Police and Government Try to Ban Student Demos!! Just Stop the Bail Out and the demos stop!! D’OH!!

The Student Demos , like a seen from “V for Vendetta”

A Tribute to the Guts of the Students . The government, royalty and the police are ALL bricking themselves over the student unrest..and … ITS SPREADING

SHAME THE UK IS NOT A DEMOCRACY …AND WE HAVE TO DEAL WITH A POLICE STATE BAN

After tripling tuitions, UK may ban student marches
London’s top police officer says he is considering banning student marches in the wake of violent flare-ups at protests opposing a massive increase in university tuition fees.
The move has prompted some observers to declare that Britain may be headed towards “martial law” as police push back against angry youth who find they can no longer afford an education, at a time when jobs openings are rare.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/12/uk-ban-student-marches/

IN A TRUE DEMOCRACY WE THE PEOPLE WOULD OF HELD A REFERENDUM AND VOTED AGAINST THE BAILOUT AND THE AUSTERITY MEASURES.

NO RIOTS , NO FUSS , NO-ONE GETS HURT ,DIRECT DEMOCRACY WORKS!!!! ITS WORKED FOR SWITZERLAND SINCE 1840 , ITS WORKS FOR ICELAND TODAY!

INSTEAD WE HAVE REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY AND OUR ELECTED DICTATORS FORCE THIER EDICTS ON THE PEOPLE AND BRUTALLY SUPPRESS DISSENT!! NO VOTE , NO CHOICE , NO VOICE!

THEY THEN BLAME THE VICTIMS FOR ALL THE TROUBLE!?!?!?!

PLEASE SEE WHAT A POLICE STATE IN ACTION LOOKS LIKE WHEN IT IS FIGHTING TO HOLD ON TO POWER!!!….LONDON’S BURNING!!

A Woman Warrior ,got to admire her guts....a Smiths T-shirt in this day and age

NONE of these people will have a SAY , ALL of these people are expected to PAY

It certainly is a MASS demonstration

A Peaceful Demonstration until the STATE TROUBLE MAKERS APPEAR

Of course the POLICE BRING WEAPONS , people start getting hurt!

A police horseman looking for a pregnant woman to beat upor perhaps someone in a wheelchair? But anyone will do!

So the SELF-DEFENCE begins , Defending Free Speach and Freedom of Expression and the Right to Protest!!! What Are The Police Defending?

 

 

Fights break out between ARMED POLICE and UNARMED PROTESTORS

People on ALL SIDES get hurt...but the protestors have neither weapons or armour

The HEAD CRACKING BEGINS

The HEAD CRACKING CONTINUES

PEOPLE GET HURT!!

 

PEOPLE GET HURT ON BOTH SIDES ..POLICE HORSEMAN DRAGGED DOWN!

 

LONDON'S BURNING....AND THE PEOPLE CELEBRATE!!

 

YOUR GOVERNMENT REP....water cannons!?!? where's my flamethrower 😉

Government reps. do not discriminate...women children ,handicapped they beat them ALL!

All this ..just because the government will not let "WE THE PEOPLE" have a SAY or a VOTE!

http://dailybail.com/slideshows/uk-student-riots/

IF THE POLICE TRY TO BAN STUDENT DEMONSTRATIONS

EVERYONE …I MEAN EVERYONE SHOULD BE OUT ON THE STREETS THAT DAY!!! OUR VERY FREEDOM IS AT STAKE!!!

IF WE TOLERATE THIS THEN OUR CHILDREN WILL BE NEXT!!!

Senior officers said the vast majority of the 182 suspects were aged between 17 and 25 and have never been involved in violence or criminal acts before.
Speaking at New Scotland Yard today, he said: ‘What struck me is the number of people arrested who did not go that day with necessarily any intention of committing any violent action.’

6 Responses to Police and Government Try to Ban Student Demos!! Just Stop the Bail Out and the demos stop!! D’OH!!

  1. We students have balls!

    • cuthulan says:

      YES you have!! I thought the students had lost them since the 1980’s . So glad to be proven wrong ,and in such a spectacular way. WELL DONE!! You have my total support ,as do the Greeks and Irish and French and Spainish and the Dutch and the Germans and ALL the our Europeans getting out onto the streets. Been rioting myself in Amsterdam and will be a lot better prepared the next time!!!!
      FREEDOM IS THERE FOR THE TAKING, NOTHING IS GUARANTEED
      KEEP PROTESTING!!!!

    • cuthulan says:

      As my comments are no longer getting posted on your story thread.Here is my last response to Black Flag!
      BF SAYS
      “You do not believe England had a government in the 1600?
      You do not believe they had taxes in England in the 1600?

