Brexit, which was an “internal Tory party problem” that was made a “British problem” by Etonian pig molestor David Cameron, who at least had the decency to resign after sabotaging the countries of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland in one vote that no-one took seriously until too late.
One failed political joke was quickly followed by another. Enter Boris Johnson who actually led the Leave campaign and then bravely wet his pants and ran away in his hour of victory because even he knew what a bad idea leaving the EU was. He never even expected to win the EU vote in the first place. Boris was just out to gain political prestige and ended up been shown as the political baffoon that he is.Even UKIP leader Nigel Farage quit British politics after winning the EU vote. He kept his MEP job as he gets paid in Euros which was handy for Nigel as the GB pound was worthless after his successful campaign to Leave the EU.
Queue the next political joke called Theresa May who has just limped from one political failure to the next, with barely enough time to wipe the custard pie from her face, while dragging Britians reputation and economy down with her. The tradgic disaster at Grenfall Towers are an example of what would have happened to Britain with Thersa May(or May not) and Boris (the baffoon) at the helm, lots of dangerous cladding that makes the place look nice for rich people, while the majority are ignored and left to burn to death. Over 500 people lived in those Towers but the PRESSTITUTES at the MSM said 17 dead and 75 surviviors.
WHERE ARE THE OTHER 400 RESIDENTS? MSM IS JUST DISGUSTING PROPAGANDA that promotes the government.What about the criminal negligence? Boris? Theresa?
In Europe Theresa May was seen before the General Election as a delusional, incomtitant and power hungry person who triggered article 50 an then immediately called a General Election instead of preparing for the important Brexit negotitations. Strong and stable WFT?! This action was seen as weak and unstable by the EU.
In this predicted Tory landslide election Theresa May lost both her hard Brexit mandate and her political majority and Britain now has to start Brexit negotitations totally unprepared and without any clear public support. Theresa May by selfishly making a pact with the religious armed loonies of the DUP also risks destroying the “Good Friday agreement” and plunging Irish politics back into the dark ages. All this just so Theresa can keep her grubby pedophile protecting and tax dodging mits on political power.
In this General election Scotland voted on “English issues” instead of voting for what was best for Scotland. This is also why Scotland needs independence. The greatly heralded MSM “Tory resurgence” in Scotland was actually comprised of tactical voting from “Unionst Labour supporters” and the support of the “anti-EU Scottish independance voters” who want out of both the UK and the EU. This Scottish Tory support will vanish like piss on a hot tin roof when the vote in Scotland goes back to being about Scottish Issues.Corbyn also split the “socialist vote” in Scotland which also let the Tories and Lib Dems back in.
The “Unionst Labour supporters” in Scotland are the reason that Thersa May held on to power in the UK. If they had tactically voted SNP instead of Tory Jeremy Corbyn would have been elected PM. What a bunch of ….. These British Labour supporters prefer “British Tory” rule to an independant “socialist Scotland”. The UK has ended up with a completely unstable and terrorist supporting Tory coaltion of chaos instead of a socialist Labour and SNP coalition which would have brought stablity and a clear direction back to the UK.
Corbyn is the only leader that has benefitted from this election.Well done to him, I mean that sincerely.
Meanwhile in reality the SNP still held 35 seats against the combined unionist powers of Labour,Tory, Lib Dem and the MSM in Scotland.That smells like victory to me. The SNP is still the majority party in Scotland with 35 seats out of 59. Maggie Thatcher famously stated that “Scotland did not need a referendum, it only needed to elect 30 SNP seats and unilaterally declare independence(UDI)”. As a long term indy supporter 30 seats was always the target.
Today the SNP still has 35 seats and therefore UDI is still an option for Scotland, an extreme one but no more extreme than a hard DUP/Tory Brexit. With the SNP holding 35 seats who needs indyref2? and with the EU economically backing Scotland who needs the bankrupt regime in Westmonster.If Scotland wants to regain its self-determination then it must be determined to be itself, and that means acting on its own intitive. UDI is certainly still an option.
May, who everyone in the EU knows campaigned that leaving the EU would be a disaster, now has to negociate a hard Brexit with the “rabid dog” DUP at her side. A rabid dog that is more likely to savage Thersa May than the EU. Talk about a loss of credibility. A bloody coalition of the confused, with English anti-Euro Tories relying on Northern Irish DUP MP’s who want borders back in Ireland.
But Theresa May is also pals with Saudi religious nutters and she supportted selling arms to the religious loonies of ISIS who ended up bombing Manchester instead of Damascus. This women just never learns from making bad deals with dodgey people and their dodgey religions, why no-one has tried to arrest this woman for supplying weapons and aid to terrorists is beyond belief, as well as loosing all the info on the political pedophiles who no doubt now fill her cabinet just like they did in the days of Thatcher.
Remind me what is so strong and stable about Thersa May and the DUP? They are just a bunch of anti-EU “Conservative and Unionist Negociating Team Supporters”(its an acronmy).
The EU view is that she is irratic, imcopitant, delusional,insincere and very very mentally unstable and her base motivation is “holding onto power at any price”the country, economy and moral high ground be damned! All round a very unpleasant and untruthful person who has made a coalition with people even less pleasant and less truthful just to hold onto political power in Britain, so she can enact a policy that she previously stated would be a disaster for the UK.
Where is the honour or intergrity in any of this?
Brexit will now be Thersa May with custard pie on her face and a begging bowl, or a letter of apology to the Europeans they have insulted, being led into the talks by a rabid dog that might savage her at any minute .The EU negociators will rip her apart if her DUP partners don’t savage her first!
Bye bye viable independent UK economy and hello to making Britian the Mexico of Europe!
It appears that Thersa May is even willing to pay for building the European version of “Trumps Wall”, not even the really stoned Mexicans are that stupid!(BTW no offence meant to Mexicans, just Tory voters who make less sense than Mexicans on drugs).Theresa May’s actions have managed to make Donald Trump look sensible, stable and statesmanlike, that is how bad she is!!!
Personally I think Brexit will be left to die a slow and lingering “death by administration”, which will be financially costly and the end our international standing. Red is no longer the colour of the British empire covering the globe today it is the colour of British national debt and those we still owe money too. We will end up exactly as we were before, just without our EU rebate and economically poorer and the UK will be the butt of European jokes, “did you hear the one about the Britain who wanted to leave Europe?”.
The Irish will be falling over themselves telling English Tory jokes đ
Theresa May just loose the plot and her job.
The UK does not need a new PM its needs a new democractic system. A 21st century system that is truelly democratic and not just a very bad representation of democracy from the 1700’s.
Maybe instead of changing dysfunctional PM’s its time to change to a True Democratic system like “Direct (True) Democracy”,(the Swiss model), instead of the bad out dated “representation of democracy” we have today.The Swiss True Democracy model would also end the EU debate, as it would be impossible to be a full member of the EU and a “direct democracy”. But we can still agree to full movement of trade and labour. There problem solved and no MP’s to f#ck it all up!
Brexit has shown us all that the UK is NOT a Democracy. Democracy has the people as the “executive” not a small group of selected individuals called “parliment” nevermind the “House of Lords”.UK democracy is actually just an “Elected Dictatorship” that gives us the choice of Tweedle Dum or Tweedle Dee and they just call it democracy. Direct Democracy would also arrest the guilty political pedophiles, fraudulent bankers, war criminals and end the austerity, while “representative democracy” just continues protects all these unsavoury people and empowers them.
So Britain make your mind up are you going to turn the nation into a giant version of Grenfall Towers for Tory landlords or make Britain a True Direct Democracy fit for all?
Direct Democracy Today for ALL!! End the Elected dictatorship in the UK and the EU.
That’s all folks!!!!!!!!!!!!
THE BRITISH PEOPLE ,SCOTTISH ,ENGLISH ,WELSH AND IRISH,(NORTH AND THE REPUBLIC),ARE DECENT PEOPLE
THEY DESERVE THE RIGHT TO LIFE ,LIBERTY AND SELF DETERMINATION
THEY DO NOT DESERVE A CENTRALISED DICTORIAL AUTHORITY CONTROLLING THEM
THESE MONSTERS HAVE BEEN IN POWER FOR A LONG TIME AND NOTHING HAS BEEN DONE TO STOP THEM
BECAUSE THEY HAVE BEEN RUNNING THE BRITISH ESTABLISHMENT FOR A LONG TIME.
THIS IS ONE REASON ,OF MANY COUNTLESS REASONS, WHY I WOULD BE VOTING FOR SCOTTISH INDEPENDENCE
WE HAVE A CHANCE TO GET OUT OF THIS HOPELESSLY CORRUPT AND FINANCIALLY BANKRUPT CENTRALISED AUTHORITY
Tory child abuse whistleblower: ‘I supplied underage rent boys for Margaret Thatcher’s cabinet ministers’
Whistleblower and former Conservative party activist Anthony Gilberthorpe says he provided child prostitutes for a sex and drugs party with top politicians
Senior Tory cabinet ministers were supplied with underage boys for sex parties, it is sensationally claimed.
Former Conservative activist Anthony Gilberthorpe said he told Margaret Thatcher 25 years ago about what he had witnessed and gave her names of those involved.
His allegations that he saw top Tories having sex with boys comes after David Cameron launched a Government inquiry into claims of a cover-up.
Anthony, 52, said: âI am prepared to speak to the inquiry. I believe I am a key witness.â
Trawling seedy streets during a Tory conference, Gilberthorpe says he was asked to find underage rent boys for a private sex party at a top hotel.
Today, more than three decades later, he claims he was acting on the orders of some of the most senior figures of Margaret Thatcherâs government.
Anthony says he was a Âfull-time Âpolitical activist when he helped procure the âyoungest and prettiestâ boys for several cabinet ministers after being told to find âentertainmentâ.
In a series of explosive claims about conferences at Blackpool and Brighton in the 1980s, he alleges boys as young as 15 indulged in alcohol and cocaine before they had sex with the powerful politicians.
He says one person who attended a party is a current serving minister.
Others said to be present at the parties included Keith Joseph, Rhodes Boyson, Dr Alistair Smith and Michael Havers
As a young aspiring politician, Mr Gilberthorpe admits being in awe of the men, but now insists: âThey Âmanipulated and groomed me to do their bidding.â
He said: âI was just 17 when I first went to a conference in Brighton in 1978. I couldnât believe I was rubbing Âshoulders with all these important people and I couldnât believe that they were taking such a keen interest in me. I would have done anything for them because I was so desperate to make it in politics.
âDuring the years I was attending conferences between 1978 and 1985, I was a full-time political activist. At the same time I was running for office in district and county council elections.â
Cabinet Minister: Former Education Secretary Keith Joseph
Cabinet Minister: Former Education Secretary Keith Joseph
Mr Gilberthorpe claims that at the 1983 Blackpool conference he was asked by Dr Alistair Smith â the Tory Party Chairman in Scotland â to arrange for young rent boys to have sex with two high-profile cabinet ministers, who we are not naming today.
Other MPs at that party were said to include Rhodes Boyson and Keith Joseph.
In that week he presented the Âthen-Prime Minister Mrs Thatcher with a cake to mark her 58th birthday. But he says he also had a more sordid role â using his young looks to find these underage boys for her ministers.
