the ‘genetically unfit’ “would have to be wiped away,” using tactics such as, “segregation, deportation, castration, marriage prohibition, compulsory sterilization, passive euthanasia – and ultimately extermination.”[30] The actual science of eugenics was lacking extensive evidence, and ultimately Galton “hoped to recast eugenics as a religious doctrine,” which was “to be taken on faith without proof.”[31]

As the quest to re-brand “eugenics” was under way, a 1943 edition of Eugenical News published an article titled “Eugenics After the War,” which cited Charles Davenport, a major founder and progenitor of eugenics, in his vision of “a new mankind of biological castes with master races in control and slave races serving them.”[32] A 1946 article in Eugenical News stated that, “Population, genetics, [and] psychology, are the three sciences to which the eugenicist must look for the factual material on which to build an acceptable philosophy of eugenics and to develop and defend practical eugenics proposals.”[33]

In the post-war period, emerging in the 1950s and going into the 1960s, the European colonies were retracting as nations of the ‘Third World’ were gaining political independence. This reinforced support for population control in many circles, as “For those who benefited most from the global status quo, population control measures were a far more palatable alternative to ending Third World poverty or promoting genuine economic development.”[34]

In 1952, “John D. Rockefeller 3rd convened a group of scientists to discuss the implications of the dramatic demographic change. They met in Williamsburg, Virginia, under the auspices of the National Academy of Sciences, and after two and a half days agreed on the need for a new institution that could provide solid science to guide governments and individuals in addressing population questions.”[35] That new institution was to become the Population Council. Six of the Council’s ten founding members were eugenicists.[36]

According to the Population Council’s website, it “did not itself espouse any form of population policy. Instead, through grants to individuals and institutions, it invested in strengthening the indigenous capacity of countries and regions to conduct population research and to develop their own policies.

The Council also funded seminal work in U.S. universities and further developed its own in-house research expertise in biomedicine, public health, and social science.”[37]

In 2008, Matthew Connelly, a professor at Columbia University, wrote a book called, “Fatal Misconception: The Struggle to Control World Population,” in which he critically analyzes the history of the population control movement. He documents the rise of the field through the eugenics movement:

In 1927 a Rockefeller-funded study of contraception sought “some simple measure which will be available for the wife of the slum-dweller, the peasant, or the coolie, though dull of mind.” In 1935 one representative told India’s Council of State that population control was a necessity for the masses, adding that “it is not what they want, but what is good for them.” The problem with the natives was that “they are born too much and they don’t die enough,” a public-health official in French Indochina stated in 1936.[38]

Connelly’s general thesis was “how some people have long tried to redesign world population by reducing the fertility of other’s.” Further: Connelly examines population control as a global transnational movement because its main advocates and practitioners aimed to reduce world population through global governance and often viewed national governments as a means to this end. Fatal Misconceptions is therefore an intricate account of networks of influential individuals, international organizations, NGOs, and national governments.[39]

As one review in the Economist pointed out, “Much of the evil done in the name of slowing population growth had its roots in an uneasy coalition between feminists, humanitarians and environmentalists, who wished to help the unwillingly fecund, and the racists, eugenicists and militarists who wished to see particular patterns of reproduction, regardless of the desires of those involved.” The Economist further wrote:

As the world population soared, the population controllers came to believe they were fighting a war, and there would be collateral damage. Millions of intra-uterine contraceptive devices were exported to poor countries although they were known to cause infections and sterility. “Perhaps the individual patient is expendable in the general scheme of things,” said a participant at a conference on the devices organised in 1962 by the Population Council, a research institute founded by John D. Rockefeller, “particularly if the infection she acquires is sterilising but not lethal.” In 1969 Robert McNamara, then president of the World Bank, said he was reluctant to finance health care “unless it was very strictly related to population control, because usually health facilities contributed to the decline of the death rate, and thereby to the population explosion.”[40]

A review in the New York Review of Books pointed out that this movement coincided a great deal with the feminist movement in advancing women’s reproductive rights. However, “these benefits were seen by many US family planning officials as secondary to the goal of reducing the absolute numbers of people in developing countries. The urgency of what came to be known as the “population control movement” contributed to a climate of coercion and led to a number of serious human rights abuses, especially in Asian countries.”[41] Dominic Lawson, writing a review of Connelly’s book for The Sunday Times, explained that:

the population-control movement was bankrolled by America’s biggest private fortunes – the Ford family foundation, John D Rockefeller III, and Clarence Gamble (of Procter & Gamble). These gentlemen shared not just extreme wealth but a common anxiety: the well-to-do and clever (people like them, obviously) were now having much smaller families than their ancestors, but the great unwashed – Chinamen! Indians! Negroes! – were reproducing themselves in an irresponsible manner. What they feared was a kind of Darwinism in reverse – the survival of the unfittest.[42]

As the New Scientist reported, while contraceptives and women’s fertility rights were being expanded, “For much of the past half-century, population control came first and human rights had to be sacrificed.” Further, the New Scientist wrote that Connelly “lays bare the dark secrets of an authoritarian neo-Malthusian ethos that created an international population agenda built around control.” One such horrific notion was “the official policies that made it acceptable to hand out food aid to famine victims only if the women agreed to be sterilized.”[43] In a sad irony, this seemingly progressive movement for women’s rights actually had the effect of resulting in a humanitarian disaster, disproportionately affecting women of the developing world.

In 1968, biologist Paul Ehrlich wrote his widely influential book, ‘The Population Bomb,’ “in which he predicted that global overpopulation would cause massive famines as early as the 1970s.”[44] In his book, he refers to mankind as a “cancer” upon the world:

A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells; the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people. Treating only the symptoms of cancer may make the victim more comfortable at first, but eventually he dies – often horribly. A similar fate awaits a world with a population explosion if only the symptoms are treated. We must shift our efforts from treatment of the symptoms to the cutting out of the cancer. The operation will demand many apparent brutal and heartless decisions. The pain may be intense. But the disease is so far advanced that only with radical surgery does the patient have a chance to survive.[45]

The American political elite fully embraced this population paradigm of viewing the world and relations with the rest of the world. President Lyndon Johnson was quoted as saying, “I’m not going to piss away foreign aid in nations where they refuse to deal with their own population problems,” while his successor, Richard Nixon, was quoted as saying, “population control is a must … population control must go hand in hand with aid.”[46] Robert McNamara, President of the World Bank and former Secretary of Defense in the Johnson administration, said that he opposed World Bank programs financing health care “unless it was very strictly related to population control, because usually health facilities contributed to the decline of the death rate, and thereby to the population explosion.”[47]

Ehrlich was also influential in tracking India’s rapid population growth into the 1970s. The rapid population growth in India was attributed at the time to the result of the public health system the British had set up under the colonial government, as well as the fact that, as a means to maintaining a relationship of dependence with Britain, the British had discouraged industrialization in India. As famine was around the corner in India, President “Johnson used food aid to pressure the Indian government to meet its family planning targets,” and “By the early 1970s, Bangladesh was spending one third of its entire health budget on family planning and India was spending 60 percent.”[48] Further:

[B]etween the 1960s and 1980s, millions of people in India and other Asian countries were sterilized or had IUDs [intrauterine devices], as well as other contraceptives, inserted in unhygienic conditions. Numerous cases of uterine perforation, excessive bleeding, infections, and even death were reported.[49]

The Population Council knowingly sent un-sterile IUDs to India, and in the 1970s, nearly half a million women in forty-two developing countries were treated with defective IUDs that “heightened the risk of infection and uterine perforation,” after the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) had “quietly bought up thousands of the devices at a discount for distribution overseas.” Then sterilization was introduced as a means for “keeping the quotas” on population control in India, as “sterilization was made a condition for receiving land allocations and water for irrigation, as well as electricity, rickshaw licenses, and medical care.” A Swedish diplomat touring a Swedish/World Bank population program at the time was quoted as saying, “Obviously the stories… on how young and unmarried men are more or less dragged to the sterilization premises are true in far too many cases.”[50]

In 1967, the UN Fund for Population Activities was created, and in 1971, “the General Assembly acknowledged that UNFPA [United Nations Population Fund] should play a leading role within the UN system in promoting population programmes.”[51] In 1970, Nixon created the Commission on Population Growth and the American Future, known as the Rockefeller Commission, for its chairman, John D. Rockefeller 3rd. In 1972, the final report was delivered to Nixon. Among the members of the Commission (besides Rockefeller) were David E. Bell, Vice President of the Ford Foundation, and Bernard Berelson, President of the Population Council. Among the conclusions were that, “Population growth is one of the major factors affecting the demand for resources and the deterioration of the environment in the United States. The further we look into the future, the more important population becomes,” and that, “From an environmental and resource point of view, there are no advantages from further growth.” Further, the report warned:

The American future cannot be isolated from what is happening in the rest of the world. There are serious problems right now in the distribution of resources, income, and wealth, among countries. World population growth is going to make these problems worse before they get better. The United States needs to undertake much greater efforts to understand these problems and develop international policies to deal with them.[52]

In 1974, National Security Study Memorandum (NSSM) 200 was issued under the direction of US National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger, otherwise known as “Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests.” Among the issues laid out in the memorandum was that, “Growing populations will have a serious impact on the need for food especially in the poorest, fastest growing LDCs [Lesser Developed Countries],” and “The most serious consequence for the short and middle term is the possibility of massive famines in certain parts of the world, especially the poorest regions.”

Further, “rapid population growth presses on a fragile environment in ways that threaten longer-term food production.” The report plainly stated that, “there is a major risk of severe damage to world economic, political, and ecological systems and, as these systems begin to fail, to our humanitarian values.”[53]

The memorandum lays out key policy recommendations for dealing with the “crisis” of overpopulation. They stated that “our aim should be for the world to achieve a replacement level of fertility, (a two-child family on the average), by about the year 2000,” and that this strategy “will require vigorous efforts by interested countries, U.N. agencies and other international bodies to make it effective [and] U.S. leadership is essential.” They suggested a concentration on specific countries: India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Mexico, Indonesia, Brazil, the Philippines, Thailand, Egypt, Turkey, Ethiopia and Colombia.[54]

They recommended the “Integration of population factors and population programs into country development planning,” as well as “Increased assistance for family planning services, information and technology,” and “Creating conditions conducive to fertility decline.” The memorandum even specifically mentioned that, “We must take care that our activities should not give the appearance to the LDCs [Lesser Developed Countries] of an industrialized country policy directed against the LDCs.”[55] Essentially, NSSM 200 made population control a key strategy in US foreign policy, specifically related to aid and development. In other words, it was eugenics as foreign policy.

