YOU ARE EITHER WITH THE TERRORISTS OR AGAINST THE TERRORISTS
IT SEEMS OUR GOVERNMENT HAS BEEN WITH THE TERRORISTS ALL ALONG
THE ISLAMIC TERRORISTS WHERE SET-UP TRAINED AND FUNDED BY WESTERN “SECURITY FORCES”
ORIGINALLY SET-UP TO STOP AFGHANISTAN FROM BECOMING A SECULAR SOCIALIST NATION.
THE ISLAMIC TERRORISTS WHERE OUT TO STOP WESTERN FREEDOMS
…SO IS THE GOVERNMENT ,THEY WHERE OUT TO SPREAD RADICAL ABRAHAMIC MONOTHEISM (ISLAMIC VERSION)….SO IS THE GOVERNMENT(ANY VERSION, ABRAHAMIC MONOTHEISM IS GREAT FOR DIVIDING AND RULING A POPULATION)
THE TERRORISTS WANTED TO BANKRUPT THE NATION
….SO DOES THE GOVERNMENT
THEY WHERE SUPPORTTED BY UNDEMOCRATIC ISLAMIC THEOCRACIES
….SO IS THE GOVERNMENT
THE WAR AGAINST TERROR HAS DESTROYED NO ISLAMIC DICTATORSHIP
…BUT HAS DESTROYED SECULAR NATIONS ,THAT WHERE FOUND INNOCENT OF THIER CRIMES!
YUGOSLAVIA… A SECULAR SOCIALIST WESTERN NATION
…..KOSOVO IS NOW A DYSFUNCTIONAL ISLAMIC STATE IN EUROPE!
IRAQ …A SECULAR SOCIALIST ARAB NATION
…..NOW AN ISLAIMIC STATE
LYBIA….A SECULAR SOCIALIST ARAB NATION
…..NOW AN ISLAMIC STATE
SYRIA….A SECULAR SOCIALIST ARAB NATION
…WE ARE SUPPORTTING ISLAMIC TERRORISTS AGAIN!!!
Iraq, Libya, Syria: Extensive US-NATO War Crimes. How the Media Buries “The Evidence”
IF THIS IS A WAR AGAINST RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISM THEN WE ARE LOOSING IT VERY BADLY INDEED
SECULAR NATIONS ARE FALLING AND RADICAL ISLAMIC NATIONS ARE SPRINGING UP IN THIER PLACE
….ALL THANKS TO US/NATO POLICY AND TWAT (THE WAR AGAINST TERROR)
COULD IT BE THE THE WESTERN GOVERNMENTS ARE IN FACT THE ORGANISERS OF GLOBAL TERRORISM?
TRAGETING NATIONS THAT DEFY WESTERN STATE CAPITALISM AND IMPOSING A COMPLIENT AUTHORITARIAN REGIME?
THE WESTERN STATE CAPITALIST GOVERNMENTS ARE THE ONES THAT BENEFIT
MORE DRACONIAN POWERS OVER SOCIETY
MORE MONEY FOR GOVERNMENT ANTI-TERROR POLICIES
MORE UNQUESTIONING PUBLIC SUPPORT FOR CENTRALISED AUTHORITY
MORE MANUFACTURED TERRORISTS TO POINT AT
MORE MONEY FOR THE WARFARE ECONOMY
Chomsky: “Obama Is Running The Biggest Terrorist Operation That Exists”
Leading liberal Noam Chomsky said yesterday:
The Obama administration is dedicated to increasing terrorism. In fact, it’s doing it all over the world. Obama is running the biggest terrorist operation that exists, maybe in history: the drone assassination campaigns, which are just part of it […] All of these operations, they are terror operations.
People hate the country that’s just terrorizing them. That’s not a surprise. Just consider the way we react to acts of terror. That’s the way other people react to [American] acts of terror.
Chomsky is right. Experts agrees that indiscriminate drone strikes are war crimes
The U.S. is not only killing people whose identity it doesn’t even know, but it is also killing children.