At the time, the age of consent made it illegal to have gay sex with anyone under 21-years-old.
He said: âDr Smith, who I looked up to at the time and was the most Âimportant Tory in Scotland, told me to go and fetch some âentertainmentâ, which was code for young boys and handed me a handful of bank notes. There was about ÂŁ120.â
Mr Gilber-thorpe claims he was not shocked by the request.
He said: âIt was a norm and an open secret that these older members of the Tory party, like
Dr Alistair Smith, paid for young men to join them at sex parties.
âIt was the first time I was asked to fetch them but it was hardly surprising as I was becoming one of their trusted people. There was a well known and used cruising area close to the Imperial Hotel, which was a conference hotel. The hotel was not open to the public.
âI was expected to find the youngest and prettiest boys. It was what those men wanted.
âIn fact it was all they wanted.
âSo myself and another Tory candidate walked down there and sat on some benches underneath an archway in the Pavilion area of Blackpool and waited.â
Attorney General: Lord Michael Havers
Attorney General: Lord Michael Havers
He said they were approached within minutes by a âguy aged about 20â called James. He went on: âI asked him if he wanted to come back to the hotel and he said âyesâ.
We asked if he had any mates and he went away and came back with two boys who were aged about 15 and no older.
“It was a surreal situation as we were dressed in suits and ties and they were wearing jeans.
âWe said we would make it worth their while and the older one held out his hand and I passed him the money to share out. I promised him there would be plentiful amounts of free booze.â
Mr Gilberthorpe claims he then asked hotel security to contact a man inside who worked at the Conservative Party Central Office to arrange for the three rent boys to be given security clearance and special badges that would allow them to enter the Imperial.
He said: âAll MPs, members of the National Executive and chosen delegates were given name badges that allowed you access to the conference hotel.
âSome of them had a small Oscar sign in the corner which was a code to allow others to know you were allowed into these secret parties.â He claimed the Hollywood-style Oscar symbol was actually in honour of gay writer and poet Oscar Wilde. Once inside the Imperial, he says the group walked up several flights of stairs to a room where politicians were waiting for them, along with a table of cocaine
In attendance: Rhodes Boyson at the Conservative party conference in Blackpool, 1987
In attendance: Rhodes Boyson at the Conservative party conference in Blackpool, 1987
He said: âWe took them straight upstairs and into a room where Dr Smith and other MPs were waiting for them at the party. They were given drinks and cocaine to snort and then they were all moved into the centre of the room.â
Mr Gilberthorpe said he witnessed two senior Tories having sex with the boys. He said: âA couple of other MPs were in the room. I can clearly remember seeing one politician, who is now a serving Tory MP, standing there and watching.â
Mr Gilberthorpe also claims that two years earlier in 1981 he saw Sir Michael Havers â then Attorney General â at a swimming pool party at the Tory conference in Blackpool, where underage boys were encouraged to perform sex acts on several politicians, who we are also not naming today.
He recalled: âIn 1981 I was invited back to the Imperial Hotel by a ÂConservative councillor.
âHe was a big player in the notorious right-wing group the Monday Club.
âWe arrived at around midnight and I was led down some stairs to a door where two men were stood as security.
âWe were allowed to enter and I was led through a tiled changing room where there were piles of clothes strewn across the floor. We then walked into an area where there was a large pool and lots of men either stood around naked or simply wrapped in towels.
âAmong the MPs I recognised in there were Keith Joseph and Rhodes Boyson. I saw the Attorney General Michael Havers down there as well.
âThere were a couple of glass tables set up as a mini bar with bottles of spirits on them and there was cocaine on several tables. I saw several boys who were clearly aged between 15 and 16 down there and I saw that a few were performing sex acts on MPs.
âOther young men were acting as waiters walking around with little black bow ties on. I was completely shocked by it because I was still only 20 and I had never seen anything like it.â
He added: âI stayed for a couple of hours but was tired because a conference was always a boozy affair where mainly spirits were drunk in large Âquantities from about 5pm onwards.â
Dr-Edward-Alistair-Smith-CBE
Request: Smith âasked for young boysâ
Mr Gilberthorpe, now 52, says he also attended a sex party at the Grand Hotel in Brighton during the Conservativesâ 1984 conference.
On the night before the seafront hotel was hit by an IRA bomb attack, he claims he saw senior MPs engaging in sex acts with boys below the age of consent at a âcorridor partyâ held in a row of rooms on the fourth floor.
He said: âThere were two guys on the door at the end of the corridor and because we were in the group I was allowed to enter. Several doors were left open and others were closed. âThere were several men walking from one room to another and enjoying sex acts with other naked men, including boys who were clearly only about 15 or 16 years old. I saw Keith Joseph there and a politician who is now still a serving MP.
âIt was held on the night before the bomb went off and afterwards one MP crudely joked that it was a good job it was, or there would have been rent boys falling through the floor.â
Mr Gilberthorpe, who decided to finally break his silence because he fears an Establishment cover-up, also claims that in the aftermath of the bombing, in which five people were killed, he was asked to look after two rent boys.
He said: âI rushed over there from my hotel after I heard the blast and saw Keith Joseph stood outside in a blanket.â
Yesterday he said: âI was a teenager when I first met these men and they manipulated me and groomed me to do their bidding.
âBecause they were the most powerful men in the land, I was led to believe it was all OK. In truth they were abusers and once they had tired of me they simply discarded me. It is time this came to light before anyone else is abused. âThey didnât think they were doing anything wrong and it was the norm then. They felt untouchable.â http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/tory-child-abuse-whistleblower-i-3848987
Tory child abuse whistleblower: ‘Margaret Thatcher knew all about underage sex ring among ministers’
Former activist Anthony Gilberthorpe says he sent Thatcher a 40-page dossier in 1989 accusing Cabinet members of abusing underage boys
Thatcher and Gilberthorpe
Her former Parliamentary Private Secretary Sir Peter Morrison has already been named in connection with a probe into the Bryn Estyn childrenâs home in Wrexham where Jimmy Savile allegedly molested boys.
Mrs Thatcher lobbied for Savile to be given a knighthood and he visited her at Chequers on at least 11 occasions.
The late MP Geoffrey Dickens also passed a list of names of prominent government figures involved in child sex abuse to Mrs Thatcherâs Home Secretary Leon Brittan. The list was âlostâ by the Home Office.
Former High Court judge Baroness Butler-Sloss
Details of Mr Gilberthorpeâs evidence emerged as retired judge Baroness Butler-Sloss came under growing Âpressure to stand down as head of the Westminster child abuse inquiry.
She is accused of keeping allegations about a bishop out of a review of how the Church of England dealt with two paedophile priests because she âcared about the church.â
Now, she faces fresh criticism over her admission of the key role of Lord Havers in the Cleveland child sex abuse inquiry in 1987 which she led.
Asked who instigated the Cleveland inquiry in 2003 Lady Butler-Sloss replied: âI think it was my brother actually as Lord Chancellor.â A key part of the Thatcher era was her emphasis on âfamily valuesâ and personal morality.
at around the same time the former PMâs Parliamentary Private secretary, the late sir Peter Morrison, was indulging his sexual appetite for boys as young as 15. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/tory-child-abuse-whistleblower-margaret-3849172
Margaret Thatcher ‘personally covered up’ child abuse allegations against senior ministers
The Tory Prime Minister is said to have held a meeting with a rising star, who was tipped for promotion, and told him: âYou have to clean up your sexual actâ
Margaret Thatcher personally covered up child abuse Âallegations made against one of her senior ministers, according to explosive new claims. The Sunday People reports Tory Prime Minister is said to have held a high-powered meeting with the rising star, who was being tipped for promotion, and told him: âYou have to clean up your sexual act.â
It followed an allegation that the minister had sexually abused young boys at the home of one of his political allies in 1982.
However the minister apparently ignored the warnings. It is claimed that four years later he was spotted by police seeking young boys for sex at Victoria railway station in London.
But no action was taken.
The extraordinary claims â made to the Sunday People by a source with inside knowledge of Scotland Yard in the early 1980s â are now expected to be put before the
Westminster child abuse Âinquiry announced last week by the Prime Minister.
They go to the very heart of claims that there was an Establishment cover-up to protect politicians , judges and police officers involved in a sick Âpaedophile network.
According to the source, the ministerâs alleged interest in abusing young boys first came to light after he stayed at the home of a constituency agent.
The agent, responsible for Âsecuring local election success for the Tory MP, is believed to have alerted authorities. A high-level meeting involving then Prime Minister Mrs Thatcher, Home Secretary Willie Whitelaw, a senior Âpoliceman and an MI5 officer was held to discuss his alleged behaviour.
The minister, according to the source, was then summoned to 10 Downing Street.
But, instead of being disciplined or sacked, the minister was warned about his future behaviour and the matter was swept under the carpet.
Four years later, fresh allegations surfaced
Request: Smith âasked for young boysâ
In 1986, the politician was alleged to have been found seeking rent boys in the menâs toilets at Victoria railway station in central London Alec Marnoch, a highly respected police officer and Operations Commander of the Yardâs No 8 Area which covers Westminster and the West End.
Mr Marnoch, who died aged 58 in 1999 soon after his retirement, also Âintimated to the source that police working in Piccadilly Circus had got a report of the same politician importuning at one of Londonâs most notorious rent-boy haunts â the âchicken rackâ.
The âchicken rackâ was a set of metal railings close to Piccadilly underground station which was a vice hotspot in the 1980s.
Boys as young as 13 waited there to be picked up by men for sex â often VIPs such as politicians, TV stars or even policemen
The Sunday People has been leading the way since Mr Watson first stunned Parliament and PM David Cameron in October 2012 with claims of a high-profile paedophile network with links to 10 Downing Street.
Since breaking the story, we have produced a string of exclusives about the alleged VIP paedophile ring and reveal how far it reached. We first revealed the existence of the âDickens dossierâ which was Âhanded to then Home Secretary Leon Brittan.
Its disappearance has prompted the Butler-Sloss inquiry.
The dossier, compiled by now-dead MP Geoffrey Dickens , contained information that would blow the lid off a secret VIP paedophile network, according to Mr Dickensâs son Barry.
He says that in the weeks after his father submitted the dossier, the familyâs home was twice âprofessionallyâ burgled.
The Home Office admits there is no trace of the dossier and that 114 âpotentially relevant filesâ have been destroyed or lost.
The Home Office was forced to defend Baroness Butler-Sloss, 80, after it was claimed she buried allegations about a bishop from a child-abuse review in 2011.
She reportedly told a victim she did not want to include the allegations in a review of how the Church of England dealt with two paedophile priests because she âcared about the Churchâ and âthe Press would love a bishopâ. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/margaret-thatcher-personally-covered-up-3848836
HAS ANYTHING BEEN DONE ABOUT THESE CHILD MOLESTORS?