In 1975, Indira Gandhi, the Prime Minister of India, declared martial law. Her son Sanjay was appointed as the nation’s chief population controller. Sanjay

“proceeded to flatten slums and then tell the residents that they could get a new house if they would agree to be sterilized. Government officials were given sterilization quotas. Within a year, six million Indian men and two million women were sterilized. At least 2,000 Indians died as a result of botched sterilization operations.” However, the following year there was an election, and Indira Gandhi’s government was thrown out of power, with that issue playing a major factor.[56]

Next, however, China became the major focus of the population control movement, which “offered technical assistance to China’s “one child” policy of 1978-83, even helping to pay for computers that allowed Chinese officials to track “birth permits,” the official means by which the government banned families from having more than one child and required the aborting of additional children.”[57] Further:

Even China’s draconian population programs received some support in the 1980s from the US-funded International Planned Parenthood Federation and the UN Population Fund. Before China launched its infamous “One Child Policy,” concerns were being raised about its “voluntary” family planning program. In 1981, Chinese and American newspapers reported that “vehicles transporting Cantonese women to hospitals for abortions were ‘filled with wailing noises.’ Some pregnant women were reportedly ‘handcuffed, tied with ropes or placed in pig’s baskets.'”

After 1983, coercion became official Chinese policy. “All women with one child were to be inserted with a stainless-steel, tamper-resistant IUD, all parents with two or more children were to be sterilized, and all unauthorized pregnancies aborted,” according to the One Child Policy. During this time, the International Planned Parenthood Federation and the UN Population Fund continued to support China’s nongovernmental Family Planning Association, even though some of its top officials also worked for the government.[58]

The UN was not a passive participant in population control measures, as it actively supported these harsh programs, and in many cases, rewarded governments for their vicious tactics in reducing population growth:

In 1983, Xinzhong Qian and Indira Gandhi were awarded the first United Nations Population Award to recognize and reward their accomplishments in limiting the population growth in China and India in the previous decade. During the 1970s, officials in these countries had launched extremely ambitious population programs that were supposed to improve the quality of the population and halt its growth. The measures used were harsh. For example, slum clearance resulting in the eradication of whole urban neighbourhoods and the widespread sterilization of their inhabitants was an important part of India’s ‘Emergency’ campaign.

In Delhi, hundreds of thousands of people were driven from their homes in events that resulted in numerous clashes, arrests, and deaths, while a total of eight million sterilizations were recorded in India in 1976.[59]

Horrifically, “between the 1960s and 1980s, millions of people in India and other Asian countries were sterilized or had IUDs, as well as other contraceptives, inserted in unhygienic conditions. Numerous cases of uterine perforation, excessive bleeding, infections, and even death were reported, but these programs made little effort to treat these conditions, or even determine their frequency, so we don’t know precisely how common they were.”[60]

In the late 1980s, revelations in Brazil uncovered the NSSM 200 in Brazil since its implementation in 1975 under the Ford Presidency. An official government investigation was launched, and it was discovered that, “an estimated 44% of all Brazilian women aged between 14 and 55 had been permanently sterilized.”

Further, the programs of sterilization, undertaken by a number of international organizations, were coordinated under the guidance of USAID.[61]

At the UN’s 1994 World Population Conference in Cairo, Third World delegates to the conference emphasized the need for development policies as opposed to demographic policies; that the focus must be on development, not population. This was essentially a setback for the radical population control movement; however, it wasn’t one they couldn’t work around. There was still a great deal of support among Western elites and co-opted developing world elites for the aims of population control. As Connelly articulated:

It appealed to the rich and powerful because, with the spread of emancipatory movements and the integration of markets, it began to appear easier and more profitable to control populations than to control territory. That’s why opponents were correct in viewing it as another chapter in the unfinished history of imperialism.[62]

It was around this point that the population control movement, while continuing on its overall aims of curbing population growth of Third World nations, began to further merge itself with the environmental movement. While always working alongside the environmental movement, this period saw the emergence of a more integrated approach to policy agendas.

Environmentalism as Eugenics

Michael Barker extensively covered the connection between the Rockefeller and Ford foundations in funding the environmental movement in the academic journal, Capitalism Nature Socialism. As Barker noted, following World War II, the public became increasingly concerned with the environment as the “chemical-industrial complex” grew at an astounding rate.[63] Since Rockefeller interests were heavily involved in the chemical industry, the rising trend in environmental thought and concern had to quickly be controlled and steered in a direction favourable to elite interests.

Two important organizations in shaping the environmental movement were the Conservation Foundation and Resources for the Future, which largely relied upon Rockefeller and Ford Foundation funding, and both conservation organizations had interestingly helped to “launch an explicitly pro-corporate approach to resource conservation.”[64] Laurance Rockefeller served as a trustee of the Conservation Foundation, and donated $50,000 yearly throughout the 50s and 60s.

Further, the Conservation Foundation was founded by Fairfield Osborn, whose cousin, Frederick Osborn, became another prominent voice in conservation.[65]

Frederick Osborn was also working with the Rockefeller’s Population Council and was President of the American Eugenics Society.

In 1952, the Ford Foundation created the organization Resources for the Future (RFF), (the same year that the Rockefellers created the Population Council), and the original founders were also “John D. Rockefeller Jr.’s chief advisors on conservation matters.” Laurance Rockefeller joined the board of the RFF in 1958, and the RFF got $500,000 from the Rockefeller Foundation in 1970.[66] The Ford Foundation would also go on to create the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), and the Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund.[67] McGeorge Bundy, who was President of the Ford Foundation from 1966 until 1979, once stated that, “everything the foundation did could be regarded as ‘making the world safe for capitalism’.”[68]

Certainly one of the pre-eminent, if not the most prominent environmental organizations in the world is the World Wildlife Foundation (WWF). The WWF was founded on September 11, 1961, by Sir Julian Huxley, the first Director General of the UN organization, UNESCO.[69] Sir Julian Huxley was also a life trustee of the British Eugenics Society from 1925, and its President from 1959-62. In the biography of Julian Huxley on the British Eugenics Society’s website (now known as the Galton Institute – a genetics research center), it stated that, “Huxley believed that eugenics would one day be seen as the way forward for the human race,” and that, “A catastrophic event may be needed for evolution to move at an accelerated pace, as the extinction of the dinosaurs gave the mammals their chance to take over the world. It is much the same with ideas whose time has not yet come; they must survive periods when they are not generally welcome. Like the small mammals in dinosaur times they must await their opportunity.”[70]

In 1962, Rachel Carson, an American marine biologist, published her seminal work, Silent Spring, which has long been credited with helping launch the modern environmental movement. Her book was largely based around the criticism of pesticides as harmful to the environment and human and animal health. Of particular note, she is seen as being the starting force for the campaign against DDT. Carson died in 1964, but her legacy was set in stone by the emerging environmental movement.

The Environmental Defense Fund was founded in 1967 with the specific aim to ban DDT. Some of its initial funding came from the Ford Foundation.[71] This also spurred the formation of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), an official US government agency, in 1970. In 1972, the EPA banned the use of DDT in the United States. Since this time, “DDT prohibitions have been expanded and enforced by NGO pressure, coercive treaties, and threats of economic sanctions by foundations, nations and international aid agencies.”[72]

DDT is widely regarded as a carcinogen, and most have never questioned the banning of DDT until understanding the effects of DDT usage beyond the environmental aspect. In particular, we need to look at Africa to understand the significant role of DDT and why we need to re-evaluate its potential usage, weighing the pros and cons of doing so. We must bring in the “human element” and balance that out with the “environmental element” instead of just simply writing off the human aspect to the issue.

The World Health Organization (WHO) said in 2000, that, “malaria infected over 300 million people. It killed nearly 2,000,000 – most of them in sub-Saharan Africa. Over half the victims are children, who die at the rate of two per minute or 3,000 per day,” and that, “Since 1972, over 50 million people have died from this dreaded disease. Many are weakened by AIDS or dysentery, but actually die of malaria.” In 2002 alone, 80,000 Ugandans died from malaria, half of which were children.[73] The fact is, that:

No other chemical comes close to DDT as an affordable, effective way to repel mosquitoes from homes, exterminate any that land on walls, and disorient any that are not killed or repelled, largely eliminating their urge to bite in homes that are treated once or twice a year with tiny amounts of this miracle insecticide.[74]

Donald Roberts, Professor of Tropical Public Health at the Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, explained that, “DDT is long-acting; the alternatives are not,” and that, ultimately, when it comes to the issue of poor countries and poor people, “DDT is cheap; the alternatives are not. End of Story.”[75]

Richard Tren, President of Africa Fighting Malaria, said that, “In the 60 years since DDT was first introduced, not a single scientific paper has been able to replicate even one case of actual human harm from its use.” At the end of World War II, DDT was used on nearly every concentration camp survivor to prevent typhus, and the “widespread use of DDT in Europe and the United States played vital roles in eradicating malaria and typhus on both continents.”

Further, in 1979, a World Health Organization (WHO) review of DDT use could not find “any possible adverse effects of DDT,” and said it was the “safest pesticide used for residual spraying and vector control programs.”[76]

However, organizations such as the WHO, United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP), the World Bank, Greenpeace, World Wildlife Fund, and a variety of others still remained adamantly opposed to the use of DDT. While DDT is not outright banned, it is extremely difficult to have it used in places like Africa due to funding. The funding for health care and disease-related programs comes largely from western aid agencies and NGOs, and “The US Agency for International Development [USAID] will not fund any indoor residual spraying and neither will most of the other donors,” explained Richard Tren, which “means that most African countries have to use whatever [these donors] are willing to fund (bed nets), which may not be the most appropriate tool.”[77]

A Ugandan Health Minister said in 2002 that, “Our people’s lives are of primary importance. The West is concerned about the environment because we share it with them. But it is not concerned about malaria because it is not a problem there. In Europe, they used DDT to kill anopheles mosquitoes that cause malaria. Why can’t we use DDT to kill the enemy in our camp?”[78]

Michael Crichton, an author and PhD molecular biologist, plainly stated, “Banning DDT is one of the most disgraceful episodes in the twentieth century history of America. We knew better, and we did it anyway, and we let people around the world die, and we didn’t give a damn.” As author Paul Driessen eloquently explained, the West “would never tolerate being told they had to protect their children solely by using bed nets, larvae-eating fish and medicinal treatments. But they have been silent about conditions in Africa, and about the intolerable attitudes of environmental groups, aid agencies and their own government[s].”[79]