      Sir, you are beyond bizarre – and as such I am done with you.”

      BlackFlag your knowledge of history is as useless as your knowledge of physics and political science ,”gravity is unpredicatble”?!!?!absolute nonsense,”the state will whither away if we ignore it”?!!?!? more absolute nonsense!
      Your economic authoritarian ideas would only lead to killing fields full of dead locals/natives ,stolen resourses and factories full of wage slaves.
      I suppose YOU will teach the native peoples of the world your finacial philosophy OR will it be thier fault for not being on the ball. THIER LOSS AND YOUR GAIN as you say?!
      Swapping glass beads for real estate would be back in style,
      FYI THERE WAS NO REGOCNISABLE UK GOVERNMENT IN 1600
      The charter used to create the East India Company in 1600 was normally used to create cities, (a community entity ,not a corporate entity!) there was NO LEGISLATURE FOR COMPANIES! Free trade ruled the seas! There was no government trade agreements or government interference in the market place.
      There was NO UK GOVERNMENT, there was no UK at the time! Queen Elizabeth of England was head of state and held a royal court with royal advisors that had sworn an oath of loyalty.
      Royals where born into postions of power by the grace of god!
      The “Rule of Law” in Scotland and England ,at the time depanded on where you where standing and what social postion you held.
      Nobels held title deeds and land rights.They would sware thier loyalty to the head of state and would be expected to provide miliary services for the monarch.They had a rule unto themselves,they where the law, trial by combat etc.
      The church also held lands and had thier own laws and courts.
      Most of Scotland and England where actually held in”common”. This was the land that the majority lived off. It was common land used for pasture and it too had its own laws and courts.It is this “common law” that is the backbone of our modern law system.
      For an indepth look at this ,please read this post

      Who Stole Scotland ? …and who will steal it back?


      FIAT CURRENCY DID NOTE EXSIST EITHER
      The silver standard is a monetary system in which the standard economic unit of account is a fixed weight of silver. The silver specie standard was widespread from the fall of the Byzantine Empire until the 19th century. Following the discovery in the 16th century of large deposits of silver at the Cerro Rico in Potosi, Bolivia, an international silver specie standard came into existence in conjunction with the Spanish pieces of eight. These silver dollar coins played the role of an international trading currency for nearly four hundred years.
      A RECOGNISABLE TAX SYSTEM DID NOT EXIST IN 1600
      Taxes in the 1600’s where nothing like taxes today.
      TODAY Taxes are charged by the state over the transactions, dividends and capital gains on the stock market.In the 1600’s there was no stock market, or state charges on trade transactions!!
      In the 1600’s taxes would be raised for a specific purpose and only those with something to gain would be taxed. These taxes had NOTHING TO DO WITH TRADE!These taxes where used to pay for war and military defences.
      EXAMPLE
      Danegeld
      The Danegeld (“Danish tax”, literally “Dane’s gold”, pronounced /ˈdeɪn.ɡɛld/[1]) was a tax raised to pay tribute to the Viking raiders to save a land from being ravaged. It was called the geld or gafol in eleventh-century sources;[2] the term Danegeld did not appear until the early twelfth century.[3] It was characteristic of royal policy in both England and Francia during the ninth through eleventh centuries, collected both as tributary, to buy off the attackers, and as stipendiary, to pay the defensive forces.
      EVEN THIS SYSTEM WAS THE FIRST OF ITS KIND
      the Danegeld was based on hidages, an area of agricultural land sufficient to support a family .in the north the typical unit was the carucate, or ploughland, equivalent to Kent’s sulung, and East Anglia was assessed by the hundred. Everywhere the tax was farmed (collected) by local sheriffs. Records of assessment and income predate the Norman conquest, indicating a system which James Campbell describes as “old, but not unchanging”.[10] According to David Bates, it was “a national tax of a kind unknown in western Europe;”[11] indeed, J.A. Green asserts that the national system of land taxation developed to raise the Danegeld was the first to reappear in Western Europe
      INCOME TAX DID NOT EXIST
      Income tax was first implemented in Britain by William Pitt the Younger in his budget of December 1798 to pay for weapons and equipment in preparation for the Napoleonic Wars
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Income_tax_in_the_United_Kingdom
      CAPITAL GAINS TAX DID NOT EXIST,CORPORATE TAX DID NOT EXIST.
      BUT of course BlackFlag believes there was a “state capitalist/socialist” interference in “free markets” before the invention of “government” or “socialism”. BUT Blackflag thinks gravity is unpredictable ,he must worry about floating to the cieling or the planets spinning off into space,and he also thinks government whithers away if we ignore it!!
      BlackFlag is a bizzare and delusional fellow ,who should of paid more attention at school!