NO
IN FACT A ROLLING COMMITTEE WAS SET UP TO PROTECT THESE MOLESTORS
2003
The Sunday Times is reported to have obtained an FBI list of Labour MPs who have used credit cards to pay for internet child pornography, and Blair has responded by imposing a massive news blackout, failing however to stop the arrest of one of his most important aides, Phillip Lyon.The controversy [was] certain to topple the Blair government, which has already issued a D-Notice to gag the press from revealing the names of known paedophiles within the British executive, including at least two senior ministers; and the case highlights the governmentâs antipathy toward the Sunday Herald and its brand of independent journalism that has, among other things, exposed the role played by the domestic security agency, MI5, in helping the IRA to carry out terrorist atrocities. Also revealed by the Sunday Heraldâs Home Affairs Editor, Neil Mackay, the British intelligence services are actively engaged in preventing any further child sex revelations that could incite further hostility to an already unpopular Prime Minister and destroy the morale of troops set to invade Iraq. An intelligence officer told Mackay that âa ârollingâ Cabinet committee had been set up to work out how to deal with the potentially ruinous fall-out for both Tony Blair and the government if arrests occur. THE ROLLING CABINET COMMITTEE CONTINUES
IN FACT DAVID CAMERON CONTINUES TO WORK WITH AND PROTECT CHILD MOLESTORS
http://www.activistpost.com/2012/11/child-sex-rings-reveal-worst-of-power.html
BUT THE BRITISH ESTABLISHMENT DO HAVE THE ECUDORIAN EMBASSY SURROUNDED JUST IN CASE JULIAN ASSANGE DECIDES TO TRY AND HAVE CONSENTUAL SEX WITH ANOTHER MATURE SWEDISH WOMAN!
OR
IT COULD BE THAT JULIAN ASSANGE SETUP WIKILEAKS WHICH THREATENS TO EXPOSE THE VERY DARKEST SECRETS OF THE BRITISH ESTABLISHMENT!
Foreign Minister Ricardo Patino announced Tuesday that his government is considering suing the British government in the International Criminal Court in The Hague for denying Wikileaks founder Julian Assange safe passage to Ecuador. Assange has been forced to take refuge in the Ecuadorian embassy in London since he was granted asylum by the South American country in June last year. http://www.support-julian-assange.com/tag/ecuadorian-embassy-london/
SCOTLAND HAS THE CHANCE TO START THE LIBERATION OF THE BRITISH PEOPLE!
VOTE YES ON SCOTTISH INDEPENDENCE
SCOTLAND CAN START AS A NEW 21ST CENTURY DIRECT DEMOCRACY
Direct democracy, classically termed pure democracy, is a form of democracy and a theory of civics in which sovereignty is lodged in the assembly of all citizens who choose to participate. Depending on the particular system, this assembly might pass executive motions, make laws, elect or dismiss officials, and conduct trials. Direct democracy stands in contrast to representative democracy, (UK,EU system)where sovereignty is exercised by a subset of the people, usually on the basis of election.
Our subset of the people , all have the same financial backers and lobby groups, and are therefore a one-party-system of elected dictatorship. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_democracy
WE CAN END THE ODIOUS DEBT AS WELL
In international law, odious debt, also known as illegitimate debt, is a legal theory that holds that the national debt incurred by a regime for purposes that do not serve the best interests of the nation, should not be enforceable. Such debts are, thus, considered by this doctrine to be personal debts of the regime that incurred them and not debts of the state. In some respects, the concept is analogous to the invalidity of contracts signed under coercion. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Odious_debt
With choice of British nationalist or Scottish nationalist as a political identity for Scotland,there is a lot of lies and propaganda going on. Mainly from the “Doomed ,Doomed we’re all doomed” people in the “Bitter Together” camp which campaigns for the NO vote and British nationalism.
These people believe that Scotland cannot run itself,which is borderline racism in my book, and that Scotland is economically better of being British.This is a complete and obvious LIE.
Unionist Economists have turned Britain into a Debtor Nation
UNIONIST ECONOMISTS LIE
181ST IS LAST PLACE!!!
NOTICE THE 4 BIGGEST DEBTOR NATIONS WHERE THE NATIONS THAT GOT LIED INTO ILLEGAL WARS!
THEY ALL HAVE MAJOR ELITE PAEDOPHILE RINGS AS WELLâŚWHERE DID THOSE IRAQI WMDâS DISAPPEAR TOO?
Rank Country CAB USD, bn
1 Peopleâs Republic of China 371.833
2 Germany 252.501
3 Japan 210.967
4 Saudi Arabia 95.762
5 Russia 76.163
6 Switzerland 70.797
7 Norway 59.983
8 Netherlands 52.522
176 Greece -44.218
177 Italy -52.725
178 Australia -56.342
179 United Kingdom -105.224
180 Spain -145.141
181 United States -731.214 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_current_account_balance
This is a list of countries and territories by current account balance (CAB), based on the International Monetary Fund data for 2007, obtained from the latest World Economic Outlook database (October 2008).
Please notice Switzerland ,Norway and the Netherlands are NOT DEBTOR NATIONS!!
This is why I would be voting YES
UNIONISTS ARGUE WE SHOULD PROSTITUTE OUR CULTURE TO SUPPORT BRITISH NATIONALISM AND NEO NAZIS
These very same people think a greater British union is good ,but a greater European union is bad.Surely if Scotland should give up soverignty for promised money ,influence or economic wealth ,then this arguement must be sound for Britain to give up her soverignty to a greater European union for promised money ,influence and economic weealth.But apparently British unionists are not European Unionists.
British unionists DO support Ukrainian Neo Nazis but not Scottish Independence or greater European unionising?
UNIONISTS ARE FULL OF WAR CRIMINALS THEIVES AND PAEDOPHILES
The truth is ,is that the British establishment is corrupt to the core and full of mad power sociopaths, paedophiles ,war criminals ,thevies ,profiteers and blackmailers and the blackmailed, that there is just no hope for it.
This is why I would be voting YES!!!
IT HAS TO GO!
This is why I would be voting YES!
Britain and British as geo-cultural designation will still exist, just as Scandic and Scandinavian does for Sweden ,Norway and Denmark. I support the British and Irish Lions rugby team ,there is more chance of there being a British and Irish Lions Football team after independence.So do not worry about loosing your Britishness,its preserving your Scottishness that is important.We where Britons long before that Act of Union, we will still be Britons long after Scottish Independence.
This is not about the SNP and Alex Salmond, this is about Scotland and its future.This is not about David Cameron or the Tories ,who will continue to run Scotland from Westminster with a NO vote! So a vote for NO is a vote for Westminster and a vote for Tory rule and more of the status quo.
This is why I would be voting YES!
As for Europe ,not even Europe wants to be in Europe at the momment.
If you expect things to get better after a NO vote ,then you are clinically insane.To repeat an action and expect a different result is a clinical definition of insanity.IF you think this is the best Scotland can do then you have a very low opinion of Scots.Only a YES vote can change things.
I believe in a 21ST CENTURY Direct Democracy Scotland ,not another outdated Elected Dictatorship
Europe is changing everyday it seems and Scotland is just a small part of a greater natural movement.
This movement is for MORE democracy and accountability of politions! With the Independence vote in Scotland coming up. We can see the changing map of Europe and how and independant Scotland would fit very naturally into a modern Europe.
Just like Austria and Germany de-unified after WWII and the countries of the USSR de-unified and even the Czecheslovakia and Yugoslavia.
With the economic failure of Unionism and the dis-United Kingdom it is ONLY LOGICAL that Scotland should want to be master of her own destiny
NONE OF THE NEW “ANCIENT” RE-BORN EUROPEAN NATIONS THINK INDEPENDENCE IS A BAD IDEA!!!
NEITHER WILL SCOTLAND!!
Watch As 1000 Years Of European Borders Change (Timelapse Map)
Watch as 1000 years of European borders change (timelapse map)?An incredible time-lapse look at how drastically European borders have changed over the last 1000 years by Nick Mironenko on Vimeo.
Scotland please think about this!!!!
…and after independence maybe mention it to the debt ridden paedophiles and war criminals and financial snake oil salesmen still running “little Britain”
Ukraine revolution: Britain offers cash to Kiev as the world waits on Putin Britain has offered to help fund an international financial rescue package for Ukraine amid mounting fears that Russia may intervene following the country’s revolution. George Osborne, the Chancellor, said that Britain and other countries will be ready âwith a chequebookâ to help ârebuildâ Ukraine following the bloody violence that has seen 88 killed and hundreds more injured.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/ukraine/10657082/Ukraine-revolution-Britain-offers-cash-to-Kiev-as-the-world-waits-on-Putin.html
SO WHO IS OSBOURNE SUPPORTTING IN THE UKRAINE WITH A BRITISH OPEN CHEQUE BOOK?
THE NEO-NAZI RIGHT SECTOR!!!
Democracy Murdered By Protest: Ukraine Falls To Intrigue and Violence.
In western Ukraine the only organized and armed force is the ultra-nationalist Right Sector. From the way this groupâs leaders speak, they assume that they are in charge.
One of the groupâs leaders, Aleksandr Muzychko, has pledged to fight against âJews and Russians until I die.â Asserting the Right Sectorâs authority over the situation, Muzychko declared that now that the democratically elected government has been overthrown, âthere will be order and disciplineâ or âRight Sector squads will shoot the bastards on the spot.â
The bastards are any protesters who dare to protest the Right Sectorâs control.
Muzychko declared, âThe next president of Ukraine will be from Right Sector.â
Another Right Sector leader, Dmitry Yarosh, declared: âthe Right Sector will not lay down its arms.â He declared the deal made between the opposition and the President to be âunacceptableâ and demanded the liquidation of President Yanukovichâs political party.
The Right Sectorâs roots go back to the Ukrainians who fought for Adolf Hitler against the Soviet Union during World War 2. It was the Right Sector that introduced armed fighters and turned the tide of the protests in Kiev from peaceful protests in favor of joining the EU to violent attacks on police with the view of overthrowing the democratically elected government, which the Right Sector succeeded in doing.
The Right Sector did not overthrow the Ukraine government in order to deliver it into the hands of the Washington and EU paid âopposition.â
There is a tendency to discount the Right Sector as a small fringe group, but the Right Sector not only took control of the protests away from the Western supported moderates, as moderate leaders themselves admitted, but also the Right Sector has enough public support to destroy the national monument to the Red Army soldiers who died liberating Ukraine from Nazi Germany.If the Right Sector hates Russians for defeating the Nazis, the Right Sector also hates the US, France, and England for the same reason. The Right Sector is an unlikely political party to take Ukraine into the EU.
Provincial governments in eastern and southern Ukraine that formerly were part of Russia are organizing militias against the ultra-nationalist threat unleashed by Washingtonâs stupidity and incompetence and by the naive and gullible Kiev protesters.
Having interfered in Ukraineâs internal affairs and lost control, Washington is now issuing ultimatums to Russia not to interfere in Ukraine. Does the idiot Susan Rice, Obamaâs neoconservative National Security Advisor, think Putin is going to pay any attention to her ultimatums or to any instruction from a government so militarily incompetent that it was unable to successfully occupy Baghdad after 8 years or to defeat a few thousand lightly armed Taliban after 12 years? In only took a few hours for Russian troops to destroy the American and Israeli trained and armed Georgian army that Washington sent to invade South Ossetia.