And it is using the justifiably-vilified tactic of killing people attending funerals of those killed – and targeting people attempting to rescue people who have been injured by – our previous strikes.
A tactic first invented by Zionist terrorists in the King David Hotel bombing
Chomsky has previously extensively documented U.S. terrorism. As Wikipedia notes:
Chomsky and Herman observed that terror was concentrated in the U.S. sphere of influence in the Third World, and documented terror carried out by U.S. client states in Latin America. They observed that of ten Latin American countries that had death squads, all were U.S. client states.
They concluded that the global rise in state terror was a result of U.S. foreign policy.
In 1991, a book edited by Alexander L. George [the Graham H. Stuart Professor of Political Science Emeritus at Stanford University] also argued that other Western powers sponsored terror in Third World countries. It concluded that the U.S. and its allies were the main supporters of terrorism throughout the world.
Indeed, the U.S. has created death squads in Latin America, Iraq and Syria.
The director of the National Security Agency under Ronald Reagan – Lt. General William Odom – noted:
Because the United States itself has a long record of supporting terrorists and using terrorist tactics, the slogans of today’s war on terrorism merely makes the United States look hypocritical to the rest of the world.
Odom also said:
By any measure the US has long used terrorism. In ‘78-79 the Senate was trying to pass a law against international terrorism – in every version they produced, the lawyers said the US would be in violation.
The Washington Post reported in 2010:
The United States has long been an exporter of terrorism, according to a secret CIA analysis released Wednesday by the Web site WikiLeaks.
The head and special agent in charge of the FBI’s Los Angeles office said that most terror attacks are committed by our CIA and FBI.
Some in the American military have intentionally tried to “out-terrorize the terrorists”.
As Truthout notes:
Both [specialists Ethan McCord and Josh Stieber] say they saw their mission as a plan to “out-terrorize the terrorists,” in order to make the general populace more afraid of the Americans than they were of insurgent groups.
In the interview with [Scott] Horton, Horton pressed Stieber:
“… a fellow veteran of yours from the same battalion has said that you guys had a standard operating procedure, SOP, that said – and I guess this is a reaction to some EFP attacks on y’all’s Humvees and stuff that killed some guys – that from now on if a roadside bomb goes off, IED goes off, everyone who survives the attack get out and fire in all directions at anybody who happens to be nearby … that this was actually an order from above. Is that correct? Can you, you know, verify that?
“Yeah, it was an order that came from Kauzlarich himself, and it had the philosophy that, you know, as Finkel does describe in the book, that we were under pretty constant threat, and what he leaves out is the response to that threat. But the philosophy was that if each time one of these roadside bombs went off where you don’t know who set it … the way we were told to respond was to open fire on anyone in the area, with the philosophy that that would intimidate them, to be proactive in stopping people from making these bombs …”
Terrorism is defined as:
The use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes.
So McCord and Stieber are correct: this constitutes terrorism by American forces in Iraq.
The U.S. has been directly supporting Al Qaeda and other terrorists and providing them arms, money and logistical support in Syria, Libya, Mali, Bosnia, Chechnya, Iran, and many other countries … both before and after 9/11. And see this.
Torture – which the U.S. has liberally used during the last 10 years – has long been recognized as a form of terrorism.
LAND OF THE TERRORIST
HOME OF THE TORTURER
Worldwide, 74% of countries that used torture on an administrative basis were U.S. client states, receiving military and other support to retain power.
Some Specific Examples …
The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950′s to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected prime minister.
The former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence admit that NATO, with the help of the Pentagon and CIA, carried out terror bombings in Italy and other European countries in the 1950s and blamed the communists, in order to rally people’s support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism.
The strategy of tension (Italian: strategia della tensione) is a tactic that aims to divide, manipulate, and control public opinion using fear, propaganda, disinformation, psychological warfare, agents provocateurs, and false flag terrorist actions.
The theory began with allegations that the United States government and the Greek military junta of 1967–1974 supported far-right terrorist groups in Italy and Turkey, where communism was growing in popularity, to spread panic among the population who would in turn demand stronger and more dictatorial governments
As one participant in this formerly-secret program stated: “You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security” (Italy and other European countries subject to the terror campaign had joined NATO before the bombings occurred).