James Lovelock, a scientist, researcher, environmentalist and futurist, became famous for popularizing his idea known as the Gaia hypothesis. He first started writing about this theory in journals in the early 1970s, but it shot to fame with the publication of his 1979 book, “Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth.” The general theory is that the Earth acts as a single organism, where all facets interact and react in a particular way that promotes an optimal environment on Earth. Thus, the theory was named after the Greek Earth goddess, Gaia. In the opening paragraph of his book, he stated that, “the quest for Gaia is an attempt to find the largest living creature on Earth.”[80] His theory provoked a fair amount criticism within the scientific community, with some referring to it as merely a metaphorical description of Earth processes.[81]

Lovelock has also been known to make wild predictive statements. In 2006, he wrote an article for the Independent, in which he stated that, “My Gaia theory sees the Earth behaving as if it were alive, and clearly anything alive can enjoy good health, or suffer disease,” and that the Earth is “seriously ill, and soon to pass into a morbid fever that may last as long as 100,000 years.”[82]

In 2008, the Guardian interviewed Lovelock, who contended that it was “too late” to do anything about global warming, that catastrophe was inevitable, and that, “about 80%” of the world’s population [will] be wiped out by 2100.”[83] In August of 2009, Lovelock became a patron of the Optimum Population Trust, a British population control organization. Upon his becoming a patron, he stated that, “Those who fail to see that population growth and climate change are two sides of the same coin are either ignorant or hiding from the truth. These two huge environmental problems are inseparable and to discuss one while ignoring the other is irrational.” He added, “How can we possibly decrease carbon emissions and land use while the number of emitters and the space they occupy remorselessly increases? When will the environmentalists who claim to be green recognise the truth and speak out?”[84]

Taxes and trades in carbon and carbon credits virtually commodify our atmosphere, so that the very air we breathe becomes property that is bought and sold. A tax on carbon is a tax on life. Since the lifeblood of an industrial society is oil, this requires carbon emissions in order to develop. The restraints on carbon, particularly the notion of trading carbon credits – i.e., trading the ‘right’ to pollute a certain amount – will disproportionately affect the developing world, which cannot afford to finance its own development. Corporations and banks will trade and own the world’s carbon credits, granting them the exclusive right to pollute and control the world’s resources and environment. The carbon trading market could become twice the size of the world oil market within ten years time.[85]

In regards to the Copenhagen Climate talks, which essentially broke down in December of 2009, the real source of this failure lies in a document that revealed the true nature of the negotiations, referred to as the ‘Danish Text.’ The ‘Danish Text’ was a leaked Danish government document which outlined a draft agreement “that hands more power to rich countries,” as, “The draft hands effective control of climate change finance to the World Bank” and “would make any money to help poor countries adapt to climate change dependent on them taking a range of actions.”[86] In other words, it becomes the new means of exerting “conditionality” upon the developing, and increasingly the developed world. ‘Conditionality’ implying – of course – a restructuring of society along lines designated by the World Bank.

While these are but examples of the influence and shaping of science to mold society and control humanity, much more discussion and debate is needed on these issues. While science can be used for the benefit of mankind, so too can it be used for the control and oppression of humanity. The people who run our societies view us as needing to be controlled, so they redirect the social apparatus into systems of control and coercion. Science can allow us to understand an idea or organism; but in doing so, it can also allow us to understand how to dominate and control that idea or organism. We must continually engage in a discussion of our changing society to better understand the nature of its changes and how that could affect us both positively and negatively.

If not for the Technological (or ‘Technetronic’) Revolution, elites would not have access to such powerful means of control; but, simultaneously, people have never had such great access to each other through mass communications and the Internet. So while environmental science can allow us to better understand our environment, something we seem still to be very much an adolescent in accomplishing, it also unleashes an ability, and what’s greater – a temptation – to control and shape the environment. Science can be used to both free and imprison the human mind. It is imperative that we approach and discuss the sciences (and all issues) from this perspective, not from a narrow-minded and divisive black-and-white world of ‘left’ and ‘right’, of religion or science. We cannot simply view criticism and opposition to social and scientific endeavours as ‘backwards’, or based on ‘religious doctrine’. There are rational reasons and purposes for criticism and debate on all of these issues, and rational positions of dissent.

Issues like climate change are generally divided upon those who ‘believe’ in climate change, and those who are termed ‘deniers’, which is a disingenuous and divisive approach to rational debate. It silences the critical scientists, who do not get funding from governments or corporations. It classifies those who dissent as ‘deniers’, employing rhetoric like that used against Holocaust deniers, whereas the majority of the dissent within the scientific community comes from those who simply see the role of other forces (often natural) in shaping and changing our climate, such as solar radiation. They do not ‘deny’ climate change, but they dissent on the causes and consequences. Is their opinion not worth hearing? If we are reshaping our entire global political and economic spheres as a result of our supposedly ‘collective’ perception of this issue – as we certainly are – then is it not of the utmost importance that we hear from other voices, especially those of dissent, in order to better understand the issue?

Merging Man and Machine: The Future of Humanity

Eisenhower warned, “The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present – and is gravely to be regarded,” and that, “we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.”[87]

Bill Joy, a computer scientist and co-founder of Sun Microsystems, who was co-chair of the presidential commission on the future of IT research, wrote an article for Wired Magazine in 2000 entitled, “Why the Future Doesn’t Need Us.” Joy explained the possibilities in a technological society of the near future, that “new technologies like genetic engineering and nanotechnology were giving us the power to remake the world.” One startling development in the world is that of robot technology and its potential impact upon society. Joy explains:

Accustomed to living with almost routine scientific breakthroughs, we have yet to come to terms with the fact that the most compelling 21st-century technologies – robotics, genetic engineering, and nanotechnology – pose a different threat than the technologies that have come before. Specifically, robots, engineered organisms, and nanobots share a dangerous amplifying factor: They can self-replicate. A bomb is blown up only once – but one bot can become many, and quickly get out of control.[88]

Joy explains that while these technologies can, and consistently are promoted and justified in the name of doing good (such as curing diseases, etc.), “with each of these technologies, a sequence of small, individually sensible advances leads to an accumulation of great power and, concomitantly, great danger.”

Joy ominously warns that:

The 21st-century technologies – genetics, nanotechnology, and robotics (GNR) – are so powerful that they can spawn whole new classes of accidents and abuses.

Most dangerously, for the first time, these accidents and abuses are widely within the reach of individuals or small groups. They will not require large facilities or rare raw materials. Knowledge alone will enable the use of them.

Thus we have the possibility not just of weapons of mass destruction but of knowledge-enabled mass destruction (KMD), this destructiveness hugely amplified by the power of self-replication.

I think it is no exaggeration to say we are on the cusp of the further perfection of extreme evil, an evil whose possibility spreads well beyond that which weapons of mass destruction bequeathed to the nation-states, on to a surprising and terrible empowerment of extreme individuals.[89]

In other words: we are entering an era faced with the “scientific dictators” of Huxley’s nightmare vision in ‘Brave New World’. Joy explained that by 2030, “we are likely to be able to build machines, in quantity, a million times as powerful as the personal computers of today.” Thus:

As this enormous computing power is combined with the manipulative advances of the physical sciences and the new, deep understandings in genetics, enormous transformative power is being unleashed. These combinations open up the opportunity to completely redesign the world, for better or worse: The replicating and evolving processes that have been confined to the natural world are about to become realms of human endeavor.[90]

Joy examined the transformative nature of robotics, as an intelligent robot may be built by 2030, “And once an intelligent robot exists, it is only a small step to a robot species – to an intelligent robot that can make evolved copies of itself.” Further, “A second dream of robotics is that we will gradually replace ourselves with our robotic technology, achieving near immortality by downloading our consciousnesses.” Joy further warns of the potential for an arms race to develop in these technologies, just as took place in the nuclear, radiological and biological weapons of the 20th century.[91]

Joy aptly explained that in the 20th century, those technologies were largely the products of governments, whereas in the 21st century, the new technologies of genetic engineering, nanotechnology and robotics (GNR), are the products of corporations and capitalism. Thus, the driving force is that of competition, desire, and the economic system. Hence, there is far less regulation and discussion of these new technologies than there was of the 20th century technologies, as the new technologies are developed in privately owned labs, not public. Joy often quotes a passage from Kaczynski’s Unabomber Manifesto regarding a future dystopia, which Joy feels has “merit in the reasoning.” In the event that human control over machines is retained (as opposed to the machines taking over):

[C]ontrol over large systems of machines will be in the hands of a tiny elite – just as it is today, but with two differences. Due to improved techniques the elite will have greater control over the masses; and because human work will no longer be necessary the masses will be superfluous, a useless burden on the system. If the elite is ruthless they may simply decide to exterminate the mass of humanity. If they are humane they may use propaganda or other psychological or biological techniques to reduce the birth rate until the mass of humanity becomes extinct, leaving the world to the elite.

Or, if the elite consists of soft-hearted liberals, they may decide to play the role of good shepherds to the rest of the human race. They will see to it that everyone’s physical needs are satisfied, that all children are raised under psychologically hygienic conditions, that everyone has a wholesome hobby to keep him busy, and that anyone who may become dissatisfied undergoes “treatment” to cure his “problem.” Of course, life will be so purposeless that people will have to be biologically or psychologically engineered either to remove their need for the power process or make them “sublimate” their drive for power into some harmless hobby. These engineered human beings may be happy in such a society, but they will most certainly not be free. They will have been reduced to the status of domestic animals.[92]

A horrifying vision indeed; but one which builds upon the ideas of Huxley, Russell and Brzezinski, who envisioned a people who – through biological and psychological means – are made to love their own servitude. Huxley saw the emergence of a world in which humanity, still a wild animal, is domesticated; where only the elite remain wild and have freedom to make decisions, while the masses are domesticated like pets. Huxley opined that, “Men and women will grow up to love their servitude and will never dream of revolution. There seems to be no good reason why a thoroughly scientific dictatorship should ever be overthrown.”[93]

We Can Have a Scientific Dictatorship, or…

We can create an alternative. We use, strengthen, mobilize, decentralize, and mobilize the global political awakening into a global movement of people not simply politically aware, but politically active and engaged. A world where people do not simply observe the apparatus of political, economic and social power influencing their lives; but in which the people actively seek to change it to better suit their lives and their freedom. We need to understand each other better; but to do that, we cannot view each other through the harsh and deceptive lens of power.

To understand each other, we must know each other. People must communicate with one another around the world; ideas must be exchanged between people and discussed, debated, and decided upon; the people must determine their own futures. Take the elites out of the equation: if you do not want them to dominate your lives, do not give them the power to do so. Talk to each other and determine your own polities, economies and societies. Do not entrust dying ideas and diseased institutions to determine your future for you.