Where does Obama find morons like Susan Rice and Victoria Nuland? These two belong in a kindergarten for mentally handicapped children, not in the government of a superpower where their ignorance and arrogance can start World War 3.
The Ukrainian right-wing is in a stronger position than Washingtonâs paid Ukrainian puppets, essentially weak and irrelevant persons who sold out their country for Washingtonâs money. The Right Sector is organized. It is armed. It is indigenous. It is not dependent on money funneled in from Washington and EU financed NGOs. It has an ideology, and it is focused. The Right Sector doesnât have to pay its protesters to take to the streets like Washington had to do.
The American media is a useless news source. It serves as a Ministry for Government Lies. The corrupt propagandists are portraying the undemocratic removal of Yanukovich as a victory for freedom and democracy. When it begins to leak out that everything has gone wrong, the presstitutes will blame it all on Russia and Putin. The Western media is a plague upon humanity. http://www.globalresearch.ca/democracy-murdered-by-protest-ukraine-falls-to-intrigue-and-violence/5370317
Sources: http://rt.com/news/ukraine-right-sector-militants-210/ http://rt.com/news/war-monument-toppled-ukraine-351/ http://rt.com/news/ukraine-acting-president-yanukovich-339/ http://rt.com/news/ukraine-opposition-yanukovich-coup-273/ http://www.themoscowtimes.com/news/article/russia-pledges-to-fight-for-crimea-if-ukraine-splits/495034.html http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-26312008 http://www.channel4.com/news/kiev-svoboda-far-right-protests-right-sector-riot-police
You don’t need me to tell you how bad things are.
You already know.
You already know that the wealth of American(and European) workers is being stripped away to prop up a failed private central banking system that issues the public currency as a loan at interest, by design creating more debt than money with which to pay that debt, to trap and enslave you.
You already know your children are dying in wars of conquest intended to force that same failed system of national economics onto other nations.
You already know the US (and UK) Government has abandoned even the pretense of complying with(international Law and Human Rights) the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
You already know that the United States(and the UK) has become a nation few want their children to have to live in.(A mass of people have already left,including myself and my friends btw things got better for us) You know all this!
The question is, what will you do about it? It is up to you, you know.
The reality is that there are no heroes to step forward to save the situation. That is a fantasy purveyed by film and TV to lull you into the false belief that if you sit quietly at home and do nothing to challenge the rulers, that someone else will fix the problems that curse your lives.
You know that is a lie.
Superman is a comic book, the Lone Ranger a radio show, Batman does what he does only on the silver screen, government and banking will never correct the corruptions which have made then rich and powerful, the CIA is not the swell bunch of Joes portrayed in the Tom Clancy books, and the imaginary playmate in the sky is not going to alter the nature of the world in exchange for the small change you toss into the collection plates, no matter how much you grovel before that child molester in the funny looking robes.
You know that.
If there is to be a better world, for you and your children, you must make it happen. And only you can do it.
If you want truthful government, you must make public the government’s lies.
If you want honest banking, you must withdraw your business from dishonest financial institutions.
If you want accurate and fair media, you must ignore the tellers of lies and support the tellers of facts.
If you want peace, you must openly oppose war.
If you want an end to corruption, you must unite together against the corrupters.
If you want a nation that is not controlled by a foreign government, then you must remove that foreign government’s enablers.
If you want a public currency that is a public utility, you must issue that currency and refuse to use the currency designed to enslave you with debt.
If you want honest elections, then you must destroy the means by which elections are rigged, and drive from power all those who stole their offices.
Above all, you must allow yourself to be openly angry to what has been done to you, what is being done to your children, and what is being done to your nation, because this is your nation. And ultimate responsibility for the future of the nation rests with you.
Only you.
If you want a better world, you must make it happen.
FOR THE PEOPLE OF SCOTLAND
THERE IS A GREAT OPPORTUNITY TO CHANGE THINGS
REAL CHANGE YOU CAN BELIEVE IN
DO NOT LISTEN TO THE NAE SAYERS AND PROPHETS OF DOOM
FOR SOME PEOPLE CHANGE SCARES THEM
DO NOT BE TIMID AND FEAR THE SHADOWS AND PAPER TIGERS OF LIARS
THE UNIONISTS LIE ABOUT SCOTLANDS ECONOMY (I KNOW I WORKED FOR THE FINANCIAL INDUSTRY, ALEX SALMOND KNOWS THIS TOO!)
THE UNIONISTS LIE ABOUT THE NEED FOR WAR (EVERYONE KNOWS THIS!!)
THE UNIONISTS LIE ABOUT NUCLEAR POWER (A UNIONIST FUKUSHIMA ON THE CLYDE ANYONE?)
THE UNIONISTS LIE ABOUT HUMAN RIGHTS AND WAR CRIMES(FROM THATCHER TO BLAIR AND BACK TO CAMERON , ALL UK WANTED WAR CRIMINALS)
THE UNIONISTS LIE ABOUT CENTRALISED BANKING(WE HAVE NEVER BEEN IN SO MUCH DEBT AS TODAY, WHAT HAPPENED TO THE OIL REVENUE?)
THE UNIONISTS LIE VIA THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA ,THE BBC BROADCASTING BULLSHIT CONSTANTLY , WHEN NOT BUGGERING BRITISH CHILDREN
THESE PEOPLE ONLY WANT THE STATUS QUO TO BE MAINTAINED
TO KEEP THEM IN THE LIFESTYLE THEY HAVE BECOME ACCUSTOMED TOO
AND TO KEEP THEM AWAY FROM PRISON
FOR FRAUD ,WAR CRIMES AND PAEDOPHILIA THE UNIONISTS ARE FULL OF FRAUSTERS ,WAR CRIMINALS AND PAEDOPHILES THEY ARE BETTER TOGETHER WE ARE BETTER WITHOUT THEM!!!
Newsnet Scotland presents … Duggy Dug in … Scotland’s Oil
Newsnet Scotland has pleasure in presenting the first in a series of animations that will take an off beat look at some of the key issues surrounding the independence debate.
Duggy Dug is our animated cartoon character who will raise a smile and a chuckle whilst providing his own inimitable commentary.
Our Scottish terrier has been months in the making and today we finally release our first animation.
‘Scotland’s Oil’ is Duggy’s take on one of the most enduring issues in the debate over Scotland’s future. How much is left, who controls it and what has happened to the cash generated since it was first discovered.
The animation has taken considerable effort and resources and our hope is that it generates sufficient donations in order to continue the series. We urge readers to contribute what they can and to distribute the link to both Duggy’s own website – DuggyDug.com – and also our own Youtube link.
DUGGY DUG – YOU’LL BELIEVE A DUG CAN TALK
UNIONISTS CAN ONLY PROMISE MORE OF THE SAME MORE WAR CRIMES MORE PAEDOPHILIA MORE DEBT MORE LIES A UNIONIST FUTURE OF LIES ,MASS SURVEILLENCE AND PURPETUAL WAR AWAITS
FOR ME AN INDEPENDENT DIRECT DEMOCRACY SCOTLAND WITH A WRITTEN CONSTINTUTION INCLUDING DIRECT DEMOCRACY ,HUMAN RIGHTS AND ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURSES PROTECTION WITH A STATE OWNED BANK OF SCOTLAND THAT PRINTS OUR OWN INTEREST FREE MONEY IS THE ANSWER
KEEP YOUR ELECTED DICTATORSHIP POSING AS DEMOCRACY
KEEP YOUR DEBT RIDDEN BRITISH POUND
KEEP YOUR EURO DISNEY CURRENCY
ECONOMICALLY IT IS OF GREAT IMPORTANCE FOR SCOTLAND TO BE INDEPENDANT
THIS VIEW IS SHARED BY THE LEFT AND THE RIGHT
View from the LEFT
âLABOUR ministers were warned in a secret Whitehall dossier 30 years ago of the powerful case for Scotland becoming independent with booming oil revenues, but the information was kept confidential by Harold Wilsonâs government to keep nationalism at bay.
The dossier, most of which was written by a leading government economist in 1974 and 1975, sets out how Scotland would have had one of the strongest currencies in Europe, attracting international capital into its banks in the same way as Switzerland.
It argued Scotland could quickly become one of Europeâs strongest economies with âembarrassinglyâ large tax surpluses.â
View from the RIGHT
âAdam Smith Institute, Friday, April 27, 2007
The Scottish economy could enjoy record growth if Scotland became independent, leaving the average Scot many thousands of pounds better off each year. This is the finding of a research Briefing Paper published today by the Adam Smith Institute, the free market economic think tank.â
THESE FACTS ARE STILL VERY TRUE TODAY
PLEASE READ THIS ARTICLE/POST BY JOHN JAPPY FOR SOME VERY CANDID ECONOMIC TRUTH
Before retiring, John Jappy was a senior civil servant in the Inland Revenue, working for the Accountant & Comptroller Generalâs Branch based at Somerset House in London. His duties involved liaising closely with Treasury officials to prepare accounts and financial information for UK government ministers.
Would an independent Scotland be financially sound? YES!!!
NOTE THE BIGGEST DEBTORS IN THE WORLD ARE THE ONES THAT LIED US INTO WAR IN IRAQ
THE USA
THE UK
AUSTRALIA
AND SPAIN!!!
THE AXIS OF EVIL(SPREADING CENTRALISED BANKING AND CENTRALISED ELECTED DICTATORSHIPS)
Rank Country CAB USD, bn
1 Peopleâs Republic of China 371.833
2 Germany 252.501
3 Japan 210.967
4 Saudi Arabia 95.762
5 Russia 76.163 6 Switzerland 70.797 7 Norway 59.983
8 Netherlands 52.522
176 Greece -44.218
177 Italy -52.725 178 Australia -56.342 179 United Kingdom -105.224 180 Spain -145.141 181 United States -731.214 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_current_account_balance
This is a list of countries and territories by current account balance (CAB), based on the International Monetary Fund data for 2007, obtained from the latest World Economic Outlook database (October 2008).
SINCE THEM WE HAVE HAD THE CREDIT CRUNCH AND AUSTERITY MEASURES
IF ONLY WE WHERE LIKE DIRECT DEMOCRACY ICELAND WE COULD DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!!!
PLEASE NOTE THE ECONOMIC RECOVERY OF ICELAND UNDER INDEPENDANT SELF RULE AND DIRECT DEMOCRACY!
INSTEAD ECONOMIC UNIONISED/CENTRALISED REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY(ELECTED DICTATORSHIP)
ICELAND HAS JUST VOTED TO STOP EU MEMBERSHIP APPLICATION!!
THEY WILL HOLD A REFERENDUM ,BECAUSE THEY ARE A TRUELLY DEMOCRATIC NATION ,UNLIKE THE UK OR THE EU!!
Iceland heads for EU referendum
Iceland has suspended European Union entry talks until after holding a referendum that is almost certain to reject membership
67 percent would reject EU membership .Opposition to membership of the European Union is growing in Iceland. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/iceland/10073787/Iceland-heads-for-EU-referendum.html
The modern banking system manufactures money out of nothing. The process is perhaps the most astounding piece of sleight of hand that was ever invented. Banking was conceived in inequity and born in sin . . . Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them but leave them the power to create money, and, with a flick of a pen, they will create enough money to buy it back again . . . Take this great power away from them, and all great fortunes like mine will disappear, for then this would be a better and happier world to live in. . . . But, if you want to continue to be the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, then let bankers continue to create money and control credit.