As admitted by the U.S. government, recently declassified documents show that in the 1960′s, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba. See the following ABC news report; the official documents; and watch this interview with the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC’s World News Tonight with Peter Jennings.
Nine months earlier, a false flag attack was discussed in order to justify an invasion of the Dominican Republic. Specifically, according to official State Department records, Under Secretary of State Chester Bowles wrote on June 3, 1961:
The Vice President [Lyndon Johnson], [Attorney General] Bob Kennedy, Secretary [of Defense Robert] McNamara, Dick Goodwin [who was Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Inter-American Affairs], [head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff] General Lemnitzer, Wyn Coerr, and Ted Achilles were here. Bob McNamara and Lemnitzer stated that under the terms of the contingency paper, they were required to be prepared to move into the island on short order if required to do so, and this, in their opinion, called for substantially more troops that we had in the area. After some discussion we considered two more aircraft carriers, some destroyers, and 12,000 marines should be moved into a position some one hundred miles off the Dominican Republic shore…
The tone of the meeting was deeply disturbing. Bob Kennedy was clearly looking for an excuse to move in on the island. At one point he suggested, apparently seriously, that we might have to blow up the Consulate to provide the rationale.
His general approach, vigorously supported by Dick Goodwin, was that this was a bad government, that there was a strong chance that it might team up with Castro, and that it should be destroyed–with an excuse if possible, without one if necessary.
Rather to my surprise, Bob McNamara seemed to support this view …
The entire spirit of this meeting was profoundly distressing and worrisome, and I left at 8:00 p.m. with a feeling that this spirit which I had seen demonstrated on this occasion and others at the White House by those so close to the President constitutes a further danger of half-cocked action by people with almost no foreign policy experience, who are interested in action for action’s sake, and the devil take the highmost …
[At a subsequent meeting], Bob McNamara went along with their general view that our problem was not to prepare against an overt act by the Dominican Republic but rather to find an excuse for going into the country and upsetting it.
Department of Justice lawyer John Yoo suggested in 2005 that the US should go on the offensive against al-Qaeda, having “our intelligence agencies create a false terrorist organization. It could have its own websites, recruitment centers, training camps, and fundraising operations. It could launch fake terrorist operations and claim credit for real terrorist strikes, helping to sow confusion within al-Qaeda’s ranks, causing operatives to doubt others’ identities and to question the validity of communications.”
As Chris Floyd and many others have noted, this plan has gone live.
United Press International reported in June 2005:
U.S. intelligence officers are reporting that some of the insurgents in Iraq are using recent-model Beretta 92 pistols, but the pistols seem to have had their serial numbers erased. The numbers do not appear to have been physically removed; the pistols seem to have come off a production line without any serial numbers. Analysts suggest the lack of serial numbers indicates that the weapons were intended for intelligence operations or terrorist cells with substantial government backing. Analysts speculate that these guns are probably from either Mossad or the CIA. Analysts speculate that agent provocateurs may be using the untraceable weapons even as U.S. authorities use insurgent attacks against civilians as evidence of the illegitimacy of the resistance.
And there is substantial additional evidence of hanky panky in Iraq.
BUT IN REALITY IT IS THE POLITION THAT SUPPORTS TERRORISM AND CAUSES MASS MURDER AND DESTRUCTION GLOBALLY
911 THE CASE FOR AN INSIDE JOB
IT IS THE POLITION THAT COMMITS CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY
BUT WHY SUPPORT ISLAM?
ABRAHAMIC MONOTHEISM(JUDAISM, CHRISTIANITY AND ISLAM) IS JUST ORIGINAL FASCISM
INVENTED BY EMPERORS ONE GOD ,ONE EMPIRE ,ONE EMPEROR
IT IS JUST ANOTHER FORM OF OPPRESSION USED BY CENTRALISED AUTHORITY TO CONTROL THE MASSES
REMEMBER ABRAHAMIC MONOTHEISTS KNOW WHAT GOD IS THINKING
…REMEMBER GOD HATES THE ALL SAME PEOPLE THAT ABRAHAMIC MONOTHEISTS DO?!?!