The tools and systems of social control are vast and evasive; they penetrate the very psychology and biology of the individual. The elite feel that they are entrusted – due to their supposed ‘innate’ superior intelligence and specialization – to control society and reshape it as they see fit, to actively mold and construct public opinion and ideas. They have a belief that people are essentially irrational emotional beings, and that they must be controlled by an elite or else the world would be in chaos. This is what underpins the ideas of ‘stability’ and ‘order’. The state has been used to fight every progressive form of change that society has ever developed for its betterment: women’s rights, racial rights, civil rights, the anti-war movement, gay rights, etc. Initially, the impulse – the immediate reaction of the state – is to oppress social movements and to suppress human freedoms. This approach often leads to a situation in which social movements are only accepted by the state when they are co-opted by the state or powerful economic forces, which then exert their influence over the state to alter the policy.

If we gain stability and order at the cost of our very humanity, is it worth it? Do we really need this eternal guidance, which has been constant through almost all of human history, to treat the human species as if it was in a constant state of adolescence, never quite prepared to make its own decisions or go out in the world on its own? Well it is time for humanity to grow up, leave the strange comfort of mental authoritarianism. The strive for human autonomy has only just begun; only now is all of humanity politically awakened; only now – and never before – has all of known humanity had such a great and perfect opportunity to remake the world, retake power, re-imagine individuality and revitalize freedom.

Our world is governed not by a conspiracy, but by ideas: ideas of power, money, the state, military, empire, race, religion, sex, gender, politics and people. The only challenge to those ideas, are new ideas. There are roughly 6,000 members of the ‘global elite,’[94] there are over 6.8 billion people in the world. That sounds like a lot of potential for new ideas. The greatest resource for the future of humanity is not in the ‘control’ of humanity, which is doomed to ultimate failure, but for the release and encouragement of the human mind and spirit.

People can understand the science and mechanics of the brain, the functions of psychology, the ability of human strength; but still, today, we do not know how all that biology can create Beethoven’s 9th Symphony. Humanity is still very much a mystery to humans, and it would seem likely that the best answers to the questions of ‘how should we live?’ and ‘how should our societies function?’ are best answered with the bigger question of ‘why are we here’?

If the purpose of people and humanity is to consume and dominate, then our present situation seems only natural. If we were meant for more, then we must become more. If we were meant to be free, we must become free. Ideas are powerful things: they can build empires, and collapse them just as easily.

In 1967, Dr. Martin Luther King delivered one of his most moving and important speeches, “Beyond Vietnam,” in which he spoke out against war and empire. He left humanity with sobering words:

I am convinced that if we are to get on the right side of the world revolution, we as a nation must undergo a radical revolution of values. We must rapidly begin the shift from a “thing-oriented” society to a “person-oriented” society. When machines and computers, profit motives and property rights are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, materialism, and militarism are incapable of being conquered.[95]
 
Andrew Gavin Marshall is a Research Associate with the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG), and is studying Political Economy and History in Canada.

He is co-editor, with Michel Chossudovsky, of the recent book, “The Global Economic Crisis: The Great Depression of the XXI Century,” available to order at Globalresearch.ca.

Endnotes
[1]        Aldous Huxley, Brave New World and Brave New World Revisited. (Harper Perennial, New York, 2004), page 255
[2]        Ibid, page 259.
[3]        Bertrand Russell, The Impact of Science on Society, (Routledge, 1985), page 40
[4]        Ibid, page 66.
[5]        Ibid, page 62.
[6]        Ibid, page 58.
[7]        Ibid, page 117.
[8]        Ibid, page 118.
[9]        Ibid, page 63.
[10]      Aldous Huxley, The Ultimate Revolution, March 20, 1962. Berkeley Language Center – Speech Archive SA 0269: http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/Speech/VideoTest/audiofiles.html#huxley
[11]      Dwight D. Eisenhower, Eisenhower’s Farewell Address to the Nation. January 17, 1961: http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/ike.htm
[12]      Zbigniew Brzezinski, Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era. (Viking Press, New York, 1970), page 97
[13]      Edwin Black, Eugenics and the Nazis — the California connection. The San Francisco Chronicle: November 9, 2003:
http://articles.sfgate.com/2003-11-09/opinion/17517477_1_eugenics-ethnic-cleansing-master-race
[14]      Michael Barker, The Liberal Foundations of Environmentalism: Revisiting the Rockefeller-Ford Connection. Capitalism Nature Socialism: Volume 19, Number 2, June 2008
[15]      Bruno Waterfield, Dutch Prince Bernhard ‘was member of Nazi party’. The Telegraph: March 5, 2010:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/netherlands/7377402/Dutch-Prince-Bernhard-was-member-of-Nazi-party.html
[16]      Julian Huxley, UNESCO Its Purpose and Its Philosophy (1946). Preparatory Commission of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation, page 61.
[17]      Ibid, page 21.
[18]      Ibid, pages 37-38.
[19]      Ibid, page 38.
[20]      Ibid.
[21]      Ibid, page 18.
[22]      Edwin Black, War Against the Weak: Eugenics and America’s Campaign to Create a Master Race. (New York: Thunders’s Mouth Press, 2004), page 418
[23]      MARTIN MORSE WOOSTER, The War Against Fertility. The Wall Street Journal: April 1, 2008:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120700566688178565.html?mod=hpp_europe_leisure
[24]      Garland E. Allen, “Is a New Eugenics Afoot?” Science Magazine, October 5, 2001: Vol. 294, no. 5540:
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/294/5540/59
[25]      Ibid.
[26]      Ibid.
[27]      Niall Firth, Human race will ‘split into two different species’. The Daily Mail: October 26, 2007:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-489653/Human-race-split-different-species.html
[28]      Edwin Black, War Against the Weak: Eugenics and America’s Campaign to Create a Master Race (New York: Thunder’s Mouth Press, 2004), 11-12
[29]      Ibid, pages 12-13.
[30]      Ibid, page 19.
[31]      Ibid, page 28.
[32]      Ibid, page 416.
[33]      Ibid, page 418.
[34]      Simon Butler, The Dark History of Population Control. Climate and Capitalism: November 23, 2009: http://climateandcapitalism.com/?p=1293
[35]      History, ABOUT THE POPULATION COUNCIL. The Population Council: September 10, 2008: http://www.popcouncil.org/about/history.html
[36]      MARTIN MORSE WOOSTER, The War Against Fertility. The Wall Street Journal: April 1, 2008: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120700566688178565.html?mod=hpp_europe_leisure
[37]      History, ABOUT THE POPULATION COUNCIL. The Population Council: September 10, 2008: http://www.popcouncil.org/about/history.html
[38]      Review, Horrid History. The Economist: May 24, 2008
[39]      Heli Kasanen, BOOK REVIEW: Fatal misconception: the struggle to control world population, By Matthew Connelly: The Electronic Journal of Sustainable Development, 2009, 1(3), page 15
[40]      Review, Horrid History. The Economist: May 24, 2008
[41]      Helen Epstein, The Strange History of Birth Control. The New York Review of Books: August 18, 2008: http://www.powells.com/review/2008_08_18.html
[42]      Dominic Lawson, Fatal Misconception: The Struggle to Control World Population by Matthew Connelly. The Sunday Times: May 18, 2008:
http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/books/non-fiction/article3938455.ece
[43]      Fred Pearce, Fatal Misconception by Matthew Connelly. The New Scientist: May 21, 2008:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19826572.400-review-ifatal-misconceptioni-by-matthew-connelly.html
[44]      Jack M. Hollander, The Real Environmental Crisis: Why Poverty, Not Affluence, Is the Environment’s Number One Enemy. (University of California Press: Berkeley, 2003), page 30
[45]      Lara Knudsen, Reproductive Rights in a Global Context. (Vanderbilt University Press: 2006), page 3
[46]      Simon Butler, The Dark History of Population Control. Climate and Capitalism: November 23, 2009: http://climateandcapitalism.com/?p=1293
[47]      Nicholas D. Kristof, Birth Control for Others. The New York Times: March 23, 2008: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/23/books/review/Kristof-t.html
[48]      Helen Epstein, The Strange History of Birth Control. The New York Review of Books: August 18, 2008: http://www.powells.com/review/2008_08_18.html
[49]      Ibid.
[50]      Ibid.
[51]      UNFPA, UNFPA and the United Nations System. About UNFPA: http://www.unfpa.org/about/unsystem.htm
[52]      Population and the American Future, The Report of The Commission on Population Growth and the American Future. The Center for Research on Population and Security: March 27, 1972:
http://www.population-security.org/rockefeller/001_population_growth_and_the_american_future.htm#Commission
[53]      NSSM 200, Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests. National Security Study Memorandum (NSSM) 200: April 24, 1974: http://www.population-security.org/11-CH3.html#summary
[54]      Ibid.
[55]      Ibid.
[56]      MARTIN MORSE WOOSTER, The War Against Fertility. The Wall Street Journal: April 1, 2008:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120700566688178565.html?mod=hpp_europe_leisure
[57]      Ibid.
[58]      Helen Epstein, The Strange History of Birth Control. The New York Review of Books: August 18, 2008: http://www.powells.com/review/2008_08_18.html
[59]      Heli Kasanen, BOOK REVIEW: Fatal misconception: the struggle to control world population, By Matthew Connelly: The Electronic Journal of Sustainable Development, 2009, 1(3), page 15
[60]      Helen Epstein, The Strange History of Birth Control. The New York Review of Books, August 18, 2008: http://www.powells.com/review/2008_08_18.html
[61]      F. William Engdahl, Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation. (Global Research, Montreal: 2007), page 65
[62]      Simon Butler, The Dark History of Population Control. Climate and Capitalism: November 23, 2009: http://climateandcapitalism.com/?p=1293
[63]      Michael Barker, The Liberal Foundations of Environmentalism: Revisiting the Rockefeller-Ford Connection. Capitalism Nature Socialism: Volume 19, Number 2, June 2008: page 15
[64]      Ibid, pages 19-20.
[65]      Ibid, page 20.
[66]      Ibid, page 22.
[67]      Ibid, page 25.
[68]      Ibid, page 26.
[69]      WWF, A History of WWF: The Sixties. World Wildlife Fund: November 13, 2005: http://www.panda.org/about_wwf/who_we_are/history/sixties/index.cfm
[70]      John Timson, Portraits of the Pioneers: Sir Julian Huxley, FRS. The Galton Institute: December 1999 Newsletter: http://www.galtoninstitute.org.uk/Newsletters/GINL9912/julian_huxley.htm
[71]      Michael Barker, The Liberal Foundations of Environmentalism: Revisiting the Rockefeller-Ford Connection. Capitalism Nature Socialism: Volume 19, Number 2, June 2008: page 25
[72]      Paul Driessen, Eco-Imperialism: Green Power, Black Death. (Merril Press: 2004), page 67
[73]      Ibid, page 66.
[74]      Ibid, page 67.
[75]      Ibid, page 68.
[76]      Ibid, page 69.
[77]      Ibid, page 71.
[78]      Ibid, page 72.
[79]      Ibid, page 73.
[80]      James Lovelock, Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth. (Oxford: 1979), page 1
[81]      S.J. Gould, Kropotkin was no crackpot. Natural History, June 1997: pages 12-21
[82]      James Lovelock, The Earth is about to catch a morbid fever that may last as long as 100,000 years. The Independent: January 16, 2006:
http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/james-lovelock-the-earth-is-about-to-catch-a-morbid-fever-that-may-last-as-long-as-100000-years-523161.html
[83]      Decca Aitkenhead, ‘Enjoy life while you can’. The Guardian: March 1, 2008:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian/2008/mar/01/scienceofclimatechange.climatechange
[84]      OPT, GAIA SCIENTIST TO BE OPT PATRON. News Release: August 26, 2009:
 http://www.optimumpopulation.org/releases/opt.release26Aug09.htm
[85]      Terry Macalister, Carbon trading could be worth twice that of oil in next decade. The Guardian: November 29, 2009:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/nov/29/carbon-trading-market-copenhagen-summit
[86]      John Vidal, Copenhagen climate summit in disarray after ‘Danish text’ leak. The Guardian: December 8, 2009:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/08/copenhagen-climate-summit-disarray-danish-text
[87]      Dwight D. Eisenhower, Eisenhower’s Farewell Address to the Nation. January 17, 1961: http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/ike.htm
[88]      Bill Joy, Why the future doesn’t need us. Wired Magazine: April 2000: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.04/joy.html
[89]      Ibid.
[90]      Ibid.
[91]      Ibid.
[92]      Ibid.
[93]      Time, The Press: Brave New Newsday. Time Magazine: June 9, 1958: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,868521,00.html
[94]      Laura Miller, The rise of the superclass. Salon: March 14, 2008: http://www.salon.com/books/review/2008/03/14/superclass
[95]      Rev. Martin Luther King, Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence. Speech delivered by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., on April 4, 1967, at a meeting of Clergy and Laity Concerned at Riverside Church in New York City: http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/45a/058.html