– Sir Josiah Stamp, Director of the Bank of England, 1927
Guess Which Country Has Debt Of Nearly 1000% Of GDPâŚ
THE LIE OF BRITISH UNIONIST ECONOMIC POWER Chinese rating agency strips Western nations of AAA status
Chinaâs leading credit rating agency has stripped America, Britain, Germany and France of their AAA ratings, accusing Anglo-Saxon competitors of ideological bias in favour of the West.
The US falls to AA, while Britain and France slither down to AA-. Belgium, Spain, Italy are ranked at A- along with Malaysia.
Dagong rates Norway, Denmark, Switzerland, and Singapore at AAA, along with the commodity twins Australia and New Zealand. AN INDEPENDANT SCOTLAND WOULD BE AAA TOO IF IT WAS NOT PART OF A FAILED FINANICAL BASKET CASE, STATE CAPITALIST UK!!!
PEOPLE OF SCOTLAND YOU CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE YOU CAN MAKE HISTORY YOU CAN STOP A WAR MACHINE YOU CAN END THE AUSTERITY MEASURES YOU CAN CLOSE THE PAEDOPHLIE RINGS
UNIONIST POLITIONS CANNOT AND WILL NOT STOP ANY OF THIS
…AND IN A DIRECT DEMOCRACY (TRUE DEMOCRACY) MOST OF THEM WOULD BE IN JAIL!!!!
BUT
YOU CAN FREE YOUR ENGLISH(AND WELSH AND NORTHERN IRISH) BROTHERS AND SISTERS FROM THE YOKE OF BRITISH ESTABLISHMENT AS WELL!
VOTE YES IN 2014
AND SHAKE THE WORLD!!
A newly independent Scotland could start afresh without the burden of having to pay off some of the UKâs massive debt mountain, according to a leading academic.
According to the Scottish Sun on Sunday, Doctor Matt Qvortrup has said international precedent backs his view that a Yes vote could result in Scotland freeing itself from a ÂŁ125bn UK debt liability.
According to Doctor Qvortrup, Scots could be presented with an opportunity to ‘vote Yes and send the bill to David Cameron’.
Speaking to the newspaper, the academic said: “Of course I am neutral and just an observer, but the world deserves to know the facts. Personally speaking, I think this could be a game changer.”
He said: “If Alex Salmond doesnât want to share the debt and is happy to reapply to Europe, the default position in international law is that Scotland would not have to pick up the debt. “That has to be known to the people before the vote next year so that David Cameron will know we are starting negotiations from the position that UK (remainder of UK) is the successor state. That has consequences. The one that pays the debt is the successor state. “If you want to be the EU successor state and be in the UN Security Council, you can. You take all the spoils – but you also take the baggage.”
Doctor Qvortrupâs views are backed he says by historical examples of single entities becoming two separate states. In a new report which studied examples since 1830, Doctor Qvortrup looked at the aftermath of Belgium leaving the Netherlands, the break-up of the former Soviet Union and the break-up of Yugoslavia.
His research revealed that countries which split equally took on their respective share of any debts built up over the period of their union. However, where one country assumed the role of âsuccessor stateâ and with it the old memberships of organisations like the EU and UN, then that country shouldered all of the debt.
Doctor Qvortrup added: “In Yugoslavia, Serbia Montenegro wanted to be the successor country but they were deemed not to be – which meant they were not landed with the debt. The position Scottish Secretary Michael Moore and Prime Minister David Cameron have is that as long as they are the successor state itâs all good.
“But the understanding about them having to pay the debt could be a good argument for the Yes campaign. “All other things being equal, Scotland does not have to pay its share of the UKâs debt.” The UK government has already claimed that the remainder of the former UK would be the successor state and that Scotland would be treated as a brand new state. Westminster has also suggested that a newly independent Scotland could be prevented from using the pound.
The SNP has already pointed out that should Westminster adopt a stance that led to some UK assets, already partly owned by Scotland, being denied a newly independent Scotland then the logical extension of the argument would apply to current UK debt.
Sunday, 12 May 2013
By Martin Kelly http://newsnetscotland.com/index.php/referendum/7365-independent-scotland-could-be-debt-free-if-westminster-maintains-current-stance
IMHO THE DEBT IS ODIOUS
In international law, odious debt, also known as illegitimate debt, is a legal theory that holds that the national debt incurred by a regime for purposes that do not serve the best interests of the nation, should not be enforceable. Such debts are, thus, considered by this doctrine to be personal debts of the regime that incurred them and not debts of the state. In some respects, the concept is analogous to the invalidity of contracts signed under coercion. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Odious_debt
THEREFORE SCOTLANDS DEBT WILL BE VOIDED WITH A YES VOTE
THERE IS ALSO THE MATTER OF THE LEGALITY OF THE DEBT
In November 2008, Ecuador became the first country to undertake an examination of the legitimacy and structure of its foreign debt. An independent debt audit commissioned by the government of Ecuador documented hundreds of allegations of irregularity, illegality, and illegitimacy in contracts of debt to predatory international lenders. The loans, according to the report, violated Ecuadorâs domestic laws, US Securities and Exchange Commission regulations, and general principles of international law. Ecuadorâs use of legitimacy as a legal argument for defaulting set a major precedent; indeed, the formation of a debt auditing commission sets a precedent. http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/10-ecuador-declares-foreign-debt-illegitimate/
AN INDEPENDANT SCOTLAND CAN EXAMINE THE LEGALITY OF ITS DEBT
THE UNIONIST ECONOMIC DISASTER
Chinese rating agency strips Western nations of AAA status
Chinaâs leading credit rating agency has stripped America, Britain, Germany and France of their AAA ratings, accusing Anglo-Saxon competitors of ideological bias in favour of the West.
The US falls to AA, while Britain and France slither down to AA-. Belgium, Spain, Italy are ranked at A- along with Malaysia. Dagong rates Norway, Denmark, Switzerland, and Singapore at AAA, along with the commodity twins Australia and New Zealand.
AN INDEPENDANT SCOTLAND WOULD BE AAA TOO IF IT WAS NOT PART OF A FAILED FINANICAL BASKET CASE, STATE CAPITALIST UK!!!
The UK LOST 34.8 BILLION POUNDS in 2006 , surely by unionist logic, the UK is a non viable independant state.Especially now with the credit crunch and Englands economic eggs ,all in one very unstable financial basket. So the UK must be disbanded and made to join the EUâŚâŚ.. or else the UK is  just some embarassing little umimportant economic basket case stuck on the fringes of Europe!
Unionism has given Scotland
1. a loss of business investment ,as bank rates are set according to the southsâ needs so encouraging business to move south.
2. Increased unemployment due to unfavourable business environment and the migration of businesses to the south http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/talking_point/198830.stm
3. a 25%-30%(at least) LOSS of living standards ,or a 30% Union Jack Tax.
Using the UKâs own assumptions for tax revenue and spending, but including Scotlandâs share of North Sea Oil receipts, this answer revealed that between 1978-79 and 1994-95 Scotland had a cumulative surplus of ÂŁ27.6 billion, or ÂŁ34 billion in todayâs prices. At the same time the UK had a deficit of more than ÂŁ330bn.
4. caused a population exodus,note there where less people in Scotland in 2006 than in 1961 and note the amount of ex-pat posters
5,116,900 (2006 est)
5,094,800 (2005 est)
5,078,400 (2004 est)
5,057,400 (2003 est)
5,054,800 (2002 est)
5,062,011 (2001 est)
5,083,000 (1991 est)
5,180,200 (1981 est)
5,234,000 (1971 est)
5,201,000 (1961 est) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_of_Scotland
MORE SCOTS FLED UNIONIST SCOTLAND THAN GERMANS FLED NAZI GERMANY
NOTICE THE POPULATION EXODUS STOPPED AFTER DEVOLUTION
WOULD THE LAST SCOT TO LEAVE THE UNION PLEASE SWITCH THE LIGHTS OUT…..
The unionist MSM has been trying to connect the Scottish Nationalist part with the Nazi party, using Godwins law, that means the unionists have already lost the arguement.
I would not want to point out that in fact the German National Socialist party was a fake socialist unionist party backed by big business and believed in Greater Germany and hated Prussian and Rhineland seperatists and Austrian nationalists and considered direct democracy evil
The modern Labour party is a fake socialist unionist party backed by big business and believes in Greater Britain and hates Englsih seperatists and Scottish and Welsh nationalists and considers direct democracy evil
They both lied thier countries into illegal wars
They both claimed to bring economic miracles which ended in disaster and destruction
They both brought in smoking bans
They are both still being hunted down for war crimes
Apparently the nazis where not big on paedophilia unlike the modern labour party
VOTE YES IN 2014 FOR A DEBT FREE INDEPENDANT PROSPEROUS SCOTLAND
âAll government, of course, is against liberty. The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary. Most people want security in this world, not liberty.â
âWhether the mask is labeled Fascism, Democracy, or Dictatorship or the Proletariat, our great adversary remains the Apparatus-the bureaucracy, the police, the militaryâŚ. No matter what the circumstances, the worst betrayal will always be to subordinate ourselves to this Apparatus, and to trample underfoot, in its service, all human values in ourselves and in others.ââ The French worker philosopher Simone Weil,1945
âThe most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out⌠without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable. It doesnât take a majority to make a rebellion; it takes only a few determined leaders and a sound cause.â
A NEW SCOTLAND
AND END BRITISH STATE CAPITALISM POSING AS DEMOCRACY
State capitalism has various different meanings, but is usually described as a society wherein the productive forces are controlled and directed by the state in a capitalist manner, even if such a state calls itself socialist. Corporatized state agencies and states that own controlling shares of publicly-listed firms, and thus acting as a capitalist itself, are two examples of state capitalism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_capitalism
OF COURSE THIS IS JUST FASCISM!!
Fascism should more appropriately be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power.
Benito Mussolini, fascist dictator of Italy (1922-1943)
A NOT SO GREAT WARFARE ECONOMY The modern banking system manufactures money out of nothing. The process is perhaps the most astounding piece of sleight of hand that was ever invented. Banking was conceived in inequity and born in sin . . . Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them but leave them the power to create money, and, with a flick of a pen, they will create enough money to buy it back again . . . Take this great power away from them, and all great fortunes like mine will disappear, for then this would be a better and happier world to live in. . . . But, if you want to continue to be the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, then let bankers continue to create money and control credit.
– Sir Josiah Stamp, Director of the Bank of England, 1927
SO YOU CAN KEEP YOUR BRITISH FIAT POUND
…AND YOUR EURO DISNEY CURRENCY
SCOTLAND CAN PRINT ITS OWN MONEY
REAL MONEY NOT FIAT MONEY
A GREAT EXAMPLE BEING PRESIDENT ANDREW JACKSON âThe Bank is trying to kill me, but I shall kill it!â
ANDREW JACKSONS VIEW OF THE BANKSâŚ.NO BAILOUT. âYou are a nest of vipers and thieves, and by the grace of the almighty God, I will root you out!â
ANDREW JACKSONâS VIEW ON CORPORATIONS Corporations have neither bodies to kick nor souls to damn.