BE THEY JEWISH
Abrahamic Monotheism Part 1 – The Invention of Judaism
Abrahamic Monotheism Part 2 – The Invention of Christianity
Abrahamic Monotheism Part 3 – The Invention of Islam
THESE DELUSIONAL BELIEFS INCLUDE A DESIRE TO END LIFE ON EARTH
SO THIER GOD CAN ARRIVE ON A WHITE HORSE AND RULE THE WORLD
….WITH THEM AT THIER SIDE,
THESE PRIMITIVE BARBARIC BELIEFS ENDANGER THE VERY EXISTANCE OF HUMANITY
BUT DO NOT ASK THEM TO PROVE THIER MYTHS ..ITS THE WORD OF GOD YOU KNOW…. AND THAT IS ENOUGH!?!?!
ABRAHAMIC MONOTHEISTS AVOID ANSWERING THE QUESTIONS AND WILL NOT HAVE THIER RELICS VERIFIED,WHILE ANCIENT PAGAN TEMPLES GET VERIFIED BY MODERN SCIENCE EVERY DAY
SO STOP PROMOTING ANCIENT DELUSIONAL PRIMITIVE BARBARISM ,IT IS THE 21ST CENTURY AD NOT BC!!
TALKING SNAKES ,SKY GODS THAT DO “REAL ESTATE DEALS” AND COLLECT FORESKINS?!?!?!
ARE YOU GUYS SERIOUS?!?!?!?!
…OF COURSE YOU COULD ALL (JEWISH ,CHRISTIAN AND MUSLIM) BE WORKING FOR SATAN
BELIVEING LIES AND COMMITTING ATTROCITIES AND TOO INDOCTRINATED TO BE ABLE TO FIGURE IT OUT
IMHO ABRHAMIC MONOTHEISM COULD ONLY MAKE SENSE IF ABRAHAM WORSHIPPED SATAN
IN FACT ABRAHAMIC MONOTHEISM COULD BE EVIL WORSHIP OR ANTI-SPIRITUALISM OR MATERIALSIM AKA SATANISM
ITS BOOKS ARE LIES(TORAH ,BIBLE ,KORAN)…WE KNOW FROM ARCHEOLOGY
ITS WORDS STOLEN AND RE-WRITTEN FROM PAGAN ORIGINALS ..ITS IS A CORRUPTION OF ANCIENT TRUTH
ITS EFFECTS ON THE REAL WORLD ARE MONSTEROUS…ITS SPREADS IGNORANCE ,PREJUDICE ,PAEDOPHILIA ,VIOLENCE ,DISEASE ,GENOCIDE, THEFT AND SLAVERY
IT DEMANDS HUMAN SACRIFICE,ABRAHAMIC MONOTHEISTS CONTINUALLY SACRIFICE EACH OTHER IN THIER GODS NAME!!
AND CHILD SEX RITUALS ARE POPULAR WITH ITS HOLY MEN
…SURE SOUNDS LIKE EVIL WORSHIP TO ME
PERSONALLY I AM AN ATHEIST AND BLAME MAN NOT GODS..REMEBER THERE IS A BIG DIFFERENCE BETWEEN KNEALING DOWN AND BENDING OVER
…AND ABRAHAMIC MONOTHEISTS PREFER TO GIVE THAN RECIEVE
…..ARE YOU BENDING OVER AND RECIEVING GODS LOVE?
An atheists Open Letter to Abrahamic Monotheists (Judaic, Christian and Islamic)
Atheism the Oldest and most popular belief
SECULAR CENTRALISED AUTHORITY IS JUST AS DESTRUCTIVE AND AS UNNESSECARY AS CENTRALISED RELIGIOUS AUTHORITY
BUT REMEMBER YOUR GOVERNMENT THINKS SACRIFICING YOU IS WORTH IT!
MAYBE WE SHOULD JUST SACRIFICE GOVERNMENT INSTEAD