MORE ARTICLES BY ANDREW GAVIN MARSHELL

Andrew Gavin Marshall is a frequent contributor to Global Research.  Global Research Articles by Andrew Gavin Marshall

http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=20028

The Global Political Awakening and the New World Order
The Technological Revolution and the Future of Freedom, Part 1
by Andrew Gavin Marshall
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=19873

Revolution and Repression in America
The Technological Revolution and the Future of Freedom, Part 2
by Andrew Gavin Marshall
http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=19951

Falling Debt Dynamite Dominoes, The Coming Financial Catastrophe
Stock-Markets / Credit Crisis 2010
Feb 22, 2010 – 03:37 AM
By: Andrew_G_Marshall

 Understanding the Nature of the Global Economic Crisis – The people have been lulled into a false sense of safety under the rouse of a perceived “economic recovery.” Unfortunately, what the majority of people think does not make it so, especially when the people making the key decisions think and act to the contrary. The sovereign debt crises that have been unfolding in the past couple years and more recently in Greece, are canaries in the coal mine for the rest of Western “civilization.” The crisis threatens to spread to Spain, Portugal and Ireland; like dominoes, one country after another will collapse into a debt and currency crisis, all the way to America.

Many Congressmen were told that if they failed to pass the bailout package, they were threatened with martial law.[22] Sure enough, Congress passed the bill, and the financial coup had been a profound success.

No wonder then, in early 2009, one Congressman reported that the banks “are still the most powerful lobby on Capitol Hill. And they frankly own the place.”[23] Another Congressman said that “The banks run the place,” and explained, “I will tell you what the problem is – they give three times more money than the next biggest group. It’s huge the amount of money they put into politics.”[24]

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article17404.html


The Dawning of Mass Self Awarness ,a tale of Sleeping Giants and Paper Tigers

June 28, 2010

The Powers-That-Be Are Terrified of the Mass Awakening Taking Place Worldwide
 Sunday, June 27, 2010

PEOPLE OF THE WORLD. WE ARE NOT POWERLESS!! WE ARE VERY POWERFUL ,VERY POWERFUL INDEED ,IN FACT, WE RULE!!!

THAT IS WHY EVERYDAY POLITIONS AND BIG BUSSINESS BOMBARD US ,THANKS TO THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA PRESSTITUTES, WITH ENDLESS PROPAGANDA AND LIES AND DISTRACTING PAP . DO YOU THINK THESE PEOPLE WANT TO SPEND THIER TIME AND MONEY IN FRONT OF A CAMERA PREFORMING LIKE A MUPPET?(BUT THAT WHAT THEY HAVE EMPLOYED CAMERON AND KLEGG TO DO……. THE UK “CHEERLEADERS”)

NO !! THEY DO SO BECAUSE IT IS VITALLY IMPORTANT FOR THEM TO DO SO!!!

WHY? BECAUSE THE MOB RULES!! WE THE PEOPLE HAVE THE TRUE POWER AND THE MONSTROUSITIES THAT ARE CARRIED OUT “IN OUR NAME” CAN ONLY CONTINUE WHILE “WE THE PEOPLE” LET IT!!!

PEOPLE IT IS TIME TO STAND UP AND SAY NO ,ENOUGH!!! IT IS TIME TO AWAKEN THE SLEEPING GIANT THAT IS “WE THE PEOPLE”. IT IS TIME TO WIPE THE SLEEP FROM OUR EYES AND SEE MASS MURDERERS AND LIARS AND FRAUDSTERS FOR WHAT THEY ARE….. THEY ARE PAPER TIGERS , WE ARE GIANTS , AND WE HAVE THEM SCARED!!!!
Our situation is admittedly dire.
Oligarchs are seizing more overt control in most countries in the world, the worldwide economy is on course for another – even bigger – train wreck, countries are cracking down on freedom and becoming more tyrannical, we are in a permanent state of war (and see this), and companies like BP are destroying our natural resources without any checks and balances.
But as Andrew Gavin Marshall points out, the elites are actually terrified of the mass political awakening which is occurring worldwide.

Marshall collects quotes from flexian Zbigniew Brzezinski – Obama’s former foreign affairs adviser, National Security Adviser to President Carter, creator of America’s strategy to lure Russia into Afghanistan, and creator of America’s plans for Eurasia in general – to make his point.
Listen to Brzezinski’s own words (consolidated from various writings and speeches, and edited as if they were a single passage):
For the first time in history almost all of humanity is politically activated, politically conscious and politically interactive. Global activism is generating a surge in the quest for cultural respect and economic opportunity in a world scarred by memories of colonial or imperial domination.
For the first time in human history almost all of humanity is politically activated, politically conscious and politically interactive. There are only a few pockets of humanity left in the remotest corners of the world that are not politically alert and engaged with the political turmoil and stirrings that are so widespread today around the world. The resulting global political activism is generating a surge in the quest for personal dignity, cultural respect and economic opportunity in a world painfully scarred by memories of centuries-long alien colonial or imperial domination.
America needs to face squarely a centrally important new global reality: that the world’s population is experiencing a political awakening unprecedented in scope and intensity, with the result that the politics of populism are transforming the politics of power. The need to respond to that massive phenomenon poses to the uniquely sovereign America an historic dilemma: What should be the central definition of America’s global role?
[T]he central challenge of our time is posed not by global terrorism, but rather by the intensifying turbulence caused by the phenomenon of global political awakening. That awakening is socially massive and politically radicalizing.
It is no overstatement to assert that now in the 21st century the population of much of the developing world is politically stirring and in many places seething with unrest. It is a population acutely conscious of social injustice to an unprecedented degree, and often resentful of its perceived lack of political dignity. The nearly universal access to radio, television and increasingly the Internet is creating a community of shared perceptions and envy that can be galvanized and channeled by demagogic political or religious passions. These energies transcend sovereign borders and pose a challenge both to existing states as well as to the existing global hierarchy, on top of which America still perches.

The youth of the Third World are particularly restless and resentful. The demographic revolution they embody is thus a political time-bomb, as well. With the exception of Europe, Japan and America, the rapidly expanding demographic bulge in the 25-year-old-and-under age bracket is creating a huge mass of impatient young people. Their minds have been stirred by sounds and images that emanate from afar and which intensify their disaffection with what is at hand. Their potential revolutionary spearhead is likely to emerge from among the scores of millions of students concentrated in the often intellectually dubious “tertiary level” educational institutions of developing countries. Depending on the definition of the tertiary educational level, there are currently worldwide between 80 and 130 million “college” students. Typically originating from the socially insecure lower middle class and inflamed by a sense of social outrage, these millions of students are revolutionaries-in-waiting, already semi-mobilized in large congregations, connected by the Internet and pre-positioned for a replay on a larger scale of what transpired years earlier in Mexico City or in Tiananmen Square. Their physical energy and emotional frustration is just waiting to be triggered by a cause, or a faith, or a hatred.

Politically awakened mankind craves political dignity, which democracy can enhance, but political dignity also encompasses ethnic or national self-determination, religious self-definition, and human and social rights, all in a world now acutely aware of economic, racial and ethnic inequities. The quest for political dignity, especially through national self-determination and social transformation, is part of the pulse of self-assertion by the world’s underprivileged
The misdiagnosis [of foreign policy] pertains to a relatively vague, excessively abstract, highly emotional, semi-theological definition of the chief menace that we face today in the world, and the consequent slighting of what I view as the unprecedented global challenge arising out of the unique phenomenon of a truly massive global political awakening of mankind. We live in an age in which mankind writ large is becoming politically conscious and politically activated to an unprecedented degree, and it is this condition which is producing a great deal of international turmoil.

That turmoil is the product of the political awakening, the fact that today vast masses of the world are not politically neutered, as they have been throughout history. They have political consciousness. It may be undefined, it may point in different directions, it may be primitive, it may be intolerant, it may be hateful, but it is a form of political activism.

The other major change in international affairs is that for the first time, in all of human history, mankind has been politically awakened. That is a total new reality – total new reality. It has not been so for most of human history until the last one hundred years. And in the course of the last one hundred years, the whole world has become politically awakened. And no matter where you go, politics is a matter of social engagement, and most people know what is generally going on –generally going on – in the world, and are consciously aware of global inequities, inequalities, lack of respect, exploitation. Mankind is now politically awakened and stirring. The combination of the two: the diversified global leadership, politically awakened masses, makes a much more difficult context for any major power including, currently, the leading world power: the United States.
The people of the world are waking up to the reality of what is happening. If we wake up fast enough, we can reclaim our power and dignity, and shake off those who would steal everything we have, including our money, opportunity and freedom.