ANDREW JACKSONS VIEW ON THE BRIGHTEST AND THE BEST Hemans gallows ought to be the fate of all such ambitious men who would involve their country in civil wars, and all the evils in its train that they might reign & ride on its whirlwinds & direct the Stormâ The free people of these United States have spoken, and consigned these wicked demagogues to their proper doom.
WE HAVE BEEN HERE BEFORE , PLEASE TAKE ANDREW JACKSONS ADVICE! âNever take counsel of your fears.â
The Jacksonians opposed government granted monopolies to banks, especially the national bank, which was a central bank known as the Second Bank of the United States. Jackson fought to end the government monopoly to the Bank and got great opposition from Nicholas Biddle, the bank chairman. Biddle first dismissed Jackson efforts, but as the initiative gained popular support, he got more concerned. There was an attempt to murder Jackson at that time but the pistols failed. Jackson would later claim that he had proof the bankers were behind this attempt. Jackson was able to gain popular support because the Bank money manipulations and inflation had created a big recession, and it had inflated land prices, benefiting big land owners and stopping economical development. In a last attempt to stop Jackson, Biddle burst the bubble his inflationary policies had created, and brought about a deflationary correction. This put pressure on Jackson, but after a year of recession, the economy was clean by the deflationary correction, and the Bank was out of âammunitionâ. Jackson had won the battle. The Bank continued his operations as a state bank, but had to close years after. Once retired, everytime Jackson was asked what was his biggest achievement as president he answered: âI killed the Bankâ. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacksonian_democracy
Andrew Jackson was the only President to pay off the national debt.
SO WHY ARE WE NOT ROOTING OUT THIS NEST OF VIPERS?!?!
WE CAN START WITH THE NEST OF VIPERS IN WESTMINSTER …..AND FINISH WITH THE PARCEL OF ROGUES RUNNING THE NO CAMPAIGN
THESE BRITISH WAR MONGERS ARE JUST THIEVES AND LAIRS AND TERRORIST SUPPORTTERS ,HEMANS GALLOWS ARE TOO GOOD FOR THEM
WE SHOULD THROW THEM TO THIER VICTIMS
THE LIBYA SMASH AND GRAB SUPPORTTED BY ISLAMIC TERRORISTS ,GOT THE MONEY JUNKIES THIER FIX
THE MSM TRIEDS TO GLORIFY MARGARET THATCHER ,A WOMAN WHO IN REALITY IS UNIVERSALLY DESPISED BY THOSE THAT HAVE SUFFERED FROM HER ACTIONS,…….THEY DID THIS WITH REAGAN AS WELL….ANOTHER STATE CAPITALIST MUPPET THAT IS TOO STUPID TO SEE THE FLAWS IN THIER OWN IDEOLOGIES
BOTH THESE DELUSIONAL MEGALOMANIACS ARE THE ROOT OF ALL OF TODAYS PROBLEMS OF WARS, FAILED BANKS AND DESTROYED MANUFACTURING
THEY HAVE IN 20 YEARS TURNED BOTH COUNTRIES INTO DEBT RIDDEN,DYSFUNCTIONAL, WAR MONGERS WITH NO HOPE OF BEING ABLE TO FEED OR CLOTH THEMSELVES IN TIMES OF NEED
MAGGIE THATCHER DID NOT SAVE BRITAIN!!!
NORTH SEA OIL SAVED BRITAIN
AND THATCHERISM AND ITS FINANCIAL MUPPETS SENT US ON A 20 YEAR COURSE TO NATIONAL DESTRUCTION
MAGGIE THATCHER ALSO THOUGHT IT WAS ALRIGHT TO USE SCOTLAND AS AN EXPERIMENTAL GROUND FOR HER UNWORKABLE POLICIES ,AS SHE HAD ZERO MPS ELECTED IN SCOTLAND, SO SHE HAD NOTHING TO LOOSE IF IT WAS A DISASTER….WHICH IT WAS AND STILL IS!!!
THATCHER CALLS THIS DEMOCRACY AND UNIONISM
I CALL IT AN ELECTED DICTATORSHIP ,STATE CAPITALISM AND COLONIALISM
THATCHER DEREGALATED THE FINANCIAL INDUSRTY….IT BANKRUPTED THE NATION
THATCHER REGULATED THE SOCIETY WITH HER VICTORIAN VALUES ,WHICH INCLUDED ENABLING PAEDOPHILES,
THIS LED TO AN INCREASE IN SOCIAL POVERTY AND BROKENS HOMES AND EVEN WHOLE COMMUNITIES DECTROYED
SINGLE MOTHERS AND BREAKEN FAMILIES AND VIOLENT STREET GANGS ARE ALL JUST THATCHERS CHILDREN
GEE THANKS THATCHER…..
On Monday the British Prime Minister, David Cameron claimed that Margaret Thatcher had âsaved Britainâ by the economic policy she adopted and stuck to, in such a stubborn manner, while other politicians and news pundits made similar claims.
THIS CLAIM IS A LIE
IT WAS THE DISCOVERY OF NORTH SEA OIL THAT FINANCIALLY SAVED BRITAIN
THATCHER JUST SQUANDERED ALL THAT NATIONAL WEALTH ON FRAUDSTERS AND SNAKE OIL SALESMEN
THATCHER AND BANKERS ARE THE REASON BRITAIN IS BANKRUPTED AND GOVERNED BY PAEDOPHILES AND WAR CRIMINALS
So what was Thatcherâs contribution to economic policy in Britain and is there some clear definition of Thatcherism?
There is no doubt that major changes took place in the late 70âs and 80âs which significantly changed the British economy and had profound effects in income distribution, social coherence, manufacturing production and economic viability for the British economy and that Thatcher played a major role in this change.
So what exactly was that change, and will it be beneficial for Britainâs long term viability?
To understand this change we need to take a wee look at Britainâs economic history before that period.
Before the First World War Britainâs economy was based on an empire which functioned very much on the basis of Britain importing âcheapâ raw materials from itâs âcoloniesâ around the world and being a world class manufacturing centre supported by an effective banking structure and a powerful military and administrative structure. This ensured that when Britain strongly supported âclassical economicsâ and defended âfree tradeâ in international markets this happily fitted well with British trade.
THE RISE OF KEYNES…AND HIS “BENINGN” STATE CAPITALISM …… AKA Â FASCISM
All of this changed after the 1914-18 war; indeed it was a major cause of that war. In the period between the wars classical economic and free trade suffered a loss of credibility as a result of market fluctuations and massive unemployment in the great depression.
So by the time the Second World War started people were desperately seeking better, more effective economic models than the classical model which had failed. It was in this period that John Maynard Keynes developed his theories about Government control and regulation to intervene in the market to effect employment and production.
It is a sobering fact that after the first year of the Second World War Britain still had considerable unemployment among shipyard workers, while the Germans were working full blast and importing labour to build ships to challenge the British Navy.
Churchill, when he come to power changed that and employed Keynes as a Government economic advisor. This final rejection of classical economics and the changeover to Keynesian economic policy was not noticed in the middle of the war, but it cured unemployment and enabled us to build an economy which could ensure our part in the final defeat of Hitler. The Attlee Government which took over at the end of the war continued to employ Keynes as an economic advisor and continued to follow a Keynesian policy. This Government was the most successful Government ever in Britain and left a valuable legacy for the Governments which followed in terms of economic policy, full employment, social benefits and âPublic Assetsâ and their policy was so successful that the Tory Governments which followed behind were afraid to change this policy and continued to operate a Keynesian full employment strategy.
In the 1970âs the British economy was still maintaining relatively full employment but the level of investment had been very low so that manufacturing productivity and economic efficiency in general was falling sharply. Briton was confronted with an international market in which it was increasingly unable to effectively compete with other emerging economies. There was an economic crisis every year either a âbalance of paymentsâ problem or a ârun on the poundâ or inflation, or wage disputes. The media was calling Britain the âsick man of Europeâ. In this situation the right wing in the Labour Party supported a policy which would keep wages down in return for full employment. The wanted an âincomes policyâ or a âsocial contractâ which would see workers accept low wages in order to save the national economy. This policy which may have been well intended was fatally flawed because the problem was not high wages it was low investment, and low wages merely encourage low investment in a capitalist market.
If we need a date when the Labour leadership rejected Keynesian policies then perhaps it is Jim Callaghanâs speech to the 1976 Labour Party Conference where he told conference âWe used to think that you could spend your way out of a recession and increase employment by cutting taxes and boosting Government spending. I tell you, in all candour, that that option no longer exits.â That statement is a clear rejection of Labourâs Keynesian past.
This of course led to bitter internal fighting in the labour movement and eventually to the tragic âWinter of Discontentâ where Callaghan tried to force an incomes policy on low-paid Government employees, much to the delight of Thatcher and the Tories.
THE THATCHER CON…
SELLING OLD AND USED IDEOLOGIES AS NEW AND INNOVATIVE VIA A SATTCHI AND SATTCHI ADVERTISING CAMPAIGN AND AN ILLEGAL WAR
MODERN POLITICS IS BORN
So the rejection of Keynesian economics and the adoption of neo-liberalism or more accurately, neo-classical economics started in the final days of the Callaghan Government, but Thatcher embraced it from the beginning and she pursued this strategy with vigour and determination in the teeth of bitter opposition, creating mass unemployment and industrial devastation on a huge scale all over Britain but with most effect in the areas of relatively high industrialization. This adoption of neo-classical economic theory with blind faith in âfree marketâ solutions not only caused mass unemployment and a huge loss of manufacturing capacity, which were widely unpopular (Thatcher was the most unpopular PM ever according to the polls just prior to the Falklands war), but they would have led to a considerable fall in GNP, a balance of payments crisis and a run on the pound, if it had not been for substantial oil coming ashore from the north sea just at that time which miraculously boosted the GNP, supported the weak pound and helped the balance of payments. This development in the economy, which had been set in train long before Thatcher, combined with the political boost she got from the Falklands war saved Thatcher from ignominious defeat at the next general election and turned it into substantial victory.
This convinced Thatcher that she was right and for most people if seemed as though she understood how to get the economic improvements which everyone claimed was required. So Thatcher went full-steam ahead and took on the miners in order to undermine the working class organisational base.
This she achieved, again with the strong support of Scottish oil and her reputation as a politician who knew how to deal with âeconomicâ problems rose, as did the idea of Thatcherism. However although that reputation has survived and people still claim as Cameron did, that she saved Britain, what is Thatcherism? Well as an economic theory it does not exist. Thatcher was ignorant in the economic field. She claimed to be a strong supporter of Adam Smithâs ideas, but it is obvious that she did not understand them. Karl Marx could have explained to her the great value of Smithâs work which he certainly appreciated. Thatcherism in economic terms is simply a return to classical economics with all its failings and an emotional rejection of Keynesian ideas. Thatcherâs destruction of industry and manufacturing in Britain was not replaced by heavy investment to re-new or up-date industry; on the contrary it left industry in Britain in permanent decline. It used public assets to boost private assets by state organised raiding of public assets for cheap sale which she called âprivatisationâ which was supposed to help the economy, not by economic theory but by blind belief. However it made a lot of people rich without adding anything to the real GNP. In support of her obsession with free market ideology, she and Ronald Reagan cut controls and regulation of the Banking and financial systems in Britain and the USA which led directly to the international banking crisis in 2008.