  2. C’mon the students!

    • cuthulan says:

      C’mon the students indeed!!
      WE need to get out and support them as well.
      WE ARE MANY ,THEY ARE FEW
      WE ARE RIGHTOUS ,THEY ARE CORRUPT
      WE ARE SLEEPING GIANTS , THEY ARE PAPER TIGERS
      ….BUT WE ARE WAKING UP!!

  3. cuthulan says:

    @futiledemocracy
    A message for Blackflag
    The person that thinks that gravity is unpredictable and that the UK government existed and had a tax system in 1600
    For a start.. The UK only existed since 1707 with the Act of Union
    The former kingdom of Great Britain, sometimes described as the ‘United Kingdom of Great Britain’, was a sovereign state in northwest Europe, in existence from 1707 to 1801. It came into being on 1 May 1707, with the political union of the kingdom of Scotland and the kingdom of England (which included Wales).
    A single parliament and government, based at Westminster, controlled the new kingdom. The former kingdoms had already shared the same monarch since James VI, King of Scots became King of England in 1603 following the death of Queen Elizabeth I, bringing about a “Union of the Crowns”.
    The new kingdom of Great Britain was superseded by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland on 1 January 1801, when Great Britain was united with the Kingdom of Ireland by the Acts of Union of 1800 following the suppression of the Irish Rebellion of 1798. Most of Ireland left the union in 1922, leading to another re-naming of the state in 1927, as the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. The later British states, albeit with territorial changes, are considered direct continuations of Great Britain rather than successor states.
    THE MODERN BRITISH TAX SYSTEM FIRST STARTED IN 1665 TO FINANCE WAR WITH HOLLAND
    The beginnings of the Inland Revenue date from 1665, when a Board of Taxes was set up following the introduction of special taxes to pay for the Second Anglo-Dutch War. A central organisation to supervise the collection of the special taxes was required.
    Taxes administered by the Board of Taxes included the land tax, first levied in 1692, together with an assortment of other assessed taxes, including taxes on houses, windows and dogs. Income tax was introduced in various forms in 1797, 1799, 1803 to 1816. and then reintroduced as an annual tax in 1842m which is formally renewed in each year’s Finance Act.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inland_Revenue
    In modern taxation systems, taxes are levied in money; but, in-kind and corvée taxation are characteristic of traditional or pre-capitalist states and their functional equivalents.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax
    THERE WAS NO TAX SYSTEM BEFORE THIS.ONLY TAXES FOR WARS (DANEGELD) MADE PAYABLE BY THOSE WITH SOMETHING TO LOOSE
    OTHERWISE YOU PAID YOUR RENT OR LAND DEBT BY CORVEE..ON AVERAGE 3 MONTHS FARM OR MILITARY SERVICE (WE PAY MORE IN TAX TODAY!!)
    Corvée is labor, often unpaid, that is required of people of lower social standing and imposed on them by their superiors (often an aristocrat or noble). It differs from chattel slavery in that the worker is not owned outright – being free in various respects other than in the dispensation of his or her labour – and the work is usually intermittent; typically only a certain number of days’ or months’ work is required each year. It is a form of unfree labour where the worker is not compensated. It is not a tax as there is no actual obligation to pay cash,
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corv%C3%A9e
    LASSIE FAIRE CAPITALISM GAVE US PRIVATEERS AND ROBBER BARONS AND ENSLAVED THE POPULATION IN FACTORY LABOUR
    IN AMERICA IT IS WHAT DROVE THE PEOPLE WEST…LASSIE FAIRE CAPITALISM WORKS SO LONG AS THERE ARE MORE RESOURSES AVAILABLE TO GRAB..IN THIS CASE THE NATIVE AMERICANS
    The modern USA rightwing Libertarianism ,objectavism or whatever you want to call it will just produce the same results.Those that want power and money will buy the resourses ,glass beads for real estate will be all the rage again.When you own the resourses you rule the people,libertarian or not.
    RIGHTWING LIBERTARIANISM IS NOT LIBERTARIAN ,ITS ECONOMIC AUTHORITARIANISM AND YES ITS BEEN TRIED BEFORE ,IF YOU THINK NOT YOU DO NOT KNOW YOUR HISTORY.
    IF YOU CANNOT SEE THE HOLES IN RIGHTWING ECONOMIC AUTHORITARIANISM THEN YOU ARE JUST NOT THAT SMART

Leave a comment