To see the context of Brzezinski ‘s quotes – and for a great analysis of the ways in which th epowers-that-be are trying to counter the mass awakening, read Marshall’s essay.

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2010/06/powers-that-be-are-terrified-of-mass.html


Health in the 21st Cenutry is killing us!

February 26, 2010

In the 20th Century the National Health Service (NHS) is the best thing the UK government has ever done. Nevermind statues to fallen soldiers etc. the NHS is the best tribute to the scarifice that was made by so many in World War II ,it saves lives everyday and has probably saved more lives than died in World War II. The tireless individuals that put in long hours and hard work for little pay deserve medals.

The National Health Service Act 1946 came into effect on 5 July 1948 and created the National Health Service in England and Wales. Though the title ‘National Health Service’ implies one health service for the United Kingdom, in reality a separate NHS was created for England and Wales accountable to the Secretary of State for Health, with a separate NHS created for Scotland accountable to the Secretary of State for Scotland by the passage of the National Health Service (Scotland) Act 1947.

It shall be the duty of the Minister of Health … to promote the establishment … of a comprehensive health service designed to secure improvement in the physical and mental health of the people of England and Wales and the prevention diagnosis and treatment of illness and for that purpose to provide or secure the effective provision of services …

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Health_Service_Act_1946

BUT You might be suprised to discover that the biggest killer in the 21st century is the Modern Health Service and you are twice as likely to die in a private hospital.

The terms iatrogenesis and iatrogenic artifact refer to inadvertent adverse effects or complications caused by or resulting from medical treatment or advice. In addition to harmful consequences of actions by physicians, iatrogenesis can also refer to actions by other healthcare professionals, such as psychologists, therapists, pharmacists, nurses, dentists, and others. Iatrogenesis is not restricted to conventional medicine and can also result from complementary and alternative medicine treatments.

Examples of iatrogenesis:

Iatrogenesis is a major phenomenon, and a severe risk to patients. A study carried out in 1981 more than one-third of illnesses of patients in a university hospital were iatrogenic, nearly one in ten were considered major, and in 2% of the patients, the iatrogenic disorder ended in death. Complications were most strongly associated with exposure to drugs and medications

Shocking death toll at flagship hospital

October: NHS trust is rated ‘good’ in glowing report by watchdog
Now: Catalogue of failings in care and hygiene is revealed

By Jeremy Laurance health Editor
Poor standards of care at an accident and emergency unit in one of the country’s flagship hospitals may have contributed to the unnecessary deaths of over 400 patients, an official NHS investigation has concluded. Dirty equipment and an absence of leadership contributed to a death rate almost 40 per cent above the national average among emergency admissions to the 770-bed Basildon and Thurrock University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, inspectors said.
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/shocking-death-toll-at-flagship-hospital-1828747.html

[2008 Oct] One in 300 NHS patients killed  by avoidable blunders, warns Richard Branson in call for new safeguards[Nov 2007 UK] Blunders in hospitals are linked to 90,000 patient deaths a year

IMHO

Nurses that are overworked will make mistakes, this is NOT thier fault. It is thier managers fault.We have in the UK a Medical Service run by economic managers and financed by politions. Its the politions and managers that get the BIG BUCKS!! Its the nurses that are overworked and underpaid and SAVE LIVES!!!

These “bean counters” have turned our Health Service into a drug experiment centre for Big Pharma and are promoting unnecessary surgery ,drugs and other treatments purely for economic or experimental reasons and NOT MEDICAL ONES!!!

“I was completely shocked, amazed, and dismayed when I first added up all the statistics on medical death and saw how much allopathic medicine has betrayed us.”—Carolyn Dean, MD”Pharmaceutical companies spent $2 billion on over 314,000 events that doctors attend…in 1991 the drug industry “gave” $2.1 billion million to colleges and universities for research.” 

The NHS was born from the post World War II backlash.The Conservative Winston Churchill who had led Britain through the WWII lost the post war election IN A LANDSLIDE TO THE SOCIALIST LABOUR PARTY.CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN! At this time the Labour party was full of new ideas and ideology and was out to create a better world.This is not the case today.

OBAMA’S US Healthcare plan does not have this pedigree, even if Obama does get his healthcare reform through its is NOT change I can Believe in…..it will be a cash cow for BIG PHARMA! Obama just wants everyone registered with Big Pharma ,he does not care if big Pharma is good for your health. In fact he knows its NOT, but will cover up these facts.

IT SEEMS MODERN PRIVATE HEALTH CARE IS MORE LIKELY TO KILL YOU THAN THE UK NATIONALISED VERSION.US PRIVATE HEALTH CARE IS AMERICAS BIGGEST KILLER

The total number of iatrogenic deaths shown in the following table is 783,936. It is evident that the American medical system is the leading cause of death and injury in the United States. Death by Medicine—-Carolyn Dean, MD, ND, Martin Feldman, MD, Gary Null, PhD, Debora Rasio, MD (2003/4)

Death by Medicine – According to a review study, more deaths are caused annually in the U.S. by medical treatment and diagnostic procedures than by heart disease or cancer.

Condition Deaths Cost Author
Adverse Drug Reactions 106,000 $12 billion Lazarou(1), Suh (49)
Medical error 98,000 $2 billion IOM(6)
Bedsores 115,000 $55 billion Xakellis(7), Barczak (8)
Infection 88,000 $5 billion Weinstein(9), MMWR (10)
Malnutrition 108,800 ———– Nurses Coalition(11)
Outpatients 199,000 $77 billion Starfield(12), Weingart(112)
Unnecessary Procedures 37,136 $122 billion HCUP(3,13)
Surgery-Related 32,000 $9 billion AHRQ(85)
ANNUAL TOTAL 783,936 $282 billion  
       
Heart Disease 699,697    
Cancer 553,251    

And these numbers are based on reported deaths, which suggests the true death toll from medical treatment is much higher.

Is American Medicine Working? Here is the reviewers’ reply…

US health care spending reached $1.6 trillion in 2003…Considering this enormous expenditure, we should have the best medicine in the world. We should be preventing and reversing disease, and doing minimal harm. Careful and objective review, however, shows we are doing the opposite. Because of the extraordinarily narrow, technologically driven context in which contemporary medicine examines the human condition, we are completely missing the larger picture.

Medicine is not taking into consideration the following critically important aspects of a healthy human organism: (a) stress and how it adversely affects the immune system and life processes; (b) insufficient exercise; (c) excessive caloric intake; (d) highly processed and denatured foods grown in denatured and chemically damaged soil; and (e) exposure to tens of thousands of environmental toxins.

Instead of minimizing these disease-causing factors, we cause more illness through medical technology, diagnostic testing, overuse of medical and surgical procedures, and overuse of pharmaceutical drugs. The huge disservice of this therapeutic strategy is the result of little effort or money being spent on preventing disease.

http://www.wanderings.net/notebook/Main/LeadingCauseOfDeathMedicalTreatment

“An analysis by Wald & Shojan [2001] found that only 1.5% of all adverse events result in an incident report, and only 6% of adverse drug events are identified properly….The Psychiatric Times noted that the AMA is strongly opposed to mandatory reporting of medical errors…Dr Jay Cohen, who has extensively researched adverse drug reactions (ADR), commented that because only 5% of ADRs are being reported, there are in reality, 5 million medications reactions each year.”  Death by Medicine—-Carolyn Dean, MD, ND, Martin Feldman, MD, Gary Null, PhD, Debora Rasio, MD (2003/4)

In 2001, there were 7.5 million unnecessary surgical procedures, resulting in 37,136 deaths at a cost of $122 billion (using 174 US dollars) Death by Medicine—-Carolyn Dean, MD, ND, Martin Feldman, MD, Gary Null, PhD, Debora Rasio, MD (2003/4)

    In 2001, cesarean section is still the most common OB/GYN surgical procedure,in the US. Approximately 4 million births occur annually, with 24% (960,000) delivered by cesarean section. In the Netherlands, only 8% of births are delivered by cesarean section. This suggests 640,000 unnecessary cesarean sections—entailing three to four times higher mortality and 20 times greater morbidity than vaginal delivery—are performed annually in the US.
    The US cesarean rate rose from just 4.5% in 1965 to 24.1% in 1986. Sakala contends that an “uncontrolled pandemic of medically unnecessary cesarean births is occurring.”(106) VanHam reported a cesarean section postpartum hemorrhage rate of 7%, a hematoma formation rate of 3.5%, a urinary tract infection rate of 3%, and a combined postoperative morbidity rate of 35.7% in a high-risk population undergoing cesarean section. Death by Medicine—-Carolyn Dean, MD, ND, Martin Feldman, MD, Gary Null, PhD, Debora Rasio, MD (2003/4)

FYI The Dutch do NOT concider pregnancy or birth a medical issue. Most people are born at home without a Doctor being present. This natural non-medical birth practice is ONE OF THE SAFEST IN THE WORLD and is SAFER THAN A US BIRTH!

In the United States, infant mortality is 630 per 100,000 live births or 6.3 per 1000 live births

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_infant_mortality_rate

Results of the “Million Women Study” on HRT and breast cancer in the UK were published in medical journal The Lancet in August 2003. According to lead author Prof. Valerie Beral, director of the Cancer Research UK Epidemiology Unit: “We estimate that over the past decade, use of HRT by UK women aged 50-64 has resulted in an extra 20,000 breast cancers, estrogen-progestagen (combination) therapy accounting for 15,000 of these.” We were unable to find statistics on breast cancer, stroke, uterine cancer, or heart disease caused by HRT used by American women. Because the US population is roughly six times that of the UK, it is possible that 120,000 cases of breast cancer have been caused by HRT in the past decade. Death by Medicine—-Carolyn Dean, MD, ND, Martin Feldman, MD, Gary Null, PhD, Debora Rasio, MD (2003/4)

COMPARED TO NATURAL REMEDIES WITH A ZERO PERCENT DEATH RATE

[2010 Jan] No Deaths from Vitamins, Minerals, Amino Acids or Herbs

SO WHAT IS THE CONNECTION BETWEEN A “FREE TO ALL” NATIONALISED HEALTH SERVICE AND THE PRIVATELY INSURED US VERSION AND A PILE OF DEAD BODIES?

BIG PHARMA

The Big Pharmaceutical companies that supply drugs to these health services ARE KILLING PEOPLE!! They bribe (lobby) our politions and hide and fix bad test results for economic reasons. They even supply drugs THEY KNOW ARE CONTAMINATED!!!! Actually more than a few of these companies should be classified as BIO WEAPONS COMPANIES!!!!

PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES CAUGHT MANUFACTURING BIO WEAPONS TO BE TESTED ON THE PUBLIC

Pharmaceutical Companies spreading disease.