FYI THATCHERITES
CAPITALISM FOR DUMMIES
1.Availability of credit allows money to flow between savers and borrowers.
2.Resources and funds are allocated to various projects or investments during a boom phase.
3.Eventually borrowing becomes excessive and leads to malinvestment,
4.At this stage, adherence to free market theory would allow for an efficient cleansing period and a healthy recovery period. How? Irresponsible and unprofitable businesses fail. Bad debts get liquidated. Excess resources go on sale, flow into more stable ventures and pool together with more profitable resources controlled by healthy corporations or entities http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article6497.html
THEREFORE…..
NO BAILOUT!!!!!!!!!
LET THE BANKS FALL
The British economy today has only the shadow of the manufacturing base it had when she came to power and with her neo-classical policies being continued by the present Tory Government the economy is in decline or stagnation and living standards are falling. We have the fourth most unequal society in the worldwith âfree marketâ operations everywhere but still low investment and high inflation on top of unemployment and the Government is blaming the poor for this mess. To top it all the economy is entirely dependent on the Banking and finance sector which has grown enormously and which we know is vulnerable and corrupt to the core. Scottish oil is still a substantial support for this ailing economy, but is not going into investment but to hold up falling revenue. That is Thatcherâs legacy for Britain. Britain now has no economic future worth consideration. Her legacy for Scotland however is much better, she, more than any other person, convinced the Scots that they needed to take control of their own destiny. They forced through some devolution, but not enough for most so they will have a chance next year to take complete control and organise their own affairs. Thatcher herself, when asked what her legacy for Britain was, said it was âNew Labourâ and that was perhaps the wisest judgement or assessment she ever made.
MORE OF THATCHERS LEGACY PAEDOPHILES IN POWER
Prime Ministerial aide Sir Peter Morrison, who was also an MP, was Margaret Thatcherâs parliamentary private secretary when she was Prime Minister.
An eye witness who worked at the North Wales Care Home has claimed he saw Sir Peter Morrison and others regularly visit the home to pick up boys, who were then returned later in a distressed state with unexplained injuries.
Former Tory Minister Edwina Currie also claimed Morrison, who died in 1995 at the age of 52, regularly had sex with teenage boys under the age of consent. Ms Currie claimed that his behaviour was covered up by senior Tories.
Former leader of the Welsh Conservatives Rod Richards said he had seen evidence linking Sir Peter to the North Wales childrenâs homes scandal.
In an interview with the Mail on Sunday, Mr Richards said: âWhat I do know is that Morrison was a paedophile. And the reason I know that is because of the North Wales child abuse scandal.â
When the Newsnight clouds clear, there is surely a trail of evidence that investigators ought to be looking into. http://newsnetscotland.com/index.php/scottish-news/6226-the-curious-case-of-newsnight-and-steve-messham
AND MORE OF THATCHERS LEGACY ……THE RICH GET RICHER Number Of Billionaires Soars Despite Downturn
The number of billionaires in the UK has increased to 32, with the Duke of Westminster Gerald Cavendish Grosvenor again named the countryâs richest man
Despite the property slump, the 59-year-old landowner increased his worth to $13bn â but still only managed 57th on the Forbes global rich list.
Despite the global economic downturn, the Forbes 25th list of the richest people on the planet saw the number of billionaires increase by 214 to a record 1,210. THE POOR GET THE PICTURE Global poverty doubled since 1970s: UN
GENEVA â The number of very poor countries has doubled in the last 30 to 40 years, while the number of people living in extreme poverty has also grown two-fold, a UN think-tank warned Thursday.
In its annual report on the 49 least developed countries (LDCs) in the world, the UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) said that the model of development that has prevailed to date for these countries has failed and should be re-assessed.
âThe traditional models that have been applied to LDCs that tend to move the LDCs in the direction of trade-related growth seem not to have done very well,â said Supachai Panitchpakdi, secretary general of UNCTAD.
âWhat happened is that in the past 30-40 years, the number of LDCs have doubled so it has actually deteriorated, the number of people living under the poverty line has doubled from the 1980s.â
The report indicated that the situation has sharply deteriorated in the past few years http://www.activistpost.com/2010/11/global-poverty-doubled-since-1970s-un.html
IMF and World Bank Create Poverty
by grtv
The IMF and World Bank were created over 60 years ago to realign the global economic landscape.
Andrew Gavin Marshall from the Centre for Research on Globalization, however, says that the actions of these international economic giants did little to help the third world countries it advertised it would, and instead has only helped make the wealthier countries wealthier http://tv.globalresearch.ca/2011/04/imf-and-world-bank-create-poverty
THATCHERS REAL LEGACY
“NEW” LABOUR
A BANKRUPTED NATION
DESTROYED MANUFACTURING
LOOTED RESOURSES
UNDERFUNDED NHS
UNDERFUNDED EDUCATION
PENSIONERS FREEZING TO DEATH IN THIER OWN HOMES
MAD COW DISEASE
MASS POVERTY
RUINED NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE
ILLEGAL WARS FOR PROFIT
(BLACKMAILED?)PAEDOPHILES IN POWER
THE SOCIAL COLLAPSE OF BRITAIN
A NATION LOOTED
A MASS MOVEMENT TO END GREAT BRITAIN
WHY DO WE SUFFER POLITIONS AT ALL?
THEY BREAK THE 2ND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS
THE MORE YOU IMPOSE LAW ,THE MORE YOU ACCELERATE CHAOS!!
IN CAPITALISM OR SOCIALISM THERE ARE NO POLITIONS IN A CENTRALISED POWER AUTHORITY ANYWHERE!!!!
THEY ARE NOT EVEN MENTIONED IN ADAM SMITHS “WEALTH OF NATIONS”…A BOOK THATCHER OBVIOUSLY DID NOT READ!!
IN THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO THE GOVERNMENT CAN ONLY WITHER AWAY…IT CAN BE SEEN AS ADMINISTRATORS ASSET STRIPPING A BUSSINESS AND HANDING IT BACK TO THE CREDITORS AKA THE PEOPLE
AS POINTED OUT IN THE ABOVE ARTICLE ,WE ARE NOT A CAPITALIST OR SOCIALIST SOCIETY
IF WE WHERE THE POLITIONS WOULD BE OUT OF A JOB, AND SUPURFLOUS TO REQUIREMENTS
NEITHER IDEOLOGY REQUIRES A POLITION OR A PRIME MINISTER
THERE ARE NO POLITIONS OR CENTRALISED AUTHORITY IN EITHER POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY
TODAYS POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY IS STATE CAPITALSIM
AKA FASCISM
THATCHERS STATE CAPITALISM
State capitalism has various different meanings, but is usually described as a society wherein the productive forces are controlled and directed by the state in a capitalist manner, even if such a state calls itself socialist. Corporatized state agencies and states that own controlling shares of publicly-listed firms, and thus acting as a capitalist itself, are two examples of state capitalism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_capitalism
OF COURSE THIS IS JUST FASCISM!! Fascism should more appropriately be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power.
Benito Mussolini, fascist dictator of Italy (1922-1943)
THE MSM LIES ABOUT ANARCHISM
IT CLAIMS THAT “STATES OF CHAOS” ARE IN FACT “STATES OF ANARCHY”
THIS IS AN IGNORANT LIE AND A MSM RUT (REPEAT UNTIL TRUE)
FYI
SWITZERLAND IS IN A STATE OF ANARCHY
ITS IS A “ANARCHISTIC” DIRECT DEMOCRACY
IRAQ IS IN A STATE OF CHAOS
CREATED BY WESTERN POWERS TRYING TO IMPOSE THIER LAW, IT HAS GENERATED MASS CHAOS
GET THE TRUE FACTS ABOUT ANARCHY
Anarchism is the great liberator of man from the phantoms that have held him captive; it is the arbiter and pacifier of the two forces for individual and social harmony.
Emma Goldman
Someone has said that it requires less mental effort to condemn than to think.
The most violent element in society is ignorance.
Emma Goldman
The demand for equal rights in every vocation of life is just and fair; but, after all, the most vital right is the right to love and be loved.
Free love? as if love is anything but free. Man has bought brains, but all the millions in the world have failed to buy love.
Emma Goldman http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/e/emma_goldman.html
ANARCHISM IS A POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY THAT EVERY INFORMED PERSON CAN AGREE WITH
THAT IS WHY THE STATE CONDEMNS ANARCHISM ,LIES ABOUT IT AND MIS-REPRESENTS IT
THE STATE BLAMES ANARCHISM FOR SOCIAL DISORDER
WHEN IT IS THE STATE THAT IS GENERATINMG THE SOCIAL DISORDER
IT IS THE 2ND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS IN ACTION
THE MORE YOU IMPOSE LAW ,THE MORE YOU ACCELERATE CHAOS
THINK!!
HOW CAN PASSING A LAW REDUCE CRIME?!?!!
IT CAN ONLY CREATE A NEW CRIMINAL CLASS ….AND THUS INCREASE SOCIAL CHAOS
THERE IS A STATE LAW AGAINST MURDER
HOW IS THAT GOING?
THE STATE NOW TRAINS MURDERS EN MASSE AND SHIPS THEM AROUND THE WORLD WITH COMPLETE IMMUNITY TO LOCAL LAWS TO RAPE AND MURDER
IN THE OLD DAYS IT WAS PRIESTS GIVING ABSOLUTION TO MASS MURDERING CRUSADERS ,SO LONG AS THEY MURDERED THE NON-BELIEVERS
TODAY ITS THE POLITITION GIVING ABSOLUTUION TO OUR SOLDIERS WITH DOGTAGS
THIS REDUCES OUR NATIONAL WEALTH AND REDUCES OUR PUBLIC SAFETY
ANARCHISM IS NOT A RADICAL PHILOSOPHY
ADAM SMITH,ARCHITECT OF CAPITALISM, WAS AN ANARCHIST
THERE IS NO CENTRALISED GOVERNMENT IN “THE WEALTH OF NATIONS”
KARL MARX AND LENIN WHERE ANARCHISTS
“WHEN THERE IS STATE THERE IS NO FREEDOM ,WHEN THERE IS FREEDOM THERE IS NO STATE”
THE ONLY POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY THAT NEEDS CENTRALISED GOVERNMENT IS STATE CAPITALISM
AKA FASCISM
ANARCHISM IS NATURAL TO HUMANITY
The Secret Life of Chaos-(BBC 2010)-Full Length Documentary
Chaos theory has a bad name,(like anarchy ,its political version) conjuring up images of unpredictable weather, economic crashes and science gone wrong. But there is a fascinating and hidden side to Chaos, one that scientists are only now beginning to understand.