Baxter Pharmaceutical has been caught, red-handed, in spreading a live, genetically engineered H5N1 Bird flu vaccine as a lethal biological weapon all over the world, destined to be used for human vaccinations. This happened just a few months ago. And only luck prevented a global catastrophe of epic proportions.

Baxter International Inc. had mixed live, genetically engineered avian flue viruses in vaccine material shipped to 18 countries. Only by sheer luck, a Czech laboratory decided to test the vaccine on a dozen ferrets, which all died in days. The World Health Organization was notified and catastrophe was averted. This was clearly a deliberate act on Baxters part, because they adhere to BS3, bio-safety level three. Baxter admitted a mistake. Such monumental screwups are totally impossible at that level. Many safety systems would have needed to be sabotaged, many key personell would have needed to be bribed. It simply cant be done without direction from the inside. They did not send out the wrong vial they produced dozens of gallons of biological-weapon agent (genetically engineered live H5N1 / Bird flu virus), then sent it out as a vaccine.

Baxter knew full well that their vaccine was lethal, because the year before they had tested it on a few hundred homeless Polish people dozens died as a result.

Wheres the meat? Well Baxter is now being sued for the deliberate, repeated contamination of vaccines with biological weapons designed by them to mass-murder people. Here is the complaint (PDF). By some kook nutcase? Not likely Jane Burgermeister is an experienced, respected journalist. She is not the only one suing Baxter for planning and executing a plan for global genocide

The Ukrainian Flu Virus

KTLA 5 News August – Today, the MSM are not talking about this case any more. Yesterday, they wanted us to believe that Joseph Moshe was a nutcase and a terrorist, arrested for threatening to bomb the White House. Interesting detail about his arrest (the Westwood standoff) was that he seemed to be immune to the 5 cans of tear gas and 5 gallons of law-enforcement grade pepper spray they pumped into his face. He very calmly remained in his car, as the video footage of his arrest shows.

Professor Moshe had called into a live radio show by Dr. A. True Ott, broadcast on Republic Broadcasting claiming to be a microbiologist who wanted to supply evidence to a States Attorney regarding tainted H1N1 Swine flu vaccines being produced by Baxter BioPharma Solutions. He said that Baxters Ukrainian lab was in fact producing a bioweapon disguised as a vaccine. He claimed that the vaccine contained an adjuvant (additive) designed to weaken the immune system, and replicated RNA from the virus responsible for the 1918 pandemic Spanish flu, causing global sickness and mass death.

Sources tell us that Bar-Joseph Moshe made no threat against the President or the White House. He did not mention any bomb or attack. He then proceeded to inform the White House he intended to go public with this information

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KpOkzKbsaNM&feature=autoshare_twitter

PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES KNOWNINGLY SPREADING HIV

“After 1978, there were four major companies in the United States engaged in the manufacture, production and sale of Factor VIII and IX: Armour Pharmaceutical Company, Bayer Corporation and its Cutter Biological division, Baxter Healthcare and its Hyland Pharmaceutical division and Alpha Therapeutic Corporation, which have been or are defendants in certain lawsuits.
The plaintiffs allege that the companies manufactured and sold blood factor products as beneficial “medicines” that were, in fact of likely to be contaminated with HIV and/or HCV. This resulted in the mass infection and/or deaths of thousands of haemophiliacs worldwide.[22]
It is believed that three of these companies, Alpha, Baxter, and Cutter, recruited and paid donors from high risk populations, including prisoners (i.e. prison-based collections), intravenous drug users, and plasma centers with predominantly homosexual donors, esp. in cities with large populations thereof, to obtain blood plasma used for the production of Factor VIII and IX.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayer#HIV_infected_Blood_Products

PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES KNOWINGLY DISTRIBUTE DRUGS WITH FATAL SIDE EFFECTS 

Bayer’s anti-cholesterol drug, Baycol (also known as Lipobay and cerivastatin), has deadly side effects. The Food and Drug Administration received reports of 31 US deaths due to rhabdomyolysis, a potentially fatal adverse muscle reaction that results in muscle cell breakdown and release of the contents of muscle cells in the bloodstream. Symptoms include muscle pain, weakness, fever, nausea, and vomiting. Bayer admitted that the drug might have killed 52 people already worldwide, with another 1,100 potentially crippled. Although Bayer voluntarily recalled the drug after a large number of deaths, Germany’s health minister, on 25 August 2001, accused Bayer of sitting on research documenting Baycol’s lethal side-effects for nearly two months before the government in Berlin was informed.’ A number of individual and class action law suits have been filed, including one in Pennsylvania which cited 480 cases of Baycol-related illnesses. The number of Baycol related deaths has risen to almost 100

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayer#Baycol_Deaths

In October 2001, Bayer was taken to court after 24 children in the remote Andean village of Tauccamarca were killed and 18 severely poisoned when they drank a powdered milk substitute that had been contaminated with methyl parathion. The white powder that resembles powdered milk and has no strong chemical odour was packaged in small plastic bags that provide no protection to users and give no indication of the danger of the product within. The bags were labelled in Spanish only, and carried drawings of healthy carrots and potatoes but no pictograms indicating danger or toxicity.[After a nine month investigation, a Peruvian Congressional Subcommittee has found significant evidence of criminal responsibility by both the agrochemical company Bayer and the Peruvian Ministry of Agriculture in the poisoning of 42 children in the remote Andean village of Tauccamarca in October 1999.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayer#Methyl_parathion_poisoning_case

[2009 March] Hundreds of deaths linked to schizophrenia drug clozapine   Fifty people die each year and hundreds more suffer serious side-effects as the result of taking powerful tranquillisers prescribed by the NHS….Data from the medicine watchdog’s own reporting scheme suggests that clozapine, a drug taken by schizophrenia patients, has been linked to 950 deaths since being licensed in 1990 — equivalent to nearly one fatality a week.

Vioxx killed up to 140,000 people after being ‘proved safe’ in animals, including monkeys.

PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES MAKING DISEASE MORE VIRILANT

Using Baytril and other fluoroquinolones in poultry and cattle leads to antibiotic-resistant bacteria and pathogens in animals, making it possible for strains of resistant bacteria to enter the human body. This makes human versions of the drug ineffective in treating people infected by these bacteria, which could be life-threatening to the elderly, to children and to those with depressed immune systems or in weakened conditions. Fluoroquinolones are commonly prescribed to treat serious gastrointestinal illness, including the common Campylobacter and Salmonella bacteria. Campylobacter accounts for nearly two million illnesses and 100 deaths each year, and Salmonella accounts for 1.3 million illnesses and about 500 deaths annually. Very few bacteria were found resistant to fluoroquinolones until the drugs also began to be used in poultry in 1995. By 1998, 13 percent of Campylobacter tested in humans were resistant to fluoroquinolones, and by 1999, nearly 18 percent of Campylobacter were found to be resistant.

After data collected by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention showed that the use of fluoroquinolones in poultry was speeding up the bacteria’s development of resistance to the drug, the US Food and Drug Administration concluded that the health of at least 5,000 Americans is affected each year by the use of these drugs in chickens. It also proposed to ban this use. Abbott Laboratories, one of the two producers of poultry fluoroquinolones in the US, voluntarily withdrew its product, but Bayer refused to comply with the proposed ban and instead requested a hearing on the proposal. This hearing may take years to complete, and by then the ban may be a moot point since the drug may be ineffective in humans by the time the FDA is able to issue a final ban on the use of these drugs in poultry.

The United States’ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the United Nations’ World Health Organization, have strongly advocated a ban for years. On 31 October 2000, Environmental Defense, the American Public Health Association, Center for Science in the Public Interest; Delmarva Poultry Justice Alliance; Food Animal Concerns Trust; Global Resources Action Center for the Environment; Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy; National Catholic Rural Life Conference; Physicians for Social Responsibility; and Union of Concerned Scientists signed a letter to the Bayer Corporation asking it to comply voluntarily with the proposed ban. In November, more than 180 individual health care professionals and several medical organizations, including the American Medical Association and the American College of Preventive Medicine, sent a similar letter to Bayer.

But Bayer has recently spent over US$ 50 million to build new production facilities for Baytril in Germany and the US. The company claimed that Baytril is completely harmless in a letter to veterinarians: “Bayer has and always will play a leading role in defending fluoroquinolones”.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayer#Fluoroquinolones

[2007] ARE MOST DISEASES CAUSED BY THE MEDICAL SYSTEM? By Walter Last

Cancer caused by modern man as it was virtually non-existent in ancient world
Cancer is a modern man-made disease caused by the excesses of modern life, a new study suggests
Researchers looking at almost a thousand mummies from ancient Egypt and South America found only a handful suffered from cancer when now it accounts for nearly one in three deaths.
The findings suggest that it is modern lifestyles and pollution levels caused by industry that are the main cause of the disease and that it is not a naturally occurring condition.
The study showed the disease rate has risen dramatically since the Industrial Revolution, in particular childhood cancer – proving that the rise is not simply due to people living longer
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/8064554/Cancer-caused-by-modern-man-as-it-was-virtually-non-existent-in-ancient-world.html

BIG PHARMA DRIVES US INSANE FOR PROFIT!!

America’s mental illness epidemic: It turns out that the drugs are the problem
By Gary G. Kohls, MD

Tens of millions of innocent, unsuspecting Americans, who are mired deeply in the mental “health” system, have actually been made crazy by the use of or the withdrawal from commonly-prescribed, brain-altering, brain-disabling, indeed brain-damaging psychiatric drugs that have been, for many decades, cavalierly handed out like candy — often in untested and therefore unapproved combinations of drugs — to trusting and unaware patients by equally unaware but well-intentioned physicians who have been under the mesmerizing influence of slick and obscenely profitable psychopharmaceutical drug companies, a.k.a. BigPharma.

Long-term, high dosage or combination psychotropic drug usage could be regarded as a chemically traumatic brain injury (TBI) or, as drugs like Thorazine were known in the 1950s and 60s, a “chemical lobotomy.” That is a useful way to conceptualize this serious issue, because such chemically brain-altered patients are often indistinguishable from those who have suffered a physically traumatic brain injuries or been subjected to ice-pick lobotomies which were popular in the 1940s and 50s — before the drugs came on the market.

America has a mental ill health epidemic on its hands that is grossly misunderstood because it is worsening, not by the supposed disease progression, but because of the neurotoxic, non-curative drugs that are somehow regarded as first-line “treatment.”

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_6267.shtml

PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES COMMIT FINANCIAL FRAUD!!!!!! THEY ARE ONLY IN IT FOR THE MONEY

In January 2001, Bayer agreed to pay $14 million to the United States and 45 states to settle allegations under the federal False Claims Act that the company caused physicians and other health care providers to submit fraudulently inflated reimbursement claims to the state and federally funded Medicaid program.

BUT WHAT DO YOU EXPECT FROM Dr.JOE MENGELE AND FRIENDS?

In his book Aspirin: The Story of a Wonder Drug, author Diarmuid Jeffreys investigated Bayer’s sponsorship of the experiments of Nazi Dr. Josef Mengele. In 1956 Fritz ter Meer became chairman of Bayer after having been sentenced at the Nuremberg trials to seven years’ imprisonment for his part in carrying out experiments on human subjects at Auschwitz.

BIG PHARMA BRIBES THE UN AS WELL, ALL THOSE “World Health Organisation” VACCINATIONS ARE BIG BUSINESS

Big Pharma inside the WHO: confidential analysis of unreleased WHO Expert Working Group draft reports, 8 Dec 2009

The compilation of documents shows the influence of “Big Pharma” on the policy making decisions of the WHO, the UN body safeguarding public health.

http://www.wikileaks.org/wiki/Big_Pharma_inside_the_WHO:_confidential_analysis_of_unreleased_WHO_Expert_Working_Group_draft_reports%2C_8_Dec_2009

http://www.wikileaks.org/wiki/Big_Pharma_caught_spying_on_the_WHO

[2009 Nov] Silence about Vaccine Deaths in Media is Due to the Confidential Contracts with Vaccine Manufacturers  the maker of PandemRix, that is used in Sweden, passed a secret contract, the same in every European country, which specified a “Green List” of what the government MAY communicate (hardly anything!) and the “Red List” of what may absolutely NOT be made public, like intermediary results of the side effects that appear in the studies of the controversial squalene (and thiomersal) adjuvantated PandemRix until they have been sanitized by Glaxo Smith Kline researchers, and published by GSK themselves.
….What I found mind boggling, as a doctor, is to discover Glaxo Smith Kline’s “Green List” of what the government MAY communicate (hardly anything!) and the “Red List” of what may absolutely NOT be made public, like intermediary results of the side effects that appear in the studies of the controversial squalene (and thiomersal) adjuvantated PandemRix until they have been sanitized by GSK, and published by GSK themselves.

Iatrogenic Death by vaccination   Death by other drugs  Suicide [2003] Depopulation and HIV by Jon Rappoport

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/04/who-admits-to-releasing-pandemic-virus-into-population-via-mock-up-vaccines/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/04/why-wont-healthcare-workers-take-the-swine-flu-vaccine/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/09/06/polio-surge-in-nigeria-after-vaccine-virus-mutates/

BIG PHARMA AND BIO WEAPONS

GULF WAR SYNDROME

In October 1999, the U.S. Pentagon released a report that hypothesized that an experimental drug known as pyriostigmine bromide, or PB, might be linked to the physical symptoms manifested in Gulf War Syndrome. The experimental drug was given to U.S. and Canadian troops during the war to protect soldiers against the effects of the chemical nerve agent soman

GERM WARFARE

According to the paper, “he was intending to reveal that he warned Prime Minister Tony Blair there were no weapons of mass destruction anywhere in Iraq weeks before the ­British and American invasion… and was also intending to lift the lid on a potentially bigger scandal, his own secret dealings in germ warfare with the apartheid regime in South Africa.”

The allegations of a potential Kelly expose come from a new film about biological weapons being debuted in London on the sixth anniversary of Kelly’s death titled “Anthrax War” (the documentary aired earlier this year on Canadian public television). Kelly was an expert in biological warfare agents, as well as a former United Nations weapons inspector in Iraq.

‘Anthrax War’

‘‘The deeper you look into the murky world of governments and germ warfare, the more worrying it becomes,” the film’s director, Bob Coen, is quoted as saying. “We have proved there is a black ­market in anthrax. David Kelly was of particular interest to us because he was a world expert on anthrax and he was involved in some degree with assisting the secret germ warfare program in apartheid South Africa.”

According to the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation’s summary of the film, Coen “was raised in Zimbabwe where the former white regime has been accused of unleashing anthrax against the black population… [who] embarks on a journey that raises troubling questions about the FBI’s investigation of the 21st century’s first act of biological terrorism.

“Coen’s investigation takes him from the U.S. to the U.K. and from the edge of Siberia to the tip of Africa. In a rare interview, Coen confronts ‘Doctor Death’ Wouter Basson, who headed Project Coast, the South African apartheid-era bio-warfare program,” the network’s website adds. “Project Coast used germ warfare against select targets within the country’s black population.

“Anthrax War also investigates the mysterious deaths of some of the world’s leading anthrax scientists, including Dr. David Kelly, the UK’s top military microbiologist, the Soviet defector Dr. Vladimir Pasechnik, and Dr. Bruce Ivins,” the CBC continues. “The FBI claims – despite the doubts of highly ranked U.S. officials – that Ivins was the only person behind the U.S. anthrax murders.”
http://rawstory.com/08/news/2009/07/06/uk-weapons-inspector-dead-expose/

Remember the Anthrax attacks in the US, post 9/11? Well the anthrax was made in a US Military Bio weapons “hot lab”.

The Bhopal disaster was an industrial catastrophe that took place at a pesticide plant owned and operated by Union Carbide (UCIL) in Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India on December 3, 1984. Around 12 AM, the plant released methyl isocyanate (MIC) gas and other toxins, resulting in the exposure of over 500,000 people. Estimates vary on the death toll. The official immediate death toll was 2259 and the government of M P has confirmed a total of 3787 deaths related to the gas release.[1] Other government agencies estimate 15,000 deaths.[2] Others estimate 8000 to 10,000 died within 72 hours and 25,000 have since died from gas-related diseases.[3][4]

Some 25 years after the gas leak, 390 tonnes of toxic chemicals abandoned at the UCIL plant continue to leak and pollute the groundwater in the region and affect thousands of Bhopal residents who depend on it

SWINE FLU,DID THEY MEAN PIGS HAVE FLOWN?

“From the Archives: Radio Public Service Announcements ~ The Swine Flu Epidemic of 1975-76.”

This is a recording session held with Jimmy the Greek to produce a series of public service announcements promoting widespread vaccination in anticipation of a wide-spread outbreak of Swine Flu in the winter of 1975-76. The PSAs were produced by the Centers for Disease Control, which spearheaded a massive inoculation campaign. No swine flu epidemic came, and unfortunately the vaccine proved to be worse than the disease. Thousands experienced serious side effects, and nearly 100 people died. The government’s aggressive initiative ended in an embarrasing public health fiasco. This recording comes from the Records of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1921 – 1995, National Archives (NARA II).

The document on the WHO website linked below states that it is common procedure to release pandemic viruses into the population in order to get a jump ahead of the real pandemic, so as to fast track the vaccine for when it is needed.

In Europe, some manufacturers have conducted advance studies using a so-called “mock-up” vaccine. Mock-up vaccines contain an active ingredient for an influenza virus that has not circulated recently in human populations and thus mimics the novelty of a pandemic virus.

According to the website, “Such advance studies can greatly expedite regulatory approval.”

http://www.who.int/csr/disease/swineflu/notes/h1n1_safety_vaccines_20090805/en/index.html

Vaccinations are a useful tool when throughly tested and are used responsibly.

VILLANS ARE THE POLITIONS AND MANGERS THAT BUY AND SELL OUR HEALTH WITH BIG PHARMAS EXPERIMENTAL DRUGS

FOR EXAMPLE

WARNING WARNING WARNING

IF BIG PHARMA KILLS OR DISABLES YOU OR YOUR LOVED ONES , THE POLITIONS HAVE IT COVERED!!!!!!!!

Legal Immunity for Pharmaceutical Industry

The US Secretary of Health and Human Services, Kathleen Sebelius, has just signed a decree granting vaccine makers total legal immunity from any lawsuits that result from any new “Swine Flu” vaccine. Moreover, the $7 billion US Government fast-track program to rush vaccines onto the market is being done without even normal safety testing.
The mass vaccinations are to be carried out predominantly for pregnant women and children. So far, neither the WHO nor the CDC or any other scientific body has demonstrated required scientific proof for the existence of the alleged H1N1 Influenza A new virus. The decree by the Department of Health and Human Services grants immunity to those making a “swine flu” vaccine, under the provisions of a 2006 law for public health emergencies.

http://www.currentconcerns.ch/index.php?id=845

I CANNOT THINK OF ANYTHING MORE CORRUPT, DANGEROUS TO PUBLIC HEALTH AND COMPLETELY IRRESPONSIBLE (but actually ,it describes a polition very well)

HEROES ARE THE NURSES AND OTHER HANDS ON MEDICAL STAFF

DID YOU KNOW…
American pioneer Mary Breckinridge, set up the Frontier Nursing Service in Kentucky using the Highlands and Islands Medical Service as a model
The Highlands and Islands Medical Service was a unique social experiment in Britain long before the NHS.
It was formally set up in 1913 with a Treasury grant of £42,000 in the wake of a report by Sir John Dewar’s committee.
Medical and nursing services were either poor or non-existent in many areas within the crofting counties. Crofters did not qualify for services under the new National Insurance scheme.
Doctors struggled to make any living in such sparsely-populated areas – apart from occasional summer visitors from the south on sporting holidays.

http://www.60yearsofnhsscotland.co.uk/

I SALUTE THE TIRELESS NURSES OF THE NHS THAT PUT IN LONG HOURS FOR LITTLE MONEY AND SAVE LIVES EVERYDAY(Hazel if you are reading this ,YES I mean YOU!!!)  AND SPIT ON MANGERS AND POLITIONS THAT WOULD BUY AND SELL OUR HEALTH FOR A BOTTOM LINE DOLLAR!!!

Death by Medicine—-Carolyn Dean, MD, ND, Martin Feldman, MD, Gary Null, PhD, Debora Rasio, MD (2003/4)

The Efficacy of Radiotherapy By Don Benjamin 

Measles by Viera Scheibner

Early allopathic therapies

The OTA concluded: “There are no mechanisms in place to limit dissemination of technologies regardless of their clinical value.” Shortly after the release of this report, the OTA was disbanded. Death by Medicine—-Carolyn Dean, MD, ND, Martin Feldman, MD, Gary Null, PhD, Debora Rasio, MD (2003/4)

http://www.whale.to/a/dean.html

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2009/12/14/anthrax-swine-flu-and-government-bio-terrorism/

https://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/01/30/war-on-drugs-officially-lost-another-fake-us-war-another-total-us-defeat/

I used to think politions where useless, until I realised they are biodegardable!!!

“The doctor is to be feared more than the disease.”—-Latin proverb