It turns out that chaos theory answers a question that mankind has asked for millennia â how did we get here?
In this documentary, Professor Jim Al-Khalili sets out to uncover one of the great mysteries of science â how does a universe that starts off as dust end up with intelligent life? How does order emerge from disorder?
Itâs a mind bending, counter intuitive and for many people a deeply troubling idea. But Professor Al-Khalili reveals the science behind much of beauty and structure in the natural world and discovers that far from it being magic or an act of God, it is in fact an intrinsic part of the laws of physics. Amazingly, it turns out that the mathematics of chaos can explain how and why the universe creates exquisite order and pattern.
And the best thing is that one doesnât need to be a scientist to understand it. The natural world is full of awe-inspiring examples of the way nature transforms simplicity into complexity. From trees to clouds to humans â after watching this film youâll never be able to look at the world in the same way again.
TODAY THE STATE CLASSIFIES ANARCHISTS WITH TERRORISTS
Editors Notes:
Anarchism is a political philosophy that seeks to build an egalitarian society in which mutual aid, co-operation and direct democracy will replace capitalism and the state.
The St Imier Congress was a gathering of anarchists from all over the world to celebrate the 140th anniversary of the first international anarchist gathering in the Swiss town of St Imier in 1872.
THE CONTINUING STATE PERSECUTION OF LIBERTARIANS AND ANARCHISTS
Anarchists Detained by Counter-Terrorist Police on Return from Swiss Conference
For the past week, thousands of anarchists from across the world have been converging in St.Imier, Switzerland to celebrate the 140th anniversary of the founding of the Anarchist international. The gathering took the form of a festival and educational, with music, films and entertainment as well as workshops and discussions.
On returning from the St Imier gathering, two anarchists, one a member of the UK Anarchist Federation, were detained for nearly two hours at Heathrow by SO15 (counter-terrorist) intelligence who initially refused to identify themselves to the detainees. During the detention, the anarchists were told that their normal rights did not apply, and had their names, addresses, email addresses, DNA, photographs and fingerprints taken. The detained anarchists were also forced to sign forms â which may or may not be legal â waiving their rights to silence and a solicitor. Police also conducted a thorough search of personal possessions, photocopied literature and passports and took information from phones and cameras.
During the detention, the police constantly accused the anarchists of lying about involvement in criminal activity and alleged that they would be conducting follow-up police action against one of the detained anarchists. In addition to this, SO15 officers asked a number of inflammatory, irrelevant and offensive questions, including âwhat would you do if someone raped your mother?â evidently in an attempt to cause emotional upset and illicit angry or violent responses. One member (28) who did not want to be named for fear of reprisals from the police, said âWe were treated like criminals. I told them I went to the congress as I am an amateur journalist and I write articles about activism. They saw my note book, camera and Dictaphone but they said I was lying.â One officer said âYou said you are an anarchist, Iâve seen anarchists on the news, they are violent, throw molotov cocktails and disrupt peopleâs lives not write articlesâ.
The counter terrorist officers either didnât know or chose to ignore that, during the first day of the gathering, the International of Anarchist Federations (Of which the UK Anarchist Federation is a member) had issued a statement rejecting all terrorist tactics as a means of achieving an anarchist society.
In contrast to the actions of the UK security forces, the local press and residents in St.Imier reported very positively on the anarchist gathering.
With this incident, we are seeing a further slide towards political policing and the criminalisation of political ideologies. The two detained anarchists have not had any involvement in any illegal or violent activity, or any activity that would concern the counter-terrorist police. As in the past, when Metropolitan police called on people to give information about local anarchists ( Anarchists should be reported, advises Westminster anti-terror police | UK news | The Guardian ), anarchists suffered harassment for their political viewpoint.
As class-struggle anarchists, we believe that the state does little except serve the interests of the rich and powerful at the expense of ordinary people. This is seen clearly when people who hold views critical of the state are treated as criminals and terrorists. We seek to create a classless society, based on freedom, equality and co-operation. We believe in the capacity of ordinary people to run society themselves, without the interference of bosses or politicians. This incident was not in response to any crime and constitutes repression and criminalisation of a political ideology.
SO..WHAT SORT OF PEOPLE DOES CENTRALISED GOVERNMENT ATTRACT?…VERY BAD PEOPLE
Study: Politicians share personality traits with serial killers
Kouri notes that these criminals are psychologically capable of committing their dirty deeds free of any concern for social, moral or legal consequences and with absolutely no remorse.
âThis allows them to do what they want, whenever they want,â he wrote. âIronically, these same traits exist in men and women who are drawn to high-profile and powerful positions in society including political officeholders.â http://current.com/community/93332432_study-politicians-share-personality-traits-with-serial-killers.htm
âIf the people were to ever find out what we have done, we would be chased down the streets and lynched.â
George Bush, cited in the June, 1992 Sarah McClendon Newsletter
WHAT ARE THE REAL EFFECTS OF CENTRALISED GOVERNMENT…MASS MURDER
Another scientific fact is DEMOCIDE .Death by government ,its humanities biggest killer!
Democide is a term revived and redefined by the political scientist R. J. Rummel as âthe murder of any person or people by a government, including genocide, politicide, and mass murder.â
Rummel estimates that there have been 262 million victims of democide in the last century. According to his figures, six times as many people have died from the inflictions of people working for governments than have died in battle http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democide
THE LIES THAT POLITIONS TELL US ABOUT FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY
POLITIONS SELL US STATE CAPITALISM AND CALL IT DEMOCRACY
State capitalism has various different meanings, but is usually described as a society wherein the productive forces are controlled and directed by the state in a capitalist manner, even if such a state calls itself socialist. Corporatized state agencies and states that own controlling shares of publicly-listed firms, and thus acting as a capitalist itself, are two examples of state capitalism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_capitalism
OF COURSE THIS IS JUST FASCISM!!
Fascism should more appropriately be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power.
Benito Mussolini, fascist dictator of Italy (1922-1943)
IT IS NOTHING MORE THAN AN ELECTED DICTATORSHIP
POLITICAL PARTIES ARE THE CHEERLEADERS OF THE DICTATORSHIP
IF VOTING COULD CHANGE ANYTHING THEY WOULD BAN IT!
“REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY” REPRESENTS DEMOCRACY IN THE SAME WAY A TRANVESTITE REPRESENTS A WOMAN
DIRECT DEMOCRACY IS REAL DEMOCRACY
A POLITION CANNOT TELL THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A DICTATORSHIP AND A DEMOCRACY
Direct democracy, classically termed pure democracy, is a form of democracy and a theory of civics in which sovereignty is lodged in the assembly of all citizens who choose to participate. Depending on the particular system, this assembly might pass executive motions, make laws, elect or dismiss officials, and conduct trials. Direct democracy stands in contrast to representative democracy, (UK, EU USA system)where sovereignty is exercised by a subset of the people, usually on the basis of election.(our subset of the people , all have the same financial backers and lobby groups, and are therefore a one-party-system of elected dictatorship) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_democracy
TODAYS REAL CULTURAL REVOLUTION…EGYPTIAN STYLE
…NOT THE TV VERSION SOLD BY THE BBC (AKA BROADCASTING BULLSHIT CONSTANTLY….WHEN NOT BUGGERING BRITISH CHILDREN)
Lessons From the Egyptian Insurrection: Communization, Strategy, and Solidarity
Interesting analysis of recent events in Egypt;
Provinces along the Suez Canal. Alexandria, Port Said, Suez, Ismaili, and Cairo have seen extensive clashes and the defiance of all curfews, with Port Said effectively seceding and military leaders warning of a state collapse. Within this fold, an explicitly revolutionary force has announced itself, calling itself Black Blocairo, Black Block Egypt, or simply the Black Bloc, pointing beyond the use of the black mask and violence as a tactic and towards a more organized and explicitly insurrectional position in North Africa.
REAL FORGOTTEN HEROES
âWar is organised murder and nothing else. Politicians who took us to war should have been given the guns and told to settle their differences themselves, instead of organising nothing better than legalised mass murder.â
-Harry Patch, the last WWI Veteran in europe (1889-2009)
Patch had no time for the Act of Remembrance on 11 November, an event he described as âjust show businessâ.
In the three years before the British government responded to the fascist threat in Europe in the late 1930s, between two and four thousand antifascists, anarchists, socialists, communists and trade unionists from Great Britain and Ireland fought as volunteers to the 16th British Battalion of the International Brigades, alongside volunteers from 53 nations across the world, against Francoâs fascist regime in Spain.
On February 27th 1939, the British government officially recognised the legitimacy of Francoâs government.
Remember also then, today, the people that fought and died with the International Brigades, and who are afforded little place in the official histories of the Second World War.
MEANWHILE OUR GLORIOUS DEMOCRATIC LEADERS SPREAD DEATH AND DESTRUCTION
WHILE CLAIMING TO SPREAD FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY
A REAL NOBEL PEACE PRIZE WINNERS SPEAKS
The next time you watch one of the legions of police brutality videos on the internet, ask yourself: who really hates you for your freedoms (what few are left)?
– On June 8, 1978, Solzhenitzyn, who won the Nobel Peace Prize for Literature in 1970 for his book âThe Gulag Archipelago,â was addressing an audience at Harvard University: â
And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? . . .â http://saladin-avoiceinthewilderness.blogspot.com/2011/08/police-and-terrorism-one-and-same.html
SO ITS RESIST
….OR WE COULD JUST LET THE CHILD RAPING ,MASS MURDERING ,LIARS ,TRAITORS AND THIEVES CONTINUE AS USUAL
âAll government, of course, is against liberty. The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary. Most people want security in this world, not liberty.â
âThe most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out⌠without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable. It doesnât take a majority to make a rebellion; it takes only a few determined leaders and a sound cause.â
âWhether the mask is labeled Fascism, Democracy, or Dictatorship or the Proletariat, our great adversary remains the Apparatus-the bureaucracy, the police, the militaryâŚ. No matter what the circumstances, the worst betrayal will always be to subordinate ourselves to this Apparatus, and to trample underfoot, in its service, all human values in ourselves and in others.ââ The French worker philosopher Simone Weil,1945
Such essential viewing for all Scots in the lead up to the Scottish Independence Referendum in 2014 This is the top 10 myths which have been exposed for what they truly are; Myths.
Better Together tried to ban this video already and maybe they will again. But that’s OK. It will just prove that they don’t represent freedom of speach or a free and unbiased arguement.
It proves that they know , in a fair fight with all the facts laid bare …the unionist would loose in a landslide.
Precious Few Heroes: The case for Scottish independence
Whether youâre for or against an independent Scotland, or maybe youâre not entirely convinced either way, this film makes the positive case for Scottish independence in a light-hearted, self-effacing fashion.
Forget the historic grudges, the ancient battles and the unjustly romanticized idols, Scottish independence isnât about âus and themâ, it isnât about anti-Englishness, it isnât about ownership, it isnât even about the SNP!
Written by Jack Foster and Alan Hunter http://vimeo.com/12458284 http://www.newsnetscotland.com/speakers-corner/285-precious-few-heroes-the-case-for-scottish-independence.html